Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Summer 2015 Transfer Window General Discussion

1798082848598

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    Any transfers going on?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,871 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    On the De Bruyne thing, he's a fantastic signing. You can't judge his quality based on his time at Chelsea, in truth it's tough to judge a player's quality when they play under a manager who is as extreme in their philosophy as Mourinho is. For Mourinho, the philosophy comes before all others, if the player does not fit the philosophy then the player does not last very long at the club. De Bruyne, along with Mata and Luiz, were casualties of this. If you were to take Mata, De Bruyne and Luiz and match them up against Oscar, Willian and Cahill away from the Chelsea backdrop I think you could make a fair argument that the former 3 are more talented and more skilled than their Chelsea counterparts. This is not what Mourinho cares about because, in his philosophy, the individual does not take precedence. Oscar is more mobile than Mata and better when his team doesn't have the ball, Willian is more robust than De Bruyne and works harder off the ball, Cahill is less erratic than Luiz and is more suited to playing in a low block. That Mourinho ditched the former 3 players and stuck with the latter 3 isn't a comment on their individual quality, it's a matter of who best fits into his set up.

    De Bruyne has shown that, free of the Mourinho shackles, he's a remarkable talent, the Bundesliga player of the year and a quality addition to any squad.
    We aren't talking about him as a mere addition to a squad though. We are talking about him as a multimillion marquee signing (is he City's record signing?). Therefore Willian comparisons aren't the ones I'd be looking at.

    The argument was never that De Bruyne isn't a talented footballer. He has shown enough in his Wolfsburg career to illustrate that of course he is. But I don't think he has proven enough to be breaking Man City's transfer record and justifying transfer fees that are usually saved for Europe's elite (not Messi, Ronaldo, Bale, Suarez but the rest).

    At that sort of fee you're banking on him being the next Silva, Hazard or Sanchez (different styles of player but all have similar impact and importance for their teams), when in reality he is a huge risk of being no more than another Navas, Oscar or Willian.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Any transfers going on?

    Marcos Lopes of Man City (no have never heard of him either) has been sold to Monaco


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,838 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Marcos Lopes of Man City (no have never heard of him either) has been sold to Monaco

    For £9m too!

    Was funny as Pellegrini insisted earlier today that he wouldn't be sold only for the Man City website to announce his sale within a couple of hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    CSF wrote: »
    We aren't talking about him as a mere addition to a squad though. We are talking about him as a multimillion marquee signing (is he City's record signing?). Therefore Willian comparisons aren't the ones I'd be looking at.

    The argument was never that De Bruyne isn't a talented footballer. He has shown enough in his Wolfsburg career to illustrate that of course he is. But I don't think he has proven enough to be breaking Man City's transfer record and justifying transfer fees that are usually saved for Europe's elite (not Messi, Ronaldo, Bale, Suarez but the rest).

    At that sort of fee you're banking on him being the next Silva, Hazard or Sanchez (different styles of player but all have similar impact and importance for their teams), when in reality he is a huge risk of being no more than another Navas, Oscar or Willian.

    To be fair, Willian cost somewhere in the region of £30 million (relatively close to that) so he's not like a Michu type signing.

    I understand what you are saying, for the money they are paying you expect him to be one of the key players in their starting lineup, as would I. The problem with saying that these are fees reserved for Europe's elite is that actually attracting Europe's elite to England is difficult, attracting them to anywhere in England that isn't London is even more difficult, getting them to stay in England is more difficult still. In De Bruyne City have found a gem, he's got experience of the English league, he's lived in England, he's got friends living close, but more than that they've identified a world class attacking player who is actually open to the idea of moving to City. Are they overspending? Probably, but I wouldn't say they are overspending any more on De Bruyne than many clubs have on their recruits.

    He's not a workhorse, he's not a utility player, he's a gifted, young attacking player. Unlike Silva, Hazard or Sanchez, who City, Chelsea and Arsenal got at relatively cheap prices, Wolfsburg aren't going to sell cheap so City must cough up the premium rate. Had Hazard, Silva or Sanchez been at Wolfsburg you'd be paying roughly the same price for them that City will pay for De Bruyne. The price is high but so too are the potential returns, Sterling, Silva, De Bruyne and Aguero almost guarantees the Premier League title, it should also mean a far greater tilt at European glory. They are buying a gem for the present and the future.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,871 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    To be fair, Willian cost somewhere in the region of £30 million (relatively close to that) so he's not like a Michu type signing.

    I understand what you are saying, for the money they are paying you expect him to be one of the key players in their starting lineup, as would I. The problem with saying that these are fees reserved for Europe's elite is that actually attracting Europe's elite to England is difficult, attracting them to anywhere in England that isn't London is even more difficult, getting them to stay in England is more difficult still. In De Bruyne City have found a gem, he's got experience of the English league, he's lived in England, he's got friends living close, but more than that they've identified a world class attacking player who is actually open to the idea of moving to City. Are they overspending? Probably, but I wouldn't say they are overspending any more on De Bruyne than many clubs have on their recruits.

