Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dublin GAA Discussion Thread - 2013

1151618202159

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭The Rooster


    Silly thing for Ger to say. Let the rest of the teams think Al is back training and chomping on the bit for a game.

    Or could the management team be playing mind games? Strange for a well educated lad like Brennan to be contradicting the manager.

    Cad e an sceal?
    Brennan didn't contradict Gavin, it was the other way around.

    Brennan said Alan might miss the rest of the season.

    Gavin said he's hopeful that he'll be fit by the time we play in championship. Which probably means its no more than 50/50, and that he's no chance of playing in the first game as he'd have no match practice. Add in just one more setback with a couple more weeks of delay and suddenly he's out until the Leinster final or qualifiers, at which stage anyone would find it difficult to break into a team.

    So I think the fact of the matter is he might miss the season, or he might be back in time for a Leinster semi/qualifier. Its one of those injuries that's hard to pinpoint an accurate return time.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 713 ✭✭✭WayneMolloy


    Lets bury Tyrone at the weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭dcr22B


    Appeal successful, Kevin O'Brien a free man.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭Justin10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,785 ✭✭✭Dubliner28


    Delighted that this alleged rumour is untrue.

    Close the door and move on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,909 ✭✭✭Neeson


    It does say it was unproven from the evidence that was given. What was the evidence?

    I'd doubt someone would make up that they were bitten either. What would be the point in that?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 713 ✭✭✭WayneMolloy


    Neeson wrote: »
    What would be the point in that?

    Getting the media off of their back over their relegation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,785 ✭✭✭Dubliner28


    Getting the media off of their back over their relegation.

    Surly that is not the chase. It does make a little sense to take the heat of their players for the poor league showing, put come on, thats slander of the highest order.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 713 ✭✭✭WayneMolloy


    Dubliner28 wrote: »
    Surly that is not the chase. It does make a little sense to take the heat of their players for the poor league showing, put come on, thats slander of the highest order.

    Jimmy is losing matches, Jimmy is relegating teams....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭sgarvan


    I don't think that this will be the end of it either


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭bruschi


    sgarvan wrote: »
    I don't think that this will be the end of it either

    I'd say it will. McBrearty wouldnt go to the hearing, and that was a major key part of the evidence. If he wasnt going to go, then there was unlikely to be any further ramifications from it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    Getting the media off of their back over their relegation.

    Donegal management and players have shown some marvellous inititave and ability over the last 12 months but to know that they were going to be relegated at half time was quite a feat, that really is clutching at straws of the highest order.
    Dubliner28 wrote: »
    Delighted that this alleged rumour is untrue.

    Close the door and move on.

    one committee found him guilty another cleared him due to lack of evidence presented, how you have come to the conclusion that it is an untrue rumour is bizzare to say the least.

    Very much doubt the door is closed, we will hear more on this I suspect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    bruschi wrote: »
    I'd say it will. McBrearty wouldnt go to the hearing, and that was a major key part of the evidence. If he wasnt going to go, then there was unlikely to be any further ramifications from it.

    I would imagine McBrearty is as embarrassed about the whole thing as anyone and just wants to play football, it was a no win situation for him, and he probably has no idea who bit him*

    * if he was bitten that is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Donegal management and players have shown some marvellous inititave and ability over the last 12 months but to know that they were going to be relegated at half time was quite a feat, that really is clutching at straws of the highest order.



    one committee found him guilty another cleared him due to lack of evidence presented, how you have come to the conclusion that it is an untrue rumour is bizzare to say the least.

    Very much doubt the door is closed, we will hear more on this I suspect.

    People are saying it are untrue just like it MUST be true when a committee found him guilty


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    I would imagine McBrearty is as embarrassed about the whole thing as anyone and just wants to play football, it was a no win situation for him, and he probably has no idea who bit him*

    * if he was bitten that is.

    IF he was forced into it, i do feel sorry for him in this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭Justin10


    This case is done, and Donegal count board and the GAA should be ashamed.

    Donegal County board for how they handled their own player, and accusing someone of an offence so serious with a picture of a mark??

