Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Rangers FC lodge papers to go into administration

11314161819150

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Dempsey wrote: »
    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/many

    I'm not going to start arguing about the meaning of many or being to start quantifying the term so you can disagree for the sake of it

    or you could just have realised how Politics should have nothing to do with Football and thankfully even Barca/Real have moved on from those sad times.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    or you could just have realised how Politics should have nothing to do with Football and thankfully even Barca/Real have moved on from those sad times.

    Should but that isnt the reality.

    You are very naive tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-17075361
    Craig Whyte has said that "every penny" which has come in and gone out of Rangers under his ownership has been "properly accounted for".

    More lies and spin from Whyte


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17079011
    The Scottish Football Association is investigating Craig Whyte after the Rangers owner admitted that he had been disqualified as a company director.

    And if it is not satisfied that Whyte falls into its fit and proper person guidelines, it will take action against the Ibrox club.

    Rangers issued a statement to the Plus stock exchange on Wednesday confirming Whyte's seven-year disqualification .

    The club says it is happy to discuss the matter with the SFA fully.

    "The Scottish FA has noted the Rangers FC statement to the stock exchange regarding the club's owner Craig Whyte," said chief executive Stewart Regan.

    "We have been in dialogue with the club on this matter and in light of today's developments have requested clarification by return.

    "We await disclosure of key information before we can make any further comment."

    The governing body's articles of association state that office bearers with their football clubs must meet their board's fit and proper criteria.

    The SFA board reserves the right to make such a judgement "after due consideration of all relevant facts".

    Asked if it was the SFA's duty to check such matters when a person takes over a football club, Regan told BBC Scotland on Thursday evening: "Every club in Scotland supplies an official return and by supplying that official return they are effectively signing up to the articles of the Scottish FA.

    "The rules and regulations are laid out very clearly as to what is and what isn't allowed as far as company directors are concerned.

    "Given that clubs are changing their directors and people are coming and going every day, it's impossible for the Scottish FA to investigate every single person across every professional club in Scotland.

    "So by signing up to the official return they are binding themselves to the articles of the Association.

    "When anything happens to indicate that a breach of those articles has taken place, that is the point at which the Association gets involved."

    A spokesman for Rangers said: "At no stage did the club believe there had been a breach of SFA regulations.

    "The club will be happy to provide the SFA with all the relevant information and discuss the matter with them fully."

    Article 10.2 (g) makes reference to a person who has "been disqualified as a director pursuant to the Company Directors' Disqualification Act 1986, within the previous five years", with the caveat that the list is "acknowledged to be illustrative and not exhaustive".

    White was disqualified from 2000 to 2007, while in charge of Vital UK Ltd, as revealed in a BBC Scotland documentary on 20 October.

    The SFA show how useless they are at protecting Scottish Clubs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 189 ✭✭fionnsda


    Eirebear wrote: »
    What do Rangers and Celtic fans have in common?

    They're all obsessed with Rangers Football Club PLC (In Administration).

    To rights we are! its like a car crash in slow-mo :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,961 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    The same old rambling? Heard it all before. I don't think too many Rangers fans even entertainment the drivel any more.

    Drivel? Someone made apoint that a 'new' rangers would be just as bigoted as the old one and your response is 'Get over it'. I see, in other words, yes the new club will be just as bigoted and timmy better get used to it. Croppy lie down.:mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Drivel? Someone made apoint that a 'new' rangers would be just as bigoted as the old one and your response is 'Get over it'. I see, in other words, yes the new club will be just as bigoted and timmy better get used to it. Croppy lie down.:mad:
    Well that is the majority of the Rangers support. Pro Union, Pro Rangers. Some people need to get over that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    Drivel? Someone made apoint that a 'new' rangers would be just as bigoted as the old one and your response is 'Get over it'. I see, in other words, yes the new club will be just as bigoted and timmy better get used to it. Croppy lie down.:mad:

    The last few pages have been a masterclass of deflecting from the real issue.

    I said would the new Rangers be just as bigoted as the old one, I was referring to the 130 years of bigoted policies.

    The The Rangers fans on her quickly moved the topic onto songs to avoid this inconvenient history which Alex Sammond and co are so worried about preserving.

    It makes me ****ing sick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Well that is the majority of the Rangers support. Pro Union, Pro Rangers. Some people need to get over that.

    Pro discrimination?

