Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1161516161618162016211641

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    I'd like to have him back in the country, just to have him as an option if we were to get an injury pre-world cup. I don't think he'd overtake Crowley or Prendergast, but It's a pretty imaginable situation where we are going into a world cup game with Harry Byrne and Ciaran Frawley as our two options at 10.

    So either I'd like to see Frawley move to Connacht (even just a loan deal in the year leading up to the world cup) with a view to getting him some meaningful game time at 10, or bring Carbery in to have another option.

    Sean Naughton looks good, but from an irish perspective I don't think that there is time for him to become established, experienced and to make it into the Irish team consideration. I just can't see Andy Farrell choosing him over Frawley by the time the WC comes around.

    Jack Murphy is a bit ahead there so he could be in with a shot if he kicks on a bit at the right time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭Packrat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭Tommybojangles


    In fairness I'd also prefer as a connacht fan I'd prefer we focus on naughton but it's not with the national team in mind. No shot he makes the world cup and its true to say from an Ireland point of view it would probably be beneficial to have Frawley or Carbery playing 10 in case of an emergency



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Am I the only one missing something with Frawley?

    I see his name mentioned a lot as an option to the other two, when he has never been able to nail down a place anywhere, never mind at 10.

    Some will say that he hasn't been given a proper chance - I'm sorry lads but he's been given loads of chances and he can't nail down a position because he's so frustratingly and consistently inconsistent. Talented player, yes, but even his talent never screamed tier 1 test rugby. I feel a lot of people have short memories about him, as for every moment of top class he's delivered, he's equally delivered a performance that looks like he's forgotten how to play rugby.

    I'd much rather look at Jack Murphy who was playing in Europe for Ulster when he was a Year 1 academy player. Is he the answer either? No I don't think so, but there's definitely a lot more upside to him than there is to Frawley.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Injury has been a huge problem for Frawley, once he gets some form etc he breaks down with injury.

    That has been a problem for a number of years. He broke his cheek at one stage and I think again etc. Just bad luck

    Same last year he picked up injury and then struggled when he returned



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Lancaster moved Frawley from 10 to 12 when he was coaching in Leinster. If Frawley moves now would Lancaster see him as a 10 or a 12 like he did when he coached him at Leinster?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭Packrat


    Well if he consistently used him in one or other position, maybe his career could be rebooted, and if good or consistent enough after playing regularly enough in a good team, maybe he'd be an Ireland option in one or the other. As he is he's going backwards at Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40 Lancey Howard


    I would be delighted to see him at full back for Connacht, with options to cover 10. Fair to assume he is still a high % goal kicker



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Not sure you can claim he is going backwards, he is still in the Ireland squad. He played in AI last year and then got injured. His form when he returned meant he wasn't getting into Leinster team. That was form and also recovering from injury

    This year his form is better and he is back in Ireland squad.

    Would any of the above have changed if he was at another province?

    Lancaster played him at 10 early on in his career and then moved him to 12 as the second play maker role, moving him to play under Lancaster again I don't see why he would move him back to playing 10



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,539 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    You're not missing anything on Frawley really. I think a lot of the calls made online for him to play at 10 are coming from people who haven't watched him regularly.

    Lancaster and Cullen assessed him every day in training for years and decided that the Byrne brothers were better 10's. In terms of athleticism Frawley has the advantage over all of them. But his decision making and technique frequently let him down when he was playing at flyhalf. Passes would go behind the intended recipient or to the inside shoulder, forcing them to check their run.

    I like that he has the balls to make the big play. We wouldn't have beaten South Africa in 2024 without him. But clearly he has never demonstrated to the coaches that he's someone that can guide his team through a game.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,769 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think he could be a very good 12 if we left him there, but it was never likely to happen in any game of note with Henshaw at Leinster. He's absolutely nothing but a stopgap cover at 10 though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,238 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Frawley did well at 12 last year, with Osborne at 13. He's a 12, and should be left to play there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    Is it not patently clear that the only 10 to challenge Crowley & Prendergast into RWC 27 is Harry Byrne ? 3 games like he had in his past 2 and he’s right up there in contention I would have thought well ahead of all others mentioned



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,238 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    If he stays healthy, and playing the way he has, I expect Harry to start at least 1 game in the 6Ns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,168 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    If he does it will be at the expense of one-off the two current incumbents. I don't see us ever starting 3 10s in the 6 Nations unless injury is a factor.

