Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Why it is in YOUR OWN INTEREST not to strike or protest at this time (mid May 2010).

145679

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    EH?!

    Dont I get to voice an opinion now???

    Lol... How is this "pushing a message" any more than anyone else writing here... If I had made it an announcement or put a flashing image on the front page, then yes. But I posted like every Dick or Harry or indeed Tom.


    I'm actually fairly hacked off at that comment... We founded boards so that everyone could have a say, including us thanks very much. Whats wrong with me using it like everyone else can and does. :mad:


    DeV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    DeVore, Thanks again for creating another interesting discussion.

    I read your OP when you first created the thread and I don't think I understood it as much as I do now. You had an aweful lot in your message and, having read it again, I spotted more stuff I think I understand.

    <tldr>

    Anyway, let's get this bit out of the way because it's like a sore thumb on this thread. I think your discussions would go bit easier if you just embraced that you founded boards.ie and that you're the face at the moment. You first moved the thread to this board and have edited at least one users post. You're not posting as a regular user and until you are a regular user, you just won't be. No matter what you said, people think of you as the face of boards.ie right now. Simple as.

    Onwards to the actual topic. I've seen you get involved in some very interesting threads recently and even got involved in some of them. This thread has got me thinking and it's based on what you have posted.

    So, you say it would be best to avoid the attention of the people who make money on a country defaulting. That they come in droves once our default in on the line. I guess this makes sense as I'm not 100% sure what happens to us if we default. Do you have any idea of how bad the country would get if we default? Please share your opinion if you do.

    Next up, do you still think we will not default? The posts you made in back in May sound like that and you have not said you have changed your mind. If we are not going to default, do you have any idea of how bad the country will end up? I see that Lenihan has said we are in for a pretty harsh budget and I was wondering where you think our austerity measures might be heading.

    Finally, I've been reading Ireland has cancelled the rest of it's bond auctions for 2010. Some discussions on other websites suggests that the markets might read into this and think Ireland is not doing well. Some have even said that it might lead to a lot of international money leaving Irish banks. The main worry seems to be that it's a sign that we are gonna have some kind of default. What do you think of that?

    </tldr>



    (Hmmmm, maybe I should've started this post with Dear Auntie DeV :))


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭ch750536


    Agreed, a little out of order, other than you stickied your 'truth about the banking crisis' thread. Kinda fair though as you didn't sticky & close so was open to debate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,227 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    stepbar wrote: »
    Mind you I agree with everything but I wanna know where the pot of money was borrowed from?

    We borrow from each other, don't you know.
    PS we are broke as well.
    DeVore wrote: »
    EH?!

    Dont I get to voice an opinion now???

    Lol... How is this "pushing a message" any more than anyone else writing here... If I had made it an announcement or put a flashing image on the front page, then yes. But I posted like every Dick or Harry or indeed Tom.

    I'm actually fairly hacked off at that comment... We founded boards so that everyone could have a say, including us thanks very much. Whats wrong with me using it like everyone else can and does. :mad:

    DeV.

    You opening post had some very interesting points, but I also agreed with some of the points raised by ch750536 in his analysis of your post.

    I am not sure if you got so many people to thank you because they agree with you because of their fear of the unknown, or because they respect your opinion as leveled headed mr boards ?

    Firstly I think it is now impossible for the current government to implement drastic cuts and try and convince the people to stomach them after their hisotry of wastage and incpmetence.
    Secondly how can they come up with a four year plan (shoudl realsitically be much longer plan) to come out of this mess when they will not be in power probably in the next year ?

    Now I have serious reservations about your pot of loot that the EU and ECB have put together to sdatve off the type of attacks that speculators made in the 90s.
    Yes in the 90s currencies were independent and could be hit one by one, but today I believe the Euro is one major shock away from drastically dropping.

