Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Farronshoneen Roundabout

17891113

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Not very pleasant...just get on with it! Point A to B...it's not sightseeing.

    Your point about motorists not having any business using the city roads, unless actually working in the city is flawed, when it is one of the main traffic arteries available to commuters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭914


    I have said this hear before, returning the Quays to four lanes will not fix the issue.

    I remember as a delivery driver around Waterford in the 90s and early 00s traffic was often backed up from the bridge back past SETU Cork road campus.

    From the bridge up Summer hill back as far as Norris's and up the yellow road back as far as Heffernans car sales..

    The by pass was built and the outer ring road and it reduced the traffic massively, but here we are again as waterford and it's surrounds population increases.

    The quay never actually had four lanes the whole length, and the stretch that had four lanes never really functioned as four lanes, especially west bound on the Quay.

    As the Quay never worked as four lanes, is the current layout the solution, no, but does it make it safer for other road users and pedestrians, I would think so.

    If you did have proper cycling infrastructure, it's not going to make everyone switch to bikes but it should begin to change the next generates attitude to alternative transport.

    Take the park road, newtown, dls and waterpark, three schools in a few 100 meters, the mornings is crammed with cars dropping kids off, imagine proper cycling infrastructure there and a large percentage of the kids actually cycled to school. Traffic would reduce dramatically.

    You say we are not the Netherlands and you are correct, but Waterford is a small city and is very accessible via a bike, but how do we do it. Not token gestures for a start, proper financial funding is key.

    Take farronsoheen roundabout, with proper funding the pedestrian crossings could be under the road.

    The Dunmore road, could be designed in a way where you remove a footpath from one side and have a bi directional cycle lane on that side with the road in the middle.

    If you think, on the left, footpath, road in the middle and on the right segregated bi directional cycle lane, plenty of zebra crossings to allow pedestrians/cycles to cross to the side they need to travel on, or if funding was no issue, a cycle alone all along the river sure like a bilberry with plenty access points to the dunmore road.

    Inside active travel is about placing white paint on the ground which is not effective.

    Cars will always be the way for our generation but that can change for future generations if proper infrastructure is in place.

    Arguments like, "stick to your bike, I'll stick to my car" certainly won't resolve the issue, if we do all stick to our cars that hour trip you take will become 90 minutes.

    Post edited by 914 on


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    On yer bike? 😂🤣😅
    You must have spent a good hour thinking about that witty response, well done.

    4 lane highway?
    Maybe stop watching so much American content. 🙄

    I look forward to many decades of you being disappointed and sad while you sit in traffic, all the time you can think about how you could have been there in 12min on a bicycle 😂

    Active travel and changes to give priority to buses etc are here to stay, it'll be lovely when urban areas have their speed limits dropped down to 30km/hour as well…its all happening eventually and it'll save lives and improve urban areas.

    Waterford isn't Amsterdam, but an awful lot of what has happened in Amsterdam happened in the past 30-35 years. Amsterdam used to be a car hell hole where they made awful mistakes knocking fantastic buildings to build massive roads.

    But they realised it was making the city worse and reversed things over many, many decades.

    Post edited by Cabaal on


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal



    Have done it thousands of times on a non-electric bike over the years,

    My route was IDA on Cork Rd, up the Folly and then up past St Anne's to just after Farran Park. Lovely commute on the way to work, I used to pass hundreds of cars.

    Coming back I'd feel it a little. But that was on a non-electric bike.

    These days I have an electric cargobike (road legal), it would be no bother at all going up those hills and I'd go twice as fast down the hills as the bike is very heavy 😄



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Waterford has a bypass for a reason,

    Taking the quays when your destination isn't in the city centre and then complaining about the traffic (you've helped create) is outright silly.

    Its hard to have empathy for people who don't value their time.

    Imagine if lots of people were up in arms because they decided to not drive on the m50 in Dublin and then complained about how long it took them to travel from the red cow interchange to Dublin airport on an alternative non-tolled and busier route.

