Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1154115421544154615471641

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,044 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Pres and Christians are very comparable to Michaels and many schools in Leinster and have produced players at a very high rate to the pro game but Rockwell arent in same world at all. Yes they do have similar enough schools cup as the 2 cork schools and its in multiples of any Limerick school but majority of their titles are from 50 years or more ago. 4 in last 25 years 6 in last 50 years.

    No province can do what Leinster are doing or even get near it they have to do things differently



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    "What advantages?"

    "There obviously are advantages"

    "[the advantage is] not an aspect exclusive to Leinster by any means."

    To be fair, you really sound back and forth on this, FTD.

    Add in population, facilities, the government and business capital of the country etc. Other provinces simply cannot compete to the same scale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    To answer in good faith, Sinn Fein had the education department for a few consecutive terms and changed the entire financial landscape for grammar schools up North. Either @jacothelad or @awec knows the nuts and bolts of it - I can't remember off-hand.

    Although Ulster have been poorly managed and are to blame for a considerable amount of their own misfortune, the simple truth is that the province also works in a far tougher financial landscape - paying 20% of ticket prices to HMRC and not having the Irish government tax break as an incentive for players to stay.

    So whatever about the Leinster schools system, the playing field is demonstrably not level. The only time people pretend it is, is when fans want to paint their province's advantages over others as entirely due to their own financial acumen or far-sighted management.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    What does the "government and business capital of the country" do exactly for the production of young rugby players?

    I'm not denying there are advantages - but it's mostly a numbers game. The largest population will obviously result in a larger quantum of players being produced. There are more private schools with excellent facilities and excellent coaching so you would expect Leinster to produce more players.

    However, all that being said - it shouldn't be as skewed as it has become. Two schools - Rock & Michaels, produce roughly 20% of all professional rugby players (senior squads and academies) in the country. They have a combined enrolment of less than 2,000 students and Rock has a very small boarding contingent. It's more than just money and demographics there — it's a cultural issue as well.

    Post edited by FtD v2 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I definitely get those aspects around the VAT on tickets, tax incentives etc - and I do think Ulster are in a different situation financially to the other provinces at the moment, a lot of which has been for reasons outside of their control.

    But, notwithstanding those issues, there has been a lot of mismanagement and poor decision making still over the past decade or more in Ulster Rugby.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    What does the "government and business capital of the country" do exactly for the production of young rugby players?

    Meant as a general advantage, not just for production of young players. More businesses will want to associate their brand, name and sponsorship to Leinster leading to more money coming in than other provinces can realistically hope to achieve in terms of sponsorship.

    Again, it is an advantage that other provinces can't compete with at the same scale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,895 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Good point, I suppose.

    But just because they theoretically have the power to do that doesn't necessarily mean acting on it is a good idea.

    What if, instead of allocating Leinster schools players to the Provinces, they decided placing top prospects from everywhere at Leinster because it's the best environment was the way to go?

    I think the status quo is pretty good. Only about 8 or 9 players make it into the Leinster Academy every year. There are good players left over who the other Provinces can target - Timoney and Cian Prendergast have made it to Test level, Ronan Foxe was the starting tighthead on an Ireland U20 team that made the JRWC Final, and Jack Murphy is looking like a very good acquisition for Ulster, as a few examples.

    There's a phenomenom at Connacht where players often graduate from the Academy to the senior squad without having made their debut. More of the first team are available all the time because they're not playing for Ireland, compared to Leinster, so there are fewer gametime opportunities for players down the pecking order. Central control of distributing Leinster's talent wouldn't be some sort of panacea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    More businesses will want to associate their brand, name and sponsorship to Leinster leading to more money coming in than other provinces can realistically hope to achieve in terms of sponsorship.

    If this is true, and we don't know definitively if it is, but presuming it is, you think the largest factor in this is the location of Leinster as the "government and business capital of the country" and not the success of the team and the public perception of it as a highly capable and well run organisation?

    What about the fact alone that the primary headline sponsor for Leinster and Munster is the same company?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I literally didn't say it was the largest factor… yet again misquoting me….

    I would posit that both are obviously a factor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Agreed - that criticism is the same I've levelled in my own post, and entirely warranted.

    But the very real problems are handwaved away a bit. You refer to Ulster being in a "different" situation financially - that's true as far as it goes. But "much more difficult situation" is a fairer and more useful assessment, if you actually want to understand the issues facing the province.

    No-one ever asks, "should the IRFU do something to combat or ameliorate these disadvantages?" It's a given that Ulster should just suck it up and that the IRFU should just shrug.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    The most significant reason for the deviation in output in the last 15 years or so though is, in my view, much more attributable to excellent management of the off-field decisions by Leinster (mostly overseen by a visionary CEO in Mick Dawson) while simultaneously a period of poor management decisions were undertaken by Munster & Ulster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think that's very fair, and in general, Ulster are kind of the forgotten province to a certain extent in Irish Rugby, with the vast majority of fans utterly oblivious to the issues you've highlighted.

    I know there are very real demographic issues at play too in terms of losing players to the UK etc at certain levels too, which is obviously a much more real issue in Ulster than elsewhere.