    I believe the whole thing is a house of cards, where I reckon the comic piece by Clarke And Dawe's about the Euro is closer to the truth than anyone gives it credit for.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D0VhS8qXT0

    How can broke economies continue to lend to each other ?
    We are lending to Greece for fecks sake. :rolleyes:

    The euro is doing well at the moment in currency markets against the dollar as it is down due to speculation about the Fed easing monetary policy further to support the economy.
    The euro or "the Single currency" is seen as a counter balance to the dollar.
    But also watch how Australian Dollar and Canadian Dollar are also up against the dollar due to stockpiling of commodity-linked currencies by central banks who have been adding them to their reserves.

    To me the trully surprising thing about yesterday was how the markets reacted to Ireland's 50 billion money pit, but was it luck ?

    Was it really because it is a time "when the euro was benefiting from its position as the anti-dollar – dollar holders feared the potential negative implications of renewed quantitative easing."
    (quote from Derek Halpenny of Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ in FT)

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    Firstly I didn't sticky this, one of the mods did and without consultation with me. I don't even know who did. Personally I don't think people read stickies as much as regular threads in fact ... :)

    Secondly I wanted to open a discussion at the time because some crazy sh!t was being bandied about and a few loonies had just attacked the gardai at the gate the day before, the Greeks were in full riot and denial.

    The institutional speculators were attacking the Greek bond markets and were on the prowl (have you noticed we don't hear so much about them now? And that Merkel basically banned them from trying it on with Germany??

    Now things are calmer , if you exclude Joe the property developer and his over abundance of cement mixers, so the biggest danger which I outlined then may be passed. The dial has been in recess since then anyway so fleck all has changed and now I would say peaceful protest is advisable if you so wish. Strikes IMHO are cutting off your nose to spite your face basically.


    People seem to think I'm some sort of apologist for the banks and the government! I'm certainly not... Google last years SSF comedy night to see my routine on what I think should be done with the banks and the bankers and the bail out.

    My concern is for us, the schmucks getting screwed (cos either way, we're in the smelly stuff) and how we minimize how much pain we're in for. That's it. Making things worse WITH NO CLEAR UPSIDE, is nothing but self mutilation for the sake of anger.
    Vent all you like but don't drag me with you....

    I'd like to hear two answers from those suggesting direct action...

    1.who fared better so far in this disaster, the Irish or the Greeks??? We have a bigger problem then they did but who has come out of this so far in better shape??

    2.can you describe for me, in prose or whatever, a believable, potential scenario arising from direct action at this time which will make one jot of difference??
    Bear in mind that when the old folk protested the government responded because they wanted to protect their reputation and were thinking about the next election. This government won't respond like that because they have nothing to lose, they know they are in for a hiding come the next GE so they simply don't care what you do outside the dial..... That's why they have cops out there!! So what I'm genuinely asking is for someone to describe the events in a popsicle future where direct action has a POSITIVE effect on our situation..... Paint me a picture of future events I can believe in and get behind rather then socialist rhetoric.

    DeV.
    Ps, this was written on an iPad and it makes quoting and editing hard, I'll respond to the well made points above when'll, I get home.... :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    Pps, I hate ipads auto correct feature sometimes :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,866 ✭✭✭irishconvert


    DeVore wrote: »
    F

    1.who fared better so far in this disaster, the Irish or the Greeks??? We have a bigger problem then they did but who has come out of this so far in better shape??
    Ask that question again next year when the December budget is hitting home. Things are not too bad now but it will be a whole different ball game then.
    DeVore wrote: »
    2.can you describe for me, in prose or whatever, a believable, potential scenario arising from direct action at this time which will make one jot of difference??
    Bear in mind that when the old folk protested the government responded because they wanted to protect their reputation and were thinking about the next election. This government won't respond like that because they have nothing to lose, they know they are in for a hiding come the next GE so they simply don't care what you do outside the dial..... That's why they have cops out there!! So what I'm genuinely asking is for someone to describe the events in a popsicle future where direct action has a POSITIVE effect on our situation..... Paint me a picture of future events I can believe in and get behind rather then socialist rhetoric.
    Everyone should down tools, assemble outside the dáil and refuse to go back to work until Fianna Fáil dissolve the dail and call a general election. We can't expect the people who got us into this unbelieveable mess to get us out of it. Did you watch Channel 4 news last night? It is frightening how bad a situation we are in. People want a new Government and that is what we should get.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 219 ✭✭CCCP


    I have lost faith in Irelands ability to manage itself, face it were Sh!te at running a country.

