Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Exactly what percentage of the population is "christian"?

1515254565770

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    weisses wrote: »

    That is a newspaper article which says that 71% of farmers surveyed go to Mass every week.

    Hardly a verifiable head count...

    What you appear to have missed is I am commenting on the irony that now surveys with a small sample size are being used to support a statement by people who previously arguing against the use of surveys ...

    That same article says approx 34-35% (depending on survey) go to Mass every week.

    34-35% of Catholics fufil this basic requirement - meaning around 65% of those who ticked 'Catholic' on the Census don't bother...

    Not looking good for the RCC is it? They can't even get bums on pews with promises of Grace which is,apparently, pretty darn important to Catholics when it comes to earning Salvation ....


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    More surveys
    This time from 2013 so more up to date then any of the 2010/2011 data if you believe it :)

    http://www.todayfm.com/thirtysomethings

    12% of 30 somethings in Ireland go to mass weekly, 6% go monthly and 50% go occasionally (births, deaths, marriages and the like), this is despite the fact that more then half (looks to be maybe 55-60% claim to be catholic.

    Given this is more recent data and doesn't include 60 year old plus people. I'd see it as far more relevant to the future of the catholic faith in Ireland....it does not paint a pretty picture

    Again, sticking with 2013 data. If we go younger then 30 and go to college students we can see that again 60% consider themselves catholic with the next biggest group being atheists at 20%

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/religion-and-beliefs/major-disconnect-between-irish-students-and-catholic-church-a-random-poll-has-found-1.1497605
    It also found that while 61.5 per cent of Catholic students took Communion, just 32.2 per cent of them believed it to be the body and blood of Christ. Of those students who did follow a religion, 45.2 per cent did so because of their parents’ influence.

    However, 40 per cent of respondents didn’t want their children to follow the same religion they were brought up with. Only 13.7 per cent followed a religion due to a strong faith.

    So out of 60% of Catholics only 13.7% actually had a strong faith (I suppose we can assume atleast some of them might went to mass? :pac:).

    45% of the Catholics only are Catholics because their parents made them be, however it looks like thats where it'll end for almost half of the catholic students because 40% of the Catholics don't want their children to follow the catholic faith.

    Oh and a whopping 83.5% of the students want abortion in Ireland, so overall a massive disconnect between younger people and the RCC in Ireland in respect of religious teachings (eating Jebus) and church views on abortion.

    Overall it paints a very bad future for the catholic church in Ireland, the numbers will only continue to drop as the years go by.

    Now of course there will be those that may dispute this because they feel threatened, but the numbers speak for themselves...they have consistently dropped since the 1970's (the RCC own mass attendance numbers back this fully) and they are not showing any sign of stopping yet.

    Some users on this forum may for some very weird reason champion the high census numbers for people that apparently tick the catholic box. However, they have to ask themselves what good is this to the catholic church if nobody goes to mass anymore or believes in the eating jebus stuff? What exactly are you so proud of?

    Its worth feck all to the church as the numbers continue to drop as they'll get less money into their pockets and churchs will continue to close around the country. So you can claim you have Catholics but you won't have anywhere for them to meet or worship their god anymore (even if they wanted to go :pac:)

    Remember, if you said in the 70's that churchs would close around Ireland due to lack of numbers the priests etc would have laughed at you...but yet here we are. The hard facts of the situation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    weisses wrote: »
    I understand your point but my concern is that the polls that are used to discredit the census could be of the same quality as the census itself, but yet are somehow accepted to use as a stick against the census.

    There are always flaws in polls and surveys

    But for your point and many other peoples view you need more solid evidence supporting your issue below

    I understand the objections but have seen nothing solid presented to justify these objections

    You see, the thing is the polls that are most likely to be flawed are those run by iona and the bishop's conference (not saying a poll on religion by an atheist group would not be as likely to be flawed, it would. Polls run by groups interested in getting a certain answer will always have a good likelihood of flaws), and they show very bad figures for participation and belief in core principles. The others we are quoting are polls done by internationally recognised polling companies who use highly valid statistical methodology to be able to extrapolate from a poll of c1,000 randomly chosen people across all demographics to come up with a strongly accurate picture of the whole (read on if you're interested).

