Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Summer 2015 Transfer Window General Discussion

1767779818298

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,709 ✭✭✭✭Cantona's Collars


    Kevin Nolan has left West Ham. SSN.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,838 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Coentrao has gone to Monaco on loan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,348 ✭✭✭POKERKING


    Nobody asked you and they both left for the same reasons.

    OK.

    You do understand how forums work, right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,321 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    zerks wrote: »
    Kevin Nolan has left West Ham. SSN.
    Good option for a Championship team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭ERG89


    Digne to Roma (loan with option to buy).
    Llorente to Sevilla on a free looking likely.
    Balotelli to Milan.....wont comment on the quality of it yet, although he hasn't done anything in 2 years. Milan needed a midfielder & another centre back both with pace


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,838 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Oat23 wrote: »
    And Sonny isn't in the squad for Leverkusen tonight so it looks like he will be going to Spurs.

    The Guardian (and others) are saying that he has an obligation to begin 21 months of military duty for South Korea before he hits 28.

    Risky investment with no resale value if he is compelled to carry it out (no guarantee of a reprieve).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,446 ✭✭✭glued


    The Guardian (and others) are saying that he has an obligation to begin 21 months of military duty for Souty Korea before he hits 28.

    Risky investment with no resale value if he is compelled to carry it out (no guarantee of a reprieve).

    He'll probably only have to do 4 weeks basic training. Many athletes are exempt from full conscription and have to complete a 4 week basic training course which can be done in the off-season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭Godot.


    Who have Wolfsburg been linked with as a replacement for KDB? You'd think with £58m they'd be able to buy 2 or 3 high class players


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭Dickerty


    Godot. wrote: »
    Who have Wolfsburg been linked with as a replacement for KDB? You'd think with £58m they'd be able to buy 2 or 3 high class players

    Maybe Mkhitaryan, since he looks he might be available?
    Some Russian teams still offloading foreign players due to new restrictions...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,724 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    Godot. wrote: »
    Who have Wolfsburg been linked with as a replacement for KDB? You'd think with £58m they'd be able to buy 2 or 3 high class players

    I read a few days ago they are interested in Dennis Praet from Anderlecht.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,860 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    And Ziyech of Twente.

    12 assist and 8 goals in Twente's last 21 goals. Those are Debruyne stats


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭astonaidan


    Godot. wrote: »
    Who have Wolfsburg been linked with as a replacement for KDB? You'd think with £58m they'd be able to buy 2 or 3 high class players

    Bendtner is playing more this season they will be fine 😄


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,301 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Everton released a statement saying stones aint for sale and his transfer request has been refused, west brom also taking the same approach with berahino. Will be interesting to see if they can keep it up as the window draws closer to its end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Magico Gonzalez


    Sterling got his agent to make absolutely sure he got his move, Stones plays the gentleman card and stays at Everton.

    Seems like Stones did everything right, maybe a transfer request should actually mean something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Sterling got his agent to make absolutely sure he got his move, Stones plays the gentleman card and stays at Everton.

    Seems like Stones did everything right, maybe a transfer request should actually mean something.

    yeah, they should. Contract?? no **** that a player asked to get out of it so it should over rule the legal contract


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    When was the last time a high-profile transfer request was accepted?

    Seems like they're always rejected. I don't understand the point of them if that's the case.

    Is it just a public acknowledgement of the player's desire to leave? And if so, how can a club reject a player's acknowledgement of that fact?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    When was the last time a high-profile transfer request was accepted?

    Seems like they're always rejected. I don't understand the point of them if that's the case.

    Is it just a public acknowledgement of the player's desire to leave? And if so, how can a club reject a player's acknowledgement of that fact?

    its a request to be transferred, the club can say no, you are more valuable to us than the money you would bring in


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,838 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    When was the last time a high-profile transfer request was accepted?

    Seems like they're always rejected. I don't understand the point of them if that's the case.

    Is it just a public acknowledgement of the player's desire to leave? And if so, how can a club reject a player's acknowledgement of that fact?

    As far as I know if a player places a transfer request, then there's either less or no entitlement for that player to receive part of the transfer fee. Not sure if that's de facto in all contracts or just built into some, but I know that some clubs before have waited for players to place a transfer request to ensure they receive more of the transfer fee.

