Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What's the point of Paul Murphy?

11112141617

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Not supporting anyone. Discussing your general comment on the left.

    Murphy and friends didn't make Putin the billionaire he is today. The Irish government and private enterprise played a major role, far and above any minor socialist leaning politician.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,742 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Yet those on the left continue their support while everyone else introduces sanctions.

    The way back to normalisation is for wars to stop, sanctions to be lifted and trade resuming (likely only possible with putin gone, but it will be another leader making money instead unless they reduce corruption significantly, which was one of the excuses given to invade Ukraine).

    The left seem to want to roll over and expose their yellow bellies. You seem to be supportive of this for whatever reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I find it interesting the big move to associate the left and opposition with Putin. I get it and there are certainly links, but it smacks of desperation. Everybody has been in bed with him for many years and far beyond being an oil or gas customer.

    The sanctions will be harder on the Russian public but I think the only change must come from within and sanctions might help that.

    The west and Irish of course turned many a blind eye on putin over the years. Trying to tack the left to putin just seems like the investors and piggy banks for Russian businesses covering their arse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,742 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    russia was trading as a normal country, are you saying we should stop trading with basically everyone? In case they start a war? There is a normality that exists in international relations that allows trade to occur but also respects the country's sovereignty to run itself even if in opposition with Western values. Insular countries (like USSR) eventually fail. Murphy is a proponent of an insular socialist economy (well, maybe it will trade with maduro...).

    At least you have said you support sanctions which puts you firmly against the majority of those sitting on the left (I guess PBP/Rise is off your voting list now, so soon after you switched from SF due to their housing policy).

    And it's not a stretch to associate those on the left with putin when they're the ones voting against the sanctions which impact putin...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I wouldn't trade with China, Israel, U.A.E. or Russia for starters.

    FG were against sanctions on Saddam. Does that mean they supported Saddam's butchering? I don't think so. There has been a desperate level of ignoring putin business relationships to talk about the like of Murphy.

    Like with IW, Murphy is a distraction. He's not that powerful is he?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Surprised that he didn't manage to squeeze Leo into his whataboutery post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There is a difference between political and trading links.

    Everyone in this country has trading links with Russia, after all, we have all used their products, be that oil, gas, coal or some other product.

    Only some politicians and parties have showed political support for Russia. They include Murphy, Wallace and Daly, as well as Sinn Fein.

    That is the difference.

    Whatabouting trading links with Russia, as if that was a signal of political support, demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of how things work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Don't forget investing in Russian companies, letting Putin and his friends use Ireland to filter money through. And keeping up those arrangements despite Putun assassinating people, locking them up and butchering Chechnyans. Thats were your 'trade' put them. More real than political posturing.

    The clear lack of understanding relates to you thinking a few politicians liking socialism does more to embolden Putin than the people help to make him rich and maintain that status. If you think Putin would give up all the money to keep the red flag flying here with Murphy, you're deluded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,742 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    But again, that's lack of understanding on your part, but it does, funnily enough, feed into Murphy's overriding goal which is an insular socialist republic.

    Lots of countries we import from have those issues, we don't produce our own oil, so all plastics are sourced from those locations.

    If your goal is to cut Ireland off from the world, have the courage of your convictions and say so, whatabouting how normal countries trade doesn't get you out of it (or just further exemplifies your lack of understanding).

    putin has gone to war. Those on the left are still supporting him by refusing to vote for sanctions against him and his regime.

    And remember that pre-war, and pre-Crimea, there were already existing sanctions against russia that russia wanted gone. And again, guess which groups didn't support those sanctions. As a clue, it wasn't the current government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Less of the underhanded insults.

    So you think what Paul Murphy says or does has emboldened Putin more than us doing business with him and funneling his oil money through our country? I respectfully disagree. Continuing to line his pockets while throwing political shapes, while ignoring his murdering and imprisoning of critics, outside of giving out a bit, hasn't marked his card has it? I would suggest he knew we were dependent on his oil and gas and figured we'd turn a blind eye like we did with Chechnya and Crimea. If he had of taken the north east regions and stopped there I doubt NATO or the UN would have blinked.

    Nope, a little balance. It's the height of hypocrisy to invest in Putin's Russia and help him funnel his money while he kills any naysayers and runs a dictatorship disguised as a democracy, and then look at the like of Paul Murphy like they played a role. Ridiculous.

