Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Holly Cairns - 'Sinn Fein policies aren't left wing'

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,255 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It is funny I saw part of her interview on the late late. She appeared to be “open” in one respect. But “calculating” in another sense. For instance she was asked why she didn’t go into government if she really wanted to make a difference? She basically bluffed the answer people want “real change” etc.

    Now with the OP’s article above. It occurred to me that Cairns wants to position the Soc Dems as the defacto leaders of “the left”. Maybe someday merging with Labour but still “Soc Dems”.

    Cairns seems to want to create a vibe of something new, fresh, real, genuine and progressive. It was notable she used a very American term in the interview “people of colour”. It is rare you hear white Irish people use that term. Cairns is clearly aiming for the progressive middle class left.
    Within that framework SF seems “more of the same” gradually going centrist. But still weighed down by the rhetoric of their republican past to a large extent. SF will always be more successful in locales where people would like to move from - than to.

    Compared to the Soc Dems SF do not appear to be the fresh, hopeful, or vibrant party. I think Cairns is being very clever she is playing the long game.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,878 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    As a voter I wouldn’t be in agreement with you in terms of the “left” -but I must say a very well written post and if the left parties came together and issued a statement similar to some of the points you’ve just made, it wouldn’t be a bad start for them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,709 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Agreed.

    The challenge will be convincing the public that the Soc Dems can build more new homes than FFG and finding a stance on immigration that allows enough people to vote Soc Dem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    One thing a party cannot be is liberal on immigration and that is for all parties. Unfortunately the world is not full of right minded people and therefore the borders of country must be protected and rules on immigration need to be tight on who is let in and who isn't. I view one of the main roles of the government is to protect the country and this would also mean investing in the security arm of the state be it the Gardai, the armed forces (what's left of them) or any other state agency involved in the security of the state. This doesn't mean we give up on our neutrality but more being able to better protect ourselves more from terrorist threats than from an invasion, don't think we would be able to stop and invasion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,709 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The left wing parties are and will remain liberal on immigration.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Then they will never get into government or if they do they may have to make some concessions on that and can they do that. I know the likes of PBP won't but they are kinda far left but can the Soc Dem's. I can see SF doing it as a lot of their support base support tighter immigration controls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,786 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    They can do that and still agree that deportations are necessary.

    In fairness to SF they seem to have copped on to this, it took them long enough but better late than never I suppose.

    Cairns and Bacik never talk about the need for deportations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    She broke up with Christopher O'Sullivan years ago btw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    The way I read it anyway, the Soc Dems are pragmatic left, and to be realistic, there isn’t much of an audience for the hard left in Ireland - it's a bit niche. Unlike most of Europe, we never even really developed a large centre-left tranche of politics. That’s basically the space the Social Democrats are trying to establish and fill, from what I can see. However, so is Labour (and they have been since the foundation of the state) and aside having less political baggage, I’m not sure what distinguishes the Soc Dems and Labour. They seem very similar on most issues.

    Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are both broadly centre/centre-right these days, although you could definitely say that historically they were straightforwardly conservative nationalist parties. They’ve shifted towards the centre over time, but the centre itself has drifted somewhat to the left, as the population became much more progressive on social issues and I think there's a broad expectation here of public expenditure on welfare, health and so on. They somewhat fit into something closer to a softer Irish version of something like the Gaullists than they are like the British Conservatives, who have a very definite philosophy about cutting public spending etc.

    Sinn Féin are also chasing that same political middle ground - effectively everyone has to. They brand themselves as more left-leaning, but in practice they’re often fairly centrist and pragmatically will pick their arguments on different topics. I think it's reasonable to say they're ideologically a bit of a mixed bag, even if they've some left in the middle of it, but fundamentally they're defined by the constitutional question of irish unity more so than anything else. Even on republican values, I've found SF can be more likely to propose compromises to achieve unity than FF or FG ever would - they've become a party moulded very much by the experience of the NI peace process in the 90s and 00s in how they exist now. That's no bad thing - it's big positive, but I just think it's a mistake to assume they're a dogmatically ideological - no Irish party really is.

