Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Huge hole discovered in Knocknacarra: Council looking into it

  • 28-01-2012 7:23pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭


    I refer of course to the allegedly unauthorised excavation of a huge site between Dunne's and Aviva in the "Galway West District Centre".

    These major works -- requiring the use of a large amount of plant, including rock-breakers, excavators and dump trucks -- were carried out (noisily) in 2007.

    galway_west_district_centre_excavation.jpg


    A planning application was lodged in 2006, though I have no detailed knowledge of what actually happened to the application subsequently. I always presumed that if the works had gone ahead then permission had been granted.

    If the excavation went ahead without "planning" permission, then one possible interpretation of the report is that it took the City Council five years to notice that a gigantic hole had been illegally created in a busy commercial and residential area:
    The former owners of the Galway Gateway shopping centre on the Western Distributor Road have been warned they face jail and a fine of up to €12.7 million for carrying out major site excavation works without permission.

    The site, which spans 52 acres in total and is also known as the Galway West District Centre, was seized by the National Asset Management Agency last weekend. However, the Council has vowed to continue pursuing the matter.

    The excavation work on Phase 2 of the centre – alongside Dunnes Stores – was carried in 2007 and the site subsequently abandoned. At the moment, the site has filled with water and is fenced off.

    The Galway City Tribune has learned that a warning letter was sent to the Moritz Group – which owned the centre and the land until its seizure – by the City Council, ordering that the land be restored to its original condition.

    “The unauthorised excavation should be filled in immediately, the unauthorised security fencing removed and the lands reinstated to their condition prior to the unauthorised works being carried out,” the letter read.

    It went on to explain that the Planning and Development Act provides for the City Council to recover any costs they incur in relation to enforcement proceedings – the deadline is the end of March.

    http://www.galwaynews.ie/23959-jail-threat-over-centre’s-illegal-site-excavation
    IMO it's odd that the City Tribune doesn't know, or chooses not to reveal, the date of the Council's letter.

    If the Council wrote to Moritz/Rumbold when the allegedly unauthorised works were being carried out, why is the deadline end March 2012?

    On the other hand, if the Council's letter was sent more recently, as seems to be the case, why did it take them so long to notice a hole so large and so illegal?


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28 Don Booker


    Thought it was the hole Dunphy was on about last night on Gaybo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,907 ✭✭✭✭Kristopherus


    On Gaybo????:eek::confused: You mean Turps surely:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 445 ✭✭ladhrann


    Iwannahurl wrote: »

    On the other hand, if the Council's letter was sent more recently, as seems to be the case, why did it take them so long to notice a hole so large and so illegal?


    Regarding the planning system in this country and county, it is a most dangerous assumption to make that either the Planning Office or the City/Council have any active part in policing planning matters. Unless an official complaint (which can be done via e-mail or in writing) is made by a member of the public or other party no action will be taken on any matter by the Council. If a complaint is made outside the 7 year time limit then the complaint will be ignored.

    In many cases the onuse will be on the individual making the enquiry or complaint to prove that the action took place within the 7 year limit. I speak from a position of some experience in this regard.

    In many cases if a complaint is made and an official makes an inspection (which they must do), unless every infringement is noted in your original complaint then [even if there are others] only what you place in your complaint will be pursued.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    So I wonder who made the complaint in this case?

    NAMA, perhaps?
    John Kennedy, Planning Enforcement Officer with the Council, visited the site on foot of a complaint on Health & Safety grounds.

    He reported: “My inspection found that the site was fenced off and a large hole had been excavated on the site covering most of the site area. This hole has filled with water so the depth cannot be measured.”
    Now that NAMA has appointed a receiver to the "Galway West District Centre" do they need to tidy things up, physically and legally, in order to get it all sorted satisfactorily?

    Or is it just a coincidence that a concerned citizen happened to make a complaint about H&S at the same time?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    This might throw some light on the subject:
    What is a fixed charge property receiver?
    Fixed charge property receivers are appointed by financial institutions and other lenders who have secured their loans by a legal charge (mortgage) on a property. The powers of the receiver will be set out in the mortgage deed and to an extent in the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009.


