Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1159015911593159515961641

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    This scapegoating of certain players is just tiresome at this stage.

    We had no line out, a mediocre scrum, no protection of the ruck and an average defensive performance…when that’s the case it doesn’t matter who you have at 10, you are likely going to lose, especially against a side as good as NZL…add in the fact that our XV had on average 114 minutes played per player and you are likely going to fall away in the final 20 versus a side who have been together for 8-9 games previously.

    It doesn’t matter who we have at 10/13, if we are falling in all the area’s above then we are going nowhere fast, all a great performance from your 10/13 will do is help paper over the cracks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭CONSI


    Overall a poor performance, did well to manage the red card but losing Beirne was costly and having to bring in henderson earlier than planned didnt help. Set piece is becoming a joke now a days, teams are happy to give us lineouts and wait for us to balls it up or compete against us. A lot of the players looked underplayed, because they have been this season, appreciate the lions tour but other countries have had lions back playing for weeks now. 12 day jolly in the USA didnt prepare the team for this game. Personally I hate these "glamour" games away during the autumn series, both unions must have been well paid for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    The other issue with the lineout is that even when we win it we have no plan as to what to do with the ball, when was the last time we actually had an affective maul? It seems we just win it, release the ball instantly to the 12, crash ball and repeat. This is why I’m starting to worry about Ireland under Farrell, one thing I always admired about him was the standards were set high and the players had no excuse to under perform…that seems to be gone now, we just make excuses to accept having a mediocre lineout. Teams know we are no threat from the lineout and know we don’t like taking their 3 points so have no fear conceding penalties against us.


    seriously, how does POC still have a job?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,895 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I was surprised how much of a different impression I got of the Beirne incident between the two camera angles. In the side-on shot it looks as if Barrett just runs into him and I was thinking does Beirne actually have to get out of the way or what? But then in the other angle it looks as if Beirne steps into it enough to look as if he's at least deliberately blocking him. And it's direct to the head and his arm is in a braced position and there's enough force to see Barrett thrown to the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    All of which overlooks the fact that, as a team, we kicked significantly more frequently when Crowley was on the pitch as it coincided with Marcus Smith moving to full back. You can ignore that if you want but that is all part of the context. And that tactic worked really well, fwiw.

    But ultimately this…

    Respectfully

    …is all I was asking for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,470 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Whatever about the rules, I admired Barrett saying he was gutted for Beirne and he didn't believe there was any intention to harm him. Also said he'd try to advocate for Beirne in the disciplinary hearing this week.

    That's my biggest problem with Kiwis. They're just so bloody sound, you can't even hate them. It's maddening!

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 geoff2204


    think crowley wasn't that bad.

    Big limitation is personnel in the team. We were absolutely beasted at the breakdown and we don't have athletes in the backs to punish mistakes like NZ do. Player for player there is a big gulf and we are lying to ourselves if we can't see that. It's not a selection thing either. There are no glaring omissions that would instantly improve the team. I think this is just where we are now for the next few years. 3rd in northern hemisphere and 5th /6th in world. Adjust expectations please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Moving on to next week; the McCloskey injury is really frustrating. I had hoped for four big weeks from him, and maybe he grabs that jersey.

    I think, frustratingly, he's going to keep a lot of the same players in the saddle for this one, but hope we'll see some changes.

    This is the 23 I'd like to see:

    (15-9,1-8):

    Jimmy O'Brien, Tommy O'Brien, Tom Farrell, Jamie Osborne, Jacob Stockdale, Jack Crowley, Craig Casey, Paddy McCarthy, Ronan Kelleher, Tom Clarkson, James Ryan, Tadhg Beirne (assuming no suspension), Ryan Baird, Nick Timoney, Caelan Doris

    Reps: Gus McCarthy, Jack Boyle, Finlay Bealham, Tom Ahern, Jack Conan, Caolin Blade, Sam Prendergast, Garry Ringrose

    Assuming McCloskey is injured

    With the following side facing Spain:

    Michael Lowry, Robert Baloucoune, Jude Postlethwaite, Dan Kelly, Shayne Bolton, Harry Byrne, Ben Murphy, Michael Milne, Tom Stewart, Tom O'Toole, Evan O'Connell, Darragh Murray, Alex Soroka, Ruadhan Quinn, David McCann

    Reps: Lee Barron, Alex Usanov, Scott Wilson, Diarmuid Mangan, Sean Jansen, Fintan Gunne, Jack Murphy, Zac Ward

    Assuming James Culhane is injured



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Where is this proof? It’s been 2 years.