    The reality of Irish politics is that it just doesn’t fit neatly into a left–right framework. That's not necessarily a negative as it brings huge stability and nuance, but it does mean that it tends to be a bit hard to define anyone ideologically. That’s partly because Ireland never had a large, organised labour movement like Britain or much of continental Europe, so the old capital-versus-labour divide never really took root here - there wasn't the industrial base for that to happen and the foundation of the state was about strands of nationalism. It’s also very much a product of the PR-STV voting system, which rewards consensus building and always nudges parties and even independents toward centrist positions if they want any hope of getting near power they need to be able to play well with others. Any party that's lacking pragmatism or that can't see past a narrow ideology tends to end up spun out to the fringes of politics - the Greens to a degree get whacked with that every time they've been in coalition - they're too ideological for the electorate, and they're too pragmatic for their core vote, so they get slammed in both directions. Irish politics is an unusual system and much, much more nuanced and less polarised than say the Westminster model, or even many of the PR systems with party lists. It's an outlier in a lot of ways - so I don't really know exactly where to place the Soc Dems or if it even matters where to place them. What will make or break them in the long run is whether or not they can play ball in the Dáil. It'll be about growing presence, talking about topics, nudging, being on committees and building profile.

    I think where Holly Carins is very strong is basically that that she's a very clear communicator and tends to have a way higher profile than a lot of party leaders because she can engage with topics very intelligently. That's something that will stand to her in politics. You can already see that. Whether that's enough to grow the party remains to be seen as they need a lot more strong candidates to stand and to define what they're about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,215 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    You can't effectively imprison someone because they're seeking asylum.

    But yes, the process should be faster. The fact that there are people living in hotels for years is ridiculous. And remember a lot of them would like to get their applications processed so they can get out of the hotels too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,878 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    “Cairns seems to want to create a vibe of something new, fresh, real, genuine and progressive.”

    While I’m not a fan- I know people who are- and I’d agree, SD’s will be growing in popularity over the next few years- I would bet that they will steal the centre left ground from SF - and that’s why I don’t see a big strong “left alliance”- whilst Labour are going nowhere fast, this party is - they’ll greatly increase their seats in next election and will be potential bedfellows with a FFG govt coalition - of course they’ll crash and burn the following election because these parties always do- but it will be fun seen SF prevented from taking office while a lesser left party does the deal😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    But they are not in prison, they are in a holding centre where they are being well looked after till their claims are processed. Like I said as long as their claim is being processed they are neither in nor out of the country but in a grey area a bit like being at immigration in the airport. They can at anytime say that they want to leave and then they can be helped with their travel arrangements.

    We can't just be allowing people to wander into the country, claim they have no documents, stick them in a hotel or warehouse and then say "There ya go lads, wander around the country there", what is the point then of having passport control or even immigration if we just going to let everyone in documents or no documents and then let them have the run of the place. It's ridiculous and the whole process needs to be tightened up. You can bet if you or I turned up in another country like Australia or the US and said listen lads I lost my documents and I am claiming asylum, I am sure I wouldn't be allowed wander around the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,786 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Mairead Farrell and Cian O Callaghan were like 2 people on an awkward first date on The Tonight Show last night.

    Bad luck for them that Sheehan was the host because he was never going to let them have an easy time of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,215 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    They're not in prison, they're just in a holding centre they're not allowed leave?

    I'm not sure you know what imprisonment actually is. You seem to think that if you get a facility, fence it off, and prevent anyone from leaving, it's not a prison. It's only a prison if you decide to call it a prison?

    You don't restrict someone freedom unless they've been convicted of a crime, or are proven to be a risk to themselves/others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,056 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Absolutely. A person should be able to identify themselves clearly, it can be photos of documents on Google Drive, but it needs to exist. Without that, they should not be free to roam about until they are identified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,178 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    Huh wasn't it the opposite,a free amount and then a charge? btw SDs wanted a referendum to put public ownership of water into the constitution.

    Post edited by expectationlost on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,796 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    the socialism created the 8 hour day movement, to limit working days to 8 hours, that got us a 40 hour week, sick pay etc etc? All that terribly nasty stuff that 'does not work'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    Henry Ford, descended from Irish immigrants to the States, wanted to pay his workers more because he wanted them to be able to afford his cars. and other luxuries at the time. Yet he was a capitalist. Go figure, and look at socialist countries like Cuba.

    Look at what the economy of East Germany was like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭BaywatchHQ


    I avoid voting in Ulster elections because of Sinn Fein's liberal agenda. However I feel like there is no good option. The thing is that Sinn Fein are the best option to have power in Catholic areas of Ulster. The alternative is to let unionists have power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    SF are FF in the 1930s.

