Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dublin Bus - Proposed 5 Year Deal Retaining All Routes from 2019

  • 01-10-2018 10:05pm
    #1
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,565 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Haven't had a read through everything (links at bottom of post) but there are a few things that have jumped out based on having a 5 minute skim through, I'm sure someone else will spot something else

    Summary
    The NTA has today released details of it's intentions to award a new 5 year Direct Award Contract to Dublin Bus for the years 2019 to 2024.

    The Dublin Bus documents suggest that the NTA is minded not to open up any further routes to be competitively tendered before 2024 as it stands, but reserves the right to do so in certain circumstances.

    Intergration
    DB will be required to integrate further with the Transport for Ireland brand
    In keeping with these objectives, the following requirements will be included in future PSO funded bus contracts, whether tendered or directly awarded.

    The Authority may also wish to provide passenger information on board buses to its specification. To assist customers in viewing the Dublin bus network as a single integrated entity, this information will need to continue to be presented in a common format and style regardless of bus operator.

    It is important from a bus customer point of view to view all PSO services as an integrated package, irrespective of operator. A unifying brand is required to achieve this.
    The experience of the recent tender process highlights that there is significant effort and cost required to maintain the integration of services in a multi-operator environment.

    BusConnects
    There's also a part about BusConnects which is interesting
    Early in the lifetime of the new contract, and once the final Bus Connects route network is confirmed, the Authority will need to work with Dublin Bus to amend or revise these routes and service levels to agree with those in the final Bus Connects network. This will require the Authority to negotiate a series of contract service variations with Dublin Bus.

    In negotiating these contractual variations the Authority will need to be cognisant of two aspects in particular (1) the variation price Dublin Bus proposes to charge for the change, and whether the required variation can be implemented by Dublin Bus in a manner that provides good value for money to the Authority, (2) the ability of Dublin Bus to commit to the performance requirements for the service, including reliability, punctuality, regularity and customer service quality, and (3) the timescale for implementation of the variation, and whether it can be delivered by Dublin Bus in a manner that fits in with the overall Bus Connects network implementation programme.

    If in the opinion of the Authority either route or service level variation costs or implementation timescales proposed by Dublin Bus appear to be excessive, the Authority reserves the right to competitively tender the services in question, in order to expedite the delivery of the Bus Connects service network in a timely and cost effective manner.

    The scale of the changes to bus services anticipated in the Bus Connects network, including the introduction of entirely new bus routes in some areas, means that the Authority will need to consider further whether those routes will be added to the Direct Award contract with Dublin Bus or be competitively tendered.

    Essentially appears to be saying that if DB are unreasonable on what they ask for from BusConnects, then the NTA will tender the routes out, which appears to be an attempt to try and keep them honest on costs, among other things.

    NTA Documents
    - DB Consultation Paper
    - DB Proposed Contract
    - DB Technical Report


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime


    I've been wondering where to post this so maybe we can adjust the thread title

    But I heard there a little while ago, the Bus Eireann pay talks were taking place today in the WRC and management announced that the NTA tomorrow that a consultation period for tendering a further 10% of BUS Eireann will begin.

    Made for interesting reactions from drivers.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,565 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    I'm posting another thread about BE in a few seconds :)


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,565 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    DB Reaction
    http://www.dublinbus.ie
    Today, the National Transport Authority (NTA) announced their intention to enter into a further direct award contract with Dublin Bus in 2019 for the provision of bus services in the Dublin metropolitan region from 2019 to 2024. This includes all services currently operated by Dublin Bus, except those previously tendered in 2017.

    The National Transport Authority will commence a public consultation process on this matter and Dublin Bus looks forward to the final decision in November.

    Dublin Bus CEO, Ray Coyne, welcomed the announcement; “We will now carefully consider this proposal but we believe it reflects the success Dublin Bus has delivered and means we would continue to operate all Public Service Obligation routes in Dublin for the next five years, excluding those previously tendered in 2017”.