    Ireland has been screwed by the Irish. Our own greed has led us here and now we are baying for the blood of the government. Fact is, doesn't matter who is in power the structure of the state is flawed and will fail again and again. When I say Fail I mean, It will fail the common people, but serve the wealthy and powerful in the exact fashion it has been designed to do.

    I find it very very infuriating that the people behind this crises are walking away with a pension or bank balance that would be akin to winning the lottery for most people.

    I live on student income of about 13K a year, on which me and 2 dependents must survive, literally hand to mouth. How can a person earning 100K+ a year expect me to tighten my belt when he/she refuses to tighten his/her own.


    We need a country overhaul not a new party. The Euro and EU now has us at ransom, We are literally and severely screwed. Welcome to the new European union, very much like the old, monarchist Europe the only difference being that instead of blood bonding these rulers together, it's investments and money. and for us the working/middle class, or should I say peasants, it's life in the gutter as usual.

    This Won't change people, history teaches us that, there is no utopia. We can only change the government, and it's better then letting these cronies and crooks stay in power.

    A General election must be called and as devore says, Lets nail these crooks to the proverbial wall!!!!!!!!!!!! But unlike him I want it sooner rather then later.
    I would like to see how Cowen, Lenihan, or Harney etc would survive on 13k a year. I think we should give them the experience.

    I would love to see Brian cowen in the dole Que where he belongs, that's what happens to people who are sacked for incompetence and fiddling the proverbial till.

    Here is one Irish Voter saying that he demands a general Election to be called immediately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,227 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    CCCP wrote: »
    I have lost faith in Irelands ability to manage itself, face it were Sh!te at running a country.

    I figured that out years ago after seeing how lynch/haughey made a balls of things yet they were rewarded with election.
    Most Irish people still think we are run by some mythical system.
    Years ago it was the British so it was seen as ok to screw the system, but that was carried on by the Irish themselves post 1922.
    Even worse one of our political parties thrive at this, whereas the rest merely practice it a bit.
    FG and Labour are adept at pulling strokes and lining the system with their own when they get in, but they are in the halfpenny place to the arrogance with which ff do it.
    CCCP wrote: »
    Ireland has been screwed by the Irish. Our own greed has led us here and now we are baying for the blood of the government. Fact is, doesn't matter who is in power the structure of the state is flawed and will fail again and again. When I say Fail I mean, It will fail the common people, but serve the wealthy and powerful in the exact fashion it's designed to.

    I find it very very infuriating that the people behind this crises are walking away with a pension or bank balance that would be akin to winning the lottery for most people.

    I live on student income of about 13K a year. How can a person earning 100K+ a year expect me to tighten my belt when he refuses to tighten his/her own.

    This states political and economic structure will ensure that the greedy and powerful will rise to the top and everyone else will stay in their box regardless of who is in government. I detest Anarchy, but feel we would be much better off with a revolution. Why can't people understand that IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO IS IN POWER AS LONG AS THE STRUCTURE REMAINS THE SAME NOTHING WILL CHANGE. I'm quoting that from someone but can't remember who, but I feel it's true.

    I would rather see a communist Ireland then this state we are in now.

    We need a country overhaul not a new party.

    I know it is against the OP and lots of others judgement and hopes, but I firmly believe the advantage of the IMF coming in would be that we as a nation would be finally shocked into giving a sh** about the country long term and not looking for the quick gain quick short term fix.

    Lots of countries have revolutionised themselves and started afresh with new republics.
    In those cases the usual sharp shock has been defeat in war and invasion.

    I firmly believe our republic and the free state before it has been a failure both economically and socially.
    What have we to show for 80 odd years of self determination ?
    Mass emigaration, poor sustained growth, reliance on foreign aid and FDI, very poor social record due in large part to our cowtowing to the church which led to a disgusting history of institutionalised child abuse.

