<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>tate — boards.ie - Now Ye&#039;re Talkin&#039;</title>
        <link>https://www.boards.ie/</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>tate — boards.ie - Now Ye're Talkin'</description>
    <atom:link href="https://www.boards.ie/discussions/tagged/tate/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Money for art</title>
        <link>https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2057611480/money-for-art</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>After Hours</category>
        <dc:creator>Andy From Sligo</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">2057611480@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[Just watching a thing on BBC2 about the new Tate Art Gallery in the UK - £58million pounds of UK Tax Payers money used in the project? - what do you think about using tax payers money to fund something like this?<br /><br />
Would the Irish tax payers put up with something like this if a similar project wanted to go ahead?<br /><br />
Do you think art and art projects should be funded with public tax payers money or should the money be raised in other ways or by entrance fee or by the artists themselves or people just interested in art only?]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