    The problem with the census is that it gets some of the most basic things wrong, for example, it doesn't get individuals to fill out for themselves, it does no correction for biases (such as people giving deliberately false answers when filling out for others), and it asks leading questions (the religion question being a case in point, and leading in two ways, the question "what is your religion?" automatically assumes you have one, and then listing rcc, coi, islam and so on down the line is also leading {look here}). For an organisation calling itself the Central Statistics Office the document is pretty badly designed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    Cabaal wrote: »
    More surveys
    This time from 2013 so more up to date then any of the 2010/2011 data if you believe it :)

    http://www.todayfm.com/thirtysomethings
    Interesting, though very annoying that it's just in "info"graphic form, with most of the actual numbers obscured thereby. I'm also confused by the statement at the bottom that respondents were aged 20-49. Is the "30s" data just a part of what they collected? (That'd push the sample size down, and the sampling error up somewhat.) Or are some "out of band" results being included in what they're presenting here?
    12% of 30 somethings in Ireland go to mass weekly, 6% go monthly and 50% go occasionally (births, deaths, marriages and the like), this is despite the fact that more then half (looks to be maybe 55-60% claim to be catholic.
    Suspiciously low. The census breakdown by age for the 30-somethings is very close to 80% Catholic: 79.6% Looks like most of the "census-Catholic leakage" will have been to "not religious but spiritual", which is an option that's not a) on the census, and b) is borderline meaningless. In theory, the "not religious but spiritual", and the "atheist" people should both be "no religion" for census purposes. But anyone that's ever watched a courtroom drama, much less knows anything about opinion surveying, knows that the options you make available, and the context for the questions asked, make a huge difference to the answers that will be given.

    It's interesting in that it's an indication of just how "soft" the "Catholic affiliation" is for 20%+ of this group. ("Are you a Catholic?" "Depends who's asking.")
    45% of the Catholics only are Catholics because their parents made them be, however it looks like thats where it'll end for almost half of the catholic students because 40% of the Catholics don't want their children to follow the catholic faith.
    That's probably a "soft" number as a) they'll get married to another "Catholic" who may be slightly less blasé, and compromise on that (or to keep the grandparents happy), or b) they''ll contract "name down for the good school" anxiety, and decide, like Henry IV, that it's worth a mass. (Or an "empty formula", if you prefer.)
    Some users on this forum may for some very weird reason champion the high census numbers for people that apparently tick the catholic box. However, they have to ask themselves what good is this to the catholic church if nobody goes to mass anymore or believes in the eating jebus stuff? What exactly are you so proud of?
    It's a rearguard action. Can't stop the numbers going down, but if you can keep the Catholic baptisms high and the Catholic school places higher, you can slow the (apparent) rate of fall, as you'll have slightly more in the next generation saying "well, I've been through all the requisite hoops, I guess I'm 'Catholic' regardless of what I think or do henceforth."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    weisses wrote: »

    As an indication of the general population that survey is meaningless, because of two reasons, it only surveys a, particularly homogenous, stratum of the society as a whole, farmers, and according to the 2011 census farmers only make up 4.11% of the working population, so it is actually a very small section of the population, meaning there is going to have to be a wide gap between the minimum and maximum numbers when you talk about confidence levels when scaling up to the full population (assuming normal distribution and general similarity to the population as a whole, if they are not present the margin gets much wider).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    Cydoniac wrote: »
    To be fair, using the Iona Institute as a voice of authority is an even worse source than the ICBC. The sample group here is even smaller! You can't take 1000 people and equate it with a country.

    You can if you do it right, for example most polling companies use a sample size of slightly over 1,000 people (I've seen as low as 1,007 and as high as 1,040). Its figuring out the first steps how to do it right that pushed Gallup into such prominence in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Now - was there ever a verifiable head count or is your guestimate ironically based on a survey?

    Survey in another report for the Conference of Bishops... the same body producing the report cited earlier that gives a 10.1% rate of Catholic Atheism, in fact, that we seem to have had no acknowledgement of from the "90% Christian, dammit!" sector. You pays your money, and you picks your cherries, it seems. (Interestingly, further data on that in this report, though seemingly pretty self-contradictory even in the same survey, such as "I don't believe in god" running at 2.8%, but "I don't believe in god now, but I used to" at 6.0%. I don't quite folloe how the respondents are compartmentalising that. Also striking that they classify "Belief in supernatural powers of deceased ancestors" as a "Non-Christian belief" -- given the canonisation process, are they entirely relying here on "clerics" and "ancestors" being non-overlapping sets?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    Jesus freaks want to teach your children statistics and hate.

    Given some of the Opinion Survey Denialism in this very thread ("a sample error of 3% in a survey of 1000 people means that 30 people in the survey answered it wrong, while what it tells us about people not in the survey is precisely nothing"), perhaps "Jesus freaks" might want to teach themselves/each other statistics, first.


