Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

The Masters 2013

124

Comments

  • #92
    the groutch
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,096 ✭✭✭✭the groutch


    besty wrote: »
    I'm on Cabrera (110/1), Snedeker (35/1), Kuchar (35/1) and Day (55/1), all each way. Hope to god there's no implosion and that the big Argentinean can bring it home for me!

    nice aftertiming


  • #93
    simon0brien
    Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭simon0brien


    the groutch wrote: »
    nice aftertiming

    Blind ppl :P


  • #94
    eh i dunno
    Registered Users Posts: 12,020 ✭✭✭✭eh i dunno


    just backed Scott @ 11/2 for some interest


  • #95
    culline
    Registered Users Posts: 254 ✭✭culline


    Anyone think playoff at 7/4 is good value?


  • #96
    Bobeagleburger
    Registered Users Posts: 45,262 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    Couples 2 behind Langer.


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,813 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    tiger now 20/1
    gimme a break

    What fool would take that price?

    then again i'd imagine there's a few out there


  • #98
    Bobeagleburger
    Registered Users Posts: 45,262 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    Langer back to even! Same score as Couples now


  • #99
    Bobeagleburger
    Registered Users Posts: 45,262 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    mailburner wrote: »
    tiger now 20/1
    gimme a break

    What fool would take that price?

    then again i'd imagine there's a few out there

    You could always lay it :)


  • #100
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,813 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    You could always lay it :)

    jaysus I rarely have that much in my bfair account
    If i had id risk the lot as its a risk free bet


  • #101
    Hoki
    Registered Users Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭Hoki


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    Langer back to even! Same score as Couples now

    And he's outta there, +2 now!


  • Advertisement
  • #102
    Rastadoyle
    Registered Users Posts: 208 ✭✭Rastadoyle


    Scott will never win a major!


  • #103
    newballsplease
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭newballsplease


    If Angel wins and theres about 4 players on same score after him, are they sll counted in 2nd place? In other words am i in with a good shout of tiger finishing in at least 4th place for money back on my ew


  • #104
    bobwilliams
    Registered Users Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭bobwilliams


    Rastadoyle wrote: »
    Scott will never win a major!

    i disagree


  • #105
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,813 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    newballsplease wrote: »
    If Angel wins and theres about 4 players on same score after him, are they sll counted in 2nd place? In other words am i in with a good shout of tiger finishing in at least 4th place for money back on my ew

    No
    In that scenario if angel wins then the next four
    players fill 2nd to 5th regardless if they all have the same score


  • #106
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,813 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    Rastadoyle wrote: »
    Scott will never win a major!

    I think he might
    I wont class him as another westwood just yet as he
    doesnt choke
    pretty solid overall this week and 6 bogeys overall is exceptional and
    probably the least of the entire field...just too many pars
    just ran into a very inspired schwartzel when coming so close to
    his first major
    I had him backed for that..still hurts

    Might just do it tonite yet


  • #107
    JLoftus
    Closed Accounts Posts: 69 ✭✭JLoftus


    JLoftus wrote: »
    Fred Couples 13/8 to be the top senior player looks a great be to me! Going with a Large stake.

    his last 3 years hes finished 12th, 15th and 6th.. his only real opposition:

    1. Vijay Singh 27th, Missed cut, Missed cut.
    2. Bernhard Langer Missed cut, Missed cut, Missed cut.
    3. Tom Watson Missed cut, Missed cut, 18th.

    That was not good for the ticker, got away with it in the end :D:D


  • #108
    newballsplease
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭newballsplease


    mailburner wrote: »
    No
    In that scenario if angel wins then the next four
    players fill 2nd to 5th regardless if they all have the same score



    Oh f**k! Im in for a sweat so...
    How can they to that if 3 or 4 players have same score?


  • #109
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,813 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    newballsplease wrote: »
    Oh f**k! Im in for a sweat so...
    How can they to that if 3 or 4 players have same score?

