Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Parking and traffic in Phoenix Park

1585961636486

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,838 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Crazy people using a park on a nice day. Who does that...

    It's not like you could predict that and plan accordingly. It's not like there's a finite number of spaces and entrances that you could monitor and control.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,536 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    in the context of bringing things into the park and being annoyed that there are not facilities provided to leave some of them behind, which is what i was referring to with the idea that if you carry stuff into the park, you can carry your rubbish home, this is a nonsensical response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Have you ever actually been to the Phoenix Park?

    Nothing you have posted indicates you have. You don't post anything that you wouldn't see on a cycling fundamentalist forum

    I'm a regular user but with three small kids, you might as well be telling me I can get a Luas to the Cliffs of Moher.

    If you did ever go there, you'd see all the runners and walkers drive in, go for their run, get back in their cars and go home. That's the reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,838 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    How about you couldn't be allowed to buy anything takeaway in the park. Like a takeaway coffee. or bring it in. Same with picnic benches. Just remove them all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,838 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Its not their reality though, and thats all that matters.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You realise all anyone has to do is click on the link you provided to find out that you made that up. Try harder



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    What do you tell your relatives that are not wheelchair bound?

    I see people near me drive their kids 1.5km to school. And collect them at lunchtime. It works out at about 200km of driving. The children are not wheelchair bound. This blinkered car-only view of transport options naturally continues as the kids get older and the cycle (no pun intended) of car dependence cannot be broken.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,502 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    the cycle (no pun intended) of car dependence cannot be broken.

    Hopefully, we'll find that the increasing cost of fuel will make people think twice about making unnecessary car journeys. If Russia continue their antics in Ukraine then this could be quite soon.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,838 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I tell them if you want to go to the park don't go via the school and stop for lunch on the way. It's very indirect and bad for the planet.



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It seems like all the usual kind of nonsense we face in this country. I'm not sure that anything needed to be fixed to begin with.

    But there is still parking available or people will just park on the grass. And nobody will enforce the speed limit and motorists will drive faster as the speed limit is too slow.

    You'll never get people out of cars in this country as long as the vast majority of jobs are in Dublin and property is unaffordable.



  • Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Scroll down before you start accusing me of making things up but I expect nothing higher of you at this stage.



  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    But they do. Apart from a few weekends in good summer weather where they may have to wait longer or look harder for parking. There is plenty of parking space.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's a very short description in that petition so it's hard to mistake the intent. It pretty clearly talks about removing through access and that's it.

    What you eluded has no relationship to the link you provided.



  • Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "Put up bollards on chesterfield avenue to prevent people from using it as a throughway into and out of the city and limit the use of car parks to those with disabilities. "

    So, no parking on the roadside in the park and no parking in the car parks for the able-bodied? Where the feck are people to park then? Mickey D's front garden while stepping around the giant dog turds.

    You have shown zero interest in engaging honestly with me over many, many months. You are a total unabashed anti personal private transport grade-a looney tunes zealot.

    Trying to access D8 from Blanch or even the park without being able to go through the gates at Castleknock is a major piece of logistical planning and 25 years ago for my job it would have added over 10 minutes to my commute before 7 in the morning to use a route other than the park.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,838 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They should try it. Stop through traffic. See how it works out.

    If you want to get to Furry Glen you have to get the long way round to get to it.. Perfect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,273 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    In a previous job a retirement email went around about a person who was retiring. They parked in the phoenix park and walked to work for 20 years, that's wrong.

    But, as a lone female who likes to exercise, and preferred the business of Chesterfield avenue I miss how safe it felt to park on Chesterfield avenue (Castleknock end) to go for a walk. I certainly would never park on the North Road, I've encountered plenty of dodgy people there over the years.

    I see the plus sides of the changes they've made but also the negatives.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yes, and there is plenty of parking for them. I’ve actually lost track of what your problem is with all this. As you say yourself, people can drive to the park and run and cycle perfectly fine

    And yes, I use the park multiple times a week. Running, cycling and walking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,838 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Maybe but parking all day in the park is a relatively recent like in the last decade. Back then parking was still available for free or cheap around town. Even when traffic was mental in 90s commuters didn't really park in the park that much. A bit in front of Garda HQ but that also was stopped.

