Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1153815391541154315441641

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,426 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    My point was that the systems are actually very similar, it's just the kiwi players are willing to move.

    The attendances for the SR franchises are probably similar to those of the Irish provinces but the kiwi teams all play in stadiums that are too big so they all look half empty (apart from the Crusaders). The big problem in NZ is the attendance of the level below SR. Attendance of NPC matches has fallen off a cliff in the last 20 to 25 years. Part of that is due to the ABs rarely playing for their province but also having league, soccer and basketball teams competing in the Aussie comps. And doing well. And those sports are doing a great job with their marketing.

    Sorry for going off topic there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    If's are ridiculous. Do you think Munster didn't know two years ago what they had in Kendellen and Gleeson?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,723 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    To be fair, those guys that move abroad are generally the exception rather than the rule. You get a few everyone once in a while (Whelan, Martin, and Berti Newman are the ones that spring to mind) but most guys are more than happy to move to Galway if it means furthering their career. Just look at the last two or three years worth of Connacht academy intakes.

    I think it's vastly overblown the "young players want to stay with their province" factor - if there's a professional opportunity elsewhere, then they'll probably go if there isn't one at home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I got your point on the willingness to move but I believe part of the issue with NZ caring about SR is the lack of tie the teams have to their community. When you have nebulas AB select team 1-5 playing it does little to get locals invested. Why get excited about seeing a young player coming through when it is likely he will just ship off next season.

    It is one of the many reasons why I dont see R360 having a chance of succeeding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭50HX


    What was the word in not offering him an academy contract?

    There was a good few from his age group that moved up wasn't there, Spicer, Smyth etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Posters are claiming provinces shouldnt have the power to keep young players, that they should be distributed.

    Munster wouldnt have the choice to keep them if there was a log-jam in front of them - like if they'd been given Penny and Deegan in addition to the guys they already have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,723 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    From what I heard, it was more of a fitness (in an injury sense) issue on his part than a quality/talent issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Agree - the last two or three years of Connacht academy intakes is proof of the current system working, along with other players movements.

    Players will move when the situation makes sense for them.

    Trying to force others to move that want to stay in the province and their province want them is simply counterproductive.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,241 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Which posters have argued that players should be forced to move? From what I've seen the argument is that they should move of their own volition if they're not getting a chance at their home province.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    No, I don’t think he was that highly rated here. A very good player who played Irish U19s, but didn’t make the Irish U20s (there was good competition that year in Edogbo, Ward, Gleeson).

    I don’t think he was seen as particularly close to getting a Leinster Academy place or deemed to be a guy unfortunate to miss out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    How is that any different from the status quo?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I must have missed the majority of that conversation.

    I'm of the opinion that players should move on if they feel they are good enough to be starters or that they feel their development is being stunted.

    I mentioned Gus McCarthy because he should be starting. That's not going to happen in Leinster because he's up against probably the best hooker in world rugby. He's 22, Sheehan is 26 and Kelleher is 27. He'll be wasting his time there. If he went somewhere else there's a possibility he might reach Sheehan's level. It's unlikely but he's got to give himself the opportunity.

    I also mentioned Penny because he looked like a future Ireland international to me but he's been stuck down the depth chart with Leinster since he came in.

    I don't agree that players should be forced to move. I do think that there should be a limit on the size of squads though. Like two full teams is 30 so I think 40 should be the limit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Healy left to get a shot at International game time which wasn't coming in Ireland. Yes, people were disappointed to lose him but established players make those decisions all the time. It's not the same as the IRFU recognising there is a surplus of good players coming out of Leinster schools and asking a question about how best tot use them to bring success to Ireland. Warming the bench for years at Leinster is not the answer to that question.

    No-one is forcing anyone to do anything. No-one has the right to an IRFU sponsored multi year training program to become a professional rugby player. That s a major investment on the part of the union and by extension every rugby player and fan in Ireland. Being offered an academy spot or a squad place in one of the IRFU owned teams is not some sort of punishment. People are quick to regard young rugby players as children who need to be near their mammies, no-one feels like that about nurses or students.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭Juventu4


    Penny lacks the size for test level rugby and does not have that power to weight ratio like smaller backrows like Hamish Watson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    He's an inch and a half shorter than JVDF and 1kg lighter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I know Connors' career has been affected by injury but 20 starts in 3 seasons is a tragic return for a guy of his quality. Another one cursed to be a back row in one of the planet's strongest back rows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,297 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I think it's always hard to tell the difference between a player who hasn't developed due to lack of game time and a player who maybe wasn't that good to begin with.