    Compare us to lets say Finland, a country that was ravaged in WWII and that had to live isolated under the shadow of the USSR for 50 odd years.
    We don't come out of that comparison very well.
    Ah but shure I will hear the refrain "aren't we better crack than them".
    Yes they have high taxes, but they have an unbelievably high standard of public and social services.
    They have built multinationals that can stand on their own two feed in the sphere of modern technology.
    We on the other hand bray about how much software we export when in affect it is really just being localised, branded, packaged by huge foreign multinationals out of here for tax reasons.

    My fear is that we, the coping classes, knuckle down real hard, live like puritans under a high taxes low incomes low services regime scraping by for the next 10 or 20 years with the only goal of watching our kids emigrate as soon as they leave school or college, like many generations before them in the hope of a better life.

    All the while the sons & daughters of the current crop of politicans, the sons & daughters of the current crop of bankers and the the sons & daughters of the current crop of business heads (developers/entrepeurs) will be setting up to start the ball rolling on the next get rich quick scheme for themselves.

    How many times will we make these mistakes with our eoncomy ?
    The 30s, 50s, 80s and now the 10s.
    How many more times will we allow connected individuals run banks as their play things, leaving us the normal unconnected people to pay for the ruins they leave.
    We had patrick gallagher's Merchant Banking Limited, we had joe moore's PMPS, we had AIB's ICI.
    We ended up paying for these through levies etc.
    This time we have a bigger mess and the levy will be much bigger.

    Surely to God somebody should have learned a lesson and tightened things, but no we just went on as before.
    Things have to change and people in Ireland have to start learning from history or we will be back here agin in 30 or 40 years time.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 219 ✭✭CCCP


    Devore your a Freemason right??

    If so I find it hard to take you at face value. I have a general distrust of fraternal groups of men who wear robes and partake in religious ritual.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,761 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    CCCP wrote: »
    Devore your a Freemason right??

    If so I find it hard to take you at face value. I have a general distrust of fraternal groups of men who wear robes and partake in religious ritual.

    Massive lol. You couldn't be farther away from the truth. I'll jet DeV answer this one, it'll be fun :-)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 219 ✭✭CCCP


    Papa Smut wrote: »
    Massive lol. You couldn't be farther away from the truth. I'll jet DeV answer this one, it'll be fun :-)

    If hes not a freemason then my apologies, you can brand me as mistaken. I vaguely remember reading he was a long time ago, but my memory may be wrong.:o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 219 ✭✭CCCP


    jmayo wrote: »

    I know it is against the OP and lots of others judgement and hopes, but I firmly believe the advantage of the IMF coming in would be that we as a nation would be finally shocked into giving a sh** about the country long term and not looking for the quick gain quick short term fix.

    I am inclined to agree with you.

    IMO In a better world Gemany would take us over, despite its history, we would be much better off with them calling the shots then our own gang of mullah prospectors.

    It pains me to say it as an Irish man, but maybe even UK membership would be better then this situation...

    I have a feeling that this country is heading from recession and economic downturn to another great depression.

    Thankfully i'm young, and although on a tiny income I am carrying a big stick:P so me and my wife may very well be heading for fairer shores in the next few years.

    I love Ireland, I love the Irish, but lets face it we're better at emigrating then anything else. Maybe I will follow in the old tradition and just feck off.

    Germany looks a hot prospect, it's unemployment is at it's lowest percentage in 18 years, But then again, judging by Brazils growth, maybe the developing world holds more prospects for a decent quality of life then this "first world" economy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,866 ✭✭✭irishconvert


    CCCP wrote: »
    I am inclined to agree with you. In a better world Gemany would take us over, despite its history, we would be much better off with them calling the shots then our own gang of mullah prospectors.

    I have a feeling that this country is heading from recession and economic downturn to another great depression.

    Thankfully i'm young, and although on a tiny income I am carrying a big stick:P so me and my wife may very well be heading for fairer shores in the next few years.

    I love Ireland, I love the Irish, but lets face it we're better at emigrating then anything else. Maybe I will follow in the old tradition and just feck off.