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    alaimacerc wrote: »
    Given some of the Opinion Survey Denialism in this very thread ("a sample error of 3% in a survey of 1000 people means that 30 people in the survey answered it wrong, while what it tells us about people not in the survey is precisely nothing"), perhaps "Jesus freaks" might want to teach themselves/each other statistics, first.

    You talking about what Bannashide calls your "guesstimates" again?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    I don't want to attack your stances on any of these issues, I'm just challenging your self-identification as Catholic, when you seem to disagree with quite a few of their beliefs.
    IHI seems to me to the ahead(?) of the Catholic curve, if anything.
    To me, it would seem that the label "Catholic" is not specific enough to tell me anything about the person other than that they are probably Christian.
    "Probably" in this jurisdiction, more or less. In other parts of These Islands, seems as likely to mean "I might not love Jesus, but I surely do hate Protestants" (and vice versa, mutatis mutandis, of course).
    That's why I suggested there should be more denominations of Catholicism as I don't think the Pope can be believed to speak for most of them as it stands.
    It's part of the (self-)definition of Catholicism that that's not possible. As soon as you form a denomination that the pope doesn't speak for, you're merely another bunch of protestant heretics. (Cf the Old Catholic Church.)


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Cabaal wrote: »
    Some users on this forum may for some very weird reason champion the high census numbers for people that apparently tick the catholic box. However, they have to ask themselves what good is this to the catholic church if nobody goes to mass anymore or believes in the eating jebus stuff? What exactly are you so proud of?

    Its worth feck all to the church as the numbers continue to drop as they'll get less money into their pockets and churchs will continue to close around the country. So you can claim you have Catholics but you won't have anywhere for them to meet or worship their god anymore (even if they wanted to go :pac:)

    Remember, if you said in the 70's that churchs would close around Ireland due to lack of numbers the priests etc would have laughed at you...but yet here we are. The hard facts of the situation.
    I wouldn't get too excited if I were you. If decades of Soviet rule couldn't kill off religion and murderous atheists like Elias Calles couldn't literally kill off religious people I don't think a literally "random survey" carried out by a polling company I've never heard of is going to change the world.

    Also, you may want to correct your post as it contains a glaring error. "Occasionally" mean every so often not as you've described as " (births, deaths, marriages and the like)"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    weisses wrote: »
    But to use the results of some polls (which nobody identified as valid)
    What does that even mean, "identified as valid"? They're all carried out by professional opinion-surveying organisations. The statistics of sampling error are well-understood. (I mean "by the people who do these things"... as distinct from "by the people on this thread".) When you read the results of every other opinion survey, do you ask "who has identified this as valid?" (... and what on earth is the answer, when you do?)
    as evidence against a possible flaw in the census to me is just as flawed as the census could be

    We're getting rather Cretan Liar Paradox, I think. Either the census isn't flawed, in which case it's fine, or the census and the surveys are both flawed, in which case we should just assume that the census is fine, is that the gist?

    Look, it's pretty straightforward stuff, and I'll try one more time. The census doesn't ask about religious belief or religious practice. Surveys that do ask about those things make it clear that many people who in some sense "identify" as Catholic (depending on the question asked, among other things) range considerably in their Catholic beliefs and practices -- all the way down to "none whatsoever".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    No. See last point above. Are my calculations not robust enough? Even taking a low 30% figure for those attending once per week?

    Not the lowest estimate (from assorted surveys) I've seen. The ACP's was in that ballpark (34% IIRC); Irish Central refers (annoyingly elliptically, without giving a source) to 18% (of the whole population). An alarming range of variation, but that's becoming same-old-same-old in this subject area.

    The fuzziest of the numbers might relate in part to the definitional problem with the denominator. If you're measuring by percentage of "Catholics", and excluding "non-Catholics" from the survey at an early stage, it's going to depend massively on the self-reported rate of Catholicism, and just how "Catholic" the "Catholics" really are. If there's indeed a "not religious but spiritual" chunk of 25% or so, they could be being included in, or all, all depending. Which is... the thread topic all over again, in a nutshell.

    So ironically, this is a case where if they were doing an all-population sample, we'd likely get a more reliable estimate of the total than with these "percentages of all Catholics".

    In principle it's a much more measurable thing than many of other subjectives that have been under discussion. But the body that's in the best position to collect the data is the one that has the least incentive to do so...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    According to this report (Practice and Belief amongst Roman Catholics in Ireland - by the Bishops Conference, academically led and funded by EU Framework grants) - Fig 1 shows that, in 2009/10, 42.1% of Irish catholics attended mass once per week and 6% attended more than once a week.

    So 48.1% of 3,861,335 is 1,857,302 people at least once a week.