    Been saying it for years, now Holly's finally listening.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,729 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    What happened today will reinforce the perception among some on the Left that SF are not leftwing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,337 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    SF really know how kick themselves in the teeth.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,347 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    I think the Social Democrats will grow, but I think they are riding a rising tide of socialism.

    In the last general election, FFG got a combined first preference vote of just 43%. The most recent poll had FFG polling at 37%, the lowest support the combined parties ever enjoyed in the history of polling. This isn't a recency bias either. There's a long-term trend for about the last 18 years now of FFG gradually losing support.

    If there was an election tomorrow, I'd say it's a 50:50 shot whether FFG would beat SF/SD/LAB/PBP/GP/etc's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,729 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I'm sceptical the Left unity will survive into the general election. Connolly was an Independent Left candidate. When it's about party labels, they will all be competing to lead the government. There are a lot of egos

    The Left party's support bases are different class wise. SD and Labour would be more posh middle class Liberals, lawyers and NGOs. Sinéad Gibney used to be in the ICCL. That's different from PBP-Solidarity, though some of their leaders are wealthy champagne socialists. I am sceptical that PBP will go into coalition with Labour and SD. PBP are Trotskyite, as was Militant Tendency in the 1980s.

    SF is itself a coalition that includes a large rural vote. SFs endorsement, and divided Centrist vote, was the gamechanger in the campaign. Ruth Coppinger was on TWIP supporting the Nitrates Directive. How would that go down with SFs farming vote?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,347 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    I'll be honest, I just don't agree at all.

    You're clinging onto this ideal that everyone at heart is centrist, and they will vote for some variation on the status quo (eg, some form of a FFG government).

    I think this has come to an end now. Politics in Ireland has swung decisively left. It started with the implosion of the Progressive Democrats. It was re-enforced when Renua bombed. Centre-right politics is a complete wasteland for any incumbents. It barely exists now, you've 4 Independent Ireland TD's and a few Independents. That's it.

    FFG have swung centre-left in an attempt to capture that trend. It's failed because they're not left enough to capture the anger of the populace, but it's also diverged too far left that they've alienated anyone centre-right. They're trying to appeal to everyone, buy failing everyone abysmally. As much as it pains me to say, I think the left will win the next election and have enough seats to form a government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,729 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    It's only a year since we elected a more Centrist government than previously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,878 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I don’t disagree in terms of your odds for a left govt tomorrow morning - I guess some of this is “pub talk” given the election is so far away. Clearly FFG have to change to adapt whereas the “left” just need to keep doing what they’re doing in some respects.

    I’m probably more conservative politically but in no way shape or form far right- I’m probably a little left of centre on some issues and a little right of centre on others. Housing is the no 1 issue for the young electorate as far as I can see but sustainable jobs and economy growth has to be no 2 whether they like it or not - otherwise they won’t be able to pay their massive mortgages.

    I’m truly fearful in terms of what the economy will look like in 4 years time and how we’ll pay for our public services no less national debt. The world is changing at a massive rate - more than ever, new skills need to be learned to stay relevant - that includes the civil service - I don’t see that happening considering there are some departments still using paper based systems FFS.

    Cost of goods and services just keep going up- I’m not at all “poor” but I can’t fathom how people on low incomes are surviving - whilst we still have low unemployment there will be less jobs available looking for better skills- and these jobs won’t be secure either.

    If “the left” win the next election, I hope it’s because they have a clear vision on how to tackle all of the challenges as opposed to simple “fed up” electorate burring their heads in the sand and wanting “change” for change sake



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,898 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Look at their respective budgets and you'll see how far they are apart politically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,729 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    But in General elections, people dont vote only on cultural issues in the way they tend to in presidential elections. They also vote on the emotive issue of taxation, and on that theres less trust in the Left in my opinion. It was the FG-Labour government that introduced the USC, which was not progressive. They also introduced water charges. The water charges are suspended. They also said "Frankfurts Way or Labour's Way", which turned out to just be two different names for the same thing when in government.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,786 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Bacik is getting in on the UI debate calling on the Government to put pressure on the Brits about holding a border poll at some point in the future.

    The shinners might not be too happy because this was always their gig and now FF,FG and Lab are getting in on the action.

    Haven't heard anything from the SDs on it yet though.



Advertisement