    Germany looks a hot prospect, it's unemployment is at it's lowest for 18 years, But then again, judging by Brazils growth, maybe the developing world holds more prospects for a decent quality of life then this "first world" economy.

    In a way they already have taken over us. All the big decisions are made by the EU.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 219 ✭✭CCCP


    In a way they already have taken over us. All the big decisions are made by the EU.

    Maybe they should just finish the job, at least we would have competent leaders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    Slydice wrote:
    So, you say it would be best to avoid the attention of the people who make money on a country defaulting. That they come in droves once our default in on the line. I guess this makes sense as I'm not 100% sure what happens to us if we default. Do you have any idea of how bad the country would get if we default? Please share your opinion if you do.

    The capital market speculation seems to have died down for now. I'm afraid I dont know what would happen if we defaulted, I doubt many do. I presume we wouldnt be loaned money again which would be very very bad for us, and truely fatal for Europe. I suspect that that wouldnt be allowed to happen by the ECB, we'd get a kicking but they have more to lose then we have and something would happen, probably the IMF would arrive which might be no bad thing long term but its bitter medicine as I understand it.

    So in the end I think Ireland has rather ironically ALSO attained that mythical status: "Too Big To Fail".

    Next up, do you still think we will not default? The posts you made in back in May sound like that and you have not said you have changed your mind. If we are not going to default, do you have any idea of how bad the country will end up? I see that Lenihan has said we are in for a pretty harsh budget and I was wondering where you think our austerity measures might be heading.

    I dunno if I said we wouldnt default, I dont know what I sounded like in your head but its always been a possibility. It would have been less possible when it was 22 Bn now at 39Bn it wouldnt seem beyond the realms by any means EXCEPT considering what I wrote above.

    I'm no guru and I have no crystal ball, what my opinion is is very much irrelevant. My first post was based on facts as I understand them and they havent been contested. Those facts matter, my opinion ... doesnt.

    Finally, I've been reading Ireland has cancelled the rest of it's bond auctions for 2010. Some discussions on other websites suggests that the markets might read into this and think Ireland is not doing well. Some have even said that it might lead to a lot of international money leaving Irish banks. The main worry seems to be that it's a sign that we are gonna have some kind of default. What do you think of that?

    This could be one of a few things.
    1. We might not want to ask and be told "feck off". That looks awful and precipitates bad things.

    2. We might have some agreement in the wings with Auntie Merkel

    3. We might not consider that we need the money at that exorbitant price for the rest of the year (we DID just raise a fair bundle).

    4. If we were going to default in 2010, it would be obvious by now and we wouldnt have been able to raise bond capital. So I doubt its that.

    5. I am not a financial advisor, I'm using logic, experience of banking systems and my communication skills to try to educate people about the best course of action FOR US ALL and to hell with the politicians, developers, bankers and cronies. If I could reverse NAMA and let Anglo fail, I probably would. If I was back a year ago, I wouldnt have considered bailing out the banks. Capitalism is based on risk reward and survival of the fittest, there should be no place for socialised losses and privatised profits.

    The words "at this time" in the subject should not be ignored, they are very pertinent and people keep putting words in my mouth.

    When I saw the soft budget of 2009 I genuinely went into the Boards office and said "we're fecked, they didnt cut deep enough or far ranging enough". A year later we have spent our way into a big hole with a budget deficit far worse and scarier than the property collapse.

    I dont think its time to smash open each others heads and feast on the goo inside JUST yet though... :):)

    DeV.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 289 ✭✭feicim


    DeVore wrote: »
    Screw the government, they are dead at the next election. I'm out for us now and I want to explain to you why our best option right now is to sit tight and ride this out.


    But you need to understand what an "institutional speculator" is to understand. I'll do my best to keep this simple and amusing, but its important you DO understand.


    A speculator is basically a glorified gambler. But a gambler backs a horse and his horse either wins or loses. Not so for the speculators. In their world the game plays like this:

    They pick a horse (country) they dont like the look of and they bet AGAINST it. That is, they buy a sort of insurance that says "if the country goes broke, the holder is covered". Now, imagine all the countries are lined up in the starting blocks aaaaand... they're off....



