Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Munster Team Talk Thread - Beirne After Reading

14354364384404411096

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Not going to happen. Doesnt make sense to

    No chance now or even if discontent did rise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I mean a split model in terms of something close to 50% of the big games in Cork. Having Zebre and the Scarlets once a year over isn’t really a split model.

    It's a split model relevant to the capacity and facilites we have in each location. That's the reality, unfortunately.

    I do like the idea of one-off games in PuC, tho. Adding games to an already squeezed calendar is going to be tough, but I wonder if the AI's the year before a RWC will see an increase in teams looking to schedule mid-week games, like SA have done here (and Ireland did during the Summer).



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Looking at the populations of just counties Limerick and Cork is too simplistic too. There are 6 counties. Players from Clare and Tipp generally end up going to Limerick rugby schools and playing senior rugby in Limerick. And Cork is so large that parts are closer to Limerick City than to Cork City. Charleville play in North Munster.

    And that doesn't even take into account Waterford and Kerry where the main population centers would probably be equidistant from Limerick and Cork.

    At the end of the day I think the lack of success over the last decade is a bigger issue to MR than where the play or train. If they were still winning trophies regularly, then none of these conversations would be happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    We all know its only a matter of time before munster rugby moves to westh cork.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Not too many from Clare/Tipp play in Limerick schools but quite a few do go on to the AIL clubs who hoover up many players as branch hasnt done enough to keep under 20 rugby going outside of the city clubs over the last few years

    But yeah if Munster were winning trophies things would be very different and these discussions wouldnt be happening



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Dismissive is just writing something off with no argument or taking one conclusion out of context and choosing to rubbish that with no discussion of anything else:

    Predicting 10+ years out is tough going. In my opinion the shift of the players in the squad towards Cork and the difference in demographics and economics between Cork and Limerick will start to force the hand of Munster over the medium term and into the long term. Which will probably look like 4 to 5 games in Musgrave and 2 to 3 games in PUC every year. A stadium name rights deal which locks out PUC, would in my opinion be a major error, particularly if it stops Munster trying ideas like a Saturday night PUC game against Ulster in the run up to Christmas, or knockout URC games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Am reading that Cork County board want the game to happen and are pricing it at a point to ensure that PUC is chosen if GAA central council approves.


    Rent for a game is nice but setting up a situation where semi regular rent is available is essentially priceless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    this might be the most sensible post ive seen on here in a while

    well when i was involved with ucc i know there was very bad feeling about everything moving to limerick so i dunno about that. the mardyke being in the city centre would limit the amount of space for expansion and the plan has been to sell the farm for years so i think it was more that they werent in the position rather than that they didnt want to know. cant speak of CIT though

    a late kick off in limerick would be similarly unsuitable for any travelling fans too?

    at least give your argument as to why it doesnt make sense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i would see the naming rights being the only real issue here. PuC is a little under double the capacity of thomond park, it could easily work from a financial pov, especially if the figures being thrown around for potential rents are in anyway true. it probably would work better for a christmas interpro but theres potential either way



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Looking at the populations of just counties Limerick and Cork is too simplistic too.

    Even more broadly, population isn't everything, if you look at Leinster's comparative attendances for example.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Munster will earn more from Thomond. with no rent. they retain more. There isnt going to be many more games in Cork especially a non Munster owned ground if it means moving them from their own ground in Limerick



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    To be fair on the Charleville thing I think that's a disingenuous argument. For 95% of people in Cork, Cork City will be the closest major urban centre. Charleville and the few tiny villages around it are the exception.

    However you are right that there is a significant portion of the population of Cork that is quite far from the city. The OECD look at functional Urban Areas and based on their assessment 75% of the population of Cork (408k out of 543k at the time) was within a commutable distance of the city or as they more eloquently define it : FUA consists of a densely inhabited city and of a surrounding area (commuting zone) whose labour market is highly integrated with the city (OECD 2012)https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/Ireland.pdf So yes I do think you can shave off a fairly a signifiant portion of the total crude population from the Cork numbers, however I don't really think that makes a difference to the growth statistics, in fact narrowing down the population to within the commutable distance of the city would probably actually exacerbate the difference. Unfortunately the CAO don't update based on FUA and both the city council areas of Cork and Limerick have changed in the last decade so using the total county numbers is the easiest. I think the point holds and the demographics are moving towards Cork in Munster.

    Post edited by snotboogie on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    In my opinion the shift of the players in the squad towards Cork and the difference in demographics and economics between Cork and Limerick will start to force the hand of Munster over the medium term and into the long term. Which will probably look like 4 to 5 games in Musgrave and 2 to 3 games in PUC every year

    How many games per year do Munster fill or exceed the capacity of Thomond? 2 or 3 maybe?

    How many games per year do they fill or exceed the capacity of Musgrave? Practically all of them.

    They'll earn more from having the majority of games against the majority of teams in Thomond than in either of Musgrave or renting PuC.

    I'll be surprised if those mechanics change, even over 10-15 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    yes that obviously must be the case when theyre looking at bringing this game to PuC and they have talked about bringing euro knockout games there previously.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Lost Ormond is right, tho.

    "There isnt going to be many more games in Cork" is different from "There isnt going to be any more games in Cork".

    They could bring this SA game to PuC and look to bring a euro knockout game there and he'd still be right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    when there are only 2/3 urc games and maybe a pre-season game in cork, even one more game counts as 'many' tbh


    and i'd definitely consider one more game over a few seasons to be 'many'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    There are two ways to look at that data :)

    If you had at guaranteed at least 4 games in Musgrave and 1 in PUC you could sell a separate Cork season ticket package.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    The kick off in limerick is the same for a venue thats half the size and half the problem of reaching a full house.

    if they want to maximize ticket sales the kick off time needs careful consideration



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Fair enough. I personally don't see 1 game a season as "many" but each to their own, I suppose...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    compared to 10+ games a season then it wouldnt be, but compared to 3/4 then it is tbh



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ok, lets look at that then. (With admittedly back-of-a-napkin maths).

