Denver Broncos Thread

Arguing with tebow, is like arguing with a girlfriend. We get angry and say crap we regret, and they just take the moral high ground and dont get sucked into the war of words.. . ..

....
..

.

:O:O:OTEBOW IS A GIRL!

Peyton Manning wrote: »

Urlacher, being the bitter old sod that he is, took a dig at Tebow after the game saying when asked what he thought of Tebow - "He’s a good running back, man. He runs the ball well".

Obviously it's lost on Urlacher that it doesn't reflect well on him and his defence that a "good running back" was able to make 18 completions for 191 yards from the start of the 4th quarter.

Of course, Tebow was nothing but the embodiment of class when asked about Urlacher's comments - "I guess that's a compliment coming from a good player."

One of those players is going to the Hall of Fame and it won't be Tebow.


/Takes Bitter cap off


Not surprised he comes out saying this. I'm very worried that the players will turn off with 3 games to go.

He had statistically struggled at the Redskins too...but that all changed yesterday!

tallaghtoutlaws wrote: »

Can you not even take a defeat without saying you played badly? Tebow was sacked 7 times ffs. Tebow threw an Int. He was passing all over the shop and your running game was going nowhere. But yet its a fluke?

Its funny when someone blames blown coverages for Tebow making passes Broncos fans say no it was Tebow being good but when you get spanked by Detroit you say Oh it was blown coverages and mistakes that won the game for Detroit :rolleyes: Detroit pressured your QB and because of this won the game. They kept Tebow quiet all game long and aren't you guys telling us he is winning the game for you? Well guess what happens when a D-line own him? Calling it a fluke is nonsense.

Im saying that the fact we played that badly was a fluke. And it was, to be fair. The only other game we got blown out of was @Green Bay, and thats @ Green Bay with Rodgers putting up 6 TDs ffs. Every other game was within a score, with defeats of 3, 3 and 5 points respectively in the Oakland, Titans and Chargers games. Not unreasonable surely? Detroit kicked our asses because we shat the place out of it that day, we couldnt buy a 1st down, tebow got owned by their line and he had way too much to try and do in his 5th start.

Deleted User wrote: »

Thanking the picture. I'm still waaaaay behind you guys to have a proper opinion on the matter.

be grand, another 50 pages of discussion on the man and i'd say you'll be up to speed :pac:

Chucky the tree wrote: »

The lions wasn't a fluke. You just came up against a team who have a average defene and offense. Every other games it's been against either a team with a terrible offense or terrilbe defense.

So we're 35 points worse off than a good team then? I didn't think the AFC west was that bad now... No team loses by 35 points and plays well

It was a fluke that we got thrashed like that, as i said, all but 3 of our games have been decided by a score. The 3 bigger wins being one dished @ Oakland and two taken @ GB and DET. Green Bay were just on fire and DET we were ****ing shocking bad.

Any explanation won't do it justice...just wait till you can watch it!

Damn they've found Tim's secret

Can anyone see the correlation between Eli and the giants in 08 and tebow?

Tebow to down the unbeaten packers in the Super Bowl in feb?

spiralism wrote: »

Glad to see a football mind like Belichick sees what Tebow's got, while also praising the team. No cheap shots from him or the Pats players about Tebow being a "good running back"(urlacher) or being "pissed if we lose to them" (briggs)

There were rumours Belichick was interested in drafting Tebow as a project QB in the later rounds in 2010, imagine this forum if that had transpired!

eagle eye wrote: »

I think McDaniels took him where he did because he felt BB would have taken him.

Just thinking there now, you got Tebow and Demaryius Thomas doing their thing of late and then Zane Beadles, Eric Decker and J.D. Walton and its a really good draft.

In a couple of years time in a redux of the 2010 draft they could be getting and A+.

Had perrish cox not been a ****ing idiot it would have been even better, he looked great in the year we had him but he threw it away. 09 draft was an abomination but 10 draft was pretty class in hindsight. Kinda summed up McDaniels in a nutshell, there was actually a good bit he did that was very good, but there was just more that was ****ing awful. Thing is, i still to this day will maintain that he was one of the best around in understanding the Xs and Os and getting the right players in. Before he came in we had a combination of some of the worst characters and lazy useless ****ers i had ever seen on a team and now we have a ton of high character leaders, most of whom he brought in.

In 08 our standout players were the likes of:
Cutler: Has grown up a lot in the last 2 years in Chicago, but was an awful child back then as evidenced by his tantrums in the whole row with McDaniels as well as a very infantile and stupid spat with Philip Rivers which he was solely to blame for.
Marshall: Idiot, as he keeps showing again and again.
Hillis: Good player, liked him but he's stirring up a lot of trouble in cleveland over a contract all year

Aside from this, we also had a shower of castoffs on Defence that would make the Pats secondary today look like all pros and one that was coached by Bob Slowik, one of the worst Defensive coordinators EVER (look at his track record). That year I remember on a number of occasions where the opposition would pick up a 20 yard gain and the player who tackled him would do a celebratory dance, it was ****ing shambolic.

McDaniels came in, cleaned house and brought in respected veterans from good teams. Guys like Dawkins, Gaffney, Buckhalter, Holliday, Ty Law, Goodman and Paxton, while getting Mike Nolan in to coach them. It created the right attitude, one which has largely endured. More players are left from the McDaniels days than from the Shanahan ones, of which only Bailey, Woodyard, Clady, Kuper, Royal , Larsen, Thomas, DJ Williams and Dumervil remain. McDaniels left us Dawkins, Goodman, Ayers, Tebow, Thomas, Decker, Beadles, Walton, Colquitt and Mays as quality starters. Haggan, while a rotational player, was signed by Shanahan to fill a gap in 08 but i credit his rise to a decent player to McDaniels, who kept him as a rare defensive holdover in 08 and made him a captain. Out of Shanahan's holdovers, only two actually are veterans in Bailey and Williams, nearly all the rest were recent enough additions before he got fired.

The problem with McDaniels was that he had the same problem as most Pats Assistants turned coaches-he was a bad man manager. He fought with everybody, Cutler, Marshall, Scheffler, Mike Nolan-you name it. Because of this the team turned mentally fragile after the 2009 collapse and it went pear shaped after THAT defeat to Oakland when he cruelly berated staff members and players in view of the owner in order to illustrate who was in charge. After that, the team just quit on him.

Personnel wise i'd give McDaniels a B, Coaching wise an F. He was a lot like Eric Mangini when he was at the Jets, he brought in a rake of good players that they still have there but was just a crap man manager.