Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Confusing pairs of words...

  • 25-05-2016 6:52pm
    #1
    looksee
    Registered Users Posts: 28,018 ✭✭✭✭


    Would you accept this clause in the terms and conditions?
    Would you except this clause in the terms and conditions?

    Two very similar words in reasonably correct sentences, but they have opposite, or at least different, meanings. There are many similar sounding words that can cause confusion if they are transposed - affect and effect are two of the commonest.

    Homonyms, homographs and homophones can be included, but contribute your favourites / most irritating / most frequently incorrect, and if you want to offer a sentence to show the difference, please do.


«13

Comments

  • #2
    pickarooney
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,063 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    flammable/inflammable


  • #3
    ezra_pound
    Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭ezra_pound


    pickarooney wrote: »
    flammable/inflammable

    Only these words mean the same thing.


  • #4
    tina1040
    Registered Users Posts: 478 ✭✭tina1040


    What's the difference between assume and presume?


  • #5
    pickarooney
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,063 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    ezra_pound wrote: »
    Only these words mean the same thing.

    That's what's confusing!


  • #6
    pickarooney
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,063 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    tina1040 wrote: »
    What's the difference between assume and presume?

    In some contexts non, but each has uses the other one doesn't.

    You can't "assume to know" something or "presume the position" for example.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Speedwell
    Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭Speedwell


    Include/comprise. Jesus, I see these used interchangeably all the time, but they are not interchangeable.

    Nauseous/nauseated is another good one. "I'm nauseous," she said. "Oh, you don't look that bad to me," I said. :D


  • #8
    endacl
    Registered Users Posts: 22,223 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Less/fewer


  • #9
    endacl
    Registered Users Posts: 22,223 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Random/arbitrary*

    *this one is more of a teenager thing.


  • #10
    loremolis
    Registered Users Posts: 944 ✭✭✭loremolis


    ezra_pound wrote: »
    Only these words mean the same thing.

    No they don't.

    Petrol is inflammable
    Diesel is flammable

    The first will ignite when a flame is applied
    The second will not ignite when a flame is applied but will burn when thrown on a fire.


  • #11
    Second Toughest in_the Freshers
    Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    TheSimpsons1218-1.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    Into The Blue
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,358 ✭✭✭Into The Blue


    Practical practicable


  • #13
    Second Toughest in_the Freshers
    Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    enormity (a shocking, evil, or immoral act) vs immensity / enormousness


    Picture shows the enormity of this storm.


  • #14
    endacl
    Registered Users Posts: 22,223 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Telpis.

    :D


  • #15
    AMKC
    Registered Users Posts: 15,524 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    to/too
    Through/true

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • #16
    alias no.9
    Registered Users Posts: 6,263 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    Khaki and Khaki.

    One is a yellow/brown colour, the name for which originates from India where it translates as 'soil' and was the colour that white linen army uniforms turned in dusty environments.

    The other is a vaguely military green colour for which the word has been incorrectly applied so often that it's almost become an accepted use.


  • #17
    ezra_pound
    Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭ezra_pound


    loremolis wrote: »
    No they don't.

    Petrol is inflammable
    Diesel is flammable

    The first will ignite when a flame is applied
    The second will not ignite when a flame is applied but will burn when thrown on a fire.

    This is completely wrong. There is no difference between the words.

    Google it.


  • #18
    tac foley
    Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    AMKC wrote: »
    to/too
    Through/true

    Your second example is only valid if you accept the often-heard Irish person's pronunciation the th- sound.

    As in three/tree, thought/taught/taut/tort, thanks/tanks et al.

    See THIS thread - http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=280097

    tac


  • #19
    endacl
    Registered Users Posts: 22,223 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Presently/currently.


  • #20
    Second Toughest in_the Freshers
    Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    tac foley wrote: »
    Your second example is only valid if you accept the often-heard Irish person's pronunciation the th- sound.

    As in three/tree, thought/taught/taut/tort, thanks/tanks et al.

    See THIS thread - http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=280097

    tac

    to through


  • #21
    Mearings
    Registered Users Posts: 557 ✭✭✭Mearings


    Into The Blue wrote: »
    Practical practicable

    Anything that can be done and is worth doing is practical. Anything that can be done, whether or not it is worth doing, is practicable.

    [The Penguin Dictionary of Troublesome Words. Bill Bryson 1984]


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    the_pen_turner
    Registered Users Posts: 7,505 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    legal / illegal always annoys me when talking to someone.


  • #23
    Speedwell
    Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭Speedwell


    the_pen_turner wrote: »
    legal / illegal always annoys me when talking to someone.

    Holy hell, what is it you're asking them to do? ;):D


  • #24
    my3cents
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    affect effect

    As in, how do you affect the effect?

    Not to be confused with the Irish ahhh-feck.


  • #25
    Yakuza
    Registered Users Posts: 5,141 ✭✭✭Yakuza


    Some people confuse "a lot" with "allot" or even invent their own "alot".


  • #26
    Pherekydes
    Registered Users Posts: 16,109 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    In a similar vein/vain, no one and noone. See what I did there?


  • #27
    Pherekydes
    Registered Users Posts: 16,109 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I heard a govt minister talking about incidences.

    When did incidences become the plural of incident?

    Incidence/incidents/incidences


  • #28
    tac foley
    Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    board/bored

    then/than

    compliment/complement

    tac


  • #29
    my3cents
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    No ones mentioned there, their or they're yet. I wouldn't call them confusing but plenty of times in other forums here you'll see there used to mean any one of the three


  • #30
    Speedwell
    Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭Speedwell


    my3cents wrote: »
    No ones mentioned there, their or they're yet. I wouldn't call them confusing but plenty of times in other forums here you'll see there used to mean any one of the three

    Good point. I don't think many people are confused about what they mean when they use or hear them, though.

    Who/whom is confusing though (and I fly the flag of using the conjunctive sparingly).


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    pickarooney
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,063 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    alias no.9 wrote: »
    Khaki and Khaki.

    One is a yellow/brown colour, the name for which originates from India where it translates as 'soil' and was the colour that white linen army uniforms turned in dusty environments.

    The other is a vaguely military green colour for which the word has been incorrectly applied so often that it's almost become an accepted use.

    Isn't the first one what you turn in the ignition in Boston?
    Pherekydes wrote: »
    I heard a govt minister talking about incidences.

    When did incidences become the plural of incident?

    Incidence/incidents/incidences

    When they happen at the same time, coincidences. :)


Advertisement