    “Miles on the clock” …they’ve played 114 minutes on average per player. If that is too much for them then maybe they should consider giving up professional sport.


    Well, the replacements won’t ever get up to the standards if they never get minutes. Who are these replacements?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    There isn’t a “big gulf”, if you did a combined XV pre game you’d likely have more Irish in a combined team and worst would have a similar amount.


    I get France who is this mysterious 2nd team in the NH that’s ahead, please don’t tell me you are actually referring to England 😂.


    And no let’s not adjust expectations, how about our World Class/ World XV actually play like World XV players…lowering expectations is going to make things worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,052 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 geoff2204


    I don't see how you you could have more Irish in a combined xv. Yes I think England are probably a better team now. They definitely have way more depth. That is borne out by the bookies odds too. I know its not what we want to hear but it's the truth objectively.

    I am not saying we can never beat these teams if we get things right and there always improvements to be made. We don't have the depth of talent of some of our closest competitors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Gerry Thornley article from this morning says:

    Stuart McCloskey’s performance was a positive – “he was a handful, wasn’t he?” agreed Farrell – but the Ulster centre will probably be ruled out of next week’s game against Japan, and perhaps for even longer, with a groin injury. The trip home effectively makes it a six-day turnaround, which will probably lead to fresh legs being brought in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Probably because the combined XV was made pre game, it’s easy to look better when you are NZL at the weekend when you consider the position they were in going into the game compared to an undercooked Ireland side.

    England are more like the new shiny toy, they’ve yet to show anything of note that they are A. A better side and B. Have more depth….not unlike them to get carried away after a good result though. It’s not objectively true, it’s bollocks. Yeah we do, that was reflected in the Lions selection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭50HX


    Yeah rinse & repeat, it'll be sorted & collapse again this time nxt year or 6N 27 or more worryingly at rwc 27

    Honestly if POC was in any other international set up he'd be gone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    As long as POC is there it won’t be sorted, he’s no reason to sort it as there appears to be no standards set in this regard.


    Let’s just continue with a duff line out, and as a result no line out plays, no maul, no plays off the maul etc and see how that goes against top sides moving forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    POC clearly isn't coaching them to do what they did on the first lineout for example, but we are in dire need of a change there. Just said it in the match thread, it's depriving us of a primary attacking platform for far too long now. Couple that with Goodman being known for his set-piece launch plays, which we just can't run off lineout now.

    Even when we are securing our own lineouts, it's not quality ball and that extra half-second makes all the difference. It seems to be in their heads at the moment too; I'm sure everyone watching was tentative going into the first lineout, and then that happens. POC has to be replaced at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 341 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Not worried about lineout, its been brutal for 3 or 4 years now, we cough up 3 or 4 per game, and our scrum is always seems to be under pressure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,297 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    In fairness, no one is scapegoating anyone - saying player X had a bad game is not the same as player X cost us the match. 80% of the team was so flat that there's plenty of blame to go around

    The 10 debate is going to keep going for a number of reasons, but primarily because it's such a pivotal position and we don't have a clear first choice or a proven test level player. Like, Dan Sheehan was pretty poor on Saturday but we know he's probably the best hooker in the game so we can hope it was a once-off. Ringrose was absolutely appalling but he's got years and years of quality performances behind him. We can't say anything remotely similar for any of our options at 10.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    The worst part about the lineout is it seems to actually be getting worse… you think to 2023, it was a shambles but when we got it right it was still effective…now rather than doing to difficult, but right thing, and fixing it we have just decided to play without it and just use it as a means to restart play…you think back to the way we mauled NZL in the 2nd half of the RWC QF…you couldn’t dream of seeing our maul causing that sort of damage now…we have pretty light SR’s and at times it feels like we are struggling to get them in the air, totally unacceptable.


    Our line-out is not good enough for professional rugby, some of the SH!5 that happened on Saturday, especially that lineout on 55 seconds, was so bad it was verging on comedy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 341 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Exactly we need new blood, nothing against ringrose but as u say all he seems to do is go for the big defensive hit, his creativity is poor, he is very bad to bring his wingers into play preferring to go himself usually, I'm not saying to discard him totally but give someone else a chance at outside center



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    We already know Crowley is a proven test player based on the 2024 6N and how he played in SA that summer.