    I think it would be reasonable for the IRFU to do more to ameliorate the financial disadvantages Ulster have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But that can be true, and Leinster can have inherent advantages that the other provinces simply cannot replicate. Indeed, a large part of the excellent management you point to was Leinster capitalising on those advantages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    No, that's not it - the advantages Leinster have they have always have. The massive deviation in quality player production over the past 15 years or so (versus the preceding 40 or 50 years) isn't because of something that's largely always been the case, it's about 80% (in my view) attributable to significantly better management over the period than other factors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,297 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It seems to me that the only real option is to expand the intake into each of the academies, with more central funding if needed.

    i.e. get more guys in and reduce the risk that a player with real potential slips through the net. The obvious downside being that more players will fail to make the grade and get ditched after year 1 but omelette, eggs etc.

    Munster took in five new academy players this season. Maybe two of them will make it to the seniors, is it enough? I don't think so.

    Leinster getting more sponsorship than other provinces is great for signing Rieko Ioane but it's utterly irrelevant for bringing through young talent if the academy remains capped at 6 or 7 per year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And again. I literally haven't claimed this.

    The massive deviation in quality player production over the past 15 years or so (versus the preceding 40 or 50 years)isn't because of something that's largely always been the case

    Post after post misrepresenting what I'm saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Okay, simple question then, what, in your view is the primary reason for why there has been such a deviation in player production of elite, top-tier international rugby players by Leinster ahead of the other three provinces over the past 15 years or so?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Because Leinster are now incredibly well run.

    And a large part of that is taking advantage of those inherent advantages.

    Simple question in return - what advantages do you think Leinster have?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Predominantly population - but also culturally. Rugby is the first sport for some relatively populous chunks of the city, and is the established sport in certain schools, where the quality and standard of facilities and coaching is excellent. Lots of kids grow up wanting to play the game and are in an environment where it's very easy to do so.

    Success begets success to a certain extent too, so it's been helpful that the team have been consistently competitive at the highest levels for a long time, as that leads to a steady stream of big games to attend / watch on TV etc, which completes the circle of making the game desirable for kids to start playing.

    Resources are definitely a big part of that - when I was 13-17 or so, there was a sheen of quasi professionalism to the level of rugby (in terms of facilities, treatment of players, gear and equipment etc) we were playing (in Blackrock) and aspired to play at a higher level, and that wasn't there to the same extent in soccer or the GAA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    listening to a podcast w Connors and SOB talking about club rugby in Kildare/Carlow and Clongowes and Connors talked about a new principle in Clongowes who is really into rugby and heavily invested in facilities there which has had a knock on effect on player production to pro and for clubs in the hinterland. That is the essence of Leinster’s advantage. A ton of rugby mad schools in an arms race producing a steady stream of better and better players. Leinster is well run and takes full advantage of its resources, etc. but it’s like a farmer on good land v a farmer on poor land. One is set up to succeed far more than the other, assuming they both know what they’re doing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And I'd agree with all of that, and don't think it's replicable - to the same scale - in other provinces.

    I suggest we leave it there on a point of consensus, FTD.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    The IRFU is paying for it but the current status quo has led to the most successful period in Irish rugby history.

    You haven't made any argument as why it makes sense for them to change this status quo - the status quo that you have in posts shown is already leading to a significant number of players already moving between provinces.

    It is telling that so much breath is consistently wasted by media and posters on coming up with new methods to pull Leinster back rather than focusing on how the other provinces can get their act together and run better so the IRFU might get a better return on their investment (at times they would have gotten a better ROI from your house and MBA than the money wasted in the other provinces) .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The IRFU literally agreed with many of those posters that a change was needed with the Central Contract situation, for example.

    Maybe the real wasted breath was in the arguments about "pulling Leinster back"…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    The IRFU also agreed that the other provinces cant be trusted to have free rein with the money and in addition to it being ring fenced it will also be closely monitored.

    You focusing on just the part that you did is as telling as always



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ringfenced to fund pathway initiatives, yes. It's akin to a government grant that has to be spent on infrastructure.

    And indeed is tacit acknowledgement that the system needed changing. Despite some of the protestations on here at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    As much as it is a tacit acknowledgement that the other provinces can't be trusted to spend the money on player pathways and need IRFU monitoring so they improve their poor performance.

    Despite some of the protestations on here at the time who constantly pointed the finger at Leinster and the IRFU rather than towards the other provinces that had significant resources pumped into the them which they squandered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,356 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    How so?

    Academy is funded directly, the redistribution of the CC money was supposed to go into pathways, but that’ll be a new fund that wasn’t there before.

    So none of it relates to whatever axe you are trying and failing to grind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Depends which way you want to spin it.

    One thing that can’t be spun any more is the notion that anyone who thought the Central Contract situation needed changing was..

    fanning flames of resentment about a massive problem they claim exists

    I think that was it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    None of this is pulling Leinster back, total red herring. Key question is whether from an Irish perspective we are getting the most out of the supply of players coming out of Leinster schools. They don't 'belong' to Leinster, but their development is of critical importance to Irish rugby, and to Leinster rugby by extension. Not the other way round. If Leinster have a surplus of players competing for limited starts and some of this players aren't reaching their potential because of a lack of opportunity to play that is a problem of resource allocation. If thats not the case then there isn't a problem to solve. And on Irish rugby, past success is no guarantee of future performance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I don't remember huge money being pumped into Connacht.

    We have 9 players of 25 or younger from Connacht who have come through our academy.

    I don't know how many Leinster players are in the Leinster squad but the province has over five times the population of Connacht.

    We are doing things right and I expect our academy is going to get better now we have Lancaster.



Advertisement