Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Munster Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread.

1191192194196197321

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,592 ✭✭✭GerM


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    It's a close one. I think Ulster could take anyone at home with the Ravenhill faithful in full voice. Munster have the know how to win games though. Put them in a neutral venue in a one off match and I think Munster might just squeak it due to ROG being able to control things that bit better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Amazotheamazing


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    Too soon to call eitherway imo, there's still plenty of games in the season, there's no objective way to determine it without knowing where both end up in the HEC and in the league.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I would love to see a Munster-Ulster semi or final in the RPD12 at the end of the season. It'd be in Thomond, so I think Munster would win, but it'd be great to see both putting first teams out against each other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Cpt_Blackbeard


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    They are playing much, much better rugby but, player for player its very close. I'd give Ulster the edge in the backrow and outside backs (incl. 12), Munster in the tight 5 (just), and we're probably even at halfback; Munster might just have the edge due to ROG's nerves though.

    Had Munster a full compliment to choose from and competant back's coaching, the advantage would be in Munster's favour.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Amazotheamazing


    I would love to see a Munster-Ulster semi or final in the RPD12 at the end of the season. It'd be in Thomond, so I think Munster would win, but it'd be great to see both putting first teams out against each other.

    I think next week will decide Ulster's season. If they win in France I think they'll go on and beat most teams and be in the mix for both comps. If they lose I think they might go back in on themselves.

    That being said, they've invested wisely in winners, not just good players. Guys like Afoa, Muller and Pienaar know what it takes to win at the highest level and it's clearly having an impact on the squad, much like Elsom did with Leinster or Williams with Munster.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,754 ✭✭✭touts


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    I think Ulster are marginally ahead of us based on their overseas players but the new rules will cripple them. If Ulster drew Munster in the HEC QF the way the two teams are playing then Ulster would be red hot favourites. Ulster have fought their way to the top of their group with good performances. Munster have stumbled to the top of their group by being less bad than the opposition on the day. Last gasp drop goals and poor performances have been the tone of all reviews of our games. There is nothing in the Munster tactics or lineup to worry any of the other 7 qtr finalists.

    Once Ulster's contracts run out and some of the old legs start to tire then they may fall back. Unfortunately their recent revival could not have come at a worst time for us as now they will have at least an equal call as Munster on whoever Leinster doesn't want from Connacht and Irish overseas. For example if the IRFU manage to prise Tommy Bowe back from Ospreys then 18 months ago he would have been easy to pursuade to come to Munster. Now his home town are up level (or just ahead) of us so if they managed to sign him over the summer it would be a no brainer that he would go to Ulster. If Ulster were to reach the Semis in the HEC and Munster stumble out of the Qtr Finals (especially at the hands of Ulster or Lenister) then Ulster will be the provence of choice for returning expats and ambitious Connacht players. You already saw the difficulty Munster had attracting players over this summer. McGahan eventually got a stop gap centre from the Queensland Reds bargain "everything must go" bucket. And now even he has faded from the match day squads. It is CRITICAL that we finish ahead of Ulster in this years HEC but I fear that will be down to a mistake by Ulster rather than any tactical brillance from McGahan.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Amazotheamazing


    They are playing much, much better rugby but, player for player its very close. I'd give Ulster the edge in the backrow and outside backs (incl. 12), Munster in the tight 5 (just), and we're probably even at halfback; Munster might just have the edge due to ROG's nerves though.

    Had Munster a full compliment to choose from and competant back's coaching, the advantage would be in Munster's favour.

    Depends which version of iHumphs turns up surely? He can be sublime, he can be sub-par.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    Well if you take the lineups and form as they are at the moment, Ulster are better.

    The key difference at the moment is the injury lists. In terms of their respective first teams, Ulster are only missing Jared Payne and Nevin Spence. With Paddy Wallace now back fit and Cave in top nick Spence isn't missed that much.

    On the other hand, Munster are missing a lot of key players. Put in a in form Flannery, Wallace, Leamy, Howlett, Jones and that team is transformed.

    On the basis of our backline's bluntness, we are seriously missing Dougie. We would not have won at home to Saints without him, his try beofre halftime was so crucial. The guy has been so key to Munster.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,468 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    Hmmm it's fairly subjective but what we do know is that Munster, while not playing great, are in the HEC Quarter Final and are third in the Pro 12. Ulster will also hopefully be in the HEC Quarter final but could also be in the Amlin Quarter instead and are sixth in the Pro12.

