Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Navan Rail Line

12021222325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    They won't be empty for long. A rare case in Ireland of infrastructure that can drive development, which is commonsense nearly everywhere else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    The line (orange line on the left) is already being diverted to run closer to Dunshaughlin in Option A, and development (Dun Rioga on the map) near the line is underway not even a kilometre away (according to Google Earth). I wouldn’t describe it as having to build a “new town.”

    IMG_1737.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,431 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    There's an M3 Parkway train that has about 300 passengers on it by the time it's in Clonsilla. Passengers regularly getting left behind on the platforms, as it's full. It's not just about the number of passengers from M3 Parkway. Those trains serve other stations too.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,547 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Also the M3 Parkway station is only representing a small amount of potential rail demand. We know that because of the sunk cost of owning a car, that a lot of people driving from Navan to Dublin will just drive past the station and continue to their destination. Total potential rail demand is more like a percentage of the car traffic between Navan and Dublin, and everybody who currently uses the bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,537 ✭✭✭gjim


    when they actually get a train line into navan then 500 will be a half of every train as numbers will balloon.

    How do you come up with a claim like that? 1,000 people every 30 minutes will board a train for Dublin?

    This would make Navan station twice as busy as Tara or Connolly. This is highly unlikely to say the least.

    People have completely unrealistic notions of rail passenger numbers. Optimistically you might argue Navan could achieve the numbers we see in places like Greystones or Howth (both under 2k a day) but most passenger demand models suggest the fact that the distance between Dublin and Navan is twice that of the distance to Greystones means demand - all other things being equal - will be about a quarter. So we're back to roughly 500 or so a day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I really wouldn't underestimate Navan ridership. There is a lot going for it, and there are a few things I don't think has been mentioned.

    The first big change that will more generally see increased numbers from last year is the new fare zones. Comparing Navan to Drogheda as two of our largest towns and at similar distance (although different fare zones), the price of rail fares was halved earlier this year. Drogheda already had about 3.5K passengers a year (Boardings+Alightings) and we have yet to see how much that may have increased with the PSO bus and train fares now being less than a euro difference, and the train also previously being more expensive than some of the private coaches. While I don't expect it to have doubled or any massive increase like that, I am hoping it will see a noticeable bump in numbers, possibly to over 4K a day.

    Another thing Navan will have going for it is the second station within the town. Where almost every other large town the Dublin commuter network has just 1 station, previous IÉ proposals have placed 2 in Navan, with the second being at the start of the Kingscourt Greenway. This will hopefully make a massive difference in the direct catchment and allow for more transport-oriented development in the northern part of Navan and would likely increase the numbers by a significant amount in the long term.

    Also in regards to Dunshaughlin and somewhat by extension Ratoath and Ashbourne, all three towns have seen massive population growth in recent years and it really shows the need for more transport-oriented development in the area. I think there really needs to be some intervention to support more growth in Dunshaughlin and maybe also western Ratoath, so that way newer development can have better access to a railway station. Whereas on the current track Ashbourne is on its way to becoming Navan 2.0 or Swords 2.0, large towns which have far outgrown the bus services and need a higher capacity intervention.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,539 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Regarding a new route, I have been saying similar to what you suggest here for a long time. Between Dunshaughlin and M3 J7, just hug the side of the motorway. No issues with splitting farms as everything has already been split by the M3 and no houses need to be CPO'd (unlike the old alignment). It wouldn't interfer with any motorway junctions, although some bridges would have to be adjusted.

    Loop around the north eastern side of Navan and then use the Drogheda line into the town centre. A station around the Kentstown Road would directly serve a big population and that's where the current expansion is happening. From Gallow Cross to the Drogheda line would be difficult but there would be no CPOing properties in the town or Level Crossings (which the old alignment would require).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,740 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it's a lot longer of a journey via that route then it would be via going the navan m3 parkway clonsilla route.

    then they would use that service as an excuse not to implement the necessary full reopening from m3 parkway.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,740 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    while i'm sure the politicians will try that tactic again, the public in navan and so on along the route who use PT are more then wise to it now and it will not work here.

    the navan line is going to be like DU and other infrastructure projects, going to have to be done and that's it, no avoiding it and no getting out of it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    I'm not sure about that route. The perks of the old route include pretty much zero land works and the farms are already split. In this route, land would probably still have to be CPO'd before the M3 was crossed, a lot more surveys, etc. would need to be carried out for the new alignment and the curve into Navan would also be quite tight.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,539 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The perks of the old route include pretty much zero land works and the farms are already split

    That isn't true. Just look at the old route on Google Maps, or at least try to... There are big sections where there is no visible evidence of a rail line ever existing there. Sections of the old alignment are now part of wide open fields.