    The question you'd rightly ask is why they didn't take the m50.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    You're living in cuckoo land if you're equating the Outer Ring Road to the M50!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Hodger


    That's a very narrow way of looking at things. There are plenty of genuine reasons for people to drive rather than cycle, and it’s not just about "bad habits." You’re ignoring the reality of people's lives.

    Scenario 1: Take a lad like Davey, who has to bring his elderly mother for a doctor's appointment or the dentist. Do you honestly expect him to put his elderly mother on the back of a bike and cycle her to her appointment? It’s absurd.

    Scenario 2: What about local musicians who have a gig in town? They have guitars, amps, drums, and stage equipment. You hardly expect these musicians to try and cycle with a full band's worth of gear just to get to work and perform a gig?

    Scenario 3: Look at the people over in Ferrybank who work out the Dunmore Road, maybe at the hospital or other businesses. If it’s a day where it is raining heavily, you hardly expect them to cycle over the bridge and get soaked before a 12-hour shift?

    The thing is, people who support these anti-car measures do not seem to live in the same real world as everyone else. Right so, if say 50% or 70% of people were to stop using their cars altogether, that is a massive loss in motor tax revenue and fuel duty. Where do you propose the money comes from to replace that lost tax revenue?

    Furthermore, looking at the politics of it: last year we had both local and national elections and there was no one from the Green Party elected to the council here or to the Dáil. Therefore, there is absolutely no mandate or public support for these green policies being forced on us.

    We all know the Local Property Tax was increased recently, and retail rates are sky-high. But guess what? We don’t have elected councillors who were actually voted in by the people having an actual say over the planning matters that affect people's daily lives. I call it a form of taxation without representation. We have high retail rates and increased house taxes, yet the councillors we elect seem to have zero power over these planning issues.

    If the Revenue wasn't directly involved in collecting the Local Property Tax, I would not pay it out of protest over this lack of democracy in our planning laws. I would fully support a boycott of local house taxes, and I think businesses should start a boycott of the retail rates, because we are all being affected by this utter green fcukology.

    Only last week another local business in town announced they will close shortly before Christmas. Well, I blame the council. The council makes it harder for people to actually drive into town, and that has a direct knock-on effect that kills local businesses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 ✭✭Meatball.Martin


    Wow. There you go. A well thought out and structured point of view. Said everything a reasonable person would. All anyone wants is to get from A to B in a reasonable amount of time. Going to work, school, doing shopping & visiting people. Being stuck in traffic gridlock for long periods is utterly frustrating. And it's not practical either. How does a family of do a weekly shop without a car? Is it safe to let your child cycle to/from school? Would you want them walking home in dark at this time of year? Do you want all the people who travel to Waterford to work/college to use a bus, cycle, use an out of town park n ride? Not gonna happen. Ever.

    If someone wants to cycle so be it. But commuting cyclists are in the minority here in Waterford. The overwhelming majority of people drive. They should be able to go about their business in a reasonable time. The concept of 'Active Travel' is just another PR fad. And our WCCC wants to be the good boy. Box ticking. Adhering to best practice. Yadda yadda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    Perfect world: There should be dedicated bus lanes from Ferrybank to UHW/Ardkeen and from Clock Tower to SETU/Yellow House/Ballybeg. This would allow some attempt at proper public transport. Exact route layout to be decided. A second traffic bridge downstream past Tower Hotel is essential to create viable working solutions.

    JJ Kavanagh should up the frequency of their services or sell on to Bus Eireann.

    Its not a question of WCCC wanting to be a good boy IMHO. Its an attempt to acknowledge problems and initiate change, however unopular that might be. The Luas in Dublin has been a huge success because its dependable and frequent and used by everyone. Two bus lanes in Waterford built around a coherent plan, perhaps using wheeled tram type vehicles deployed on them would signify real intent. We cannot continue to expand car ownership 700k in 1995 to 2.4m in 2025 without some serious and ambitious plan. Something has got to give and I acknowledge all the scenarios outlined above which propose continued car primacy, but deciding that Oh well, everyone has a car, needs a car and has to be allowed use a car and must be facilitated to go everywhere they wish at any time in the city is deeply flawed when faced with the kind of exponential growth in car ownership and consequent traffic we have seen.

