Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Munster Team Talk Thread - Beirne After Reading

14344354374394401096

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It's pretty hard to see something you know will be great knocked by know-nothings over and over again before it's even announced.

    I think you're conflating things here tho; just because someone discusses potential issues or hurdles with a proposition doesn't mean they're actively against it.

    The majority posting here are Munster fans. I'd wager if the economics of it work, and it turns into something positive for Munster, most here would be delighted.



  • Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What would you rather I call people who actively say things you know to be untrue? It was a handful of pretty certain posters who were very dismissive of even the concept.

    The cosplay comment (fwiw, since I'll be closing this account soon I think) comes from a former player who was told by a sports psychologist (something like) "to remember when dealing with online criticism [of his play] that most critics are like cosplayers, they dress up and they are very invested but they've never played the game [at his level]."



  • Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In the original discussions, they weren't just offering constructive feedback, they were actively against the concept, tbf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 285 ✭✭tonyfillony


    People need to relax in here .

    Its good news that this might happen and could then possibly open it for a European quarter or semi played . I will be bringing the whole family to this if it goes ahead

    All this he said /she said stuff is nonsense / lame



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,031 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    I've actively let slip info about the business plans of Munster rugby

    Wow. Thanks Mr. Snowden.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,031 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    Also.... questioning that I called you out on a superiority complex and then IN THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE bragging about "actively letting info slip" and referring to people as know-nothings is truly mind boggling lack of self awareness.

    Like surely... SURELY this is satirical now hahaha



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,432 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    I think they're official media now so info could be reliable and seemed to be fairly detailed report on discussions between IRFU and the GAA. Whether it gets the go ahead is another question though. As an aside the Examiner are streaming the friendly on Friday night.



  • Posts: 487 ✭✭ Amari Full Terminology


    I'm failing to see where someone definitively stated something and said it was a fact. There is plenty of opinions on the concept, some good, some bad. But that's what forums are for, to share opinions.

    Again, if someone has a vested interest in something, they should be more than entitled to share their opinion.

    For what its worth, I am a season ticket holder, I travel over an hour each way to all home games, travel to the away interpros, and at least 2 game abroad each season. I'll never play the game at a professional level but I put my money where my mouth is to support Munster Rugby, the least I should be entitled to is an opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Now I highly doubt you're self aware enough to see why that might lead to people calling you out. But it does. And it should

    Superiority complex?

    It's pretty hard to see something you know will be great knocked by know-nothings over and over again before it's even announced.


    @arsebiscuits1 that was pretty prophetic really.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Posts: 487 ✭✭ Amari Full Terminology


    Confirmed that it is happening, only question remaining is where:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    Harvey you have been an insightful and informative poster on here particularly in the past few weeks. You have certainly fleshed out my guesswork on the financial framework the game works within and have offered extremely good insight into the makeup and evolution of the URC and supporting leagues. DO NOT close your account. I for one have learned a lot from you and look forward to more inside knowledge.

    Edit: sorry just whizzed through the thread am I to understand Harvey has been advocating support for games at Parc Ui Caoimh and dullards and negatrons have been shooting him down?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    Interesting. And if it’s a trial run that means you have heard or know the door is ajar for European games. You were proven right on this in the first place on this, I believe you on the follow up.

    Much brighter days ahead with this development.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Edit: sorry just whizzed through the thread am I to understand Harvey has been advocating support for games at Parc Ui Caoimh and dullards and negatrons have been shooting him down?

    No.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    If it is in PUC on a Thursday the kick off time will be important, 6pm and its over by 8. 7pm and its over by 9. 8pm and its not over till 10pm on a school night.

    That can make a big difference to parents bringing kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭snotboogie



    There is certainly a pretty dismissive, borderline hostile attitude to any discussion regarding increasing the number of games in Cork, especially any mention of games in PUC, from certain posters. Given the player profile, demographics and economics of the team and province at large, I personally don't see the Munster decision to go all in (or 95% in) on Limerick as sustainable in the long term. People are too focused on the short term economics of single games and are ignoring the larger picture of freezing out the biggest market in the province. Posters taking the attendance figures for Thomond and copy and pasting them to the much larger, far less served, market in Cork, is kind of typical of the points being missed.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    On the other hand, the earlier the kick off time is, the more difficult it is for people to make it on a work day. An early kick off would also make it more difficult for people traveling from across the province. A 6pm KO, for example, would clash with rush hour traffic. I can't see it being on earlier than 7:30pm. Especially if it's televised. I'm sure it would be fine for the kids to have one late night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Quite awhile ago now, but the All Blacks game in 08 was a Tuesday at 7:30pm, so I'd expect it to be similar alright.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Some people seem to forget where the Munster Branch of the IRFU are still based. They are the ones who decided to rebuild TP. The training center is in Limerick because UL gave them the best deal. UCC seemingly didn't want to know and UL beat CIT and LIT with their proposal. The CEO at the time of these decisions was a Cork man. The current CEO is a Cork man. These are the people making the decisions. Not posters on internet forums. They are well aware of the long term picture.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Discussing the practicalities against it (and there are a few) isn't dismissive or hostile, tho.