    Some sections remain as an overgrown ditch, so while a new trackbed could be built there, it would have to be completely rebuilt from scratch. That means major engineering works and having the necessary working space and access for same. The idea that there are "perks" of the old route just doesn't match with the reality on the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,247 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I mentioned earlier in the thread that the old alignment was only double-tracked as far as Drumree. So any remnants of it from Drumree to Navan would have to be rebuilt from scratch anyway. You also have the problem of getting around a big hotel in Kilmessan. I don’t think that the old line would be viable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    Looking at the route on satellite imagery, I'd reckon at least 50% of the alignment still exists, which is an improvement of the 0% of the alignment existing for a new build.

    Not to mention all the surviving road bridges, or the viaduct over the Boyne. There's even an underpass on the M3 that was built in the expectation of the railway following its original route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,987 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The underpass was necessary allow any continuation of the railway line, regardless of routing: the minimum permitted turn radius meant that any line extension would have to go under that junction, no matter where it went afterwards.

    Around Fairyhouse, just north of the tool-booths, the M3 is built directly on top of the old alignment, and no concession was made to the railway there - there was clearly an assumption that the railway would just be rebuilt entirely here if it was extended. I think that if there’d been more forward planning, a routing between Dunshaughlin and Ratoath would have been facilitated way back when the M3 Parkway spur was re-opened (2005-2010 - the same time as M3 was constructed), so that that station would be to the east of the motorway, not the west, but that ship has sailed. Crossing the motorway now would add a lot to the cost of any line extension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    I'm not talking of the underpass immediately north of M3 Parkway, I'm speaking of the one near Bective.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,987 ✭✭✭KrisW1001



    Where is that? I can’t see it on any aerial photos. Here’s where the old alignment crosses M3, north of Bective (photo is from GeoHive, as it has better quality aerial images):

    image.png


    The motorway is in a slight cutting here to go under the L8034 road, so is maybe a metre below the surrounding ground level. The area inside the orange circle looks like this from the M3 itself:

    image.png



    And here’s the crossing of the M3 Navan spur. The motorway is in a fairly deep cutting here, so any reinstatement would be on a bridge over the M3…

    image.png

    … except that newer photography shows a series of houses have been built just south of M3 here, so that’s going to be fun to resolve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,522 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Its there, you can just see the edges of the box, its particularly obvious on the Navan side

    Screenshot 2025-11-10 at 13.25.55.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    Google street view from 2009:

    Screenshot_2025-11-10-13-33-53-676_com.google.android.apps.maps-edit.jpg

    And satellite imagery from 2010:

    Screenshot_2025-11-10-13-36-02-386_com.google.earth-edit.jpg

    It's quite tucked away but it is there, so I imagine it should be used.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,522 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Also note the additional crash barrier either side of the M3 which protect the 'railway'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,522 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Great to see there are public photos available. I have several photos that found there way to me but strictly not for public visibility



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,411 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Where possible, the old routes should be followed if they are still available. However in 2008, when the preferred route included about two thirds of the pre existing line, a report found it financially unviable. That was during the recession of course.

    In 2021 a report found the cost of of the lime will be €2-3bn. It sure if it's the same route.

    I'm very pro rail though. I needed to use it more for medical reasons for months until a few months ago when I resumed driving, and I'm still wary of driving to other counties so I like trains. I dont like busses as i tend to feel unwell on them (probably the air conditioning).

    Post edited by Ozymandius2011 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,987 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @thosewhoknow , @goingnowhere Thanks for the info! I hadn't realised they were going to use a railway cutting either side, and it has got seriously overgrown since it was built! In fairness, the M3 and the Navan Rail Line were concurrent projects (M3 was one job, but Navan was phased, which allowed them to can it after Phase 1 when the money ran out), so it would have been extremely disappointing if there had been no preparations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Why though?

    I get that some underpasses are already built but that's a sunk cost. The old alignment was built long before the growth of Dublin surrounding towns and suburbs.

    As others have mentioned Dunshaughlin Ratoath and Ashbourne are large towns that have grown rapidly. To take an extreme example when the original line was built Ashbourne was barely a village if you look at the map of Ireland in 1910 which is freely available online. That's before we even talk about technology and expectations from the general public. You also will need to double track large if not the entire line, as others have mentioned the original alignment was single track.