    Suddenly Greece is miles behind and Ireland, Spain and Portugal are bringing up the rear too.
    Now, the speculators who bought this special kind of "insurance" against the bankruptcy of those countries, well.... they find themselves in possesion of a (suddenly) very valuable and sought after piece of paper eh??

    I mean, wouldnt you like a "get out of jail free card" if you were heavily invested in the Greek government bonds?? Sure you would!



    So the speculators sell their insurance and make a profit. (they arent stupid, they never had anything in vested in those countries in the first place, they just speculated that insurance for those countries might be very handy to someone soon.

    Greece didnt need to go bankrupt for them to win, it just had to go down the tubes a bit from where it started. The speculators guessed right that it would, bought insurance cheap when the coutnry was kinda ok and sold it when it was looking dodgy. Nice chunk of change.



    Now comes the interesting bit. The EU heads have actually done something clever. They put a big big BIG sack of money on the table in the middle of Europe and said to the markets "wherever you go to speculate, we'll prop up that government by letting them borrow money from this here big pile of dosh!".

    Well, thats death to the speculators. Firstly their money could well be tied up in insurance that isnt going to pay off as described above because the target country wont be allowed to fail and everyone knows it so the value of any insurance is eroded!


    Secondly, money invested in the stock market that doesnt return any profit is in fact making a loss because it could easily have been banked and made a few percent. Thats bad for the speculators, their bosses will see that as a LOSS.



    Thirdly the country might even benefit from access to these new funds and then its AWFUL news for the speculators the country would become MORE secure and the insurance becomes LESS valuable... now they have made the cardinal sin of actually LOSING money. Bad bad bad. No bicuit.



    So, there is significant risk of significant loss for them and the EU is standing there with a 1 trillion Euro budget ready to fight with. No institution wants to take that on. Its just too scary, they could get burned badly. Money is tight remember, even for banks!



    So we're all good then?! Protest away?? Well no. If the speculators get a single strong signal that a country is internally going nuts, then EN MASSE they will attack. One or two of them would be no problem, but like pirahna the problem is when they all attack in a group.


    What they NEED is a single kick off point, kind of like a shotgun start at a golf course, everyone gets a clear GO GO GO signal. For Greece it was the strikes which led to the IMF.

    In every trading floor room I have ever been on there were constant displays of world news, SKy News, BBC, ABC, CNN etc on LCD tvs. We do NOT want to be on those screens. Ever.



    What we need to be doing now is saying "nothing to see here, move along to someone else, we're gold".

    Going out and protesting right now is NOT going to change anything, I'm sorry but do you really think it will? Has it ever before??


    But what it will do is bring the dog-pack here en masse.

    Save your anger for the election, contact your TD and wear his ear off, but to go on the streets and riot or appear to be supporting riots is lunacy.


    If you are in the Public sector, you DO NOT WANT to see the IMF come here, they dont care about you and they arent elected so they dont care if you dont like their measures, they will simply take control of the government coffers and issue your bosses less payroll. It wont be a "cut" as such, they just simply wont pay you.

    If you are in private sector, you might think "wooo, that sounds like fun, lets f*ck the PS again. Come on IMF". You are also nuts. Reaming the PS just means a whole pile of stoppages and our country, your country, gets trashed. Good luck selling your goods, or helping your boss sell his goods when no one can move in the cities and no one has any money to spend. Some of your customers are Public Sector remember...

    So what do we do? Lie back and think of Ireland? Well, ironically, yes. We take this shafting because we have no choice, we havent had since NAMA. But we should remember this and when the time of reckoning comes (its called an election :) ) we screw these bastards to the wall.


    Right to the motherf*cking wall.



    But we dont screw ourselves. Not now... cos we are the only ones looking after us now. Think clearly, think with your heads.



    DeV.


    I have to say I disagree with asking the Irish not to protest. The Irish are so passive in this respect already it is not right to give them any more reasons not to protest.

    If the government thought a street protest, about a particular issue, would badly harm the country, maybe the threat of a protest would achieve something and the government might take action on said issue and do something about it.