    By the way, our low density housing model of two storey semi detached spread like butter on toast across the landscape is the enemy of urban life as seen in most European cities and is really unhelpful in underpinning public transport in my opinion.

    I dont cycle, by the way, I use a car or bus locally and train to Dublin when needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭914


    I'm someone who both cycles and drives and feel I can honestly answer this.

    1. No

    2. No

    3. No

    As for revenue loss of people suddenly stopped using cars, I wouldn't worry about that, they'll get it out of us another way.

    I for one are not asking people to give up the car. I'm not someone who cycles 24/7, I probably do more driving than cycling, and you are right not everyone can cycle and other reasons can prevent them from cycle.

    I always take schools as an example. I'm 1.2km away from the kids school. We walk pretty much every day.

    I see people living 600m - 1km from the school drive their kids practically to the door while sitting in traffic for 10 minutes and then have to sit in traffic on the way back for another solid 10 minutes.

    Monkey see, monkey do, what will those kids do when they are older probably the same. If safe infrastructure existed we could see an increase of kids cycling to school and something they might continue to do into their adulthood, and not out of being forced to do it but because they might want to do it rather than sitting in traffic, it's a culture change and shift.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭914


    "All anyone wants is to get from A to B in a reasonable amount of time" but how?

    Take the dunmore road as an example, it's not possible to add extra lanes, Waterford population is increasing which means more cars on the road, more cars means more congestion, even if you remove every single active travel scheme.

    Its not and won't be possible to get from point A to B in reasonable time if more and more cars are on the road.

    By the way that's not me being "get out of the car and get on the bike"

    It's an honest question, if the population increases and more and more cars are on the road, how can you get from point a to b in a reasonable time?

    M7/N7 and M50 are prime examples, extra lanes added and often it's still at a crawling pace, no active travel scheme along those routes and it can often nearly take you longer to get from the N7 to the airport than it can from Waterford to Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Over half a century ago they knew the population was increasing but they didn't bother to plan ahead. 20 plus years Collins avenue was built and they keep building out that way but not upgrading the transport network properly. When they build the link road between the hospital and Williamstown they didn't think ahead again. Whoever thought it was a great idea to have housing estate entrances onto a ring road that requires people to have to go down to an already heavily congested roundabout to be able to turn around to get out to the industrial estates needs their head examined. Knightswood, Deer Park and any other estate they put in that area exiting onto an already badly designed traffic flow is going to put people off moving to Waterford and the surrounding area. Who in their right mind would move out there if they work in the industrial estate on the cork road or the other business on the Cork side.

    The link between the hospital and Farronshoneen could have been done with 3 lanes. An extra one on the hospital end to allow more traffic to turn left towards town and the third to allow left to ballygunner from Tesco Ardkeen roundabout. This with plenty to spare for footpaths and cycle lanes. When I was on the Dunmore road I used to avoid that whole area in the mornings. My rat run was right out towards Dunmore East, then up to Ballygunner and straight through towards the Airport road via narrow windy back roads onto the bypass, get off at the Tramore road. Up the Ash road towards Paddy Browns and then take another rat run through Skibbereen Road. As long as I got out before 8:10 I got into work in about 30 to 45 mins. Where I worked taking a bus was not an option.

    A big game changer would be more school buses and make parents use them. If a parent is not near a bus stop and that's their excuse to drive their kids to school then have designated drop off points that are also bus stops. Area's where there is a large carpark so they won't be blocking the roads. This will make the area's around schools safer as well. We all see the difference in the mornings when they schools are off.