    He's not a workhorse, he's not a utility player, he's a gifted, young attacking player. Unlike Silva, Hazard or Sanchez, who City, Chelsea and Arsenal got at relatively cheap prices, Wolfsburg aren't going to sell cheap so City must cough up the premium rate. Had Hazard, Silva or Sanchez been at Wolfsburg you'd be paying roughly the same price for them that City will pay for De Bruyne. The price is high but so too are the potential returns, Sterling, Silva, De Bruyne and Aguero almost guarantees the Premier League title, it should also mean a far greater tilt at European glory. They are buying a gem for the present and the future.
    I don't really see it that way. City have attracted players of similar or better quality to De Bruyne for much cheaper, with a much more proven pedigree. De Bruyne was class last season and all the things you said he was but I wouldn't go so heavily in my praise for him in any other season. Surely he needs to prove more to justify he can be that marquee player? We still have to see him play Champions League football even and we are talking about him in the terms of Hazard, Silva and Sanchez. I find that difficult. My point was that he's talented but unproven and I'm inclined to stand by it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,860 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    Paully D wrote: »
    Ola Toivonen has joined Sunderland on loan. He has worked with Advocaat before at PSV and I believe he commented before how well Toivonen and Lens used to link up with Toivonen in the central creative role and Lens a wide forward.

    I haven't seen much of him though. Can anyone tell me how disappointed I'm going to end up being with this one then? :pac:

    Well, he went from PSV to Rennes which however you look at it, isnt exactly a promotion.
    Managed to "crown" himself the most hated player in the eredivisie and that counts his colleagues at other clubs, not just the fans.

    He is a grade A ....... (those are blanks, not censored) but a team struggling might just need that every now and then.
    Was never really clear what his best position is, centre forward or attacking midfielder. He wanted the no 10 role at PSV but never really cemented that spot

    He does have goals in him though.
    And i know i ll take him on to pick up a card here and there in the right matches.


    And as for Coleman to PSG.
    PSG is rather busy getting VD Wiel out of the door. In a way by saying he isnt fit while he claims he is and is left in the stands, not even o nthe bench.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    CSF wrote: »
    I don't really see it that way. City have attracted players of similar or better quality to De Bruyne for much cheaper, with a much more proven pedigree. De Bruyne was class last season and all the things you said he was but I wouldn't go so heavily in my praise for him in any other season. Surely he needs to prove more to justify he can be that marquee player? We still have to see him play Champions League football even and we are talking about him in the terms of Hazard, Silva and Sanchez. I find that difficult. My point was that he's talented but unproven and I'm inclined to stand by it.

    To be fair the circumstances of the players they attracted for less money were different. Silva was sold off by Valencia because they desperately needed money, I mean look at the players who've arrived in England that have cost more than him, his price tag didn't equal his ability. Yaya wasn't the youngest, was an out of favor holding midfielder at Barcelona who rarely get a great price when they sell players anyway and his wages were massive. Aguero was a bit more money wise but again Atletico pretty much had to sell due to debt.

    They did fantastically well to find players of that quality who were in situations where the price for each individual was less than £40 but that's simply not always possible. They are going to pay a premium price for a premium player.

    That's fair enough, I believe he is a top class player and he'll continue to be. I'll just say that there's definitely examples of players being unproven in the CL that have gone for big money and gone on to do great things.


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are City going to play De Bruyne on the right? Or drop Sterling? If De Bruyne is going in the middle then Silva wont be there which is bad for City. If De Bruyne is on the wing then he wont be as good as he has been off the striker for Wolfsburg so that's bad for City. I could be proven very wrong on this but I think it may leave them exposed in defense if they play De Bruyne, Sterling, Silva, Aguero and Yaya in the same team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,871 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    To be fair the circumstances of the players they attracted for less money were different. Silva was sold off by Valencia because they desperately needed money, I mean look at the players who've arrived in England that have cost more than him, his price tag didn't equal his ability. Yaya wasn't the youngest, was an out of favor holding midfielder at Barcelona who rarely get a great price when they sell players anyway and his wages were massive. Aguero was a bit more money wise but again Atletico pretty much had to sell due to debt.

    They did fantastically well to find players of that quality who were in situations where the price for each individual was less than £40 but that's simply not always possible. They are going to pay a premium price for a premium player.

