Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dairy Chitchat 4, an udder new thread.

13543553573593601116

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,211 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    Just wondering where 0.85m3 coming from the top danish rate band of storage is 0.445m3/week



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭straight


    Building facilities is money well spent. Never regretted pouring concrete here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,439 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    220 gallons in a cubic metre of slurry 170 cows milking here at the minute and including parlour washings their about 6500 gallons of slurry a day produced, 6500 x7 is 45000 gallons, that's coming to 264 gallons a cow a week, take out the parlour washings and you'll spare it back to around the .85m3 a week rate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,439 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Last tank done here in early 2020 was a 180 ft u shaped tank 8 ft deep with a 16'6 slat concrete was 65 plus vat a cubic metre, steel was 10k incl total for entire tank, and the slats plus columns and 4 agitation points came to 17k plus vat, total cost came to 50000 euro plus vat for tank and slats no shed our any site works around it included, roughly 140000 gallon capacity so would just about get a 70 cow herd out for the winter where cows are dry.....

    Same tank now I'd say 85k-90k would be the lower end of the price to do it, could run well over a 100k depending on site and builder



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 4,709 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Thanks for the info. What little of the rose-tinted glasses I had left are pretty much gone now 😀



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,570 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    Would agree normally, the catch this time is the risk that the cow numbers to pay for it could be taken from you...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,700 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    I did a tank with a little bit less storage for 53 k inc vat last year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭alps


    Comes from the change they made last March when they declared that 1m³ or 1000 litres of slurry only contains 2.4 kg of N as opposed to 5kg previously.

    Our cow was deemed to excreet 85kg N in the year..or 85÷52 = 1.634kg per per week.

    1.634÷5(theN content in 1m³) =0.33

    Therefore the cow required 0.33m³ of capacity per week of your storage period.

    Move it right on..

    Cow now excreets 106kg N per year..

    or 106÷52= 2.038 kg N per week

    Then 2.038 ÷ 2.4 (the new figure of N per m³🤨) = 0.85...

    Going by their previous calculations...the new one should be 0.85m³ required per week of storage required...and that has increased as well...

    Carnage🥸



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 4,709 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Will farmers be expected to more than double their current storage capacity, if the reference figure goes from 0.33 to 0.85?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭alps


    They are reviewing the figures, but to my mind if they come up with a lesser figure it means that 1000 litres of slurry contains more than 2.4 kg N...but they got that one wrong before..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭blackdog1


    Does the composition of the diet have any effect on N excreted per cow? for example a cow on a 16% diet will excrete less N than a cow doing similar litres on a higher protein diet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭alps


    Definitely, and can be measured by milk urea levels...The Dutch built that into thier banding but it looks like a complicated headache..hopefully we stay away from it...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,764 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    And a way around to feed high(er) protein and have low(er) milk urea is to feed humic acid,biochar.

    It's all a balls anyway. Purposely making it complicated to drive people from farming.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,632 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    Lads i very slow but are ye sayong if the ntrogen content increases the volume increases .i understand that we will have to store more dairy washings but i dont understand the conne tion between volume and nitrogen content



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭straight


    Funny how they keep getting it wrong but they think they can get it right this time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,287 ✭✭✭✭893bet




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,632 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    Struggling to get my head around this .83 cu m per week.do ye know in the spriñg when the tanks fill up and the weather is iffey and you start putting a few loads here and there to keep it down,well over rhe years i ve kinda got a handle on how much slurry the cows produce per day from how many days you get from how many loads you put out.i did the sums and it comes in at .361 cu m a week.there is some rainwater from un roofed cubicles.i dont know what the nitrogen content is but that is the volume produced per week

    Post edited by K.G. on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 865 ✭✭✭Pinsnbushings


    Sure all you need do is talk to any contractor with a pipe system, I know one fairly well that says the only day's they weren't out last winter was Christmas day and Stephens day. Dirty water of course



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,322 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    I think though this year has been really bad some rain has fallen since the start of October. Cows were in here before the start of the closed period. We'll have enough storage, just about , this year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 865 ✭✭✭Pinsnbushings


