Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1158615871589159115921641

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Moved to NZ match thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Moved to NZ thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭Trey13


    Seems like we're all thinking the same things.

    • On the 10s - Crowley was poor but he is still only 25. He will learn and hopefully continue to improve so I don't mind him or Prendergast having poor performances if they can improve. Harry Byrne has been playing well for Leinster so he isn't out of the mix yet imo.
    • Age profile - as most have said, the age profile is just not ideal. The tricky thing is that a lot of those 30+ lads are just off a winning Lions tour so I can see Farrell's reluctance to drop them. For me, Henderson and Aki are two guys we just can't afford to play. They will put in good performances from time to time, but so would anyone. I would rather us back upside like Izuchukwu or Gavin, Osborne in centre.
    • Attack - it has never looked good under Goodman imo. England and Australia were both well able to attack today, nothing about the laws stopping them.
    • The next 3 weeks? Beat Japan and lose to the Boks - that game against Australia is probably a 50/50. Gun to my head and I would say we go 1-2 and will be in a tough spot ahead of the six nations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Well I'm glad Tommy put this one to bed. Getting done on the wing by 34 year old Beauden Barrett would be the definition of slow. We were also done on his wing multiple times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 496 ✭✭Piskin


    With the combined age of this Irish Squad it's going to be very lean years ahead



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,866 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Maybe going into a world cup 'under the rader' is best

    It was a spirited performance tonight but you could see the AB onslaught coming sadly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    not really, plenty of talent in the other provinces, which is the point we are making.

    post world cup seeding, we need to be dipping into that pool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Farrell needs to freshen up his coaching staff imho.

    Replacing POC & Goodman with better coaches would go a long way to reviving Ireland's performances imho...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,539 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    We're down for kicking once every four possessions. New Zealand kicked once every eight. I don't have a problem with our relatively higher amount, but rather that we kicked poorly when we went to contest.

    Unfortunately Crowley had a bad day with his boot and kicked too long on quite a few of them. We couldn't consistently pressure the New Zealand receiver in the tackle as they could run into free space or just mark it in the 22.

    We still could have made it work if Beirne was on the pitch. He's brilliant at the ruck and will slow ball down all day, if not turn it over outright. We currently lack someone to slow the ball down. Doris is probably the next best in the pack, but he's been out almost 6 months and even then his work there isn't as outstanding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    Crowley had no go forward options. NZ swamped us and we had nowhere to go.

    JUst a bad day at the office for everyone. Especially Ringrose and Conan



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Genuinely don't know how you think Conan was one of the two worst players on the pitch.

    I'd have him and Baird as our best forwards.

    People are seriously watching different matches to me when they pick and choose players who were poor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    There is no point picking out a poor player on one performance. But there is justification on picking out a player on many moderate performances. So the front row is a real worry. Other than Sheehan there isn't much. And when you add the replacements in it's actually worse. Second row is just a mess. Beirne isn't even a second row but he's doing his best to hold the second row together. Back row has always been an Irish strength but it can't work if the first and second row ain't working.

    And if your heavies ain't working well then your scrum half/out half are flucked and your nippy wingers are pointless



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    Imo any chance we had of winning this game was kicked away by Crowley between 30-60 minutes. Can't figure out if this was our tactic or what. But either way this loss is on Farrell first and last. His tactics or else he left on an under performing player.

    Line out shambles didn't help but at least NZ were nearly as bad as us.

    Ref wasn't going to let a game break out which probably helped us a little.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 revth1990


    Think most people on this forum and with any common sense knew that the scheduling of this game as irelands first game of the season with zero warm up was a terrible idea if we actually wanted to win a rugby game.

    Having said that I thought we did well for 60 minutes and then lack of top end match fitness cost us aswell as a number of terrible Crowley errors (Prendergast was worse when he came on).

    Problem is the stop start nature of the game actually helped Ireland and allowed us to take NZ's fluidity and pressure out of the game for the first hour but we just couldnt hang on.

    I think we need to start bleeding more young guys in now with an eye to a world cup. Iain Henderson is not an international quality player anymore and was completley out of his depth around the park yesterday and needs to be moved on.

    I think the integration of guys like Gleeson, Edogbo, Izuchukwku, mccarthy, Boyle and the rest of the talented u20s cohort of the last 5 years needs to start being prioritised more than it is in bigger international games, we want to avoid the slow slide of what happend with Schimidt leading into his last WC.

    All this is easier said than done and injuries have hampered this integration.

    Andrew Porter also pretty dissapointing and has been for quite a while, his ability is massive, but now he just doenst have those big game moments he used to have a couple years ago - turnovers, big carries/hits. Now he just seems satisfied with locking out scrums and thats it, same goes for Tadhg, when we were beating big teams like NZ guys like Porter and Furlong were playing out of their skin, winning scrum penalties and dominating in the loose, this just doesnt happen anymore.

    Bright side, thought we hung in well and had good fight for 60mins, hopefully more match fitness can can make this an 80 minute thing. Doris back massive plus he showed glimpses of what he can do. tommy o'brien showed if youre in form pick them, zero experience in big internationals and looked like a a natural out there. Mccloskey epic. Ringrose some big shots in defence but still offering zero attacking threat.

    Lowe fought hard and had good moments, Osbourne solid. Pack was largely solid and competed well but our outhalves have no ability to run a backline or get us posing any sort of threat and this has been a constant issue since Mike Catt left there has been zero inovation or attacking flare produced by our backline - very concerning and I dont think our backs coach is up to standard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,895 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Changes for Japan?