    Actually, you're missing another "slice" of the pie: the "daily" crowd, 3.5%, are being counted separately from the "more than once a week" types. So that's a total of 9.5% (or 9%: there's a discrepancy between the text and the chart -- too many doctors of divinity, not enough mathematicians, I guess...) between those two, to add to the 42.1%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    My "witty" line about religion police wasn't aimed at knocking the point you made btw. Your's is a 100% perfectly valid question. Just one (imho) that doesn't have a straightforward answer and certainly can't be measured using a tool as cumbersome as a census.
    I think that's the point we're been trying to make for some time. Especially given that our starting point were arguments like "Ireland is a 90% officially Christian country, therefore the president, popularly elected in a landslide on the 'nod and a wink atheist' ticket, needs to throw some 'Christ' red meat into his seasonal address".
    I don't think the RCC's view on the last abortion debate would have been any different if only 30% had ticked the "Catholic" box on the census.
    Oh, they'd have had the same view, at least in theory. Considerably different tactics, though. The Other Archbish Martin wouldn't have been on TV attempting to hint heavily at excommunication for anyone voting for abortion provision considerably more restrictive than that the RCC is loudly agitating for in other countries if "the art of the possible" weren't a factor in their thinking. Or did I miss the people from the hierarchy in Spain and the UK saying "you're going to hell if you vote for anything other than a total ban"?
    Is this what we refer to as "a la carte" catholics? I can't see the RCC telling people that there are two "grades" of catholicism. Goes against christian values that everyone has the same "worth" as his neighbour. Even if he is a sinner.
    There are certainly two grades of member "in the eyes of eternity", no? (Actually, a few, if we throw in Purgatory and Limbo(s).)


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    I wouldn't get too excited if I were you. If decades of Soviet rule couldn't kill off religion and murderous atheists like Elias Calles couldn't literally kill off religious people I don't think a literally "random survey" carried out by a polling company I've never heard of is going to change the world.

    Why don't you just godwin yourself and get it over and done with?
    :rolleyes:

    Ireland doesn't have some government trying to change people's views and tell people what to do.

    People have become better educated and have realised the con, its natural progression and people have done it all by themselves. People used their free will. :p

    If you want to make a far more appropriate comparison then I suggest you look at the catholic faith in the Netherlands. The catholic faith represented 40% of the population in the country in the 1970's making it the largest religion by far.

    It has since dropped to 29% in 2011 and is still dropping, even though it has 29% only 1.2% attend mass each week. This is next to useless for the RCC and the catholic church is in crisis mode over it.

    The closure of church's and the drop of religion in the Netherlands is such a issue that they even bring it up during the boat tours in Amsterdam as they talk about converting the church's to other uses.

    So while you can claim this and that about Ireland, its more likely Ireland will go the way of the Netherlands (and in some respects already has) then go the way of some dictatorship run country.,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    Using a combination of the 2011 census figures and the Iona institute's survey from the same year. I arrive at approximately 769,964 adults that attended mass within a week of the survey.

    I'd be interested to see how you arrived at that figure Gaynovader, given that iona report gives a 30% figure for mass "in the last week".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    alaimacerc wrote: »
    Not the lowest estimate (from assorted surveys) I've seen. The ACP's was in that ballpark (34% IIRC); Irish Central refers (annoyingly elliptically, without giving a source) to 18% (of the whole population). An alarming range of variation, but that's becoming same-old-same-old in this subject area.

    There's the problem right there.


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Cabaal wrote: »
    Ireland doesn't have some government trying to change people's views and tell people what to do.
    You must have missed what went on over the lisbon treaty referendums then.


    Cabaal wrote: »
    People have become better educated and have realised the con, its natural progression and people have done it all by themselves. People used their free will. :p

    If you want to make a far more appropriate comparison then I suggest you look at the catholic faith in the Netherlands. The catholic faith represented 40% of the population in the country in the 1970's making it the largest religion by far.

    It has since dropped to 29% in 2011 and is still dropping, even though it has 29% only 1.2% attend mass each week. This is next to useless for the RCC and the catholic church is in crisis mode over it.

    The closure of church's and the drop of religion in the Netherlands is such a issue that they even bring it up during the boat tours in Amsterdam as they talk about converting the church's to other uses.

    So while you can claim this and that about Ireland, its more likely Ireland will go the way of the Netherlands (and in some respects already has) then go the way of some dictatorship run country.,
    Alternatively you can look at officially atheist China, which is experiencing a boom in religion in line with it's modernisation and as a pushback against the emptiness that comes with materialism.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    I'd be interested to see how you arrived at that figure Gaynovader, given that iona report gives a 30% figure for mass "in the last week".

