Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Weird, Wacky and Awesome World of the NFL - General Banter thread V3

1220221223225226265

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    Fant has a lot of ability - but he is inconsistent, goes missing in games, will constantly whiff on blocks and drops the ball. He hasn't been helped by poor QB play - but a lot of this is his own lack of urgency or even willingness to actually play the game. His fifth year option is chicken-feed at $6.7m - it should say a lot when the Broncos were undecided about exercising it. Shipping out Fant solves their problem and the Broncos have 2 decent TEs in Albert O and Saubert (a FA who will likely return) - cap space for a FA and a draft with a lot of depth at the TE position.

    I agree about how stacked the AFC is at QB.

    The big advantage for Wilson is that he will have some serious offensive weapons - Sutton, Jeudy, Patrick, Hamler, Javonte Williams (and Gordon might come back), Albert O - he also has a pretty decent OL which he didn't have in Seattle (that will be set if they get a RT) - and a HC who loves outside zone concepts which play into Wilson's talents. On top of that the important parts of the Broncos roster are either signed to long-term cap friendly deals or are on rookie contracts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,730 ✭✭✭boccy23


    Are the Broncos a QB away though? In that division and a stacked AFC, will this get them over the hump?

    I am sceptical on that front. Also, does the Miller trade look short-sighted now with a QB on board?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,111 ✭✭✭Christy42


    I think they are a qb away from a chance. It is a stacked division/conference but they can't do much about that except not try which seems a poor option.


    I am also not sure many teams have more than a chance at reaching the SB in that conference as well as everyone is too good. So much will come down to small margins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,740 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Fant was on my fantasy team that got to the Super Bowl this year, so I will always have a soft spot for him 😃



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,740 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Just seen a graphic on GMFB there that Wilson has 9 Pro-bowl appearances, one SB ring and another SB appearance in ten years as a starter in the league. Rodgers has more Pro-Bowl appearances, but less overall SB apperances than him in a longer career. Some outlay from the Packers for the whack job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Mahomes, Herbert and Carr are all top notch QB's. They are closer with Wilson than with the awful QB's they had the last while but I thought Wilson slowed down a bit and looked older than his years last season. It'll be interesting to see if he bounces back.

    They'll find it difficult to improve much though in that division.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    He had nine winning seasons in a row, still looks in great shape and talks like a much younger man. Are you calling it because of his age or his one losing season after nine in a row winning ones?

    I can't see any reason to move on from him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,798 ✭✭✭Big Pussy Bonpensiero


    I really don't know how the Packers have pulled that off when they're supposed to be in cap hell. The last few seasons has made me quite sceptical of how the cap is applied tbh.

    The Broncos should be quite happy with that trade tbf. They certainly wouldn't be in my top 5 for Superbowl contenders for next season but Russ should see them vying for playoff spots for the foreseeable. Think the Seahawks got robbed but you never know how those picks will fare out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,145 ✭✭✭Mr. Guappa


    Rodgers had a massive cap number for 2022 so the extension will actually lower that number.


    Wentz traded to Washington (still not used to the Commanders name). Flip of 2nd rounders this year, plus a 3rd this year and probable 2nd next year. Not a move that would excite me if I was a Washington fan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I thought Wentz did well in Indy, very surprised at that move. I though he'd improve with the confidence of last season behind him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    Yes - the Broncos are a QB away from contending - averaging 20pts a game last season would have netted 10 wins - with Wilson added to the talent on that roster there will be a major jump in production on offence.

    Miller is a free agent and already hinting that he could return to the Broncos - imaging getting a 2nd and a 3rd for a 6 month loan from a wasted season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,737 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    the confidence of last season ? The colts had to beat the jags in week 18 to get into the playoffs and shat the bed badly and wentz was a big part of that. Why are you surprised at the move ? The owner of the team ranted about the season on a video, and the GM and HC when asked didn’t commit to wentz coming back and when frank reich was luck warm on wentz I knew he was done.

    Let Carson wentz go to Washington. Unless he changes his mental outlook he’s never getting back to his early years in Philly where he played amazingly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭letowski


    The Wentz trade has similaries to the trade last year. If Wentz plays 70% snaps the 2023 3rd rounder goes to a 2nd rounder. So the Colts traded a 1 and 3 for him last year and may get back a 2 and 3 in the end.

    As a Colts fan, I'm a little indifferent about the trade. I don't think Wentz is the guy to take the franchise to where it wants to go. But at the same time, its going to be hard to find a good QB to replace. Jimmy G would be a lateral move for example imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,112 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    I mentioned his age for a reason, it's nothing to do with his winning record. I don't expect them to change coach because it was pretty clear over the last few months that either he left or Wilson did. Now that Wilson has, he's obviously staying.

    But he is 70, no coach in NFL history has made it beyond 73 and he was an interim (Romeo Crennel). Obviously Carroll could go beyond that but if the Seahawks were looking towards the next golden era for the franchise, now would be a good time for a fresh face given the obvious on field rebuild they're about to undertake.



  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    Don't know if it's a sign of where Rodgers is at, but seems like a slight lack of enthusiasm amongst Packers fans. This should be the biggest news in years, but the reaction is lukewarm and have even seen references to it being a lot of money to ensure 4 more years of playoff losses. The shine has really gone from the halo in the last season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,613 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    I think keeping a player is always less exciting that signing a player, it's just human nature



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Not sure what kind of maths you're doing on that Lance comparison - it must be some or all of a) getting the number of picks they used to 'trade up' wrong (not netting the first round picks), b) ignoring the discount when you deal future picks instead of the current year, c) ignoring the trade value they'll get back for Jimmy (very unlikely he is cut), d) ignoring the huge difference in salary (Lance only barely breaks $10m in the final year of his rookie deal while Wilson is likely going to want a $45m+ contract this year or next). Good to be happy with a deal your team made but no need to make up reasons for it.