    1. Paddy McCarthy
    2. Dan Sheehan
    3. Tadhg Furlong
    4. James Ryan
    5. Tadhg Beirne
    6. Ryan Baird
    7. Nick Timoney
    8. Caelan Doris
    9. Jamison Gibson-Park
    10. Jack Crowley
    11. James Lowe
    12. Stuart McCloskey
    13. Thomas Farrell
    14. Jacob Stockdale
    15. Jamie Osborne
    16. Ronan Kelleher
    17. Andrew Porter
    18. Thomas Clarkson
    19. Thomas Ahern
    20. Jack Conan
    21. Craig Casey
    22. Sam Prendergast
    23. Jimmy O'Brien

    Need a new openside. Van der Flier is making little impact.

    I'm not as down on Henderson as some, but this might be a good time to get Ahern involved - maybe even in a starting capacity if Beirne gets banned.

    It's probably time to move on from Aki.

    Farrell over Ringrose for me. Far more running threat.

    I've been thinking for a while they should make greater use of Stockdale as #23. Playing in a different position than usual would be a good way to prep him to be versatile off the bench.

    But personnel changes are a pretty small thing with big issues in the coaching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    My XV for Japan


    1 McCarthy

    2 Sheehan

    3 Furlong

    4 Ahern

    5 Ryan

    6 Baird

    7 Timoney

    8 Doris

    9 JGP

    10 Prendergast

    11 Stockdale

    12 Osborne

    13 Ringrose

    14 O’Brien

    15 O’Brien



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    "Need a new openside, Van Der Flier is making little impact."

    F*ck me the dramatics and the hysterics and the panic after one game of rugby genuinely astounds me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 427 ✭✭Greengrass53


    Farrell has become too complacent imo . He's not going to rock the boat now, nice cushy number for the next 2 years and then sayonara



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,592 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Ireland is becoming a concern, our ball efficiency in the 22 is similar to Munster under JvG, easy enough to get in there with penalty kicks, converting the entries to scores is a huge issue.

    Leaving aside our poor conversion rate in the 22, if the opposition take away those penalty kicks then how do we compete, our attack seems dependent on kicks. Farrell took off the one threat we had last night to get Aki on the field, I couldn't fathom that out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,184 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I think rugby has changed since RWC2023. Kicking has definitely come back into vogue with defenders no longer able to escort chasers. See what England did yesterday with (from memory) two of their tries coming from kick contestables where either the ball was won by the chaser or the attacking team won the breaking ball. Do we have the chasers (and the kicking accuracy) to play this game? The other two top teams, SA and France, are also happy enough to put boot to ball. It was something we used to excel at under Schmidt with Murray’s kick accuracy and the likes of Conway, Trimble, Bowe, Henshaw and Kearney all super at contesting.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭Packrat


    I read somewhere that McCloskey was hurt. Its the only rational explanation.

    I'd wait for the injury report before I'd hang Farrell.

    I also await that ridiculous red card being downgraded on appeal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    Ringrose missed 7 tackles yesterday, 2 of which led directly to NZ tries. The shooting out of the line for the big hit needs to end. He was abysmal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,184 ✭✭✭clsmooth




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    Great selection, not a hope it will happen though.

    Only change I'd make is to stick with TOB on the wing and put Stockdale at 23.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    VdF has been well off his best with 12 months. He was outplayed by Curry and Jac Morgan in the 6N and couldn't displace either on the Lions tour.

    He worked hard yesterday but couldn't make any meaningful impact on the game, aside from 1 turnover. His rucking for the Crowley holding on penalty was hopeless and he was caught totally flat footed by their 9 for the final try. I worry about what Fraser McReight will do to our ruck ball in 2 weeks time. VdF has never gone well agaisnt him.

    For me, him and Ringrose are a big worry. 2 very important players who have been out of form for an extended period.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Van Der Flier has not been 'out of form'.

    Those two games against Curry and Morgan in the 6N, he was one of the three best players on the pitch, just in each time his opposite number would turn in POTM performances. Similarly against Pollock in the Champions Cup. He was probably Leinster's best player that day but yet he's the one that's held to the higher standard because his opposite number turns in a world-class performance.

    We get this on a regular basis with Van Der Flier for a very bizarre reason. I was lambasted for saying he is one of the most under-appreciated Irish rugby players I can remember not so long ago. Any time he has a game that's slightly below his very high standard the knives are out for him. It happens every year.

    One game. Let's keep the dramatics and hysteria aside for one series can we not?

    Ringrose is another matter entirely. When previously he would shoot out of the line and smash lads, he's falling off them now. A big concern.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Actually I just had to remind myself.

    England's opposite number didn't outplay Van Der Flier that day, and this is not the first time this has been pointed out.

    mod edit

    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He was always prone to missing a good few, but he generally at least put the ball carrier/passer under pressure and disrupt the attacking structure. He's shooting out into space now. We have far more options at 12 than 13 though, absolutely no idea who should come in to replace him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭OldRio


    VDF is not a problem. They are a few that are but just no



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭jem


    I actually blame team management for where we are at with the 10 situation. should have stuck with crowley last year and allowed Prendergast to grow / develop / learn ( including physically ) with leinster.

    I feel they damaged the confidence of both players in the past 12 months and in fact have damaged the team as a whole.

    Was Crowley brilliant yesterday no he did ok. Some poor kicks, some excellent ones, some good passages of play and some not so good. Thing is that his ability to take ball into contact and also defend has him quite a few steps ahead in my opinion . I also think he has the bottle for the big games. I do think he needs a run of games as 10 and needs to be told that. He needs to get game time with the other players in a green shirt for them to get used to him and visa versa.

    On another note I do think the bringing over current international players on short term contracts like Barrett is a huge mistake yes I know about video analysis etc but putting the likes of him into the squad that makes up the majority of our team gives unnecessary information and insights that could come against us.



Advertisement