    By the time the Quarters come about Munster will hopefully have Felix Jones (to make his HEC debut), David Wallace, and Jery Flannery back which will greatly improve the team.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Amazotheamazing


    The A game on Friday will be very interesting, wish I could make it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Cpt_Blackbeard


    Depends which version of iHumphs turns up surely? He can be sublime, he can be sub-par.

    Same can be said for Murray, although his sub-par isn't as bad as iHump's. I'd pretty much have Murray/iHumph and ROG/Piennar cancel one another out but, when it comes to a big game in the HC, you'd be foolish to bet against ROG.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭durkadurka


    I don't really buy the injury argument. In the sense that you mightn't see some of these guys again.

    Eg wallace is 35, fla is 33 and his condition is chronic possibly, howlett may not play again for Munster, jones appears to be totally injury prone.

    I don't think you can really bank on all of these guys coming back for a meaningful length of time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Cpt_Blackbeard


    durkadurka wrote: »
    I don't really buy the injury argument. In the sense that you mightn't see some of these guys again.

    Eg wallace is 35, fla is 33 and his condition is chronic possibly, howlett may not play again for Munster, jones appears to be totally injury prone.

    I don't think you can really bank on all of these guys coming back for a meaningful length of time.

    What is the injury argument? None of the players mentioned may ever reach their peak again but, each one of them would significantly improve the current Munster team. Each and every one of them can be as good as anyone else in their position in the country; bar Jones and Nacewa but, he still has lots of time to try and reach that level.

    I don't think any other team in the country could face injuries to such important/talented players and still be competitive in both league and cup.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I don't think any other team in the country could face injuries to such important/talented players and still be competitive in both league and cup.

    Ah now you were doing well until this! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    What is the injury argument? None of the players mentioned may ever reach their peak again but, each one of them would significantly improve the current Munster team. Each and every one of them can be as good as anyone else in their position in the country; bar Jones and Nacewa but, he still has lots of time to try and reach that level.

    I don't think any other team in the country could face injuries to such important/talented players and still be competitive in both league and cup.
    I think the point is that Wallace is not to put to fine a point on it old, injuries are more common amoung players who try to keep playing at that age, any other province would have retired a player with the injury record of Flannery or Jones.

    When you take those three out who can be expected to be out you have much less of an injury crisis you just have a succession crisis in not having the players needed to compete and replace the regularly injured players or those that are too old.

    I made the same point to Ulster fans last year who went on about Ferris not being fit as a reason to for defeats. No matter how good a player is if they are made of glass you can't make if x was fit we would be uber arguments.

    That said I do agree that Munster have a terrible record with injuries. Is S&C doing their job properly and does their need to be a review of the medical staff down there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    The A game on Friday will be very interesting, wish I could make it.

    I wonder who will play in the backrow, all our "squad" backrows are injured! Plus Holland will be in the HEC 23.

    DOC2.0 at 6, O'Hara at 7? No idea who would be at 8!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,591 ✭✭✭✭phog


    durkadurka wrote: »
    I don't really buy the injury argument. In the sense that you mightn't see some of these guys again.

    Eg wallace is 35, fla is 33 and his condition is chronic possibly, howlett may not play again for Munster, jones appears to be totally injury prone.

    I don't think you can really bank on all of these guys coming back for a meaningful length of time.

    We're not talking about injuries into the future, these guys are out injured now and would be getting H/C gametime if they were around, the Irish lads were on the plane to the W/C bar their injuries and Howlett is a huge loss right now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Cpt_Blackbeard


    Ah now you were doing well until this! :pac:

    I knew that wouldn't be too popular but, we're missing a backbone of brilliant players. I had actually an equated like for like players in both provinces bur, I had forgotten Horgan/BOD when I originally made the statement. Leinster would be in a better place in the backs and in a similar position to Munster in the forwards (although I doubt anyone could cope as well as Munster with injuries at hooker :D )

    I think the biggest reason why it is affecting the Munster team is that we have had a slew of retirements, some forced/early, so the injury situation couldn't have some at a worse time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭durkadurka


    phog wrote: »
    We're not talking about injuries into the future, these guys are out injured now and would be getting H/C gametime if they were around, the Irish lads were on the plane to the W/C bar their injuries and Howlett is a huge loss right now.

