Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Are the attempts to stop the British government amnesty for the troubles futile

Options
  • 30-01-2022 2:42am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭


    All political parties in Ireland along with all the victim groups of the troubles from Ireland to England along with pretty much the whole population of Ireland both Unionist and Republican are completely opposed to the amnesty, what can do they do about it realistically? If the British government clicks their fingers and says that's that then what can they do about it?

    The forthcoming amnesty bill would prevent all prosecutions for crimes during the troubles and shut down all further inquiries into the state’s actions during the Troubles, such a law would have prohibited the Saville Inquiry into Bloody Sunday and other inquiries into state collusion with loyalists which many believe is the real reason for this amnesty.

    Although Boris Johnson seems to be getting most of the blame it's extremely unlikely he and a few of his colleagues decided out of the blue to take this decision, he more than likely done this after being recommended and convinced to do so by MI5, the most powerful people in Britain.

    During the troubles the intelligence services worked closely with loyalist paramilitaries as part of a psychological warfare campaign against the IRA, one of the most infamous was the killing of human rights solicitor Pat Finucane who was at the time investigating state collusion with loyalists when MI5 set him up for assassination, this case stands out because it's one of the only cases that have been proven beyond doubt, although the state is strongly suspected of involvement in hundreds murders in collusion with loyalists.

    There is a good documentary on Netflix about the Miami showband massacre, it talks about Robin Jackson the most ruthless killer during the whole troubles who is estimated to have been involved in the murder of 150 innocent Catholics and lead the men who committed the Dublin Monaghan bombings and the Miami showband massacre, it provides evidence that he was an agent working for MI5 and RUC special branch and that the Miami showband massacre was signed off on at the highest level of the British intelligence agencies and that government of the time likely knew about it, the documentary claims the intelligence services set this up because they wanted the Irish government to seal the Irish border as the IRA in the South were launching attacks against the army and then fleeing easily back across the border.



«1345

Comments

  • Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They will be offering amnesty for the Manchester arena bombers next



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They chased the nazis to the end of the earth,and introduce laws to provide immunity to their own war criminals



    I dont think the british are as good as they let on



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 9,988 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Confusing indifference with support is a mistake.... Your opinion is out of step with the times.

    People, reluctantly, accept that it is a step that has to be taken and so unless you are willing to do an awful lot more that be a keyboard warrior then you are just going to have to accept that. For instance have you even visited you local politicians and made them aware of your opinions??? If not then you have answered your own question.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Its not a step,that has to be taken....theres not a single victim relative group from either side supports this


    Fundamentally,they deserve justice/answers for what happened to their loved ones,irregardless of who killed em,



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    This is complete and utter nonsense Jim I have to say this is one of the most uneducated posts on any subject I've seen on boards in a long time, my opinion is completely in step with the times, a quick google search should bring you up to the date on the matter, I honestly don't know how you came to the conclusion in that post.

    The proposals are strongly opposed by all the parties at Stormont, the Irish government and all of the victims groups, even labour are strongly opposed to it.

    I wouldn't personally have a problem with an end to convictions, I do have a problem with an end to all inquiries and inquests into troubles matters, the British are trying to cover up their activities.

    You don't seem to know much or seem to have read much articles about the amnesty so here are some to bring you up to date https://www.itv.com/news/utv/2022-01-07/amnesty-plans-do-not-have-support-to-proceed-legitimately-labour

    "Representatives from all the major parties, North and South, have signed a document outlining their rejection of the UK Government proposals to introduce an amnesty for legacy killings".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    He clearly just didn't really have a clue what was going on and didn't read most of the OP, it's fair enough, stuff happens.

    He claimed people reluctantly accept it is a step that has to be taken, I provided him with articles showing that it's a step literally no one apart from the Tories and MI5 see it as a step that has to be taken, he should come back soon with a new, more well informed opinion on the subject.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    just pointing out a pattern of behavior by a proven fantasist driving a specific agenda at the behest of a specific semi political group harry , i don't know why it would irk you so when its pointed out unless you dont want people to spot what you and some other posters here are at 😉 helps to keep boards honest



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 9,988 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    At the end of the day beyond mouthing off you have done and will do nothing. Enough said.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    When have I claimed I'm going to do anything about it? What do you expect Harry from boards to do about it? I'm simply discussing the matter as most people on boards do.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 9,988 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    We know who killed them and we have a pretty good idea of what happened. The brutal reality is that continuing to rehash this will serve not purpose in the big picture. So unless you are willing to do awful lot more that spatter out the odd comment on social media that is how this ends and there little point in debating who moved your cheese.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    What is this bigger picture yous speak of,and how deos covering up war crimes here (and this is what it is btw) along with sheltering the murderers of elected politians bode for future conduct and carryon from these people?


    Its entirely reasonable for anyone to want justice for their killed relatives/friends,otherwise all your doing is attempting to put a lid on something,that will inevitably explode again



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Well you should tell that to the Irish government, all major political parties in Ireland North and South and the labor party in the UK, you should also tell all of the victim groups and the UN who all strongly disagree with this amnesty which Britain is introducing in an attempt to hide all of the horrible things they done in Northern Ireland.