    The GAA for the statement they released, its as if they where saying ye he done it but cant prove it, should of been lack of evidence so he is innocent, instead of lack of evidence so we cant do him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭Justin10


    Anyways...... looking forward to the team tonight, be interesting see has anyone got into the starting 15 during the break.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭sgarvan


    bruschi wrote: »
    I'd say it will. McBrearty wouldnt go to the hearing, and that was a major key part of the evidence. If he wasnt going to go, then there was unlikely to be any further ramifications from it.

    When I say this may not be the end of it, I don't mean from a CHC point of view. I just have a feeling that as he still has not been declared innocent that a slander case may happen.

    Could be totally wrong though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 165 ✭✭cat in the sack


    yes the book should be threw at McBrearty and Donegals CO. Board


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,785 ✭✭✭Dubliner28


    sgarvan wrote: »
    When I say this may not be the end of it, I don't mean from a CHC point of view. I just have a feeling that as he still has not been declared innocent that a slander case may happen.

    Could be totally wrong though

    Hopefully not, O Brien does have a case doh. Hopefully this will be the end of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    yes the book should be threw at McBrearty and Donegals CO. Board

    For what?? The committee did not rule it was a false allegation or anything of the sort, they decided there wasn't enough evidence available - two completely differrent things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭Justin10


    For what?? The committee did not rule it was a false allegation or anything of the sort, they decided there wasn't enough evidence available - two completely differrent things.

    To bring a case you have to have a certain about of evidence, it seemed Donegal had a picture of a bruise.
    That is not enough and if he did go legal route he probably would have a case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    Rochey18 wrote: »
    To bring a case you have to have a certain about of evidence, it seemed Donegal had a picture of a bruise.
    That is not enough and if he did go legal route he probably would have a case.

    It wasnt a court of law you do need a 'certain about of evidence'.

    Donegal County Board never once mentioned O'Briens name to the press or in public, if he has a case its against the CCCC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭Justin10


    It wasnt a court of law you do need a 'certain about of evidence'.

    Donegal County Board never once mentioned O'Briens name to the press or in public, if he has a case its against the CCCC.

    I think it would come under the defamation of character, which is a very easy thing to get a prosecution under, but seriously this is a football forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭RMDrive


    Rochey18 wrote: »
    I think it would come under the defamation of character, which is a very easy thing to get a prosecution under, but seriously this is a football forum.

    I'd say the last thing any corner back would want is a case where details of his marking techniques would have to be laid bare.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,842 ✭✭✭corny


    I'm glad this is over.

    There always seemed a complete lack of evidence against him but if he did do it thats unfortunate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭Gael85


    Team for sunday is
    Cluxton
    O'Brien
    Cooper
    Daly
    McCarthy
    Brennan
    McCaffrey
    Mccauley
    O'Sullivan
    Flynn
    Connolly
    Cullen
    Mannion
    Andrews
    Brogan


  • Subscribers Posts: 16,896 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    Great to see O'Brien in the side. Hope he is not affected long term by the drawn out farce. The GAA and the media have a lot to answer for. Boards.ie didn't handle it at all well either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 643 ✭✭✭Qwerty Dub


    copacetic wrote: »
    Great to see O'Brien in the side. Hope he is not affected long term by the drawn out farce. The GAA and the media have a lot to answer for. Boards.ie didn't handle it at all well either.

    You can be sure it didn't effect Kevin O'Brien at all bar wasting a few hours of his life that he'll never get back at the appeal during the week.

    The verdict was never in doubt. He knew it and the management knew it too. Thats why I would say that not only was he named in the team to start today but you can be sure he is listed there in the programme which waould have been submitted early in the week. Thats how confident they would have been. No panic there. Common sense prevailed, even if it took a while.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 16,896 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    I'd be concerned about it following him around, the GAA have a lot to answer for about how it was handled. Still implicating him in press allowing people with bias to paint a different story on his clearance, as per other shameful thread on it here on boards.

    Anyway, hopefully it just makes the team stronger seeing how a teammate can be treated by his organisation..


Advertisement