    While the NTA report notes in particular that Dublin Bus has achieved a very high level of customer satisfaction, we are committed to continuing to find new ways to improve our services and ensure we are offering a sustainable service for our growing number of customers. In 2017, we carried 139 million customers and this trend is continuing during 2018 with numbers projected to increase to over 145 million customers by the end of the year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,654 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Have DB agreed a pay deal yet, the current one is up around Feb if I'm not mistaken?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Have DB agreed a pay deal yet, the current one is up around Feb if I'm not mistaken?

    No, current agreement concluded 10 months ago with the last 3.75% rise.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,654 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    GM228 wrote: »
    No, current agreement concluded 10 months ago with the last 3.75% rise.

    Have they not submitted a new claim yet?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Have they not submitted a new claim yet?

    Not yet.

    There may be discussions at local level (have not been informed of any though), but nothing has come through the WRC yet.

    I understood they may be waiting for GA to be fully operational first before any potential claim.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,654 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    GM228 wrote: »
    Not yet.

    There may be discussions at local level (have not been informed of any though), but nothing has come through the WRC yet.

    I understood they may be waiting for GA to be fully operational first before any potential claim.

    Was thinking GA are responsible for no claim yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,218 ✭✭✭markpb


    Does anyone know if they plan to move to a direct payment model (like GAI and Transdev) under the new contract or will they continue to let DB keep the farebox? It would simplify ticketing and finances considerably if they changed from the current model.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    markpb wrote: »
    Does anyone know if they plan to move to a direct payment model (like GAI and Transdev) under the new contract or will they continue to let DB keep the farebox? It would simplify ticketing and finances considerably if they changed from the current model.

    All direct award contracts are net costs contracts meaning the operator keeps all fare revenue.

    Competitive tendering contracts are gross cost contracts which means the operator does not see any of the fare box.

    This is pretty sandard accross the EU, however, the consultation oddly enough states:-
    It is also in interest of the public transport customer that a Gross Cost contract with incentives is introduced as well as further incentives and penalties to enhance customer experience.

    The proposed contract itself however confirms it will be net cost based.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    The NTA has recently published the report into the next DB contract aswell as submissions from interested parties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,256 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    Something odd I noticed in the report

    “There is a strong case for moving the existing Dublin Bus routes 33 and 65 to a different form of service, more appropriate for towns of their distance from the city. There is also a strong case for linking them more closely with Bus Eireann routes 101 and 132 that parallel them to some extent. It should be noted that changes to operating area has already once been made in this decade, when Dublin Bus withdrew from Kilcock, leaving it to be served by Bus Eireann.”

    They fail to mention that the changes in kilcock were very unpopular and also with a population of 6k vs 21k in the case of balbriggan I’m not sure the cases are as similar as Dublin bus are trying to portray. Personally pulling out of balbriggan and leaving it to just irish rail (who are already experienced massive capacity shortages) and Bus Éireann who are due to lose the 101 route as is due to poor performance is an idiot idea.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    Is there similar information, contract/consultation details etc, available on the routes GAI were given?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,565 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    dfx- wrote: »
    Is there similar information, contract/consultation details etc, available on the routes GAI were given?

    Unlike Dublin Bus, Go Ahead Ireland were not given any routes, they had to competitively tender for them.

    The only other operator that was given a direct award has similar details available.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭KD345


    Something odd I noticed in the report

    “There is a strong case for moving the existing Dublin Bus routes 33 and 65 to a different form of service, more appropriate for towns of their distance from the city. There is also a strong case for linking them more closely with Bus Eireann routes 101 and 132 that parallel them to some extent. It should be noted that changes to operating area has already once been made in this decade, when Dublin Bus withdrew from Kilcock, leaving it to be served by Bus Eireann.”

    They fail to mention that the changes in kilcock were very unpopular and also with a population of 6k vs 21k in the case of balbriggan I’m not sure the cases are as similar as Dublin bus are trying to portray. Personally pulling out of balbriggan and leaving it to just irish rail (who are already experienced massive capacity shortages) and Bus Éireann who are due to lose the 101 route as is due to poor performance is an idiot idea.