    People used to park at Parkgate street gates. But the OPW stopped it. Thats when people started parking all day on Chesterfield.

    It would be very easy to track all day parking and fine them. If that was the problem. The reality though is it wasn't just commuters parking there (that's a false narrative) and they don't just want commuters off Chesterfield. It's everyone.

    The numbers going through the park commuting is the lowest it will ever be. If they want to cut off through traffic even as a trial now is the time to do. They should have done it during the lockdown. But traffic is only going to increase from this point forward.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭getoutadodge




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭getoutadodge


    I've lived beside the Park all my life and echo this. The OPW are simply not up to the task. Recent screwups are, for instance, the absence of a proper toilet block at Ashtown Castle Centre redevelopment (where Bloom is held). They threw in some smelly portaloos - elevated for some insane reason - which are totally unsuitable for the elderly let alone the disabled. All throughout the park there are trees which have long since outgrown the wire mesh protector yet are never removed. The Army and Garda GAA clubs look derelict and dilapidated. Use them or lose them. The paths in the Peoples' Garden are a joke and in 60 plus years I never saw the miles of railings being repainted. There is no vision for increasing biodiversity by replacing the acres of grass with meadowland species. I could rant on...

    As to the traffic thread, though I am a keen cyclist thanks to an e bike (a godsend at my age), many are not as lucky to live in close proximity and should be catered for. ..by reasonable car access. There should be a bus service from Heuston Station up Chesterfield to Castleknock and beyond catering for public transport access to the Zoo etc and general commuting. The North Road has a sinister feel to it these days. The stupid ramps put in years ago would trash an army jeep.

    I've written to Eamonn Ryan asking for wolves to be reintroduced to control the population of southsiders😎



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think everyone here would agree with you on almost all of that. Parts of the park have been left, in a ‘wither away’ context rather than a pro-active re-wildling one. The north road is shocking and there should be a bus. Instead of focussing on these things they came up, in recent years, with ridiculous brain-farts like the cable-car to the memorial gardens in islandbridge

    I think car access is absolutely reasonable and adequate. There are still through routes from every gate to every other gate (though maybe a little more indirect than before) and there are parking options all over the park. There is no part of the park that is not accessible

    I think they’ve got a good comprise with traffic. They now need to sort out the general decay of some areas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭getoutadodge


    "Reasonable and adequate" means many things to many people. The Park is the poster park not just in this city but nationally. If restrictive access to those with no other option than car usage, is pushed to excess, it will merely appear an elitist argument and undermine any broader conversation for change. The OPW clearly have bamboozled the elected politicians with the standard budget guff and are either unwilling or fearful to confront institutional inertia. There are Beech trees centuries old in the park and, if allowed, it will be another century before the current glacial pace of change allows the park reach its full potential.

    PS I'll credit the OPW for doing a great job on the Connyngham Rd Gate. Now get on with the Magazine Fort etc etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,838 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭getoutadodge


    Just as a car would. No ? It's hardly busy. Maybe I'm missing something...but I don't think it merits an entirely separated bike exit point..it would also screw with the aesthetics.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Its a one way out. I cycle in via that gate multiple times a week…..just through the pedestrian arch. It’s fine. I don’t that’s a priority….much happier seeing upper Glen blocked off for throaty traffic like the s-bends are



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭getoutadodge


    I admit I never spotted the "one way sign" before. Then again I haven't driven in years. Guess I'm breaking the law coz I enter there quite frequently by bike. The outlaw jose wales....



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ‘Reasonable and adequate’ to some here seems to mean ensuring enough parking spaces for the very busiest times of the busiest days of the year. Leaving empty concrete the rest of time. Completely illogical. Like having enough permanent car parking space in the city centre sufficient to cater for 2pm on the Saturday afternoon before Christmas

    that seems to be the only remaining point of contention tbh, and neither side will ever agree

    but I’d be pretty certain that Chesterfield av parking will not return



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭getoutadodge


    "but I’d be pretty certain that Chesterfield av parking will not return....."

    My son is happy with that. I admit I never even considered it before....just hated the ugliness of the cones. Goes to show there are many cyclists who are very uncomfortable in close proximity to motor traffic.....unlike me. Anyhow all good now ..hope the bollards wont be ugly yokes. DCC might screw it up though with their bollard selection committeeee...



Advertisement