    I don't know if it's feasible but maybe a survey like the census asking what people driving/travel habits are, also add in their shopping habits to see why people don't want to go into the main town now to shop. Ask the people who live here how they live, what would make Waterford more attractive to people and businesses alike and what would make their lives that little bit easier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    Your school bus point is true and the concerns you note are very widely shared, but otherwise your proposed solutions are car based. Three lanes? And when they are clogged up will we require four lanes? Somethings got to give. Traffic problems are everywhere. One poster has aready mentioned the M9/8/7 junction below Naas. Extra lanes were added and there is still a crawling queue.

    As for the idea that the traffic congestion would deter people from moving to Waterford, I suggest people go to Galway and see their problems. They do not have an Outer Ring Road like ours and it certainly has not deterred people from moving there. Our family, we do our shopping in the city centre (odd journeys to Ardkeen) and we walk or bus. Friends live in Tramore and they confirm that the bgreatly expanded bus service (360/360A) Tramore to the city centre has been hugely beneficial.

    Hindsight is 20/20 but when you say there was no forward planning, you have to ask how the ORR got built connecting all the radial routes into town and with a connection to the N25 and M9? That was forward planning, but any upgrades made in the past 50 years have been for cars starting with a four lane Rice Bridge, the Inner Ring Road which was the be all and the end all and then the ORR. Economic growth and an explosion in car ownership has overtaken what was planned.

    For people interested , we destroyed the medieval Wyse Bridge in Poleberry to ease it for traffic. We would not do it now! Ferrybank Village was destroyed for a four lane highway because a neighbouring council would not assist with prioritising a bridge in Newrath/Sallypark.

    We must find some other solution. While we are searching for the answer we need an interim solution and in my view that largely resolves around a bridge below the Tower Hotel to effectively create a real ring around the city. I believe the new pedestrian bridge should have been simpler and lighter, more fully pedestrian and cyclist focussed and completed simultaneously with a bridge below the Tower Hotel. But that, as they say, is water under the bridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Reality is people are going to keep driving and the Council, bike and active travel people need to understand how other people live. We have an aging population who are not going to rely on bikes and public transport to get around and the rest who have their own reasons are going to continue to use their cars. In our house we drive because of age and health issues. We do our shopping once a week in Tesco ardkeen and aldi even though it is not near us because there is a better selection of items. We don't buy small mince we buy large so it makes 2 meal which in turn means less plastic and general waste. We all have arthritis, mum has it in all her joints, my father in his spine and neck and I have it in my neck. Neck pain that causes shooting pains and numbness in arms does not allow for hauling shopping bags about and anyone who tells me to use public transport for shopping can go f*ck themselves. W are not going to go out every few days to get items which would mean having to buy smaller packs to fit into shopping bags and that means more plastic waste and time wasted.

    Less cars on the road also means less revenue from car tax, fuel, NCT's and the tax from items bought for cars. They are going to try and get that money back from other means so you might start seeing your pay cheques getting smaller and the carbon tax on heating going up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭914


    Again, I wouldn't worry about the loss in revenue, they would just find another way to get it from us.

    I don't think anyone is saying, everyone should get out of their cars and cycle or use public transport.

    The current road infrastructure can not handle the volume of cars and this will only get worse in the further.

    The idea is to provide an alternative for those who might/can or choose to cycle or use public transport.

    We as a family have dropped from owning two cars to just one, and this was from a financial point of view and not a "save the world" kind of notion.

    Due to that I cycle/public transport a lot more, for work, small messages etc, and to be honest I enjoy it now. I honestly think if the proper infrastructure was in place more people might opt to cycle/public transport if it was a viable alternative.

    For those who do cycle I think its fair to offer a safe commute as any accident between a bike and a motorised vehicle, there is only one winner, and it isn't the cyclist.

    I feel safe commutes would encourage more kids to cycle to school etc and keep up the habit into adult hood. Pre Celtic tiger it's fair to say, a vast majority of people cycled for work, small messages etc and we have completely lost that due to cars, the result an increase of traffic/traffic jams, decline in health across all age groups.

    As a prime example, someone in this thread stated it takes them almost an hour to travel 2.5km by car, and they take that over a 12 minute cycle, the reasons for not cycling appeared to be safety, so if proper infrastructure was there they could save themselves 45ish minutes a day of sitting in traffic, and it's not that they would have to cycle every day, perhaps when its nice they might choose the two wheels over four.