    I could be wrong, but those suggestions were just made by members of the public and interested parties, they are not the opinion of Dublin Bus.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,224 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Go ahead is off to a rocky start. Quality of driver training and recruitment is questionable. Give them some time but I don't think the NTA should be rushing to give that lot more routes.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Go ahead is off to a rocky start. Quality of driver training and recruitment is questionable. Give them some time but I don't think the NTA should be rushing to give that lot more routes.

    They aren't on direct award contracts, they won't be "given" more routes. If more DB routes are put up for tender (which appears unlikely) they would have to win the competitive tender.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Go ahead is off to a rocky start. Quality of driver training and recruitment is questionable. Give them some time but I don't think the NTA should be rushing to give that lot more routes.

    As the OP alluded to they won't be given any more routes. A lot the issues have due to the NTA themselves such as poor RTPI, bad fleet allocations most notably single decker buses on the 102 and unrealistic timetables.

    Although some can be blamed on Go-Ahead themselves such as the decision make the same buses operate a number routes ie. not allocating each bus to a particular route such as making an inbound 75 go out from DL as a 63 causing knock delays if the 75 was delayed coming from Tallaght. I haven't found any issues myself with the quality of the driver training no more so than DB.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    haven't found any issues myself with the quality of the driver training no more so than DB.

    +1, and it's worth pointing out that the drivers for both DB and GA are assessed by the same RSA employed assessors to the same standard when they receive their appropriate licence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Go ahead is off to a rocky start. Quality of driver training and recruitment is questionable. Give them some time but I don't think the NTA should be rushing to give that lot more routes.

    Considering the fact that every Go-Ahead driver had to pass the exact same driving test as Dublin Bus drivers, can you point to any specific inadequacies in the quality of their training?

    It could definitely be argued that a disproportionately high number of Go-Ahead's drivers are inexperienced, having only recently passed the test. Anyone who has driven anything - bus, car whatever - will know that it takes time, beyond passing the test, to become completely comfortable with the size of the vehicle. But that's not an indictment of the company's instructors (almost all of whom have decades of experience in the UK) or the quality of training they've provided. As you say, give them time.
    Stephen15 wrote:
    Although some can be blamed on Go-Ahead themselves such as the decision make the same buses operate a number routes ie. not allocating each bus to a particular route such as making an inbound 75 go out from DL as a 63 causing knock delays if the 75 was delayed coming from Tallaght.

    This is something that will hopefully end when/if they open a depot in (or around) Dún Laoghaire. It makes operational sense to send a bus to the Square (10 mins from Ballymount) and then on to Dún Laoghaire as a 75, rather than on a long, fuel-wasting 'dead run' down the M50. It's never good though, when operational needs are placed above the needs of customers.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,565 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Go ahead is off to a rocky start. Quality of driver training and recruitment is questionable. Give them some time but I don't think the NTA should be rushing to give that lot more routes.

    One thing I do agree on is that there should be a mechanism for the state to be able to seek new operators of publicly funded routes where an operator, whether public or private, fails to provide a certain standard of service over a prolonged period of time to their patrons and the public at large. Whether an operator is public or private or not should not mean we tolerate it more/less than another who is the opposite and there are no valid mitigating circumstances.

    For what it's worth I agree that the NTA have made a wise decision to give Dublin Bus a new 5 year deal, because it is very sensible to see how things pan out with Go-Ahead before tendering any more routes. However they also need to make sure that it's not seen as a free pass for Dublin Bus to run the routes poorly in the knowledge that they have a 5 year contract. That's why the caveats about the right to tender routes if poor performance is offered over a prolonged period of time are sensible, if indeed they are in the next direct award contract.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    GM228 wrote: »
    +1, and it's worth pointing out that the drivers for both DB and GA are assessed by the same RSA employed assessors to the same standard when they receive their appropriate licence.

    I think the main issue with the driving standards is that some of their drivers have taken wrong turns and some were slow initially due to nerves as they were starting. The wrong turns is something I would imagine happens to many drivers while starting out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    I think the main issue with the driving standards is that some of their drivers have taken wrong turns and some were slow initially due to nerves as they were starting. The wrong turns is something I would imagine happens to many drivers while starting out.