    Agreed but the point is I believe that realistically some of these guys are gone for good. Or may make very little meaningful contribution in the future.

    Edit : by the way I still hear people complaining about Hines being gone and that's ridiculous to me.
    ( I think I the kind of person who, once he breaks up with a girlfriend, she's immediately deleted from all records and written off!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    That said I do agree that Munster have a terrible record with injuries. Is S&C doing their job properly and does their need to be a review of the medical staff down there.

    You would wonder, at times, what they're up to.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,591 ✭✭✭✭phog


    durkadurka wrote: »
    Agreed but the point is I believe that realistically some of these guys are gone for good. Or may make very little meaningful contribution in the future.

    Edit : by the way I still hear people complaining about Hines being gone and that's ridiculous to me.
    ( I think I the kind of person who, once he breaks up with a girlfriend, she's immediately deleted from all records and written off!)

    That could very well be true, but they went in after the start of the season, very little could be done but get on with it and in fairness that's what Munster have done. They're still a huge loss and most fairminded pundits would recognise that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 607 ✭✭✭ed7890


    I wonder who will play in the backrow, all our "squad" backrows are injured! Plus Holland will be in the HEC 23.

    DOC2.0 at 6, O'Hara at 7? No idea who would be at 8!

    Maybe Shane Buckley, he's another lock/6 I think.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,468 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    You would wonder, at times, what they're up to.

    Wallace, Jones, and Flannery were injured with Ireland and Howletts was a freak on field injury.

    I don't think the S&C coaches could do much about any of them.

    I'm not really qualified to say what the story was with Leamy....but I'll have a go anyway. I think it might have been hereditary....just a gut felling :pac: or maybe too much off the field extra ciricular activities :pac::pac::pac:


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,069 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I get what people are saying about some of the lads that are injured being a bit old/past their prime, but whatever about big games, having players out mean that squad rotation can't be done, players get tired if they're playing week in week out. Also, the more experienced players bring so much more than just playing, they take the lead in training, develop younger players, help with analysis of opponents.

    Every team is affected by the world cup or injuries, Munster have been lucky with their ability to eek out results in difficult circumstances, we are the only pool leaders without a bonus point, in fact we are 1 of 5 teams without a bonus point, saying that we are the only team who has won every game so there's something good happening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    Wallace, Jones, and Flannery were injured with Ireland and Howletts was a freak on field injury.

    I don't think the S&C coaches could do much about any of them.

    I'm not really qualified to say what the story was with Leamy....but I'll have a go anyway. I think it might have been hereditary....just a gut felling :pac: or maybe too much off the field extra ciricular activities :pac::pac::pac:

    Yeah but then you have to consider the chronic nature of Fla's injury. Ditto with Hurley, Borlase was out for a good bit last season. Currently have Sherry, Gleeson out injured. I'm sure there's more.

    I said it earlier, but Ronan should have never been risked yesterday.

    It may just be confirmation bias, but to my mind the injury rate seems higher than at say, Leinster.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,468 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    Yeah but then you have to consider the chronic nature of Fla's injury. Ditto with Hurley, Borlase was out for a good bit last season. Currently have Sherry, Gleeson out injured. I'm sure there's more.

    I said it earlier, but Ronan should have never been risked yesterday.

    It may just be confirmation bias, but to my mind the injury rate seems higher than at say, Leinster.

    Well off the top of my head Leinster have BOD, Fitzgerald, Sykes, Strauss, Horgan, Berquist, and Dom Ryan out.

    I remember reading somewhere a couple of years ago that 33% of a rugby squad will be injured at any one time. When you think of the nature of the game that would seem about right.

    I don't know what the story is with Sherry, Hurley, or Borlase but Gleeson's injury seemed to be impact related as opposed to a strain. I didn't see what happened to Ronan but was his not impact related. I think the one last week was impact related i.e. he fell on it awkwardly.

    If there were alot of players pulling up with strains, and muscle tears I think you could then question the S&C coaches, not so much with impact damage.

