Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1198019811983198519862002

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    So it's a zone enduring conflict or a zone holding up a ceasefire? You are contradicting yourself. Surely if it's ceasefire there should be no reason to stop any adults legally travelling there, with legal cargo, they know the risks as all travellers do. As I said I don't hear you arguing this same treatment for any other country in the world.

    How exactly do people sailing to Gaza with food and medicine paint Israel in a bad light? What am I missing here? You still aren't explaining the actual problem with it.

    Should people who you believe "paint Israel in a bad light" (which I disagree bringing biscuits on a boat is doing) be banned from going to any other countries?

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    What's the issue with the lack of the free press in Gaza? Sure, we've got twitter posters giving us the inside track…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,157 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    The flotilla proved that Israel doesn't want food and aid going to a population under controlled starvation. I'm not sure there's a reasonable excuse for boarding the boats and abducting the passengers in international waters. All the arguments against on the thread seem to revolve around not liking the people on the boats or thinly veiled "Israel has the right to do whatever they want to the Palestinians".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,809 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    So you don't know how many Gazans have been killed by the IDF since the so called ceasefire. Ok. Do you care?

    Next question...Given there is a ceasefire, which only the IDF don't abide by, why aren't Israel allowing in sufficient aid to feed the innocent men, women and especially children? Why are all the aid agencies begging the international community for help?

    Before you respond with irrelevant waffle, here is a link from MSF which I don't expect you to read. I bet you were glad when MSF was banned from Gaza.
    Deliberate restriction of food and aid led to alarming malnutrition in Gaza | MSF

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,961 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I keep saying that supporters of Israel are probably much further to the right of the German public who elected Hitler in 1933. They are fully aware of the numerous (believable and verifiable) accusations of genocide and war crimes and either don't care or actively support the war crimes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Hold on…you're here asking me a question and expecting me to answer, and this is how you phrase it? Insulting me…seriously, grow some manners and get back to me, otherwise jog on….talk about arrogant patronising!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,809 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Where were the insults exactly? I was trying to educate you on why the flotilla was formed. They were honest questions. Defend yourself man.

    As expected though. A runaway. So you were just looking for attention until the questions got hard.

    Are you jealous that good people had the will to try and help starving people?

    Did the Gazans ask for food? The level.…

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Well I haven't been rude to you and you still haven't given me a straight answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,058 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That's the view of a pro-Israeli trying to lessen the fallout. The world is still talking about the brutal treatment and actions of Ben Gvir.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    no. You never have. Hence my engagement. You’ve always been courteous.

    I fully agree with Israel being able to check, vet, challenge, allow or refuse a the free passage to Gaza. It’s Israel in the middle of this conflict (in ceasefire now), not these Europeans sailing there.

    If Israel feel (and I strongly suspect they do) that these flotillas are anti Israel, it stands to reason Israel won’t allow them free passage to Gaza. Why on earth would they allow all these people into Gaza that are clearly one-sided?

    So, it’s not my call as to why they’re refused. It’s Israel’s call. A call I fully agree with. You don’t. That’s your call. I think I’m right and Israel is right here, and you don’t. Not much more to it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    and another thing.. these selfie flotillas expecting free passage to Israel, yet on their way there it’s insta video after insta video (for their likes) and on them they’re slating Israel and calling Israel a terror state and everything else, and people are surprised and outraged that Israel aren’t so keen to allow them free passage to Gaza? Huh?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    What's your take on the colonisation of the West Bank and Arab East Jerusalem?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Thanks appreciate it.

    Israel may feel these people are "anti Israel", but you haven't explained why you fully agree with them.

    Surely being in possession of a brain chock full of opinions of your own, you can explain (even to yourself if not to us) why people travelling legally to a place that is not Israel and is in a ceasefire, with a cargo of only food and aid, could possibly be damaging or dangerous to anybody, or how that act is "anti Israel" - to justify to yourself them being illegally aprehended in open waters and detained.

    It seems you fully agree with Israel, whatever they do, even if you don't understand why? Apologies if I'm categorizing you wrong.

    I'm sure you agree bringing food to Ukrainian women and children is not anti Russian, it would be humanitarian, and Russia should not be allowed to stop this. Because it would be bonkers advocating for that imo. But you seem to apply the same bonkers situation to Gaza when not really knowing why you are doing it.

    And one more thing you could maybe think about - if Israel is, as is widely alleged, committing genocide and ethnic cleansing against these people, let's say hypothetically, would you still agree with them not allowing anybody to land and document what is happening? I would appreciate an answer to this thanks.

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    ...but they aren't going to Israel. People say bad things about different countries all the time. I'm sure you are no different.

    Do you think any other countries should be allowed to stop people who say mean things about them from travelling to countries that aren't their own?

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭random.stranger


    There's been plenty of documentation of rape of prisoners in Israeli prisons, floatilla participants have explicitly said their treatment was not as bad as what Palestinians receive.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/criminal-probe-launched-into-leak-of-detainee-abuse-video-idfs-top-lawyer-goes-on-leave/

    Edit:

    The really revealing thing about this case is the public outcry in Isreal over charges being brought against the rapist, resulting in his release, while the lady that leaked the footage was imprisoned.

    Five reservists were formally charged since the video was leaked in 2024. Among the charges they faced was using a "sharp object" to stab the detainee near the rectum.  

    https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20251103-israel-arrests-ex-military-legal-chief-who-leaked-video-showing-abuse-of-palestinian-detainee

    In October 2024, a UN commission found thousands of detainees were subjected to "widespread and systematic abuse" in Israeli military camps and detention facilities that amounted to a "war crime and crime against humanity of torture".

    From same article.

    Post edited by random.stranger on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,157 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    We get it, you don't like these people, but what gave the Israelis the right to abduct them? Try to look past your internet rage and assess the laws broken here. Posting on Instagram from a boat isn't illegal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,961 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    If they are activists and trying to draw global attention to their campaign, wouldn't you expect tons of content from them on social media?

    If we go back to the Suffragettes 100+ years ago, their campaign for the women's vote saw them embark on a whole series of crazy publicity stunts and eye catching incidents (and frequently even arson, violence and terrorism) in order to draw attention to their cause.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    that was a mistake about them going to Israel. I meant passage to Gaza. But Israel control the influx of people here into the areas. And of course they do. They have the might and power to do so.

    It’s Gaza s and ‘Hamas Gaza’ that are/were a huge threat to Israel, so of course Israel will be very wary and careful on who goes in and out.

    And when you have groups and groups of foreigner people wanting free passage to Gaza, who have clearly displayed their anti Israel views and stance, then absolutely I’d agree with Israel stopping them.

    Two families side by side who have been at war for decades. One family clearly physically superior. Then dozens other families from outside want to take the side of the weaker family, and are openly hostile to the stronger family. No idea why anyone should think the stronger family wouldn’t/shouldnt stop this..

    Anyway, the flotillas never ever believed, or even actually wanted to get to Gaza. It was never about that. The latest one absolutely knew they weren’t getting there. Because Israel had already stopped previous flotillas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    they were not abducted. That’s a nonsense. Intercepted, detained, held and released. Of course, anyone wanting to slate Israel will lap up the abducted narrative, just like they’re lapping up the beaten/starved and tortured narrative.

    And who said posting on Instagram was illegal? And bringing in internet rage? What are you on about?

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,725 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Do you object to Israel being called a terror state, but what else should we call them when they are engaging in state terrorism? Is it that you dispute the attacking of civilians infrastructure and engaging in collective punishment is by defintion state terrorism. What military objective is achieved by destroying much of the Agricultural land in Gaza? When asked about this by the BBC the IDF declined to comment. When Russia attacks civilian infrastructure the EU is clear about what it is, but maybe you see it differently



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    You are missing the point….whether I believe or these flotilla lads believe Israel are a terror state matters not a jot…what does matter is what Israel believe, and Israel do not at all believe they are a terror sate, hence any these flotilla lads, who are expecting free passage to Gaza, and how dare Israel intercept them…the arrogance these lads.

    Expecting free passage to Gaza, when Israel control this passage, and on their way they are publicly hostile to Israel and then whineging and moaning when they are intercepted, and then making up fanciful tales of beatings and sexual assaults when they are detained, and released.

    And I don't object to anyone calling Israel a terror state. I don't believe they are, but also, I don't believe them to be a state of virtue either. But when you are surrounded by arab/muslim states that want you destroyed, then I'll be a little less quick to start labeling them as terrorists when they act to stop these threats



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Hamas and the IDF/Israeli leadership are the two families in your analogy right (assuming you aren't advocating for Israel and Gazan civilians to be targeted for the crimes of those representing them)

    Because then, in my book, whether the flotilla people said mean things about Israel or not - they are delivering food and aid, not guns and bombs, to an independent location that is currently in a ceasefire. There is no harm with what they have on the boat, it is clearly for civilians, and I do not understand why you "fully agree" with them being illegally detained when you are unable to articulate why landing there could possibly be dangerous to anybody. Its like you just fully agree with Israel even when you don't understand why.

    And this my last q- I'm sure I have worn you out- would really appreciate if you would answer genuinely as it's rare I get any engagement outside of sneer and slander. It is a hypothetical q from prior post:

    if Israel is, as is widely alleged, actually committing genocide and ethnic cleansing against these people, hypothetically, would you still agree with them not allowing anybody to land and document what is happening?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    It has not been internationally legally verified that a genocide was committed, and not everyone agrees on this.

    Tell ya now, Israel certainly went too far from my following of it all, something I have said before, but I do not believe they commited genocide. But if they really have, then yes I think the might of the international community should push to full access to all the facts.

    And, ya know it’s nice from time to time on this thread to have a casual and real and respectful back and forth, minus the arrogance and sniping and patronising that seems to be very prevalent against any posts that may be seen as too pro Israel. It really is a strange thread from this point of view. So much pile on against any posters that aren’t full on against Israel. I think lot posters disappeared because this. Me included

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,396 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    People need to go and visit majority Muslim countries.

    All it seems is that they latch onto are Muslims = potential terrorists and rapists.

    Indonesia is one of the most beautiful countries (collections of islands) on the planet, the people are amazing, as friendly open and welcoming as you’ll find anywhere.

    I really don’t understand the hatred of over 2 billion people based on the horrific actions of a tiny minority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    so are you accusing anyone who posts more in favor of Israel as hating 2 billion Muslims?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,725 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Given what have i outlined to you, why don't you consider them as a terrorist state. If you believe they are a democratic state, how do you square that with illegally detaining protestors in international waters? How do you know their accounts of mistreatment are untrue? Bear in mind b'tselem has documented widespread misteatment of Palestinians by the Israelis.

    Israel are hardly surrounded by states that want to destroy them. Alot of Arab countries, notably Saudi Arabia and UAE are quiet friendly to Israel in private. In any case even if they were, it does not give them licence to engage in mass war crimes and illegal annexation of land in defiance of International law. In fact it's quite the opposite, if, as its supporters would have you believe, it is a democratic state with western values, it is incumbent upon them to do their utmost to abide by international law. Deflecting to whataboutism about the lack of standards of non state actors and others undermines that claim and is a poor argument.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,396 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    It is an emotive topic for sure, I've taken a lot of flack myself.

    And sorry but you didn't answer the Q at all. I know genocide hasn't been legally verified yet (yet the evidence imo is clear).

    If Israel were committing genocide on these people, hypothetically, would you still agree with them banning people from going to Gaza to document it? Doing so would hurt Israel after all.

    You don't believe it's happening anyway, so nothing should really preclude you from giving an honest answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,877 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I did answer.. read it again.full access. That would mean entry by the relevant authorities from the international community


    “But if they really have, then yes I think the might of the international community should push to full access to all the facts.”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Miniegg




Advertisement
Advertisement