    Will ye have that in the new rangers or leave it out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    The last few pages have been a masterclass of deflecting from the real issue.

    I said would the new Rangers be just as bigoted as the old one, I was referring to the 130 years of bigoted policies.

    The The Rangers fans on her quickly moved the topic onto songs to avoid this inconvenient history which Alex Sammond and co are so worried about preserving.

    It makes me ****ing sick.

    why don't you just not bother support the SPL if you hate it that much?

    EVENFLOW



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    why don't you just not bother support the SPL if you hate it that much?

    so I have to like the 130 years of discrimination to like the spl?

    Scotlands shame have no shame


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    Pro discrimination?

    Will ye have that in the new rangers or leave it out?
    I don't know. You will need to ask the club that question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    so I have to like the 130 years of discrimination to like the spl?

    Scotlands shame have no shame

    well nobody is forcing you are they?

    I mean every other club have to put up with **** from Celtic and Rangers too, but just get on with it.

    we don't go crying to mammy:p

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    I don't know. You will need to ask the club that question.
    Which would you prefer? How would you like a potential new club to operate?

    Let me guess...no opinion :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    Which would you prefer? How would you like a potential new club to operate?

    Let me guess...no opinion :rolleyes:
    To win football matches and play for the faithful Rangers crowd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    well nobody is forcing you are they?

    I mean every other club have to put up with **** from Celtic and Rangers too, but just get on with it.

    we don't go crying to mammy:p
    Correct, I am not forced to follow an SPL team.

    So you equate opposing Rangers openly sectarian discriminatory policies as 'crying to mammy'

    sums you lot up perfectly

    roll on the big tax bill and administration part2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    To win football matches and play for the faithful Rangers crowd.

    in relation to illegal employment policies?

    come on artfull dodger


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    Correct, I am not forced to follow an SPL team.

    So you equate opposing Rangers openly sectarian discriminatory policies as 'crying to mammy'

    sums you lot up perfectly

    roll on the big tax bill and administration part2

    :confused:

    Oh Dear!!

    EVENFLOW



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    in relation to illegal employment policies?

    come on artfull dodger
    What employment policies? Got Muslims playing for us in recent seasons. Don't see the big problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    :confused:

    Oh Dear!!

    that it avoid the topic, you lot refers to the Rangers support who condone the clubs 130 years of proud discrimination.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    that it avoid the topic, you lot refers to the Rangers support who condone the clubs 130 years of proud discrimination.

    Avoid the topic you say?

    Most Football fans would love to avoid the topic of Politics and talk about what this thread is meant to be about!

    maybe you could try it yourself. You lot are always the same.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    What employment policies? Got Muslims playing for us in recent seasons. Don't see the big problem.

    :D Good man

    Who mentioned muslims, good to see how the average the the rangers fan thinks :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    :D Good man

    Who mentioned muslims, good to see how the average the the rangers fan thinks :D
    You seem to be parading this myth that only Protestants play for The Rangers. It is boring and off topic.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Regrettably, I will not be attending tomorrow's match against Kilmarnock. Although I would dearly love to be at Ibrox for the game, my priority is, and will continue to be, to assist the administrators in any way I can to bring this process to as speedy a conclusion as possible.

    :D He's good for a laugh, I'll give him that! I know I'd agree with him on that though.... Monaco is much more appealing than sitting in Ibrox with a whole lot of angry bears throwing abuse at you.

    Best fans in the world eh Craigy.... ask the people of Manchester if they agree. ;) And pay your f**kin' taxes you cheat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    130 years? Someone needs a history, or maths lesson.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    Avoid the topic you say?

    Most Football fans would love to avoid the topic of Politics and talk about what this thread is meant to be about!

    maybe you could try it yourself. You lot are always the same.

    another beautifull swerve.

    Lets try again, why do you equate me opposing discrimination as 'crying to mammy'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    You seem to be parading this myth that only Protestants play for The Rangers. It is boring and off topic.

    Again who said this?

    another insight into the average the the rangers fans mind


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    another beautifull swerve.

    Lets try again, why do you equate me opposing discrimination as 'crying to mammy'?

    What discrimination are you on about?

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    Eirebear wrote: »
    130 years? Someone needs a history, or maths lesson.

    Maths :o No point learning the history till them titles are taken off ye :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    Again who said this?

    another insight into the average the the rangers fans mind
    You did. Basically implying that we don't sign Catholics.


Advertisement