    What seems alien to some of us now was the norm not so long ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭johnnykilo


    It's pretty simple, if they want to get people out of cars, increase the bus route frequency to every 10 (peak) or 15 minutes (off peak). A bus every 30 minutes (when they actually turn up) isn't convenient for anyone. Yes, there might be a lot of redundancy and inefficiency at the start, but it needs to be put in place first if they expect to change behaviours and have local bus travel viewed as a reliable and viable alternative by the public.

    For the argument that the buses are still going to get stuck in traffic, they can have contraflow bus lanes and green only bus traffic lights, the same as they have in many places in Dublin, which also has ancient roadways that people have to contend with. It won't fix the problem, but again, if the use of these can allow the buses to get to where they need to go, say twice as fast as being in a private car, then it will encourage people to move to buses. I do appreciate that private car travel is still required by lots of people for lots of reasons, but there are also a lot of journeys that could be bus journeys if there was a frequent, reliable, convenient service.

    The problem is there's no will to do this. Bus Eireann operate a token local bus service that ticks the boxes but which passengers can't really rely on. It suits Bus Eireann but do you ever hear any passengers every singing it's praises?

    There should already be a bus route from the hospital out to the Industrial Estate/SETU. I, like many people went to the trouble to highlight this in the BusConnects consultation about a year ago. Anyone with half a brain cell could see that would be a good idea, and it would be able to link in with the other existing W services, a lot of which cross the Outer Ring Road. But is that in the new plan? Of course it **** isn't: https://waterfordnewnetwork.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html

    Again, just token gestures, no real appetite to change anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭Deiseen


    One thing that I always thought was massively lacking around Waterford is more walkways/cycleways between the dunmore road > Williamstown road > killure road > tramore road.

    You have to cycle almost into town or out to the ring road just to cut through from one place to another. Very normal in most places but they've probably left it too late now as the place is chock a block with housing now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    W5 bus from Clock Tower to UHW (described as Waterford Hospital" on the TFI map) is a great success. I cant understand why the W1 to Ballybeg, which I use on occasions, has destination as An Che (The Quay) as it travels outwards, nor can I understand why it doesnt go to Whitfield UPMC Hospital or at least indicate that destination on its literature.

    Its not helpful to have JJ Kavanagh operate a city bus service IMHO. A single operator would be much better.

    We need some proper bus lanes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 ✭✭Meatball.Martin


    Seems like the WCCC are not just content with the city centre but also annoying the residents of small towns in the county.

    https://www.waterford-news.ie/news/kilmacthomas-locals-bemoan-active-travel-scheme-in-waterford-village_arid-78486.html

    Losing the run of themselves altogether. The response by their spokesperson is passive aggressive at best. Playing the safety card to avoid discussing the matter like an adult. Unelected local government employees holding a bit of power doing what they want. It happened at Farronshoneen Roundabout. Again up in Alphonsus Road. It will keep on happening as they feel nobody can stop them doing what they want. Active travel mayhem... Coming to a street near you soon!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭914


    Some councillors seem to forgot active travel is not just about public transport and cyclists, its aim is to also improve safety for pedestrians by slowing car speed.

    In a week Waterford has had one cyclist and pedestrian killed on our roads. No matter how safe we all are accidents happened and a car, bus, lorry will always win over a pedestrian/cyclist.

    Other road users seem to have been completly forgotten about in this debate.

    Visually impaired and wheelchair users. Ask either and they will take a pedestrian crossing over a zebra crossing any day.

    I have a niece who is in a wheel chair and I would encourage anyone to borrow a wheelchair, sit in it and try to navigate around town, you will easily see, a pedestrian crossing and narrow junctions is a god send.

    Also close your eyes at either a pedestrian crossing, zebra crossing, narrow junction, wide junction and attempt to cross the road, and see which you would find safer. I bet pedestrian crossings and narrow junction win every time.