    There was an interesting article in the Independent with Bryce Cavanagh during the week http://www.independent.ie/sport/rugby/munster-follows-ac-milans-example-of-trying-to-hold-back-father-time-2985053.html

    Munster follows AC Milan’s example of trying to hold back Father Time

    FOR followers of the 'beautiful game', the names glide off the tongue... Franco Baresi, Alessandro Costacurta and the finest of them all... Paolo Maldini.

    Aside from being wonderfully graceful Italian footballers, these players are linked together by their remarkable longevity (Maldini and Costacurta played top-level football into their 40s, Baresi to 37) and the fact they drew their inspiration and energy from the same source -- AC Milan.

    The Italian club has become renowned for enduring excellence, a trait that persists into their current squad where you find the likes of Clarence Seedorf (36 in April), Filippo Inzaghi (38), Alessandro Nesta (36 in March) and Gianluca Zambrotta (35 in February).

    It cannot be simply the benevolent weather and urbane surroundings of Italy's trendiest city, so what makes Milan the Tir na nOg for footballing superstars?

    The answer lies in Milanello, a state-of-the-art fitness centre 50km north of Milan and home to the famous 'Milan Lab' -- their High Tech Scientific Research Centre.

    The brainchild of the club's Belgian doctor Jean-Pierre Meersseman, the lab was set up in 2002 as an "ideal combination of science, technology, IT and psychology".

    Every aspect of a player's make-up is analysed, from diet, sleep patterns and characteristic movements down to the type of shoes and clothes they wear, with the stated aim being to help athletes achieve the optimum performance, reduce the risk of injury and help the decision-making process central to the well-being of every professional athlete.

    The lab's development has been traced back to the signing of Fernando Redondo from Real Madrid in 2000. The Argentinian was a sublime talent but when he signed for Milan, his body did not meet the standard required and he barely played during his four-year stint at the club.

    Now, players have to meet exacting standards before they join. Including David Beckham. His two loan spells at Milan may have been viewed as a cynical attempt to cash in on his marketing pull, but Beckham would not have made it through the doors had it not been for his talent and capacity to defy the passing years.

    Beckham was put through rigorous tests on his first visit to Milanello to determine if the then 33-year-old was worth the risk. Milan found him to be a remarkable athlete and (after asking him to wear mouth support until he got dental work done because they felt his balance would be affected) predicted that, like Maldini, he was capable of playing into his 40s.

    The Milan philosophy is simple: take every conceivable step to ensure new signings meet the criteria demanded and, when you have quality, seek to preserve it for as long as possible.

    ******

    Never has the Milan approach seemed so relevant for Irish rugby. The success of the game in this country over the past 10 years was founded on what became known as 'the golden generation'. Some have already passed into retirement, others are now into their 30s, and losing the bulk of them in a short space of time would leave a void that could take several years to fill sufficiently.

    The 'Holy Trinity' of that generation are Brian O'Driscoll (33 later this month), Ronan O'Gara (34) and Paul O'Connell (32). O'Driscoll is currently recovering from shoulder surgery but hoping to return fitter and stronger, O'Gara is playing as well as ever and O'Connell, looking back to his best after his injury problems last season, has just signed a two-year deal.

    And there are many other international-quality players in their 30s like Mike Ross, Gordon D'Arcy, Donncha O'Callaghan, Denis Leamy, Leo Cullen, Jerry Flannery and Tom Court that Ireland need to hold onto as long as possible to compete with the better-resourced nations.

    ******

    Bryce Cavanagh has been head of fitness with Munster for the last six months.

    The Australian's CV makes for impressive reading. He has just come from a five-and-a-half year stint with AFL heavyweights Sydney Swans, where he worked with Irish players Tadhg Kennelly, Brendan Murphy and Chris McKeigue (he describes the Irish players as all having a "ridiculously good work ethic") and has also worked with the West Indian cricketers and NSW Waratahs Super rugby team.

    Now it is Munster and, in the short time he has been with the province, Kavanagh has introduced methods that have won the admiration of the players and charted a path for the future.

    Chief among them is 'The Maldini Project', based on the example of the AC Milan legend and designed to get the maximum benefit from Munster's 30-something stars.