    Having said that, I agree that this is probably a steal from the Broncos as being a fan of an NFCW team I am delighted Wilson is out of the division and not too worried about the picks and players the Seahawks received. I had to add probably because I watch more NFCW games than most and Wilson's play has been deteriorating over the last few years. Now that could be down to Seahawks using him incorrectly or Wilson being in a huff causing him to underperform but the physical traits he has relied on most over his career are those that tend to fail the earliest with QBs (scrambling, movement, long pass, durability) and he historically hasn't really shown much ability to adjust his game (each OC that comes in he basically plays the same way).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I don't think Jimmy would be a lateral move. He isn't that huge step up into the top tier QBs but Jimmy is a good QB who is much more proven than Wentz and unlike Wentz Jimmy's team mates absolutely adore and run through walls for him. For example, I don't see a world where Jimmy doesn't help the Colts win that last game of the season.

    Jimmy isn't the exciting pick up and I'll understand the frustration of whatever fanbase he ends up with if he costs what this latest Wentz deal does (or likely more), I've been there myself over the years with him, but if your GM can't or won't pay the price to make one of the aggressive 'mortgage your future' type moves to get the few elite QBs that come available then I'd much rather be in the position the 49ers have been with a great supporting cast and good Jimmy than scrambling around hoping you get lucky and a great QB falls into your lap for cheap - especially when the Colts' division is very, very winnable right now and who knows what happens in the playoffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,111 ✭✭✭Christy42


    I think Jimmy would be a better fit for the Colts. Though if you need a new qb it is better to start the search early so I feel you had to move on and take the sunk cost from last year.


    Wentz just comes across as ready to panic at any given moment. Not sure about the character stuff that comes from any qb release but on the field he had pretty serious issues. From watching him I have no idea how he got so few interceptions this season but he simply hasn't shown it for a while now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Have you seen any interviews with him? He sounds a lot younger than his years. He acts a lot younger than his years.

    You are just deciding that because he's hit 70 they should get rid of him. That's ageism my friend.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    He came out if a very bad situation with I'd imagine very low confidence in himself. I thought he did pretty well, much better than he did with the Eagles over the last few years. I felt last season would be the ingnition for him returning to the level he was at early in his time in Philly.

    The owner is obviously an idiot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,737 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    By bad situation do you mean his time in Philly ? If that’s what you mean then lets not pretend he’s not to blame for some of that bad situation. Yes, he had injuries but so do many players but they rebound. From when he tore his ACL it was a slow if steady slide to what we saw in the 2020 season which was a pity. He should’ve been benched weeks before he was because he just wasn’t playing at all well. I blame the coaching staff in Philly for not having the balls to not coddle him and protect his feelings and instead do what was best for the team.

    One common thing that Jalen hurts and Nick foles have with their team mates is that they played for them. The same can’t be said for Carson wentz and it seems the same issues occurred in Indy.


    if by owner you mean Jim Irsay, then yes on the whole I’d agree that’s he’s an idiot but I’ve no issue in this regard with his decision. You expect when you give up what you give up for a QB, that down the stretch he’s there and he performs and wentz wasn’t due to his own choice over the vaccine, which is his right but there were consequences to that choice. And then week 18 we saw what happened there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It appears you are starting out with a dislike for Wentz and are unable to just focus on his one year in Indy where he threw for 3500+ yards, 27 TDs and only 7 ints and that was on a run first team.

    That's a very good season by any standard.

    As I said, with that season behind him you'd expect him to improve again this season.

    Irsay is an idiot and it's stupid of him to meddle in personnel decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,737 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    It appears you are starting out with a dislike for Wentz and are unable to just focus on his one in Indy.

    No I don’t have a dislike for Wentz but you implying something that a poster didn’t say isn’t new from you. I was delighted that we drafted Carson Wentz but the fact remains he had issues by the end of his time in Philly that weren’t on anyone else but Wentz.

    why would I just focus on one year ? If it was that good a year he’d still be there. He can have good seasons statically but unless he decides to stop holding onto the ball way too long, deliberately ignoring wide open receivers(which he did in Philly) and instead throw into double coverage and get picked off, and unless he rediscovers an internal okay clock it won’t matter what team he’s on, or the best OLine in the league, he won’t have the success his talent out of North Dakota suggested.

    well when a players Personal decisions have an impact on the success of his team then he has a right to be pissed off.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,592 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Khalil Mack traded from Chicago to the Chargers for a 2d round pick this year and a 6th next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭paulie21




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,727 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    That's really the first evidence we have of the direction Poles is going in. Clearly he doesn't think this team can compete this year with a minor reshuffle and is tearing it down. Eat the dead cap of $24m this year and enter FA next year with an additional $28m in space.

    I'd trade Robert Quinn coming off 18.5 sacks too if there is interest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    I didn't like this at all when I first heard just because it didn't add up to great value but the charges are also eating the salary so it makes some sense. Also agree they should keep trading while they're at it, load up on picks, after many years now of frittering them away in trades and moves up the board, and clean up the cap after years of kicking the can on salaries down the road through restructures for a win now that never came. I can certainly take a couple of years of "development" instead of 7-9 wins in perpetuity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    Just to add though: fields won't be a rookie for long so if the plan is to win while he's still cheap I hope they have a good plan for making the rebuild fast.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Do you agree that Wentz season with Indy was miles better than anything he did in Philly over the last few years?

    If you do agree then are we in agreement that it's likely he was low on confidence when arriving in Indy?

    If you agree with both those then would you not think that last season would have given him a lot of self-belief and possibly led to a better season ahead?



Advertisement