    Its a bit of a moral hazard, before long the government realises they can keep people off the streets by using a bit if scaremongering and spin. (or even better the public do this to themselves).

    The real problem is with our finances, that problem is so glaring and bad it kind of dwarfs street protests.

    A protest can achieve something - before it gets to the stage of actually protesting.

    Like this recent example.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,375 ✭✭✭metrovelvet


    Sorry, I know you boiled this down as simply as you possibly could. Is protesting a bad idea because it shows a lack of confidence in the economy and government?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I think It means that in our current financial crisis we're very vulnerable to international speculators taking bets against us. Protests would be reported all over the media(some of whom have a vested interest in our failure) and those who have bet against our failure and stand to make large wads of cash from that bet, would circle like sharks sniffing blood. I agree too.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,375 ✭✭✭metrovelvet


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I think It means that in our current financial crisis we're very vulnerable to international speculators taking bets against us. Protests would be reported all over the media(some of whom have a vested interest in our failure) and those who have bet against our failure and stand to make large wads of cash from that bet, would circle like sharks sniffing blood. I agree too.

    Ok so protests encourage bets against us? Why? Do they indicate instability or lack of confidence? The protests verify our economic failure?

    So basically it is in our interested to put on a big national poker face here right?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Pretty much. As DeVore put it
    So we're all good then?! Protest away?? Well no. If the speculators get a single strong signal that a country is internally going nuts, then EN MASSE they will attack. One or two of them would be no problem, but like pirahna the problem is when they all attack in a group.
    Mass protests would be a trigger for this feeding frenzy. These financial gamblers would only love it. Well they'd stand to make a fortune betting on it.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Thanks for the reply DeVore.

    What I see at the moment is that Irelands economic future is just not clear and what is clear is that it is still going down hill.

    Most of what I have been reading lately suggests the country is heading to the wall. The outcome I see being pointed to is either default or cash from the EU-IMF scheme or just cash from the IMF. The EU-IMF seeming to be the most likely for no other reason than the EU wanting to minimise the hit to it's pride.

    Of course, the Government might try to squeez the cash out of the people without any international help. This could lead to protests/strikes/riots or not. It's really hard to tell. Unions and groups who represent people in different parts of society seem to be keeping their heads down with the odd "don't come after us" announcement.

    I'd like to know what happens after any of those rescue or recovery type events but it's really hard to find anything online about it.

    My biggest concern would obviously be to not lose the small bit of savings I have in the bank. I'd say most people who have any money in a bank share this concern.

    Then, I'd also like to know what more "Austerity" measures are in store and the effect they will have on the people.

    I'd think it'd be a real shame if the country is screwed regardless of what happens and yet the current government gets another two years in office. Like you say, they are out in the next election and that's a recognition of what the people want right now.

    If the economy of the country is screwed and the people are powerless to change that, then I guess the country will eventually go through what it has to go through.

    It's just, I'd really have thought then that the one thing the people can change would be the government itself. It just sounds like the one thing the people could do to show the world that Ireland is sorting itself out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    DeVore wrote: »
    The capital market speculation seems to have died down for now. I'm afraid I dont know what would happen if we defaulted, I doubt many.

    no it hasnt were still around 6.5% which is extortionate


    since NTMA will not be issuing bonds for another 6 months and running down their reserves the attention has moved elsewhere for time being


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    no it hasnt were still around 6.5% which is extortionate


    since NTMA will not be issuing bonds for another 6 months and running down their reserves the attention has moved elsewhere for time being

    The bond yield rose to almost 7% without any protests. They rose because we have perhaps the most incompetent government in the world.

    These people actually thought that you could "talk down" an economy. the economy collapsed because of disastrous economic policies and an almost childlike understanding of how markets work.

    These same idiots now think that they can "talk up" the economy. constant repetition of "corner turning", calling the bottom and "drawing a line under it" while simultaneously sucking current and future money out of the economy.