    Now all that said my guess is that the powers that be will probably go with a plan that some what follows the old alignment. It just shows a lack of imagination and future proofing public transport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,539 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The powers that be will go with the old alignment because it's easy to spin it as something which might happen but it'll quickly run into lots of issues which will drag on for years. For politicians, it's short term gain with built-in arse-covering for failure to deliver.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    If the line went towards Ashbourne it wouldn't be able to also serve Dunshaughlin and Ratoath without being very indirect and losing any time savings on the bus. The original route may have only had one line for most of it but it was designed to accommodate for a second if needed. I think something like a metro might suit Ashbourne better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,414 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I don't think they mean the line should serve all 3 towns but that it should go East of Dunshaughlin and that would serve Ratoath also.

    They're maybe 6kms apart as the crow flies.

    Not possible to serve Ashbourne but that basically has its own motorway so not necessary.

    We really went nuts on Motorways in the 00s.

    I bet loads like the M2 are way under capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,740 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    there is always the option if a route can be found to build a branch off the navan line to whichever of the towns doesn't end up being served such as Ashbourne if the other 2 receive the line through them.
    it may not necessarily be optimal sure and it would cost more but it's not a big deal if the money could be found and a route for it.
    that way all the main towns in meath will be served.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 235 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Only issue with a branch is that the M3 line is already a branch as things stand… a branch line off of a branch line is not great for capacity.

    Now that said, after the Maynooth - Adamstown link is constructed, the only trains on the Western line will be the 12 DARTs per hour in each direction, 8 of which will serve Maynooth and 4 of which will serve M3. Presumably all of these would be continued on to Navan once the line is finished, but 12 trains an hour on a segregated alignment all the way to Connolly/Spencer Dock/Pearse is quite comfortable so arguably, IF a branch was made to Ratoath/Ashbourne, theoretically, it could get another 3/4 trains an hour. I’m not agreeing with this as an idea but it is technically feasible once services beyond Maynooth are removed from the Western line.

    On the subject of frequency, do we think that all 4 M3 DARTs will continue to Navan? And if so (in a post DU X-shaped running pattern) would all of them continue as DARTs all the way through to Bray? Or would the Navan services operate as surplus to the 4 DARTs an hour, and operate only to SD/Connolly, and leave the 12 DARTs from the Western Line continue to Bray?

    On the Ashbourne note, I feel it is best left served by a metro or even potentially a greenfield Luas Green Line extension, similar to in European cities where their trams run out beyond the suburbs for a few miles through open fields to connect slightly farther out towns that don’t warrant their own heavy rail. The Luas would run like heavy rail out here though, 100kph (if the new Alstom Citadis trams that can do so are used) and could feature multiple stations in Ashbourne as well as a Park and Ride to the north.

    Finally, just my tuppence worth on the route, but would it be feasible or likely to head directly north after M3 and serve the southwest of Ratoath with a station off the Fairyhouse Road (R155) and then curve northeastward to serve Dunshaghlin at the northeast of the town with a station off the Grange Park Rd (R125)? Where the station is to the edge of the town in these places, the town could be built out towards the station, encouraging even more development and opening up the land either side of the railway on the fringes of these towns, while still being very accessible from the town centre.

    The line would then continue north to Navan following the M3 without having to cross it again, (farms are already split by the motorway, so if the railway hugs it closely enough, there isn’t too much CPO issue) to enter the town from the south on the old alignment, with a new station behind the hospital after joining the Tara/Kells/Oldcastle line and finally would branch north on the stub of the old Kingscourt line for a Navan North station. Is this an alignment that makes sense or is it too tight or indirect.

    IMG_1445.jpeg

    In reality it’s not actually any less direct than the current route, but even still, I do think there is enough to be said for the train not having to take the most direct alignment. As countless studies have shown, what passengers want is not necessarily the quickest route, but one that is frequent (every 15 minutes is incredible) and consistently reliable (same journey time all day, most unlike the car and bus) so the route could get away with serving more places at a slight time penalty, but maybe this route is a bit too much price wise, given it will almost be entirely brand new… Thoughts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,414 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Good idea.

    That's the ideal route.

    Getting bums on seats has to be the primary objective.

    Just need to upgrade the road leading to the stations so they've cycle lanes etc…

    If I was living in either town, I'd cycle to the station so secure lockup is essential or I might take my bike on the train so good storage is essential.

    Maybe further south for the Dunshaughlin stn would be better like the Lagore rd.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    My point about Ashbourne is more how the population has exploded in the area over the last hundred years or so. Ashbourne is an incredible example, barely a village and now a motorway bypasses it. See a link below where you can overlay the 1910 map with todays. The same goes for Ratoath and Dunshaughlin. Mere villages then and now large and still growing towns.

    The rail route that was built in the 1800's was built in very different context. The Ireland of the 21st century is very different and has different needs. The rail route should reflect that.

    https://www.dublinhistoricmaps.ie/maps/1940-1999/index.html



Advertisement