    No point telling me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭piplip87


    You have the Loyalists demanding that their murderers where only defending their community from attacks and should not be charged with crimes.

    You have SF/IRA who have already received amnesty letters saying that their murderers where only doing it for Civil Rights and they should not be charged.

    Then you have the British saying their murderers where protecting the people.


    All three of the above believe their band of murderers where justified in their actions. They all believe their victims where collateral damage and they all use innocent civilians who got murdered for their own political gain.

    All as bad as eachother



  • Registered Users Posts: 309 ✭✭O'Neill


    Good grief. You do realise that all of the political parties are against an amnesty? Also when this was first announced, this brought back the pain for many of the families on these islands. How on earth can you seriously move on without a proper reconciliation process taking place. Like Richard Moore in Derry who was left blind by being shot in the eye by a British soldier but are now in good terms. Without such a process there can't be any proper healing which is a failure on Stormont and the British Government.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    your posts seem to be way out of step with the actual topic, you must be referring to another poster on another thread.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    aw that's just what they want you to think , don't fall for it 🤣🤣

    "dont be a sheaple "



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 9,988 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007



    Yep as I said a lot of hot air, but nobody actually doing anything… at the end of the day a line needs to be drawn under this and we move on and that is exactly what will happen. An Irish-American President, Ireland on the security council, member of the EU…. And nada - note even a hint of a UN resolution etc…



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    no line will be drawn and no moving on will happen until ireland is fully free, an amnesty for british army terrorists will not be the drawing of a line and moving on.

    the amnesty will deny the people of northern ireland justice, say those people are lesser people then those living in britain itself, and admit the british army were no different to terrorists which won't go down well.

    and that is the best case, the worst case is we see violence on the streets of northern ireland again.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,660 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    are you surprised the British government would try this? I'm not, and they WILL try to do it. the fact they are trying it on shows they have a lot to hide. then again though - whats new there? They've always been a shower of **** who lie.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,660 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    you are debating with people on this forum who's nearest experience of the north is reading the Indo. Don't expect them to have any inkling of an idea of what you mean



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,660 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    how many of those three are a well financed world super power?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Complete nonsense, both sides Catholic and Protestant have repeatedly called for a truth and reconciliation process similar to the one in South Africa which would allow people to speak openly about what happened what happened during the troubles, this information would also work in collaboration with an investigative team into the troubles.

    The British are strongly opposed to this, they are putting an end to not just convictions, but also all inquests and public inquiries into the troubles, they want to bury the past and put an end to all the information that has been coming out in the last the 20 years into their collusion with loyalists.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Sure it's all propaganda Harry



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    What's all propaganda? What are you on about? Are you sure you've clicked on the right thread?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,196 ✭✭✭MrVestek


    Please tell me this is sarcasm because erh... DUH?!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Along with all of the war crimes by the British army, and MI5 collusion with loyalists that led to the deaths of hundreds of innocent people, the British used to kidnap IRA suspects on this side of the border and if the kidnapping went wrong then they would kill them and blame the killings on loyalists.

    The SAS in 1976 kidnapped an IRA man on the other side of the border, the SAS man told him "if you want to end it here and now then your death will be claimed by the UVF, otherwise come with us." The claims were strongly denied at the time but in a documentary on Robert Nairac from the 2000s, the former SAS deputy commander claims that the story is more than likely true.

    This in correlation with the flagstaff hill incident, which was an international incident between the Republic and the United Kingdom where eight SAS men were captured by the Irish army on this side of the border, they were carrying sterling submachine guns, a browning pistol and a pump action shotgun, the weapons found on the SAS men were significant as they were not weapons you would expect the SAS to be using, the weapons found on them were the same weapons "loyalists" were using to kill numerous Irish people near the border in the Republic in the same year.

    The Nairac documentary can be found here if anyone is interested. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D9DJ8L44puTQ&ved=2ahUKEwj-55G36tz1AhXHQkEAHZxhA-4QFnoECAcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3UKTwgcBNncfORTKLw9ZCO



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭piplip87


    It does not matter. All of the above targeted innocent civilians. All of the above used the other side's targeting of innocent life to condone their own taking of innocent life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 230 ✭✭Miniegg


    I’m so sick of people equivocating the British government murdering innocent people with terrorist murders. What moral authority could the UK possibly have to govern in NI if they are the same as terrorists?

    Terrorist groups are in their nature illegal, and their only reason for being is to commit intentional violence (including murder) to achieve their aims. They have no responsibility to protect innocent people, they have no mandate to govern.

    Loyalist and Republicans who murdered on behalf of terrorist groups who murdered – I believe -should face the full force of the law. It is up to the UK and Irish governments to hold these people accountable before the law as they see fit.

    An elected, sovereign government - whose fundamental responsibility is the protection of its citizens and the upholding law and order - sending its soldiers into Northern Ireland and allowing them to maim and murder its own innocent civilians with impunity, and then be given amnesty, is completely different on every level.

    Citizens committing violence (such as terrorists) can never give a government authority to murder its own innocent people. If so, where do we draw the line? Can the Irish government send in the army to shoot up Grafton Street because the Kinahans and Hutches are feuding?  Will you say it’s ok because all sides “targeted innocents”?

    I don’t think you would, because that would be ridiculous. 



Advertisement