    Ye any tank not under a roof or collecting water off a yard got no chance this year..I have 40 percent more storage than I need on paper,so took a chance and didn't empty the tanks in October with the way the weather was, I'd say it was a mistake I will need to get some out by the end of January at the rate they are filling.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 214 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The whole system is rotten, what some lads can get away with while others that have ever had an issue are watched like a hawk. Neighbour horses out slurry every year with contractor tanker in all sorts of conditions nov/dec, including rock solid frozen ground including drawing on public road. Working off slurry storage that was built for half the cows he has now and his about to complete the building of a new milking parlour with 60% grant that he could have lived without. One of these poster boys for farming. It’s this kind of thing that really puts me off farming. If everyone was playing by the same rules then fair enough, life isn’t always fair I know. I’ve no issue with the neighbours, it’s just the idiotic nature of governance.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,632 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    Ah lads i m not talking about spreading before the 12 jan.i m talking about these calculations that requires an increase in slurry storage and i m saying my experience is telling me that .33 cu m per week is what they prduce not .83.i cant get.my,head around why a change in nitrogen content means a change in storage volume.i have always understood that 1000 gls of slurry was roughly the equivalent of a bag of 10 5 30 which ties in with the 2.4 figure.5 kg per cu metre would give a figure of 25 5 10 which i ve never heard anyone using



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,632 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    How did you get the figure of 6500 gls a day.grant it there is no parlour washings in my estimates but a 1000 gls would easily wash most parlours twice in a day and i m saying 2000 gls per day from the same number of cows from just the cow house



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,975 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Fairly annoying all the regs we are forced comply with here when u see what the likes of the kiwis can get away with …that’s before you’d even mention a china/India etc ….we are a mere drop in a huge ocean in what we produce but yet we are bulldozed into spending millions and millions on things our competitors would laugh at …..I mean there’s kiwi farmers making silage pits and justifying it with its high dm feed that will have no run off …would love a dept inspectors response if we tried it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭straight


    Eamon Ryan's answer to that is that we trade on origin green brand. That's why we have so many high value markets, bla, bla, bla. Nobody would buy anything off us if it wasn't for origin green. Claire Byrne and co accept that as a perfectly suitable answer. Those lads have a handful of answers they keep spewing out to get them through their interviews and they never get challenged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭straight


    Maybe the mistake you are making is trying to make reason of their latest notions. It's a bit like this; I dried off my cows this year at 6490 kg supplied. If I milked them for an extra day, or if I sold 1 dry cull cow before year end, it would mean that they excreted 106kgs nitrogen vs 92kg.

    They will try everything they can to keep pushing their ideology of more cows, higher stocking rates and less milk per cow. They're the experts after all. Sure it might keep the price of milk up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,392 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Drying off your cows this year didnt save you. It is the average of 3 years the banding is based on.

    Regarding the required slurry storage that doesnt change because of banding. The volume of slurry excreted per cow stays the same regardless.

    If anything you will need less storage in the higher bands because you will have less cows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭straight


    I supplied 6580 litres last year and 6350 litres in 2020. So barely stayed under the 6300 average this year but I won't be doing it again. I'll drive them on to 7 or 8 thousand litres now in future.

    I agree with what you are saying about storage. Sure it's just common sense but I have heard from my contacts that they are trying to put higher slurry storage requirements on the 106kg cow. As I was saying, they will try everything they can to influence people into higher stocking rates with smaller cows and less milk per cow. And remember.... They are the experts.

    I'd be more interested in the UCD Lyon farm approach myself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,975 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Experts …..so called experts with agendas ….there has been a complete fascination from Tegasc and advisors with the kiwi dairy model for a long time and we are where we are now because of it …cows have gotten smaller ,stocking rates are increased and quality of beef and male calves has gone backwards as a result ….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,392 ✭✭✭ginger22


    There is an interesting chart in the IHFA winter journal on nitrates.

    They basically do a comparison for a 50 Hectare farm working without derogation.

    At present they can keep 79 cows yielding 5608 Ks and 34 replacements 0-1 and 1-2 year olds, total solids per Hectare 674. Then if you reduce to 4500L band 87 cows 36 replacements 484 solids per acre. Under 6500 band, 77 cows and 32 replacements, 634 per Hectare. But if over 6500 Litre band 68 cows and 30 replacements output goes up to 725Ks solids per Hectare.



Advertisement