Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

3DMARK Scores!?

1…789101113»

Comments

  • #362
    Sqaull20
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭Sqaull20


    Thats a 320mb GTS?

    If its a 512mb one you should be getting around 15k for that clock speed.

    Why do you have a €700 cpu paired with a €120 video card?


  • #363
    BadCharlie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭BadCharlie


    Sqaull20 wrote: »
    Thats a 320mb GTS?

    If its a 512mb one you should be getting around 15k for that clock speed.

    Why do you have a €700 cpu paired with a €120 video card?


    Its a 320Meg version... & i know its crap "i got it real cheap think 70 odd euros.

    I plan on getting a better video card maybe after my next pay day. Just building my machine up slowly and having fun while i do it.
    Have it clocked at 4ghz now and stable. Its very quite as i have all fans set to low prob could clock it higher if i turned them all up and also add a fan to the heatsink. But i just want something quite and fast and will run 24/7.


  • #364
    BadCharlie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭BadCharlie


    benchmark18955kuz3.th.jpg

    Got SLI working on my 2 x 8800GtS 320meg cards. Gave me a nice increase in score.

    New video cards have been ordered but have not arrived yet. Might get over the 20k mark with them.


  • #365
    kearneybobs
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭kearneybobs


    iwas getting 11500 or so with my new rig

    XPS 630, Q6600 2.4Ghz, 4 gigs of 800Mhz ram, and 2 9800 gt SLI'd.
    I was wondering why my score was very low. so then i i ver clocked my quad core to 3.0Ghz and now i get a pretty good score of 15000 or so.
    There seemed to be a bottleneck with the processor.


  • #366
    Spiritine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭Spiritine


    Just spent ages downloading 3dmark06 lol,

    16362 3DMarks with no overclocking



    http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=9F943FB44EAA144BF6E236C3FD961241


  • Advertisement
  • #367
    L31mr0d
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    Murray135 wrote: »
    Just spent ages downloading 3dmark06 lol,

    16362 3DMarks with no overclocking



    http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=9F943FB44EAA144BF6E236C3FD961241

    That link doesn't work. What is your PC spec? I'm getting around the same score currently in 06 with my sig rig at stock


  • #368
    Spiritine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭Spiritine


    Hmmm wierd, still works for me lol

    Heres specs http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=57357366&postcount=22

    Whats yours?

    Took a screenshot of the link that....dosnt work for ya:D



    3dmark06.jpg


  • #369
    Spiritine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭Spiritine


    maybe u cant see the link cause im using the free trail version of 3dmark, also it says this for me too in the edit page

    Please note that this result has been produced using display drivers which have not been validated or approved by Futuremark and will not be visible on default result search on the ORB or on the Hall of Fame. For a list of currently approved display drivers for your hardware, click here

    the drivers are from the nvidia site lol, so i dunno wat thats about, anyways....thats prob y it dosnt let any1 else see it


Advertisement