    If scott, leish cabr finish 2nd on -7 then they occupy three places
    it wouldnt make sense from a betting point of view as you could
    have 3 players in second (jointly) same in third, fourth etc
    it would mean the bookie could be paying out on the first ten
    golfers if that were the case
    in your case you really need tiger to finish 4th on his own for
    your money back
    if hes joint 4th then you will be down money


  • #110
    Rastadoyle
    Registered Users Posts: 208 ✭✭Rastadoyle


    i maybe regretting my scott will never win a major but if he doesnt get this he may not!


  • #111
    8-10
    Registered Users Posts: 13,297 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    mailburner wrote: »
    If scott, leish cabr finish 2nd on -7 then they occupy three places
    it wouldnt make sense from a betting point of view as you could
    have 3 players in second (jointly) same in third, fourth etc
    it would mean the bookie could be paying out on the first ten
    golfers if that were the case
    in your case you really need tiger to finish 4th on his own for
    your money back
    if hes joint 4th then you will be down money

    So PP pay to 6 places and I had both players that finished t-6th

    How do I know which one of those gets the 6th place spot? I thought both would have 1/2 the payout?


  • Advertisement
  • #112
    bobwilliams
    Registered Users Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭bobwilliams


    8-10 wrote: »
    So PP pay to 6 places and I had both players that finished t-6th

    How do I know which one of those gets the 6th place spot? I thought both would have 1/2 the payout?
    they're both 6th........so half ur stake at full odds with both players


  • #113
    Insane Rambling
    Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭Insane Rambling


    Can someone let me know how I am fixed...

    Backed Jason Day @ 60/1 €10e/w in Powers (6 places)

    Thanks


  • #114
    bobwilliams
    Registered Users Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭bobwilliams


    Insane Rambling wrote: »
    Can someone let me know how I am fixed...

    Backed Jason Day @ 60/1 €10e/w in Powers (6 places)

    Thanks

    160 in phocka


  • #115
    newballsplease
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭newballsplease


    And me

    Tiger woods 5/2 ew

    20 and 4places?


  • #116
    bobwilliams
    Registered Users Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭bobwilliams


    newballsplease wrote: »
    And me

    Tiger woods 5/2 ew

    20 and 4places?

    was that 20e/w and was it 1/4 of the odds?
    if it's a 1/4 you get 32.50 back

    sorry scr that he was joint 4th hold on

    think it's 16.25,not great


  • #117
    Deeds373
    Registered Users Posts: 1 ✭Deeds373


    I had 2.50 each way on Cabrera 110/1 how did I only get 72€?? I thought it would be 275/2? No? :(
    What will I get for snedeker 35/1


  • #118
    opr
    Registered Users Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    Deeds373 wrote: »
    I had 2.50 each way on Cabrera 110/1 how did I only get 72€?? I thought it would be 275/2? No? :(
    What will I get for snedeker 35/1

    You lost the win part? So you only get paid on the place part. 110/4 ~ 27.5/1

    (27.5 * 2.50) + stake (2.50) = 72

    Sned tied for 6th place so half the stake at the odds. So 35/4 at half of what you put on the place part.

    Opr


  • #119
    eh i dunno
    Registered Users Posts: 12,020 ✭✭✭✭eh i dunno


    eh i dunno wrote: »
    just backed Scott @ 11/2 for some interest

    nice to wake up to see he won


  • #120
    RIALTO1
    Registered Users Posts: 672 ✭✭✭RIALTO1


    Anyone have a bet with Bet365?

    I had Snedeker EW, was fairly sure they were paying 6 places but settled as a loser.

    Would check with them direct but in work all day.

    Cheers


  • Advertisement
  • #121
    okidoki987
    Registered Users Posts: 10,615 ✭✭✭✭okidoki987


    In running was unbelieveable last night for the last hour.
    Scott went to 5's to 1/5, back to 5/2 to 4/5 while Cabrera went from 4/5 to
    6's to 8/13 to 6/4, Tiger went from 110 to 30 back to 300's.
    Mental stuff.


Advertisement