    That's fair enough, I believe he is a top class player and he'll continue to be. I'll just say that there's definitely examples of players being unproven in the CL that have gone for big money and gone on to do great things.
    Fair enough, but I think if we put De Bruyne on the same level of proven as Sanchez or Hazard we're certainly doing him a service. While Hazard moved from Lille, his career has just been one upward trajectory. Everything has gotten better for him and will continue to. De Bruyne's had a bit of a mess and only last season has really gotten to show his talent. Whereas Sanchez was coming off a season having scored over 20 goals at the biggest (or 2nd biggest whatever way one chooses to argue it) club in the world.

    I feel that Hazard and Sanchez came to the Premier League with expectations that they would be great. This is my memory of the general consensus of it and it is how I felt. While I feel that De Bruyne is very talented but comes with a pretty big question mark as to how he'll actually do at City, but for a much bigger price.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,202 ✭✭✭Gavlor


    I think this is a great buy for west brom

    https://twitter.com/fourfourtweet/status/637301223922790400


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Evans is the complete opposite of a Pulis defender. I don't think Everton would lose out much in the short term bringing him in for Stones and accepting Chelsea's mega offer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,871 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Would not be surprised if Pulis is going to play Evans as a full-back. He does that sort of thing alot and with Evans not being the stereotypical Pulis CB, suspect that might actually be the plan.


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    CSF wrote: »
    Would not be surprised if Pulis is going to play Evans as a full-back. He does that sort of thing alot and with Evans not being the stereotypical Pulis CB, suspect that might actually be the plan.

    That would be a disaster imo. He is good at carrying the ball forward and passing but looked his most dodgy when covering for the left back last season when they went walkies. I rate him quite highly as a ball playing CB but great in the air he is not.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 23,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bounty Hunter


    Gavlor wrote: »
    I think this is a great buy for west brom

    https://twitter.com/fourfourtweet/status/637301223922790400

    Have seen it said that if this goes through Lescott will join Villa. Not one hundred percent sold on the deal myself due to his age and as I like Clark (who finally seems to be becoming the player Villa fans thought he could) but Lescott's experience wouldn't hurt and he was WBAs best defender last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Pathetic that Sunderland wouldn't go all out to get Evans. He's exactly what we need. Left behind by all but the promoted clubs at this stage. :(

    Evans and Lescott both excellent signings for WBA and Villa respectively IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭rwbug


    Man City have sold Marcos Lopes for around €10m to Monaco.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭ERG89


    Kampl joined Leverkusen from Dortmund after a brief stay.
    Kucka joined Milan from Genoa in a move that was on/off for a few years now.
    Looking like Iturbe will join Genoa on loan from Roma after a mediocre season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,668 ✭✭✭✭JPA


    Paully D wrote: »
    Pathetic that Sunderland wouldn't go all out to get Evans. He's exactly what we need. Left behind by all but the promoted clubs at this stage. :(

    Evans and Lescott both excellent signings for WBA and Villa respectively IMO.

    Sunderland are doing nothing of note in this window, those in charge are really messing up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭eh i dunno


    JPA wrote: »
    Sunderland are doing nothing of note in this window, those in charge are really messing up.

    Everton have spent the least of all premier-league teams. Imagine how we feel


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,668 ✭✭✭✭JPA


    eh i dunno wrote: »
    Everton have spent the least of all premier-league teams. Imagine how we feel

    Didn't know that, although it's unlikely they will be fighting relegation. This is not the season to get relegated for Sunderland or any team.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Well done to Everton for repelling borders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    eh i dunno wrote: »
    Everton have spent the least of all premier-league teams. Imagine how we feel

    The difference is, Everton have 6 players who are or were recently worth around £25 Million and upwards!

    I think Everton will make a big signing in the next 4 days!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    Not good enough for Chelsea.

    Mourinhio was proven right too

    lol I can't believe after all this time you're still trying to bang that drum


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    JPA wrote: »
    Sunderland are doing nothing of note in this window, those in charge are really messing up.

    Agreed. It's down to Short not providing the required money to be honest. Everyone else can only do so much when the money isn't there.

    I know Short has been burnt so much in the past and previous regimes have essentially pissed away about £200m with little return so I can understand his reluctance, but it's just asking for trouble really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,709 ✭✭✭✭Cantona's Collars




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    zerks wrote: »

    Really strange as to why they're giving him a chance. He was sh*te at Milan and hasn't done a lot since he returned to Brazil.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,838 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Really strange as to why they're giving him a chance. He was sh*te at Milan and hasn't done a lot since he returned to Brazil.

    Hard to believe he's only 25.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,343 ✭✭✭Bobby Baccala


    Really strange as to why they're giving him a chance. He was sh*te at Milan and hasn't done a lot since he returned to Brazil.

    He had 2 or 3 good seasons with Milan and he was a young lad too, bit harsh to call his time there shíte

    Also he was very unfortunate with injuries


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    when I think of Pato I think of that goal against Barca when he ran through the middle of the whole team

    It's a shame he didn't progress he had the world at his feet back then in that Milan team


Advertisement