Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1159515961598160016011641

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,770 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think Coombes problem is largely just that he is viewed by the people that matter as worse than Conan and Doris and those two have rarely been injured. I don't think the case for him over Doris can realistically be made, and it is not a coincidence Conan is a 6 time Lions starter at the position. And I'd be surprised if Gleeson isn't higher rated in both Munster and Ireland already.

    I guess you could make a case for him at 6, but obviously he wasn't going to get ahead of POM there, and when it comes down to him vs Baird (or Ahern) we are talking completely different skillsets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,591 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Coombes scored a try against an international team last weekend. Unfortunately for Ireland he was playing for his province.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,527 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    IF. Thats exactly the prob.

    The risks increase exponentially when in the 30s.

    Ireland cant be going into the RWC with a clatter of 33/34+ yet again. Conan, vdF, Beirne, Furlong etc

    I was thinking Vermueulen may be used as an example. He was a different 8 to Conan.

    The reason SA used a clatter of 30+ is because they have other exceptional athletes elsewhere who can eat up the ground in attack and covering in defense.

    As we know Ireland do not have that. Its a live issue for Ireland now, never mind in 2 years time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    If all the possible explanations for Coombes not being picked are rubbished, but the reality on the ground is that he's not being picked, despite all his call-ups to the squads over the last four years, then what is the explanation?

    And again, the comparisons to Doris and even Conan are completely pointless, the issue for Coombes is that he's always behind Baird, Timoney, Prendergast and now Izuchukwu as the next cab off the rank in the back row. Possibly even Gleeson now.

    So, why is that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    I think the issue Coombes has is that he is unfortunately probably third best 8 in the country. He is a very good player and would start in a lot of other eras, but Doris is pretty much globally recognised as one of top three number 8s in the world. Conan has huge credit in the bank, never lets Ireland down and (in my opinion) is a better player. I have said it a few times so don't want to repeat myself but it's unlikely Farrell chooses three numbers 8s in a squad.

    Now if he is looked at as a second row/6 hybrid I think that is where he can feel hard done by in relation to this squad. Henderson offers absolutely nothing anymore and hasn't for years. Prendergast and Timoney, while good players, appear in most Irish squads but rarely see game time. I think there is definitely a pretty strong case that he should have been named ahead of Henderson, or maybe Predergast/Timoney so the coaching team can get another look.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,770 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Literally none of the players in the Argentina XV are in the main squad - it was the equivalent of the team we are sending to Spain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Your "Tom Farrell / hit by a bus" comment hasn't made you re-consider your "next cab off the rank" logic?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭antfin


    We had Gleeson in the squad until his injury and he'll likely feature in the Six Nations. Nobody is saying that in 2027 we should be putting all of our eggs in Conan's basket to start the big games but he could be very well in 3rd position at no.8 by then if Gleeson develops well. The alternative is to drop Gleeson for Coombs because right now Ireland won't be dropping Doris, who is captain and ranked one of the best no.8s in the world, or Conan who just added to his Lions test caps. At 8, the choice is clearly between Gleeson and Coombs and, lately Deegan is putting his hand up there too and rediscovering his form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    Forgot about that game. Either way I'm still a bit suspect as to why he hasn't been involved more. It can't be down to club form anyway. As another poster rightly said, he's been Munster's most important player other than Tadhg Beirne for the last 3-4 seasons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Probably worth noting that neither of us thought Farrell would be picked. I thought it was because he's an uncapped 32 year old and other guys were picked on the summer tour. You thought it was because of conservatism, ignoring form and Leinster bias, so I'm not sure your smugness is justified.

    As I've said a million times here - and you'll ignore it like you always do - I think Coombes could do very well for us. Put that in your spreadsheet, will you?

    But you ducked the question. If you disagree with every possible explanation for why Coombes is not picked, why do YOU think it is the case?

    You won't answer, you never do, but hey, maybe you'll surprise me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    I'm not sure about this appraisal of his attributes. The pre-contact footwork? Coombes often leads Munster's stats in post contact meters and gain line successes. How he achieves it is irrelevant. As for pace and acceleration, maybe but I can't recall that ever being an issue in his club career so far. His tackle count is often in the top 2-3 players and he is a decent tunrover threat too. He's getting around the park.

    Coombes is just a different type of player to Doris and Conan. Perhaps slower, but more effective in the tight carrying situations and very skilled at scoring from close range. He has raw strength and power that others do not. Others have a yard of pace on him. Hence why I keep bringing up why not use him on the bench, he offers something different to try an change a game. I'm not for a second saying he should be picked ahead of Doris. We will have a 35 year old Jack Conan going to RWC 2027. Jack Conan who does everything the same as Caelan Doris, but just not quite to the same high level. Why not bring a 29 year old Coombes, who is very effective at other elements of the game and a proven try scorer.

    As for the tighthead lock comment, perhaps this may have been an avenue for him. But again he has played there in URC games during Munster's many injury crises. Again, why not pick him on the bench? He's primarily a 6/8 but can do a job a lock if required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,527 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Thats why I said something will have gone wrong IF Conan is playing for Ireland at the RWC.

    It will mean Glesson hasnt developed as hoped, or is injured, or SEdogbo hasnt developed or is injured.

    Again Ireland/Munster need to move Coombes to 6. That is best for all concerned. As is moving Ahern to Lock.

    With McMillans coaching Coombes could yet force his way into the the Irish squad as a 6/8.

    For the record 1. I like Coombes. and 2. Ireland desperately need more athleticism, power and pace into the squad.

