Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Pasta Quest: DMV. Esoteric Edition.

1235714

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,705 ✭✭✭stimpson


    I think your missing a subtle point here. They say it's a parody religion, not a parody of religion. Therefore they have accepted that it is indeed a religion and are now discriminating based on the type of religion. It's shocking that it still goes on in this day and age.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭rovoagho


    Just a note to say that I will happily contribute to legal expenses for this, if they become necessary, up to €100.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Anyone a solicitor who'd take on the case for funsies?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Put me down for another €100 towards any solicitors' letters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭UDP


    I think I am going to go both the ombudsman and the equal status act routes. I know the equal status act route has time limits associated with it i.e. must make a complaint within 2 months of the event thus I want to keep all options open just in case the other route follows through.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,521 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    UDP wrote: »
    I think I am going to go both the ombudsman and the equal status act routes. I know the equal status act route has time limits associated with it i.e. must make a complaint within 2 months of the event thus I want to keep all options open just in case the other route follows through.

    How about you you go the route that doesn't waste tax payer money on frivolous bull****?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    How about you you go the route that doesn't waste tax payer money on frivolous bull****?

    You mean frivolous bull**** that means in certain instances laws don't apply to some people when those laws conflict with their religious beliefs?

    If you think that is frivolous I hate to think what you would consider serious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,521 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    You mean frivolous bull**** that means in certain instances laws don't apply to some people when those laws conflict with their religious beliefs?

    If you think that is frivolous I hate to think what you would consider serious.

    Yes, i mean frivolous bull**** like this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭gaynorvader


    How about you you go the route that doesn't waste tax payer money on frivolous bull****?
    Yes, i mean frivolous bull**** like this.

    Those frivolous bull**** anti-discrimination laws! What a waste of tax money! We could have been building churches!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Those frivolous bull**** anti-discrimination laws! What a waste of tax money! We could have been building churches!

    And pyres to burn the heathens!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Yes, i mean frivolous bull**** like this.

    WOW.

    Sooooo - allowing people to opt out of laws because their particular religion says different is just hunky dory with you.

    Where should we draw the line do you reckon?

    Do you think it's grand that people can say 'Not keeping that law because it goes against my religion'?

    Some crazy religious beliefs out there - should they all get a Get out of Jail Free card?

    I believe in the Norse Gods therefore I must carry a sword or axe at all times as if I wish to go to Valhalla I have to die fighting and armed. :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,521 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Where should we draw the line do you reckon?

    We should draw the line when it is clearly someone acting the maggot, as is the case here by the ops own admission


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭Absoluvely


    We should draw the line when it is clearly someone acting the maggot, as is the case here by the ops own admission

    If Pastafarianism is acting the maggot, then mainstream religions are the maggot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,521 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Or we could draw the line by applying the same rules to everyone. You know, fairness, equality and all that bs.

    Grand so, let's waste tax payers cash so you can prove you need to wear a Bosco wig in your passport or whatever ****e is current.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭[-0-]


    I'd gladly donate as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Grand so, let's waste tax payers cash so you can prove you need to wear a Bosco wig in your passport or whatever ****e is current.

    Ah now you're being offensive to his religion. That headgear is very sacred.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,705 ✭✭✭stimpson


    We should draw the line when it is clearly someone acting the maggot, as is the case here by the ops own admission

    So how do you draft a law to define someone "acting the maggot"? Who gets to decide which religions are worthy of protection and which ones can be persecuted for their beliefs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,521 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    stimpson wrote: »
    So how do you draft a law to define someone "acting the maggot"? Who gets to decide which religions are worthy of protection and which ones can be persecuted for their beliefs?

    I'm not talking about drafting a law. I am referring to this thread and the OPs own admission.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Grand so, let's waste tax payers cash so you can prove you need to wear a Bosco wig in your passport or whatever ****e is current.


    You've almost grasped the central point. Let's see if you can make that final deduction. You've accepted that giving people exemptions to certain laws because of whatever they claim their religion is is a waste of money. So the options are 'Allow exemptions for every religion at the expense of the taxpayer' or..?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    We should draw the line when it is clearly someone acting the maggot, as is the case here by the ops own admission

    Is someone also acting the maggot when they refuse to wear a crash helmet on a motorbike as their religion says they have to wear a few yards of material?

    Why stop at road safety laws?

    Should there be exemptions in other areas too?

    Oh wait...there are exemptions in other areas too - like employment law. :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,705 ✭✭✭stimpson


    I'm not talking about drafting a law. I am referring to this thread and the OPs own admission.

    But the OP's beliefs are protected by law. The equality legislation does not qualify which religions are "acting the maggot" so his beliefs are every bit as protected as Catholicism, Voodooism or any other belief system.

    If you want to discriminate against Pastafarian's then you'll have to draft a law specifying it as an "acting the maggot" religion, as opposed to "real" religions.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Some crazy religious beliefs out there - should they all get a Get out of Jail Free card?
    The get-out-of-jail card is only useful when they're in jail to start with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Should someone have told Kent Hovind before he was jailed for tax fraud..?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭googled eyes


    Would the money offered for legal fees not be better off being given to charity?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    No. Why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Would the money offered for legal fees not be better off being given to charity?

    Would the BILLIONS the catholic church has not be better spent by giving it to charity?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    robindch wrote: »
    The get-out-of-jail card is only useful when they're in jail to start with.

    This is true.

    It's a Stay out of Jail card.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    Would the money offered for legal fees not be better off being given to charity?

    Good point
    As of now Pastafarianism is a charity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭swampgas


    I wouldn't be too surprised if the staff dealing with this driver license request were aware of, and following, this particular boards thread. Not that that makes any difference to the issue, but it might give them advance notice of any planned course of action.

    /tinfoilhat


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭googled eyes


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Would the BILLIONS the catholic church has not be better spent by giving it to charity?

    Ah come on now. We're not talking about the catholic church?

    Were talking about people wasting the ombudsman's time so they can wear a colander on their head.

    Every one of us knows the problems and hypocrisy of the church.


Advertisement