    He's playing well though, it will be interesting to see what happens at Leinster over the next two months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,019 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Connacht have to do what's best for Connacht and bringing in a part time injury prone or inconsistent out half is not in the best interest imo. I definitely don't want to see either. We don't need cover at centre or full back either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,131 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Currently, I don't think any of Crowley, Prendergast, Frawley, Carbery or H. Byrne are good enough to get us through to the pointy end of RWC knockout games. I think we'd be much better off working out a play style around that, rather than endlessly trying tens until they each prove they're not the finished article. A number of those players are quite young, and you'd expect will improve (or need to improve) some aspects of their game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,052 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I think the idea is that in 22 months time, when the RWC actually begins, one or two of them will indeed be the finished article, or as near to their peak as they're going to be.

    Your suggestion is probably preaching to the converted. Andy Farrell above all people knows that he didn't have another Jonny Sexton waiting in the wings. Most teams don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    its a while since i read it but as far as i remember, in rob kearneys book he said JC was becoming the preferred option at 15 for the leinster coaches but Schmidt preferred Kearney, it was hinted there was some IRFU intervention and JC then went back to covering 10 from the bench



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,131 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    100%. I just think we should draw a line under Frawley, Carbery, Byrne.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,019 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Byrne did well with Bristol when he got a good run. He never got that before, he's still young and possibly has a lot more to offer than the other two. He needs to get a shot if he's doing it for Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,238 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I think Harry, when he's playing in the form he is currently, is a better all around player than the other 2. Not to say that they can't develop and overcome their deficiencies. There's a ways to go til Feb, and given Farrell's general attitude of giving lads a lot of runway, I doubt he'd be quick to move on.

    There's a tension bubbling in the team, of players being picked on reputation over form, where the potential exists for a rapid change in the complexion, especially in the backs. When you look at the WC, 9 thru 13 are spots that could see a lot of change over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭Zeugnis


    Harry Byrne had the humility to go to Bristol and benefited from it. He's playing really well since he returned, and looks like a guy who has changed his attitude. It's insane to write him off.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,769 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think the Harry Byrne reigniting his career in Bristol arc is a bit much. He played fewer minutes last season than the season before and starter fewer matches. He started 7 games for Bristol, 2 of which were in the Premiership Cup.

    Once McGinty was back he basically disappeared - he had 31 minutes of gametime from April til the end of the season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    His appearances for Leinster this year have looked good though. He also played some great games for Bristol. I think the argument that getting away from Leinster for a season, in a different environment, different priorities and a different coach may have had a good effect on him. He's only ever been coached by Leo with some interludes in Ireland camp. I don't pay much attention to him but intuitively a break like that can be very positive. And Im not sure he's much worse than the other two at the moment. We'll see how it goes for SP on Saturday but on the evidence so far neither himself nor Crowley will be coming out of this series with a spring in their step.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Vinnie222


    People need to stop obsessing over the outhalves. The real problem is the platform. The midfield has been blunt, predictable and offering absolutely nothing in terms of creativity or go-forward. And the lineout is coughing up possession like we don’t actually want the ball. Until Ireland fix those basics, it wouldn’t matter if you had Byrne, Crowley, SP or prime Sexton at 10 , they’d all look bang average behind the same slow ball and zero shape.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Giving up scrum penalties should be added to the list. But the players have the pedigree and the new kids have tons of ability. If this is the bottom and we can start to rebuild from here Ill be very happy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,019 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    A good 10 makes it a lot easier for everybody.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,662 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    If Crowley is afforded the same forgiveness for the NZ game that sam was given all last year, and Crowley can come back with the form that destroyed leinster a few weeks ago, I'll be happy.

    Someone pointed out that the midfield and the backs in general had no penetration or creativity, this can't be stressed enough. no linebreaks compared to 6 (or 7) from NZ is an embarrassment.

    The backs from the A game can't be ignored Balacoune Postlethwaite and Kelly were electric.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Ireland made 2 line breaks…pedalling a false stat doesn’t make it true.



Advertisement