Good guy with a gun shoots bad guy in Indiana

It might be because so many of us have family and friends living there.

But they don't want to fix it. The democrats might make some sort of noise now and again claiming they want to fix it but they actually don't. They are so ultimately in bed with arms companies and manufacturers, the same ones who make the guns wholesale for the American market who in turn sell multi-million shipments of weaponry to totalitarian kips such as Saudi Arabia who bomb the $hit out of countries in the depths of a absolute total Hellscape famine. Totalitarian kips such as Saudi Arabia where only last weekend President Biden was fistbumping and begging the murdering head of the brutal regime there. Why the F**k should I or anyone here in Ireland care how that thick, ignorant and hypocritical nation manages its affairs or culture? It is a basket case.

Why so many? What's WRONG with that place?

I have made this point before, but it does seem to me that the argument that there's something inherent in the American way of life that produces an inordinate number of people with some predisposition towards mass shootings, which is often put forward as a defence of gun rights, is actually a very strong argument against gun rights.

I mean, surely the very people most likely to go on a mass shooting spree are the ones who need access to guns removed.

In the same way that a person with a predisposition to arson has their access to fire-making materials removed, or a person with suicidal tendencies has access to dangerous items removed.

I rest my case folks.

No that wasn't it. Juuust the callousness aspect of it.

It shouldn't worry you. I was just perplexed some tried to deny it was callous. It is, with reasons to be.

I never said you should; I think you are over-analyzing my contribution.

Well, you are the one trying to label and analyze me and people like me as callous for not overtly caring about a dysfunctional, lying, hypocritical, mass murdering, failed system that doesn't even care about itself.

Yeah and I agree with that poster 100%, so you can reply to me too. But for some reason, you won't? So, go on and explain, why exactly should we care?

You called me CALLOUS Overheal. You said that. You are the one trying to put labels and words onto and into peoples mouths, not me. So own what you said and explain exactly what you said, that's all I'm asking. What's with your ridiculous merry-go-round where you won't own up to what you said? You called out my "callousness" so go on, call it out this dastardly "callousness" exactly.

I didn't deny agreeing that it was callousness.

But, then you wound yourself up assuming that I was at all trying to tell you 'no you really need to give a **** about the dumpster fire America'

But I wasn't. And I keep telling you you're over analysing but then you seemingly kept at it. You inserted subtext where I hadn't put any.

I chimed in on a simple point of semantics by posting the 2b definition of Callous from Merriam-Webster. I even reiterated that to you:

Just to clear my position up for you: Nothing wrong with being callous and even apathetic about the gun epidemic in the USA, it's warranted given the state of things and the state of US Politic. It is nonetheless objectively callous.