    Something that many (if not most) DB drivers will admit to have done themselves when starting out.

    The difference is DB is well established and only the odd time would you encounter a new driver who takes the wrong turn etc.

    When everyone is new in the likes of GA you notice the mistakes more because the likelihood of it happening has increased ten fold because unlike the old outfit nearly everyone is in the same boat and there are no senior more experienced drivers to laugh at those school boy errors.

    If I had a cent for every DB driver I had to direct over the last 20 years...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    This is something that will hopefully end when/if they open a depot in (or around) Dún Laoghaire. It makes operational sense to send a bus to the Square (10 mins from Ballymount) and then on to Dún Laoghaire as a 75, rather than on a long, fuel-wasting 'dead run' down the M50. It's never good though, when operational needs are placed above the needs of customers.

    Agreed but I think it would be better though to then send the 75 back out on another 75 duty rather than as a 63 or 45a. DB used to this but not as often GAI seem to be I know for example the 15:15 Saturday departure on the 63 used to be part of a 46a duty as this departure was sometimes operated by a VT which is rare for the 63. I think some 59 duties were covered by 46a duties aswell but not to the same extent as GAI.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    GM228 wrote: »
    Something that many (if not most) DB drivers will admit to have done themselves when starting out.

    The difference is DB is well established and only the odd time would you encounter a new driver who takes the wrong turn etc.

    When everyone is new in the likes of GA you notice the mistakes more because the likelihood of it happening has increased ten fold because unlike the old outfit nearly everyone is in the same boat and there are no senior more experienced drivers to laugh at those school boy errors.

    If I had a cent for every DB driver I had to direct over the last 20 years...

    If only they had the time to prepare properly and not do this.

    I mean what was the rush in getting them to start their routes until more were actually ready so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    dfx- wrote: »
    If only they had the time to prepare properly and not do this.

    Come on now your expecting a bit much. GAI buses were out all summer around DL route training saw plenty. Standard procedure in the bus industry the driver is only taught the route once as far as I believe this could be done in broad daylight so it may be trickier to remember if the first time a driver does a route is at night.

    Also a driver could be asked to s/he is not trained to drive due to staff shortages, illness, breakdowns etc. so drivers are expected to have some degree of flexibility. This is standard practice and not unique to GAI it happens in DB, BE and I'm sure many of the privates.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,224 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    L1011 wrote: »
    They aren't on direct award contracts, they won't be "given" more routes. If more DB routes are put up for tender (which appears unlikely) they would have to win the competitive tender.

    were there any other serious contenders this time around?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,224 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Considering the fact that every Go-Ahead driver had to pass the exact same driving test as Dublin Bus drivers, can you point to any specific inadequacies in the quality of their training?

    Not knowing their route and having to ask customers would be a good example.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Not knowing their route and having to ask customers would be a good example.

    Not really. Its common enough in Dublin bus as well.

    I got one day to learn 3 routes with DB. I took many wrong turns and asked many locals for advise.

    As did many if not all of my colleagues.

    SO what. As long as the driving is safe, the routes will come with experience.

    I personally hate the fact Go-Ahead are here. But attacking the common feet on the ground is pointless.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,224 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Not really. Its common enough in Dublin bus as well.

    I got one day to learn 3 routes with DB. I took many wrong turns and asked many locals for advise.

    As did many if not all of my colleagues.

    SO what. As long as the driving is safe, the routes will come with experience.

    I personally hate the fact Go-Ahead are here. But attacking the common feet on the ground is pointless.

    I wasn't aware this was so common. Maybe it's a case that all eyes were on them because they are new. In any case you'd think that the company would double down on preventing such hiccups.

    I've been on Dublin Buses where drivers have gotten out to go to the shop, DB drivers have swore at me.

    More frequent and annoying behaviour includes:
    Talking with their friend (standing by the driver's cabin), blocking customers from getting on and off.
    Not opening the bloody centre doors.

    So is this any better with GoAhead? not sure yet, needs more time.


Advertisement