    I'm pretty sure it's in most contracts now (when brokered by an agent) that if a player is transferred without submitting a request, they may be entitled to X% of the transfer (its probably quite a small % but when there's huge fees involved it obviously means more).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Beefy78


    Players are contractually entitled to hand in a transfer request, at the cost of foregoing the loyalty bonus at the end of the contract if the request is accepted. Stones has done everything as he should have done in the circumstances and Everton are entitled to turn the request down.


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've always been confused as to why loyalty bonuses are involved in football contracts given their nature atm.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Magico Gonzalez


    Beefy78 wrote: »
    Players are contractually entitled to hand in a transfer request, at the cost of foregoing the loyalty bonus at the end of the contract if the request is accepted. Stones has done everything as he should have done in the circumstances and Everton are entitled to turn the request down.

    Absolutely, but there should be some recourse for a player rather than being stuck somewhere he doesn't want to be.

    Ideally if the transfer request is not accepted it should force a buyout clause. Buyout clauses should be a mandatory clause in every contract in future. In the case where they haven't existed between premiership clubs some sort of arbitration should be available to set a fee, or even better some calculation should be applied using the players wage, wage increases, ages, national team call ups, u21s etc. Something like that. More science to it!

    Neither the Sterling route nor the gentlemanly failure of the Stones approach are ideal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Absolutely, but there should be some recourse for a player rather than being stuck somewhere he doesn't want to be.

    Ideally if the transfer request is not accepted it should force a buyout clause. Buyout clauses should be a mandatory clause in every contract in future. In the case where they haven't existed between premiership clubs some sort of arbitration should be available to set a fee, or even better some calculation should be applied using the players wage, wage increases, ages, national team call ups, u21s etc. Something like that. More science to it!

    Neither the Sterling route nor the gentlemanly failure of the Stones approach are ideal.

    no it should not force a buyout clause. FFS they signed a contract for thousands of pounds a week for a period of time. It's not as if they are forced to sign, a lot of clubs put a lot of time and money into players and deserve to get their services for as long as both parties agreed to


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Magico Gonzalez


    no it should not force a buyout clause. FFS they signed a contract for thousands of pounds a week for a period of time. It's not as if they are forced to sign, a lot of clubs put a lot of time and money into players and deserve to get their services for as long as both parties agreed to

    Almost every other type of contract includes a mechanism for it's termination. Right now in the football scenario this mechanism is basically Club A has a bucketload of money and club B needs to sell more than they need the services of the player. Club B has only hope and goodwill to go on to ensure the player actually performs and doesn't sit on his hands until Xmas when the window opens.

    Seems to me it'd cleaner to get it wrapped up, get the money and move on. Perhaps a good contract would stipulate the buyout could only take place 1 month before the window closes.

    Seems neater to me. At the end of the day the rich clubs get the players, I would be surprised if Stones doesn't go in January at this rate.

    ps...I would 100% include a salary cap for clubs, sliding scale based on the division they play in.

    Cleaner all round.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    Stones will be gone as long as Chelsea and other clubs are still interested. 90% of the time once the transfer request goes in they are gone eventually, regardless of a gentleman way to do it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    If I'm correct there was a ruling (maybe Andy Webster case?) to allow players to buy themselves out of contracts, but it was clubs who agreed not to use it?

    This would potentially come into force where transfer requests are refused


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,872 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I mostly think it is funnier given that Everton is about the lad's level. Have seen nothing from him yet that suggests hes ready to compete at the consistency required for a title push and European glory in tandem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    If I'm correct there was a ruling (maybe Andy Webster case?) to allow players to buy themselves out of contracts, but it was clubs who agreed not to use it?
    Looked it up and don't think it could be applied in this instance for now:
    However, because he had served more than three years of his contract he was outside of FIFA's "protected period", and any compensation due to Hearts would, per Article 17, be based primarily on the amount of Webster's salary still outstanding—a figure estimated by Webster's advisors at approximately £250,000.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webster_ruling

    Stones has only been at Everton since January 2013 so the Webster ruling can't come into effect 'til January next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Joey Barton to burnley


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,080 ✭✭✭✭Panthro


    Joey Barton to burnley

    So he'll now be Tweeting from Burnley then!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,446 ✭✭✭glued


    CSF wrote: »
    I mostly think it is funnier given that Everton is about the lad's level. Have seen nothing from him yet that suggests hes ready to compete at the consistency required for a title push and European glory in tandem.

    He's going to be a top class centre half. He should stay at Everton for another season. He'll go for bonkers money next year. He's about as close to Rio Ferdinand as you'll get when Rio was 21/22.


Advertisement