    You are to be congratulated DeVore You have quelled the revolting peasants while the greatest heist in the history of the free state was carried out before our very noses. Our "leader" is still the 4th highest paid in the world and developers have been spotted all over the med relaxing in the sun while 4 million people pay for their gambling addiction.

    Suck it up peasants, don't bother protesting because that ship has sailed. The time to protest was before the guarantee, the nationalisation of Anglo, and the ineptitude that was NAMA.

    I don't know how anyone with any knowledge of economics can look at our situation and not realise that default is inevitable. It was from the time Seanie decided he knew better than anyone else.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Butch Cassidy


    DeVore wrote: »
    Going out and protesting right now is NOT going to change anything, I'm sorry but do you really think it will? Has it ever before??



    Protesting in Iceland forced an election.

    The OAPs protested against the removal of the medical cards and gained a significant concession in forcing govt to change policy.

    The head shop protests got new legislation drafted and ratified.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    Weak examples when compared with Greece and France, what did either of them achieve? The french simply trashed their own economy for weeks and got nothing. The greeks are still doing so with the same result.

    I dont like this bank bailout one little bit. I'm not in favour of bailing Anglo but not one person has painted a believeable picture of what MIGHT happen if we all took to the streets? What... suddenly FF will sit up and realise we dont like them and change their direction?


    Also, I'll point out *again* that the subject line includes the temporal phrase "at this time". That time was after the Greek riots which buried their country and while the bond and shares market was looking for someone else to skin. While we are now getting the wrath of the bond markets anyway (due to markets passing on the risk of a haircut on their yields) at least we got in and out in the mean time or we would already be in the loving arms of the IMF.

    Fr0G the time to protest was in that very narrow window between when NAMA was announced and when it was enacted. That was LONG before May when I wrote this.

    Protest is one thing, strikes and riots are another thing entirely.

    DeV.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    DeVore wrote: »
    Fr0G the time to protest was in that very narrow window between when NAMA was announced and when it was enacted. That was LONG before May when I wrote this.

    Exactly. But it is only when people begin to feel the pain in their back pocket they feel any motivation to get off their ass and demonstrate. That kind of "I'm alright Jack" self-interested mentality is what has led this country down the path of ruination, many a time.

    A lot of the anger is justified, but a large chunk of it is just people who put themselves into massive debt and are getting less government goodie bags. If more people were genuinely interested in society as a whole being better off, then far more of these protests would've happened probably even years ago, as many of our problems far preceded this crisis. The sad reality is most people will shut up once their slice of the pie is safe. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Thanks for another interesting reply DeV
    DeVore wrote: »
    Also, I'll point out *again* that the subject line includes the temporal phrase "at this time". That time was after the Greek riots which buried their country and while the bond and shares market was looking for someone else to skin. While we are now getting the wrath of the bond markets anyway (due to markets passing on the risk of a haircut on their yields) at least we got in and out in the mean time or we would already be in the loving arms of the IMF.
    This sounds like your thinking may have changed a little since your first post.

    but then you wrote this:
    DeVore wrote: »
    Fr0G the time to protest was in that very narrow window between when NAMA was announced and when it was enacted. That was LONG before May when I wrote this.

    So that sounds like your thinking may have changed but you think it's now too late and has been for a long time (evening before your first post) to get some change to our situation.

    How do you feel about riots, strikes and protests at this present time? Do you still think it'd be best to hang on until the next election is called for a change to happen in this country (even if it is 2012)?

    Oh and of course, how do you feel about peoples money in their bank accounts and what do you think is going on with newspaper stories about people being told not to worry about their savings?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Yeah lets keep waiting. Since May more bond holders have been paid off more billions put into dead banks another 10 billion borrowed to keep the quangos, elites, insiders and friends of FF in the manner to which they have become accustomed.

    These dead banks are now pulling the irish economy down with them. they have been unable to borrow money from the interbank market and depositers have been abandoning them over the past number of weeks. As I write the EU are discussing the terms of our surrender. But lets keep waiting, lets wait until the NPRF is spent and we have nothing left to negotiate with lets keep waiting... and waiting...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    And your plausible alternative is to .... what? Trash the gaff?

    DeV.


Advertisement