    How does a fixed charge receiver function?
    The first consideration will be the stabilisation of the asset and following this, determining the most appropriate strategy going forward. Fixed charge receivers are property experts who can actively manage the asset, deal with any tenants, rent reviews, lettings, lease surrenders and outstanding problems, collect rents and service charges, arrange insurance cover and effect necessary maintenance programs. In many cases the function may just be to arrange an early sale of the property in order to repay as much of the loan as possible.


    Why use a fixed charge receiver?
    Unlike other insolvency procedures, the purpose of the receiver is to secure the best possible return for the lender, rather than any creditors as a whole.
    I'm just guessing here, but I presume that if there is a huge unauthorised hole in the asset, then it will have to be dealt with asap in case it reduces the amount of the loan that can be recovered.

    The Moritz Group itself is not in receivership, but do they have the resources to do what the Council is demanding?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 445 ✭✭ladhrann


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    So I wonder who made the complaint in this case? Now that NAMA has appointed a receiver to the "Galway West District Centre" do they need to tidy things up, physically and legally, in order to get it all sorted satisfactorily?

    Or is it just a coincidence that a concerned citizen happened to make a complaint about H&S at the same time?

    I don't know if it makes any difference who made the complaint. In fact I made a complaint about unauthorised signage, hoarding and fencing there a couple of weeks ago. I'm glad someone did though. Its hard being the planning and development acts 2001 (amended) crusader all on my own


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    On Gaybo????:eek::confused: You mean Turps surely:D

    Still Gaybo to us old guys.


  • Registered Users Posts: 458 ✭✭milehip1


    hmm..... I wonder does Joe McNamara have a solid alibi?;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    They should put a Tesco into that hole.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    They should put a Tesco into that hole.
    Why, so they can advertise more christmas shelf stacking internships and do more Irish producers out of business?

    There's more to the world than Dunnes and Tesco, sb.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    IIRC there was once talk of a Tesco store being located on one of these sites. That was before Dunne's arrived in the "Galway West District Centre".

    Very little of these fanciful proposals materialised even at the height of Celtic Casino hysteria, and IMO much of this area now has an ugly derelict look about it. Nothing but dilapidated hoardings on view now for several years, and I suspect it will only look worse over the next 5-10 years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    They should put a Tesco into that hole.
    Yeah, the Tesco Hypermarket that they are trying to get planning permission for in Westside won't be big enough what with Dunnes and Aldi only being 200 metres away.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28 Don Booker


    kabakuyu wrote: »
    Still Gaybo to us old guys.
    Yep intentional. Shouldn't have been continued just to give Ken and Tubs a handy Friday night.


  • Registered Users Posts: 497 ✭✭Mr Keek


    Am I the only person when I saw the Title of the thread "Hugh hole Discovered in Knocknarra: Council Looking into it'

    ...and pictured some council workers in Hard Hats & Hi Vis gear, standing at the edge of the hole, munching on a Chicken Roll from Dunnes saying, "Jaysus Mick, its a fine hole"


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,659 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    There's more to the world than Dunnes and Tesco, sb.

    Yup, that side of town could do with a Lidl or Aldi.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    JustMary wrote: »
    Yup, that side of town could do with a Lidl or Aldi.

    Put them all in the hole.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Head The Wall


    It looks like the council is just looking to cover it's ass in relation to this. Or maybe it's a scheme where they are trying to get money out of developers (maybe via NAMA) to keep the massive wages flowing to the county managers and those other useless councillors. Do they still have a 15m hole in the finances?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 31,117 ✭✭✭✭snubbleste


    The Moritz Group and associated companies who developed this hole have been subsumed into Nama.
    It may yet transpire that this hole is our hole.

    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/nama-appoints-receiver-to-moritz-assets-2995777.html
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlV6jFjykyK6dHdKR0kwY2FkcEtQT19NQ2p6NkwwRkE&hl=en#gid=0


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    Oh I dunno, they turn it into an Olympic sized swimming pool or landscape it and turn into duck pond where you can sail your model boat on the weekend.


  • Registered Users Posts: 445 ✭✭soundbyte


    snubbleste wrote: »
    The Moritz Group and associated companies who developed this hole have been subsumed into Nama.
    It may yet transpire that this hole is our hole.