    "It has become quite holistic," says Cavanagh. "Go back 15 years, and rugby broke players and the physio's job was to fix them. You flogged players until they broke and the cream rose to the top, the ones that didn't get injured became the best -- we can't do that anymore, certainly not in Ireland.

    "We don't have the same depth of playing talent as South Africa, England, New Zealand or France, we have to look after our talent.

    "So you look at it holistically, you look at lifestyle, the physical, the mental. It's no longer the big three of strength, speed and conditioning, it's way beyond that.

    "We are running a project called 'The Maldini Project' and Paolo Maldini is the role model we are using for these guys. Why are you thinking it is the end just because you are a certain age?

    "You can't buy experience," adds Cavanagh. "You can't just turn to a guy who is 23 and give that experience, so these guys are ridiculously valuable.

    "If we can physically sort their bodies out, the only thing that will cause them to retire is the mental issue of whether they want to do it anymore.

    "So, we need to treat them differently with this project and a lot of it is about the time they are away from training. We can control what they do for two or three hours, but what do you do for the other 22? That comes down to lifestyle and the holistic approach again.

    ******

    "The overall project is ridiculously tailored," he adds. "I have an over-riding edict with the guys who are working for me, based around controlled individualisation. It's not 52 individual programmes, we need to group guys and then cater for them individually on the edges.

    "We run a programme called 'flippy, floppy, stiffy' so the guys who are floppy are put into a group, the guys who are quite stiff are put into a group and the guys who have a bit of both are put into a group, rather than a blanket approach.

    "Our guys come in every morning and we do a thing called a recovery market, how well have you recovered? It give us an indication of can we push this guy today or do we have to pull him back?

    "Rugby is an intensely physical game and it is our job to give these players the tools to make sure they can take the punishment well into their 30s. We have got a group of players in Munster at that stage and some of them are in the cream of the crop in their position in the world -- why should they stop playing if we manage them correctly?"

    Why indeed? At a time when maintaining our best home-grown players for as long as possible has assumed monumental importance, Cavanagh and his 'Maldini Project' might just be pointing the way forward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    Well off the top of my head Leinster have BOD, Fitzgerald, Sykes, Strauss, Horgan, Berquist, and Dom Ryan out.

    I remember reading somewhere a couple of years ago that 33% of a rugby squad will be injured at any one time. When you think of the nature of the game that would seem about right.

    I don't know what the story is with Sherry, Hurley, or Borlase but Gleeson's injury seemed to be impact related as opposed to a strain. I didn't see what happened to Ronan but was his not impact related. I think the one last week was impact related i.e. he fell on it awkwardly.

    If there were alot of players pulling up with strains, and muscle tears I think you could then question the S&C coaches, not so much with impact damage.

    There was an interesting article in the Independent with Bryce Cavanagh during the week http://www.independent.ie/sport/rugby/munster-follows-ac-milans-example-of-trying-to-hold-back-father-time-2985053.html

    Confirmation bias then!

    Ronan was turning to follow the play and his knee went.

    Read that article myself, good approach to have.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,769 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    Hard to say at the moment. I think Ulster would be doing better in Munster's pool to be honest - they'd certainly have some bonus points to their name at this stage. Likewise, I think Munster would be doing worse in Ulster's pool. However, if Ulster were in the same position as Munster in the final 5 minutes of their first two pool games I'd expect them to lose both. Munster still have a certain ability to grind out wins (and even losing bonus points) that Ulster yet lack imo.

    Ulster are most definitely on the way up though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭profitius


    Clegg wrote: »
    What did ye lot think when Will Greenwood said that Munster are now Irelands 3rd best province?

    On recent form I'd say he's right. Ulster have been something else in the Heineken Cup. They have some great players in top form right now and the yeam as a whole is playing great rugby. Their pack is playing out of their skin and the back are very dangerous.

    Don't take this as an insult to Munster. I'm just wondering what you think about the current state of Irish provincial rugby.

    I'd go along with that. Munster are probably one of the worst attacking teams in the tournament. Thats saying something and is a very bad reflection on Jason Holland and McGahan.

    At least its an area Munster can rapidly improve on if they make a few changes in the summer.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 607 ✭✭✭ed7890


    Unfortunately the word on MunsterFans is that Ronan has done his cruciate. What a sickener, the guy was going so well.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement