Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1165316541656165816591838

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,297 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Whatever about some of the guys (Keenan, Baloucoune etc), I think there is a very clear argument that Zac Ward and JJ Kenny wouldn't be playing pro rugby if not for 7s. Both had been overlooked by the provincial academies, and were only still in the system at all because of 7s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭jimbob955


    Great points about the 7s, it was definitely a different type of "academy" and clearly has produced a few different players.

    I think the global sevens calendar is too expensive and not very environmentally sustainable.

    I wonder could they launch a smaller, cheaper, regional type 7s competiton. Like a Euro 7s to run in the Autumn or Spring. Bring in countries like Spain/Port/Germany. Would help T2 countries and also Ireland in developing some different talent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,541 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Humphreys killed the 7s because it was Nucifora baby

    Where are you getting this from? I'd say it had more to do with keeping finances in check.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,424 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    EEuropean 7s exists already. It has been in place alongside world sevens series for decades. It was through that that we qualified for world series when we started back in 7s a decade ago. Its restructured since with different names. But when we entered a mens team in 7s back in 2015 f9r f8rst time in long time we entered at division C level and worked up to division a/grand prix level where we were for a few years bef9re qualifying for world series



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,297 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    The language used was all about savings, and unquestionably it's a factor (allied with the fact that the 7s doesn't generate any money in and of itself), but the purported savings (€500k per season) are not that material in the context of the scale of the IRFU's finances.

    It was highly associated with Nucifora - he was described as the driving force behind it (he pretty much immediately launched a pro 7s programme in Scotland as soon as he took over the performance director role there too), and does look to me as a way for Humphreys to put his own stamp on his new role.

    Financial backers of the 7s programme (David Barry) spoke out saying they weren't even consulted or given a heads up before the announcement was made to cut it, so it doesn't look like they even made attempts to see could they procure more funding to further close that €500k gap. This is a direct quote from him, who, once again, is a guy who provided substantial funding to the 7s programme over the past decade:

    "It’s hard to accept that this decision was taken solely on financial grounds as I cannot see any tangible effort expended during the so called consultation period to solve the purported funding challenge. A sad demise to a wonderful programme!".



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,525 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I find it hard to believe running a 7s programme cost as little as 500k.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think that was the funding gap the IRFU covered after other investment.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,525 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,541 ✭✭✭✭phog


    It doesn't, but there was an external benefactor who covered some of the costs too. We don't know what his conditions were in funding the program or for how long more he intended to fund it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    sponsors, benefactors, Olympic funding maybe?

    The players were paid peanuts also.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,297 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    It's very widely reported that that is the annual saving to the IRFU, including in articles citing IRFU sources. Given the blowback they've gotten for this, if the savings were more substantial than that then I feel they'd be very quick to get that messaging out there.

    As per the comment I posted earlier from the guy who had provided some funding support to the programme for years, it doesn't look like they went to great lengths to see if they could further close that funding gap either (given they didn't even pick up the phone to that benefactor).

    Post edited by FtD v2 on


  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,303 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    there certainly was olympic funding through the OFI, and Sports ireland funding for olympic qualification efforts as well.

    personally i think the main reason for pulling from the programme was due to the changes being introduced at 'world sevens' level which would have made it even more loss making for countries not in the top 8 of the world, which we would never be without major investment.

    remember Team GB pulled its programme for both men and women as well. And thats after being amalgamated for a few years due to the costs involved.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Was gonna say - I kind of thought the World Sevens series (sorry, SVNS) was kind of dead anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Reasons why Team GB quit, along with no qualification for the Olympics

    Reasons for the Programme Changes

    • Financial Pressures: The primary reason cited by the Rugby Football Union (RFU), Scottish Rugby Union (SRU), and Welsh Rugby Union (WRU) was the financial strain of maintaining full-time sevens programmes. Sevens does not receive central Olympic funding like some other sports, which added to the challenge.
    • Loss of the London Sevens Leg: The cancellation of the London leg of the World Series contributed to a financial shortfall, removing a key revenue stream.
    • Pathway and Development: The unions felt the previous sevens model was no longer the best development opportunity for players in the 15-a-side game. The new camp-based approach is intended to better integrate sevens into the existing player development pathways.
    • Olympic Qualification Mandate: World Rugby mandated that England, Wales, and Scotland combine to compete as Great Britain on the World Series circuit from the 2022-23 season onward to align with Olympic status, a move met with some controversy among fans who preferred to see their individual nations compete. 

    In terms of England, they have multiple clubs in the "Prem" so did they need another route? Ireland is totally different.

    Wales are also a disaster area at the moment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭JeanRasczak




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,424 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Because its a very different thing for womens rugby compared to men. Womens 7s allows more professional contracts for women who dont have same opportunities for playing professionally as men do with 15s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭OldRio


    But women's 7s have an opportunity to gain professional contracts unlike the men's 7s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    I responded to a post saying 7s was dead

    If its dead for mens would it not be the same for womens?

    I dont see how it is different in terms of pro contracts eithers? the 7s is a route for players to get game time and potentially get into a 15s contract



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The Sevens world series has massively cut back on the number of teams and I think possibly on the number of events. I don't think it is long for the world. I don't follow it closely, so I'm happy to be corrected, but that was the impression I got.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,424 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Its different for women because of the way the game is set up and professionalism of the 15s game compared to mens game. the womens game isnt anything like the mens in set up or should they look at following mens structures. 7s doesnt have to be a route into 15s



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    It doesn't have to be but it can be for Ireland because we only have 4 provinces.

    You can have a core of 7s players and then other players who drop in/out with the view of been 15s players longer term

    Shutting it down just shuts just closes that possibility and to me it was done as Nucifora was the person who brought it to Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,541 ✭✭✭✭phog


    me it was done as Nucifora was the person who brought it to Ireland

    I really think this is a daft conclusion to come to. The probability is not matter what Humpreys thinkers with, it will be a Nurcifora baby, will the take always be, well he's only doing because Nurcifora started/implemented it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,297 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Genuinely have no idea what you're trying to say here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,049 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It would have been nice to have kept it, but what would you axe instead of it?

    When the IRFU is running a huge deficit, hard decisions have to be made and tbh the number of pro players it identified is a pretty low return on investment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,297 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    They ran a €4.2m deficit last year. There isn't tremendous detail in the annual accounts, but they report €9.6m of Admin & Overheads expenditure (comprising €5.4m Salaries & Pensions, €1.5m of Professional Fees, €1.0m of Office Maintenance, €640k of Miscellaneous Admin costs, €536k of Rates, Rent, Insurance etc and €447k of Governance Costs).

    Some of those are insufficiently clear, and the €1.5m of professional fees looks pretty high IMO.

    Amongst some of the other cost line items, there's a €5.4m charge lumped under Men's Professional Game costs (broken out separately from Player & Mgmt Costs - €39.6m and National Tours, Camps & Squads Costs - €1.3m) and I've seen others speculate that the pretty significant expenditure on committee members etc travelling to away 6N games and committees etc is likely lumped in here.

    I don't know the details of this, but people have been griping on the expense on committee members for years now - business class travel, expensive hotels, expensive dinners, free match tickets etc.

    To me - the bigger question is around the long term sustainability of the RWC in its present guise - it is completely illogical that the participating unions run enormous deficits the years they compete in that tournament.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Is the huge deficit not down to the World Cup year? that was the big issue

    Plus the reasoning was not to save money but to take the money and give to the academies so its not a saving just a reallocation of money

    Looking at previous players from 7s and number of players from some of the provinces I think 7s is probably able to claim more



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Not sure what the point is here apart from calling someone opinion "daft"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Thats the bigger issue, even if Ireland won the World Cup(please) they would have still come out of it running a huge deficit that year and the IRFU from recollection said at the time they have to put that into all plans for the years inbetween to finance going to the World Cup

    That means less money going into rugby in Ireland to play in what is supposed to be the Premium Rugby Competition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,622 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It's an absolutely mad situation for unions to be that financially compromised by the WC. How is it remotely sustainable?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,974 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The sport is growing all the time. It should be profitable to play in a world cup very soon.



Advertisement
Advertisement