    A lot of the time, we get excited about young players on the basis of a very small sample size of games, but then the more we see of them the more average they look. TBH I think I'd have Penny in that category. Van der Flier misses a lot of games with Ireland, Connors is perma-injured, so there are lots of minutes to be had but Penny hasn't been able to capitalise.

    I'm not sure a move to another province would have made any odds, but who knows for sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I agree with some of this with regards Penny, but the following isn’t accurate at all:

    Van der Flier misses a lot of games with Ireland

    I think it's correct that, prior to the summer games - when he couldn’t play for Ireland, as he was with the Lions - he missed only 2 of the previous 43 Tests (He started 39 of them) over the last 4 seasons.

    The only games he missed were a RWC warm-up game vs Italy and an AI game versus Fiji.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    I think the last poster meant that VDF misses a lot of Leinster games because he is away with the irish team, and so there is game time available in Leinster.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    When Penny came into the squad as a teenager he looked a massive talent. He played some fantastic games which led to player of the match awards. Then he flat lined and didn't continue to improve.

    I believe this was down to not getting enough gametime, not being considered good enough. He was just too far down the depth chart and this leads to a loss of confidence among other things.

    I truly believe he'd have flourished in a team where he got regular starts. He's still young enough that maybe he could improve with a club where he's a more important cog.

    In my initial post I was pointing him out as an example.

    Gus McCarthy is in a similar situation right now. There is no way he's becoming a starter for Leinster, for obvious reasons, and it's quite possible he won't even be the no.2 for quite some time. He's got a 26 year old and 27 year old ahead of him, both Ireland internationals. He's a massively talented young man and it'd be horrible to see that talent dissipate because he's stuck deep down the depth chart with Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Scott Penny has gotten loads of gametime, so that theory is wrong. His issue is he isnt powerful enough and isnt a threat at the breakdown.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,284 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    McCarthy should be the de facto starting hooker for the first few games of the season and after the AI games. We'll get a better idea of what he's worth this season. I think a lot of smoke is blown up his arse based on very little so far but time will tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    So posters are moaning about the status quo and their solution is the status quo that is in your post?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    What's the most games he's started in one season?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    How do you call players moving by choice a status quo?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Healy left to get a shot at International game time which wasn't coming in Ireland. Yes, people were disappointed to lose him but established players make those decisions all the time. It's not the same as the IRFU recognising there is a surplus of good players coming out of Leinster schools and asking a question about how best tot use them to bring success to Ireland. Warming the bench for years at Leinster is not the answer to that question.

    I know people are greedy but no matter how some would like it. It cant be just a bad thing with young players not getting game time at Leinster so it would mad to create a new system where only Leinster have to share good school players. Leinster school players going to other provinces would regularly lead to surplus when their own crops come through. A new system would need to share good school players across all provinces - in my earlier example you ignored Penny and Deegan go to Munster then they end up losing Kendellen and Gleeson.

    No-one is forcing anyone to do anything. No-one has the right to an IRFU sponsored multi year training program to become a professional rugby player. That s a major investment on the part of the union and by extension every rugby player and fan in Ireland. Being offered an academy spot or a squad place in one of the IRFU owned teams is not some sort of punishment. People are quick to regard young rugby players as children who need to be near their mammies, no-one feels like that about nurses or students.

    If you're not forcing them to go to a certain province if they want to join an academy then what the hell are you talking about?

    Forcing players to move provinces is a valid opinion to have, I just thoroughly disagree with it. It is impossible to have a discussion when people wont call a spade a spade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Are you not aware that players are already moving between provinces both at academy and professional level? This has even ramped up over the last few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I am but it's not a regular thing with the same number moving every year. You could have a year where it doesn't happen at all. It's not a set thing that repeats annually even close to the same level.

    As far as I'm aware Connacht haven't taken any player from the Leinster academy or senior squad this year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    The framing you're using is purposely meoldramatic. If a kid is being offered a place in UCG but not UCD he is not being 'forced' to do anything, he's being given an opportunity to do something, or not. If the IRFU system was to distribute players across academies then thats the system players would operate in. You are assuming players have a 'right' to play in one academy or another, you'll have to elaborate on how or why such rights exist, they don't.



Advertisement