    Putin didn't care about any previous political posturing while we were investing in Russia and minding his money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,742 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Nothing murphy does matters, he's a complete non-entity, what matters is that he's voted against sanctions on russia and is implicitly supporting russia because of that, those that support murphy also fall into that bucket.

    Whatabouting again over dealings with russia pre-war, again, if your goal is an insular socialist republic, as you keep skirting around, come out and say it and have a little bit of courage in your stance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I'm simply pointing out how we dealt with Putin has more to do with what he is than an ideology based on politics putin doesn't even follow himself. What putin did was condemned by pretty much everybody. Some differ on sanctions and the militarisation of Europe and moving to US fracking etc.

    The move to try make out a few Paul Murphy types played more of a role than the money men is just not believable.

    Putin is a capitalist not a socialist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 503 ✭✭✭animalinside


    He's a lot more socialist than the United States.

    If he was a pure capitalist he wouldn't bother getting involved in costly wars and facing extremely harsh sanctions that would decimate the Russian economy would he.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Is he invading Ukraine for the people do you think, or his own ego? The Russian people aren't even allowed discuss it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Brucie Bonus: "Putin is a capitalist not a socialist".

    But his capitalism is not what we know as capitalism: based on theft of state assets, not subject to any legal or regulatory oversight. But maybe some leftwing socialists regard capitalism as just a form of kleptocracy, so there's almost no point in arguing with them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    But his capitalism is not what we know as capitalism: based on theft of state assets, not subject to any legal or regulatory oversight

    Charles Haughey *cough*

    He might break and make rules but he's more about making money than 'property is theft'. Anyway,just repeating myself. He didn't become the lovable murdering, dictator who just threatened Finland and Sweden with nukes and loves to make a few Bob by collective farming.

    Post edited by Brucie Bonus on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Putin doesn't know their names or care if they are in Govt.


    He has Scholz, Merkel was one of his best.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,540 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Mod - Stay on topic please, or has this thread run its course?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭xl500


    I love you the way he says he only takes the average industrial wage and donates the rest to the party

    Then the party employs his wife and pays her more 😡😡😡



  • Posts: 742 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Whose wife? Smirker hasn't got a wife, he has a "partner" - so all of the benefits and none of the comitments! Also, that way I assume that no ethical issues will arise in the employment stakes.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Surely Mr "I was elected to break the Law" would support a fella who gets to the top and then ignores all local and international laws to enrich himself and his buddies and maybe invade a few other countries as well? A bit of the oul' genoicide?

    It would be consistent in principle anyways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,871 ✭✭✭MFPM


    One more nonsensical nay embarrassing contribution to this thread...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Are you not aware that Mr. Murphy thinks he is allowed to break the law?


    It would be pretty embarrassing if you are a fan of his and aren't aware



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,871 ✭✭✭MFPM


    I'm well aware of the statement he made, the context it was made in and indeed what he meant by it though he expressed it a little clumsily. So, no embarrassment here unlike your previous post which is laughingly so!



  • Posts: 742 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I see, thanks.

    Presumably he finds the word 'wife' too bourgeois, so prefers to describe the fair Ms. Spears as his 'partner'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Grand. Given that I'm sure you are not a hypocrite, then you'll likewise excuse the likes of Charlie Haughey or Ray Burke or Michael Lowry etc. Given that you agree with the concept of politicians being elected to break the law



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Interesting.

    Might have been a necessity/convenience if she didn't otherwise have status here. Not saying it's not genuine - just that maybe he doesn't subscribe to the notion of "husband/wife" and only did it to tick the box for some other reason.

    You'd imagine though he'd refer to her as his wife if they are married. Unless he thinks it would put off all those 18-20 year old hippy college ladies if they thought hunky Paul was off the market!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,871 ✭✭✭MFPM


    I'm certainly not a hypocrite though you do seem to enjoy labelling me! I'm not sure Haughey was convicted of any law breaking though I might be wrong. I'm not sure Murphy was advocating corruption or planning impropriety, he was advocating civil disobedience and I'm totally fine with that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    hmmm. ok. You're ok with the concept of it being ok for some politicians to break some laws.

    So who gets to choose? Is it the politician themselves? And can all politicians choose, or just the ones you like? It would be very difficult to run that system because they'd get fed up having to contact you personally all the time to check who is and who isn't allowed. It's obviously not the legal system that chooses as laws are ostensibly made for everyone.

    I'm sure Ray Burke was also fine with the breaking of some laws but presumably he wasn't an anarchist and was not fine with other ones being broken. You'd have supported Rambo too I take it?



Advertisement