    Musgrave is pretty much at capacity every game, so there's essentially no additional revenue for your Cork Season tickets for those games. You're down probably ~4-5k attendances for the additional Musgrave game? (vs having it in Thomond).

    So for the PuC game, you need to be hitting 31k+ to balance that AND an additional amount as well to cover rent. Someone mentioned €200,000 awhile back; that's an additional 5,000 tickets at €40 a pop.

    So that's roughly 36k attendance for the break-even point for the current situation? And ideally you want to be bettering that obviously. Are there any regular season games where we'd be guaranteed to draw that? I'm not sure, tbh.

    Which goes back to the original point; I don't really see this happening all that frequently.

    I do like the idea of this game to look into the possibility of it tho.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ah ya, Limerick native here, but if I was in your shoes, I'd be loving the idea of 1 additional game, particularly if it was to be a big knock-out game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Anyways, I think one thing we can all agree is, would they ever get that fecking motorway finished...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    Aloof , aside from the business mechanics which will undoubtedly drive the decision there are other intangibles to consider. It gives the people from the other major rugby playing county in Munster some rugby in an idyllic setting.

    Also, the crowd factor and excitement it would generate for the team would give them an injection of life and I’m sure the performance levels would rise in front of such a large crowd. It evolves the game in the province and makes the game there fluid and includes more people. It makes things which seem stagnant less so and demonstrates growth.

    Staying the same, while sometimes aligned with success more often than not leads to stagnation. Munster needs to grow and evolve. This is a step in that direction.

    In terms of the business case against the move the same could have been said of Leinster’s move to the RDS. They have to pay rent despite the larger capacity. Ok PUC would have to sell substantially more tickets, but I can easily see it doing so for European games. This isn’t a full scale move of Munster Rugby, it’s a splitting out of the pie so more people can have it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    ...there are other intangibles to consider.

    Little disagreement with this, but post-Covid, as you say yourself, the business mechanics will drive the decision.

    Also, the crowd factor...

    Would it be any better than the atmosphere in the Aviva for the Toulouse game? That day was unbelievable. With the benefits of not having to rent the stadium.

    Staying the same, while sometimes aligned with success more often than not leads to stagnation. Munster needs to grow and evolve. This is a step in that direction.

    I'm all for growth and evolution. But changes to stadia circumstances aren't universally successful in rugby. A change doesn't automatically guarantee success.

    In terms of the business case against the move the same could have been said of Leinster’s move to the RDS. They have to pay rent despite the larger capacity.

    Do you mean the move from Donnybrook to the RDS?? I'll charitably say that's a flawed comparison, at best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    I'd say that that financial intangibles are more likely to be considered than rugby related intangibles.

    Having a showpiece for sponsors in Cork could be very valuable. If Munster draw 40,000 to PUC its a valuable statement to potential sponsors and existing sponsors about the support available to Munster Rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    You'd need to see the financials of how the season tickets work at the moment. I think they have a Limerick only and two mixed Cork/Limerick options. The 3 cork games end up costing up to €65 extra vs a Limerick only package. So it’s about €20 a ticket. The Limerick package costs up to €300 which is up to €40 a ticket. Bundling the Cork games with a PUC big fixture and a higher profile MP game would mean you could charge a lot more than €20 a ticket and probably come close to matching the Limerick bundle. Ultimately though we’re guessing without access to the data.

    The other thing to keep in mind is the likes of an Munster Ulster game in PUC on a Saturday night in the run up to Christmas would be the biggest rugby game in the city in 20 years. In Thomond it’s the 4th or 5th biggest in a given year and the lethargy of it is showing.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Munster are never at home to Ulster in the run up to Christmas. Leinster at home on St Stephens Day and Ulster away around New Year's are pretty much locked in stone at this stage.

    A game that rarely if ever attracted 20k to Thomond is not going to get anywhere near PuCs capacity. Especially if it was a regular occurance

    Besides the Champions Cup games are played the two weeks before Christmas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    Do you mean the move from Donnybrook to the RDS?? I'll charitably say that's a flawed comparison, at best.

    Why is it flawed? Going from a branch owned ground to a rented ground with roughly the same proportions of seats?

    Donnybrook 6,000 RDS 18,500 3x times capacity. Thomond Park 25,600 PUC 45,000 2x times. I don’t know how the outlays work on putting on a game in each stadium but surely 20,000 tickets more than doubles the 12,000 from the Leinster switch.

    The Munster situation is different because it’s split across two cities, but the finances surely are maybe not proportionally better for PUC but the idea of getting the game to more fans holds true. And that’s not to say they can’t make substantially bigger profits than playing a European match at Thomond?

    Excuse my ignorance but how much is rent per game at the RDS? Possibly lower proportionally because it’s used more often across more games. Is there any other factors that make the comparison flawed?

    Post edited by Itxa on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i think the toulouse game worked so well due to fantastic efforts by the mrsc to mitigate the cock up of booking ed sheeran. i wouldnt expect the same pricing/ travel options etc to always be available for aviva based games

    A game that rarely if ever attracted 20k to Thomond is not going to get anywhere near PuCs capacity. Especially if it was a regular occurance - when cork hasnt had a big game in years how can you know that? the novelty factor alone would bring it close. and contrary to popular belief, there is actually a somewhat decent rugby following in cork



Advertisement