    It remains to be seen if Gleeson can do that at Test level and equally as importantly; for 80mins. I'm optimistic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    I don't actually, Doris will most likely be captain. But who will be the backup number 6/8? Conan is most likely going to be relegated to cameo appearances off the bench for the next 2 seasons in Leinster's most important games. All the while why father time ticks on by.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,856 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    If you read the post I didn't say those passes proved he was a better passer, there is data on thousands of passes to show Coombes is a more accurate passer. Those examples are just to highlight the eye test that Coombes attempts more difficult passes than Doris. It's not really fair to say he hasn't done it at the international level when he isn't given a chance at the international level. Doris has plenty of games at URC level to broaden his range of passes but he almost always stays very conservative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I think 35 is not an outrageous age for a bench player and if he's still doing the business, we should pick him.

    After that, I guess it's Prendergast but I would hope that some young guy will come through, Gleeson maybe, or one of the young Ulster guys. Soroka looks a prospect also.

    I'm far more worried about open-side, I think Conan is aging better than VDF to be honest and we have limited options to replace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Leinster bias

    This part literally isn't remotely true. You can keep claiming it is, but it's not. If you can't see the difference between the suggestion that some selection decisions may go to way of the Leinster player because of cohesion, vs claiming bias, that's a you-issue, not a me-issue.

    The "conservatism and ignoring form" part is indeed accurate tho. The Tom Farrell selection was (another) small step away from that and I hope that's something that continues. Especially in the next couple of weeks, but it remains to be seen.

    If you disagree with every possible explanation for why Coombes is not picked, why do YOU think it is the case?

    I've said before and I'll say it again - I do indeed absolutely disagree with the explanation that he isn't good enough. And I've absolutely no idea why he's not picked, because from what I've seen from Coombes for season after season now, I'd have him in there all day long.

    But my main point was….. it should be possible for form players to jump any perceived pecking order / next cab off the rank. It was in the case of Tom Farrell, when Aki and Henshaw evidently weren't hit by a bus (#TransportMetaphors).

    None of that is me suggesting Coombes should be thrown in ahead of Doris. But I absolutely think he has deserved more than the 3 caps he's gotten to date.

    and you'll ignore it like you always do

    You won't answer, you never do, but hey, maybe you'll surprise me.

    You can claim this too but it also literally isn't remotely true, as evidenced by the above….

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    I'm fairly sure when Gleeson is rehabbed from his injury that he will either be in a back row with Coombes or in the no.20 shirt for Munster's CC games. He hasn't displaced Coombes yet from the Munster no.8 shirt. It most likely will happen but hasn't happened yet.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,770 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This is absolutely not a "Farrell can do no wrong" post, but in reality players get their chance in the international training squads and that is going to be what the coaches select them on. And Coombes has been in a lot of training squads, so he's clearly not doing something the coaches want - something I can only assume that was not corrected in the few caps that he has had.

    I think he probably deserved more caps. But given he is behind probably our current best player and a 6 times Lion I'm pretty sanguine about it - I don't think it would make any big difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    35 is not outrageous but we're in serious danger or going back down the same avenues again as we've done since time immemorial. Brining aged players to a WC because they have credit in the bank and expecting them to work miracles. While younger players who have shown great form for their provinces stay at home playing URC.

    There were plenty of posters on here who thought a 35 year old POM was too old to be in the 6N squad for the tournament just gone. He had plenty of credit in the bank too and was a former Lions captain. And he blocked the selection of Ryan Baird. Which is it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


     Which is it?

    I don't know, you'd have to ask the posters in question. I was a huge champion of POM's selection right up to his last game and I'd have loved to have had him on Saturday night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,238 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Izuchukwu or Soroka for me. They tick a lot of boxes. Powerful, excellent lineout jumpers, good ball skills.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    In fact I'd liken Vermuelen more to Coombes than to Conan i.e. a heavy tight carrier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    Izuchukwu who mostly plays as a lock for Ulster and never plays no.8? Soroka who has 11 senior appearances for Leinster?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Gavin Coombes should be worried about Brian Gleeson behind him rather than two-time Lion Jack Conan and Ireland captain Caelan Doris ahead of him.

    There are levels here, and Coombes has never shown that he's in the same league as the other two.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭50HX


    11 senior appearances doesnt hinder Farrells view

    Paddy mc & Edogbo were called in with v little/less.

    Hansen was capped after 9 appearances for Connacht, albeit he was Brumbies b4 that but I'd wager that had little to do with his selection

    Hope Soroka gets a real crack at it with Leinster



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    players get their chance in the international training squads and that is going to be what the coaches select them on

    And I think there's an obvious point that this would be a mistake, as training now doesn't have nearly as much contact as a game setting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭50HX




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    Just for reference these are Izuchukwu's appearance positions for Ulster for the season just gone.

    Summary of 2024-2025 Appearances:

    • Lock (Number 5): 7 starts
    • Blindside Flanker (Number 6): 4 starts
    • Replacement (Numbers 20): 2 appearances (came off the bench)

    And Alex Soroka who also doesn't seem to play no.8 and has never played a CC game for Leinster:

    Summary of 2024-2025 URC Appearances:

    • Blindside Flanker (Number 6): 6 starts
    • Replacement (Number 20): 2 appearances (came off the bench)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,527 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Plus if Ireland want to go deep in a RWC - They play the last group game and Doris gets injured, low and behold the 35 yearld Conan is starting a QF. The less athletic and powerful Jack, who can no longer play the 80 effectively.

    Alongside jvdf (34), Beirne (35), Furlong (34/35).

    The way were going here, 35 year old Henderson will also be brought as another 'bench player'.



Advertisement