<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>feature request — boards.ie - Now Ye&#039;re Talkin&#039;</title>
        <link>https://www.boards.ie/</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>feature request — boards.ie - Now Ye're Talkin'</description>
    <atom:link href="https://www.boards.ie/discussions/tagged/feature-request/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Rate a Post and/or Moderator&#39;s Golden Star</title>
        <link>https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055350298/rate-a-post-and-or-moderators-golden-star</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Feedback Archive</category>
        <dc:creator>cregser</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">2055350298@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[There's a lot of crap on the Internet and a lot of crap on boards. We need a way to sift through all the crap and find the good stuff. Other forums or comments sections in blogs use post ratings to allow users to grade posts as they see fit. This allows readers with more important things to do (read: short attention spans <img src="https://www.boards.ie/resources/emoji/wink.png" title=";)" alt=";)" height="20" />) to glance at the post's score and decide if it's worth reading/replying to. It's similar to the "Thanks" and "Ignore Poster" buttons but less definitive/extreme.<br /><br />
I just thought of this idea when reading through a large thread that started off interesting but (as usual) swayed on and off topic. I thought it would be handy if there was a way to filter the noise and hopefully find a decent discussion.<br /><br />
I don't think everyone should be allowed to rate posts or it will get abused like Youtube where the average score is -5. Moderators and posters nominated by moderators (for the respective forum) could rate posts. This brings in the Moderator's Golden Star idea. The person who has this is just short of a moderator. Basically, their opinion has proven to be worth something and the mod has given them a star (or whatever) and that user can then go and rate the newbies. This would give mods of all forums the option of whether to use this feature or not - if they want, they can just star nobody.<br /><br />
Pro's:<br />
- it'll help busy threads and forums to stay on topic.<br />
- it'll inform users that they're being unhelpful or unappreciated before they go and get themselves banned<br />
- it could make spotting bad posts easier for mods so they don't have to sift through everything to keep a forum decent.<br />
- a post from a starred user can be trusted more &gt;&gt; niche or technical forum posts were advice is given can have some weight behind it or show that it warrants further research.<br /><br />
Con's:<br />
- peeps might get upset and complain if marked low<br />
- may be difficult to implement.<br />
- an elitist clique could possibly form in some forums were newbies could become ignored/ridiculed.]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