    Ya, got that on the previous page, thanks:
    The former owners of the Galway Gateway shopping centre on the Western Distributor Road have been warned they face jail and a fine of up to €12.7 million for carrying out major site excavation works without permission.

    The site, which spans 52 acres in total and is also known as the Galway West District Centre, was seized by the National Asset Management Agency last weekend. However, the Council has vowed to continue pursuing the matter.

    Also, the Moritz Group was not 'subsumed' into Nama. Receivers were appointed over certain assets within the group. The Group is not in Nama. Yet :)


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 31,117 ✭✭✭✭snubbleste


    I missed that post by Iwannahurl.
    Was browsing through namawinelake's latest production and noted Michael Whelan was in the latest update for developers being namafied.. I investigated further and saw the newspaper article.

    Moritz Group, Maplewood Homes, Maplewood Developments, MW Homes, Seskin, Moritz Elliot, Moritz Commercial, Moritz Mivan, Victoria SRL, Lunar Sea Holdings (UK) Limited, Kristmannson Properties BFT, Digiweb, PH Ross, TJ O'Mahony, Commons Hardware, Paul McCann (Grant Thornton, receiver), Digiweb, Wickes DIY, St Enda's GAA Club
    Galway Gateway (Knocknacarra, Galway), Newcastle (Dublin), sites purchased are all in major urban centres around Burcharest and regional cities (Romania), Ballycullen(Dublin), Hazelhatch Park(Celbridge, Co. Kildare), Hazelwood(Celbridge, Co Kildare), Herberton (Dublin), Newcastle Lyons(Newcastle, Co Dublin), The Paddocks(Adamstown, Co Dublin), 70 Gracechurch Street (London), Temple Road (family home, Dartry, Dublin 9)


  • Registered Users Posts: 73 ✭✭GOODME


    wow they should really pay for this, i hope it will be sorted soon or fish will find a new home on a man made pond/lake.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    If you look at "Birdseye view" in Bing Maps you can see the excavators busy creating the "Big Dig"

    http://binged.it/ACMTC2

    Gaillimh-dig.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    dubhthach wrote: »
    If you look at "Birdseye view" in Bing Maps you can see the excavators busy creating the "Big Dig"

    http://binged.it/ACMTC2




    Great pic, and well spotted.

    My recollection is that there appeared to be a large amount of machinery working on the site at the time, including a constant stream of large trucks carrying the excavated material away.

    Somebody with an educated eye for these things tells me that an excavation of this nature is effectively an unauthorised quarry on a massive scale, and that the stone removed could well have been sold at a considerable profit.

    I can't remember exactly when the project stalled due to the collapse of the bubble, but it's possible that by then the quarrying part of the business had been successfully and profitably completed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    Well to be fair, you don't have to dig down very far anywhere in Galway to get to solid rock. There are a number of abandoned sites around which look like quarries, Mervue, Ballybrit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,581 ✭✭✭barryd09


    Wasnt there plans to extend the shopping facilities in that area?
    I remember reading in the sentinel a while back that argos and a few other stores were to be moving in up there?


  • Registered Users Posts: 498 ✭✭bobbytables


    During the 90s & the boom years, the "next phase" of many developments created much excitement. When they built Baily Point in Salthill there was supposed to be a nightclub & cinema. In the early 90s there was supposed to be a cinema in leisurland.

    Then more recently in Knocknacarra, cinemas, nightclubs, airports, space stations, nuclear power plants along with contemporary cardboard living units were all promised, but instead we got a Dunnes & a duck pond.

    If the ducks fly away the whole thing will be pointless!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    When thou hast Dunne's, thou hast not done.

    Some ducks would be nice, actually. All I've seen are common or garden seagulls.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    I wouldn't mind but they did build the cinema in Bailey Point. Whole thing is caught in legal mess between bankruptcy and fact that the crowd originally suppose to operate it was replaced by another crowd. Resulting in another court case.

    It's one reason the place is in such a state as it is. Of course I remember when it basically look like a Quarry.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Baily Point looks like it's falling apart.

    Those buyers who got their deposits back and then stayed well clear were the lucky ones, IMO.


Advertisement