    We had 5 22 entries, same amount as NZL managed. Maybe the question needs to be rather than the 10 why are we only winning 69% of our lineouts despite having 6 test lions in our pack and then why is our ruck clear out and protection so poor…maybe instead of making excuses let’s actually fix these problems, you could bring Sexton back in at 10…it’s not going to help our test lions win their lineouts and it’s not going to help them clear out and secure ruck ball.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭50HX


    Ah come on, Baird had a great end to last season, had a stop start season at the beginning last year but has put in excellent club performances since then.

    He warrants his position at present & is showing signs of becoming a leader on lineout calls.

    Its up to him to keep his standards up...i don't see another 6 who has shown anything of the consistency he is starting to show....Ahern needs to put a club run together before being considered imo but thats not a pre requisite of Farrell as shown by other selections...thats just my own opinion.

    The others you've mentioned have plenty of credit in the bank.

    There's alot of knee jerk reaction to Sat.

    If it was game 4 of the series & we were to play again I'd fancy us...NZ were there for the taking & a more cohesive team would have performed much better.

    Lets wait til all games are played



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 longjohn200


    Things are never as good as they seem, and never as bad. I expected ireland to lose that game. If you didn't, you are deluded..

    Imo, Jury is still out on TOB to take over the mantle on the right wing. Hard worker but maybe not international quality. I will be keen to see how Balacoune goes against Spain.

    Looking forward to seeing Farrell at 13, offers a real attacking treat in the 13 channel.

    Stockdale has rediscovered his confidence, so excited to see him go. He still looks as though he lost that edge of pace since he broke into the irish team. Injuries taking there toll I imagine.

    Shame for McCloskey and the injury. Looked dominant and dangerous on each carry. Haven't seen Mccloskey look as aggressive at the line in a long time.

    I think Harry bryne has to jump prendergast in the pecking order.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    That doesn’t matter, they’ve had a summer off, that’s plenty of rest time. Also most of these older players played at least okay so I don’t really see the validity of the argument.

    VDF and Furlong each played at least okay, again I don’t see the logic here.

    Baird was probably our best player and 1 of the few players who had a decent game. Well, that’s what happens when you are conservative and don’t have the cajones to let a “legend” of the game go at the right time.

    Could at least get the age of the players right.

    Ringrose is only 30 years old, Aki it’s obvious in Osborne once they stop trying to turn him into a 15. Winger is less obvious but short term it’s likely someone like Stockdale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Baird was the best Irish forward on the pitch.

    Honestly, what game were you watching?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    He probably didn’t watch it, from reading it feels like another poster who just love regurgitating what the media thinks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,297 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    We already know Crowley is a proven test player based on the 2024 6N and how he played in SA that summer.

    We really don't know that, and it's abundantly clear that Andy Farrell didn't either.

    We had 5 22 entries, same amount as NZL managed. Maybe the question needs to be rather than the 10 why are we only winning 69% of our lineouts despite having 6 test lions in our pack and then why is our ruck clear out and protection so poor…maybe instead of making excuses let’s actually fix these problems, you could bring Sexton back in at 10…it’s not going to help our test lions win their lineouts and it’s not going to help them clear out and secure ruck ball.

    That's literally what I said, so I've no idea what the 'making excuses' bit is about. I literally said that no one player cost us the match and that 80% of them were flat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    His kicking from hand is tragic 

    I mean, literally his previous game before this (Leinster), which went a long way towards forcing his selection for this game, his kicking from hand was excellent.

    It didn't go well for him here, but that doesn't mean his kicking from hand is "tragic".

    "Created absolutely nothing" isn't completely accurate either. In the lead up to our try, he did really well, going blindside and offloading to Sheehan for huge inroads, from which Ireland get a penalty, which he kicks to 5m, and we score our try off the resulting lineout.

    One of only 3 offloads all day fwiw. And the linebreak stat has been updated to 2 (vs NZ's 6, for example, off more carries).

    It's also way more difficult to manufacture a linebreak when your carriers aren't punching holes and commiting defenders as effectively as the opposition (Ireland's post-contact metres were less than half of NZ's 157, vs 320).

    That's all part of the context. It was definitely an issue but it can't all be pinned on Crowley.



Advertisement