    Why? Right/narrow junction mean cars have to slow to turn, rather than just wizzing in. Pedestrian crossings hearing the green man and knowing the light is red gives more confidence in crossing.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal



    I love how you discribe safety improvements as "annoying residents'.

    I come from a town where three zebra crossings were installed at a busy 4 way cross roads, people locally bitched and moaned like crazy while it was being built.

    But now? Silence, anyone with a buggy, wheelchair, accessiability issues, with kids or who regularly walks it loves the crossings.

    Its far, far safer. They narrowed the roads to slow the traffic, installed the crossings and raised road surface and it forced motorists to slow down. Pedestrians, young kids walk to school safer now, numbers have even increased and some parents are happier with their kids crossing such a main busy junction.

    People don't like change, its human nature. its sad when we have people in their 20, 30 and 40's who only see car as king moaning about such changes, they sound like old cranks.

    Key to remember is you may not always be able to drive, you may not always be able to walk very well..or at all. You'll appreicate safe and well built infrususture, disability parking, good bus links.
    I've seen this with my relatives and family.

    A smart person looks forwards and wants a future that will benefit them, not copy the mistakes of countrys like the USA where if you don't have a car or cannot drive then you are f**ked.

    Waterford could have dedicated bus lanes on Rice Bridge and right down the quays the entire way and Parliment street with proper enforcement it could take lots of people off the road. With some planning some streets could be assigned to bus priority at certain times and use cameras to enforce these restrictions.

    A smart person would favour these changes because they realise less people driving is a good thing.
    But some people aren't very smart.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 28,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Oh dear, your scenarios are rather silly but sure.

    Scenario 1: So he has to bring her to a medical appointment each day in the city centre? Thats not an issue.
    But I expect his mother to have options also, not every elderly person is an incapable baby that people below 60 like to think they are.🙄

    We should have excellent bus links which priority over cars, his mother would have free travel so if she's able she would be able to benefit from having a fast, reliable and free transport option. Proper dedicated bus lanes throughout the city also benefit the elderly in other ways as emergency services can use them to pass 100's of cars easily, allowing them to assist people in their time of need.

    If she's not able bodied then because of active travel and bus improvements less people take cars needlessly to travel just 2km and travel congestion is lower so she can easily get a lift or a taxi faster then the current shitshow you want to maintain.

    Better public transport is a non-brainer, we're all getting older and we won't always be able to drive or walk properly, futureproofing for that situation is common sense. I've seen this first hand and its scary that so many seem incapable of thinking about the future.

    On top of this there needs to be 100's of more disabled parking spots in Waterford, given you seem concerned about elderly people I'm sure you are fully in support 100's of existing spots being converted to blue badge only? Our population is getting older so this is a smart move.

    Not to mention, better cycle lanes benefit those that are disabled. Its not uncommon to see olderly people on bikes wheelchairs or mobility scooters in cycle lanes in Paris for example. They can make far better process then on footpaths. (its easier cycle then walk for so, so many and ebikes make it almost effortless).

    Scenario 2: So this is a none issue. I've said time and time again that the issue is people driving THROUGH the city that are the problem.. If somebody is doing a gig in the city centre then thats exactly where they should be, doesn't matter if they are fixing pipes or playing music.
    I've said this countless times already and its rather worrying that you've missed this and chosen such a silly scenario. Stay out of the city centre if thats not your destination. 🙄

    Scenario 3: Not sure what it is with people in Ireland and their inability to buy decent rain jackets, its actually tragic. A good rain jacket and rain paints will sort you out in heavy rain, I've been bringing my kid to creche and school for years on a bike in all weathers. Rain is not a problem.
    If a small child can remain dry I'm sure an adult can. 😂