    Iona - haha
    Must be true so!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    You must have missed what went on over the lisbon treaty referendums then.

    :rolleyes:
    Alternatively you can look at officially atheist China, which is experiencing a boom in religion in line with it's modernisation and as a pushback against the emptiness that comes with materialism.

    You are actually that deluded that you think country's like the Netherlands and Ireland who have experienced drops in Catholics going to mass will go the way of China.?

    If you think that in the coming years Ireland will experience growth in the catholic faith then you have some serious pie in the sky theory's.

    The only thing the catholic church is going to experience in record numbers in Ireland in the coming years is the extremely low amount of men joining the priest hood and women becoming nuns.

    Christianity only accounts for a pathetic 2.4% (approx) of the Chinese population so while it may seem like big growth compared to Ireland's population it really is nothing to write home about,

    Chinese folk religions account for the vast majority of religious belief in China with 56%...clearly it is far more meaningful to people,

    Sure the government don't endorse a religion...but then no government should endorse any specific faith, in doing so they impact on any other beliefs, non-beliefs..

    The US Gov doesn't endorse a specific faith in schools etc and yet Christianity numbers have dropped....86% in the 1990's to 73% now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    Iona - haha
    Must be true so!!!

    Well it's the one Gaynovader used but the 30% doesn't compute.

    I prefer to assess evidence based on its merits, not because i agree/disagree with who is giving me the evidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,644 ✭✭✭swampgas


    Alternatively you can look at officially atheist China, which is experiencing a boom in religion in line with it's modernisation and as a pushback against the emptiness that comes with materialism.

    Careful there, BB, you are starting to sound a bit like John Waters!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭weisses


    With so much focus on percentage points and conclusions drawn from it, What do people think about the definition that over 90% of Irish people is religious ... Just in a broader sense ?

    http://atheism.about.com/od/religiondefinition/a/definition.htm


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    weisses wrote: »
    With so much focus on percentage points and conclusions drawn from it, What do people think about the definition that over 90% of Irish people is religious ... Just in a broader sense ?
    Since the term "catholic" (and "christianity" even more so) seems to have no meaning that anybody can agree on, then that 90% figure really isn't all that cromulent.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    weisses wrote: »
    With so much focus on percentage points and conclusions drawn from it, What do people think about the definition that over 90% of Irish people is religious ... Just in a broader sense ?

    http://atheism.about.com/od/religiondefinition/a/definition.htm

    I think perhaps that percentage have some sort of belief, god or gods, an afterlife, having their dead relatives look after them etc.

    However do they believe a religion occupy's an important place in their life?. We know from previous surveys that 42% of people answered no to this very question.

    We also know although people may believe in a god and claim to be part of a religion that a majority have little interest in practicing it on a weekly basis.

    Bottom line is if people believe rocks are inhabited by spirits, fairy's or whatever and that gets them through life then whatever works for them, are the religious, no....are they spiritual. yes.

    I've no problem with anyone believing the above, as long as they don't expect their beliefs to dictate what rights other people have and how people are educated, treated medically in this country or others etc. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    robindch wrote: »
    Since the term "catholic" (and "christianity" even more so) seems to have no meaning that anybody can agree on, then that 90% figure really isn't all that cromulent.

    Extras thanks for use of the word cromulent. My second favourite word.
    ( discombobulate is my fave)


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,374 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    as a pushback against the emptiness that comes with materialism.
    LOL, want to flesh out that joke a bit further.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭gaynorvader


    I'd be interested to see how you arrived at that figure Gaynovader, given that iona report gives a 30% figure for mass "in the last week".

    Sure, no problem :)

    Population in 2011: 4,581,269
    %of population 14 years or younger: 21.3%
    Adult population in 2011: 3,605,458.703
    % Adult Roman Catholics: 69%
    Adult RCC population in 2011: 2,487,766.50507
    %RCC members that attended mass in the past week: 30%
    Adult RCC members within a week before the survey: 746,330 (rounding up)

    I may have been a little more generous with my rounding previously.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Sure, no problem :)

    Population in 2011: 4,581,269
    %of population 14 years or younger: 21.3%
    Adult population in 2011: 3,605,458.703
    % Adult Roman Catholics: 69%
    Adult RCC population in 2011: 2,487,766.50507
    %RCC members that attended mass in the past week: 30%
    Adult RCC members within a week before the survey: 746,330 (rounding up)

    I may have been a little more generous with my rounding previously.

    Christ! That's precise!:eek:


Advertisement