    Posters taking the attendance figures for Thomond and copy and pasting them to the much larger, far less served, market in Cork, is kind of typical of the points being missed.

    The most significant hurdle to me seems to be the economics of it. To the point Cork may attract bigger attendances, they'd have to be materially larger than the capacity of Thomond to at least mitigate the cost of renting PuC. I just don't see that happening for anything other than a knock-out Euro game.

    And even then, the Aviva may be available; for all the hand-wringing before the Toulouse game about Thomond not being available, Munster and MRSC got that day spot on in the circumstances, from a supporters perspective with regards buses, ticket pricing etc.

    I see your point that you don't want to disillusion the Cork fanbase, but presumably coming out of Covid, short-term economics are going to be of even higher importance than usual.

    But ultimately, if they can get the economics to work, it'll happen. I just don't see it happening all that frequently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,509 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    What difference does the venue make to what time the game is played?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,432 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    Think it was more a comment on it being a school night for kids say especially anyone with kids travelling for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,194 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    am I to understand Harvey has been advocating support for games at Parc Ui Caoimh and dullards and negatrons have been shooting him down?

    Yeah. In fairness to Harvey, he predicted the European QF against Toulouse would be played at PuC and he was proven correct, so we all owe him an apology there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    TP only needs to sell 26k tickets.

    PUC needs to sell 45k.

    The timing of the game is an important part of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,920 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Im pretty sure individual parents will decide what suits their own kids.


    Also a later kickoff can be a negative for traveling fans. 8pm kick off means you dont get back limerick till 11:30/ midnight.

    I know i wouldnt bring my kids to a 7:30 kick off on a school night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    100% ya. It was Cork people who took the decisions. I think at the time they were the easy decisions to make, Cork City Council were a nightmare and there was enough nostalgia and mythology around Thomond that there was very little complaints from Cork.

    I would question if they were aware of the long term picture at the time though. The demographic numbers are quite stark. When the decision to redevelop Thomond was made in 2006 the population of Cork was 481k, at the census last year it was 581k. Limerick was at 184k in 2006 and was at 205k last year. Cork grew by 21% and Limerick by 11% since the decision was made. If these trends were to continue, Cork will be at 700k by 2035 and Limerick will be at 225k that same year.

    I think those numbers will get harder and harder to ignore over the next 15 to 20 years and Munster will have to revert back to a split model to exploit the commercial opportunities and to negate the low probability but major impact downside risks like a Cork club going it alone professionally (presumably in England). I know that suggestion will be laughed at now but if the public in Cork was to turn sour on the lack of attention from Munster and something like the Grovemore deal for Cork City (which was rumoured to include a 12-15k stadium development for Turners Cross) it would become a lot less laughable.

    I will concede that this is a really low priority, borderline non issue amongst the Cork rugby public now. It’s bubbled slightly once or twice, I think the Donal Lenihan interview to second captains in 2016 was the peak of “discontent” but to ignore the risk would be a major mistake, in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,254 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    ...and Munster will have to revert back to a split model...

    But they already have a split model. They've invested a lot in Musgrave as it is, they'll want some return for that.

    ...and to negate the low probability but major impact downside risks like a Cork club going it alone professionally (presumably in England).

    How likely is this in reality, tho?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Munster already operate a split model in terms of games being played and there isnt going to be a change in terms of training etc. There is no chance of any cork side going it alone professionally.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I mean a split model in terms of something close to 50% of the big games in Cork. Having Zebre and the Scarlets once a year over isn’t really a split model.

    On the second point I’d say the possibility is zero in the next 5 years. If the market continues to grow and if there is a discontent that possibility will rise 10-15 years from now. I think there is a massive overestimation in terms of the administrative obstacles, Rugby is incredibly flexible and if the public backing and finance was there (neither of which exists at the moment) the unions would accommodate.



Advertisement