    Where's your scenario 4 where because of people insisting on just wanting to drive 1-2km to school, work, college emergency service get stuck in traffic results in a totally avoidable death or other life changing situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    anyone agree that this thread has gone off on a complete tangent/broader issues…….anyone care to get back to the original topic of the fearronshooneen roundabout ‘upgrade’/downgrade depending on your view point. For some strange reason the inbound morning q’s which were very rare last year immediately following the completion of the works are almost back to the level they were at pre the upgrade/downgrade works…? Plus the outbound evening q of traffic around 5pm to 6pm now regularly goes as far back as st Anne’s tennis club…..can this be down to the removal of the very short length of ‘left turning only lane’ at the roundabout…..or the new pedestrian crossings that were installed …??? Or is there something else causing the return of the q’s.??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭914


    I think the removal of the inside lane is definitely causing an issue. As the inside was used as a filter lane, which allowed cars to progress I feel.

    They could have left the two lanes present and just moved the zebra crossing back a bit, and they still could have achieved the same outcome with safety etc.

    For the life of me all the work that went on there and can't believe they left the pedestrian crossing on the Williamstown side right on the roundabout, I'd say that goes against all kind of safety crossings.

    I think that's dangerous to all road users, motorists, pedestrians and cyclists.

    1000072002.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Removal of the filter lane and pedestrian lights which block the roundabout from all sides. It was a very ill thought out piece of planning and there will be no recourse or ramifications for anyone only citizens trying to go about their daily lives. Traffic is a part of life but this was a poor decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,871 ✭✭✭Speak Now


    Driver behaviour at this roundabout not helping either. Cars knowingly coming in outside lane off the ring road even though they're not taking 3rd exit. Also when traffic backs up from solas red light drivers like to block up the roundabout for fear that a car might get out in front of them 😏



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Hodger


    Calling the elderly "incapable babies" is fairly condescending. It’s not just about being "able-bodied" enough to sit on a bus. It’s the walk to the bus stop, the standing in the rain waiting for a "ghost bus" that never shows up (a massive issue currently), and the walk at the other end. If public transport was actually "fast, reliable and free" as you suggest, people would already be using it. 

    Regarding the rain gear: "Just put on rain pants" is the standard cyclist answer, but it ignores those of us who live in the actual real world, and work requirements. People going to meetings, court, or client-facing roles cannot arrive dripping wet or spend 15 minutes changing in a bathroom cubicle.

    As you brought up an ambulance stuck in traffic. They say a photo paints many words.

    Screenshot 2025-11-24 9.45.24 PM.png

    Here we have a still frame of an ambulance stuck in traffic, because of the decision by the council to impose a single lane traffic system, a decision you support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Hodger


    While there would of been busy traffic at times at the roundabout, there was never bottle necks like there is now since the imposition of a single lane traffic system at the roundabout. Like they say a photo paints many words, what you see in this screenshot is a direct consequence of the Council's decision and the tiny minority that support it .

    Generated Image November 24, 2025 - 10_01PM.png

    514362602_10239724125418812_5922184310375556941_n.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Hodger


    The anger from residents often stems from the fact that these decisions feel completely imposed on locals without proper democratic consent.

    It’s hard to take the process seriously when meetings are purposely scheduled for 14:30 or 15:00. The council knows full well that the vast majority of people are at work, in college, or doing the school run at those times. It comes across as nothing more than a box-ticking exercise to say they "consulted" the public while ensuring minimal turnout.

    If they genuinely wanted feedback, they would hold meetings in the evening when residents can actually attend, and perhaps even take a ballot at the end to gauge real support. Paying Local Property Tax and commercial rates should come with actual representation. The power to make these planning decisions needs to be returned to elected councillors. They are the ones who get the feedback on the ground; if they know a traffic plan lacks local support, they should have the authority to block or amend it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭914


    Tbf that ambulance stuck in traffic is at O'Sullians/The Reg where there was only ever one lane.

    The day Tiernan recorded that video, a car broke down on Rice bridge outbound reducing the bridge to one lane which as we can imagine caused absolute havock.

    The solution for emergency services is an easy one, reduce the width of the central median, that way you still have single lane carriageway and vehicles have room to move aside if required.

    That problem no government funding would cover that works unfortunately.



Advertisement