Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

A Federal EU superstate

«134

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,433 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    No

    Article does not mention a "federal Europe" though?



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭Freight bandit


    "Germany has set itself ambitious goals to launch a reform process of the EU.

    The new government’s coalition agreement specified that they want to use the ongoing Conference on the Future of Europe as a starting point for EU reform that should ultimately lead to the “development of a federal European state"

    It's been mentioned elsewhere that the new German government is putting EU federalisation on the top its agenda.

    Also Macron banging on about a new EU sovereignty

    Post edited by Freight bandit on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭Packrat


    No.

    “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,218 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The ultimate aim of the EU is to make Europe like the United States.


    They have never hidden that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 172 ✭✭Glock17


    A federal EU superstate is clearly the aim of the EU.... you'd have to be blind not to see that.....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,319 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    There's been scaremongering about this for fifty, sixty years. Nowhere in the article is a Federal EU mentioned.

    This is more scaremongering.



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭Freight bandit


    They did in Lisbon treaty when they removed language referring to flags,anthems,symbols to hide its political ambitions and avoid calls for referendums on it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 172 ✭✭Glock17


    The EU has it's own flag and national anthem. It also has a parliament in Brussels where elected representatives set out new laws. It also has it's own currency.

    At the moment it is effectively a federal superstate...

    You Irish have basically given your country away for 30 bits of EU silver.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,433 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Too many in Ireland don't see where it is all going yet but they will be woken up sooner or later.

    It's all done by stealth in a way most won't understand. The treaties normal people have never read and left to their elected representatives to guide them.

    Take the EU army, sure we already are part of rapid action groups, the precursor to that very thing.

    How many people in Ireland or any other country actually knew that if you asked them?

    It's all sleight of hand because those pushing it know it has to be.

    It won't last, of course.

    Fooling around with sovereignty in Europe has never ever ended well.

    That is what is happening. Our sovereignty, our right to make our own choices is being siphoned from us bit by bit, year by year, treaty by treaty.

    The EU can still be saved but ever closer union has to end.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Don't see the issue tbh. All baby steps that take us away from insular nationalism towards a united globe in a number of centuries are to be welcomed.

    The value of EU membership has never been clearer than in the last decade. We'd be an economic mess, frozen out of international markets, at the mercy of the economic whims of the lunatic asylum across the Irish Sea.


    I have absolutely no problem with an EU federation that derogates supranational concerns like defence and external trade to elected federal bodies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,218 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Apart from it being a clear aim and with the introduction of the Euro probably inevitable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Since Ireland joined in 1973 the EU has gone a very, very long way towards becoming a federal state.

    People in Ireland hate Brexit and the idea people voting for Brexit aren't all stupid, but the moves towards federalism was one of the major reasons people voted to leave. It was just something many of them considered and didn't want, as they wanted to be closer to decision making. The fact Britain couldn't control levels of immigration from EU states was a huge issue in the debate.

    I don't really like the moves towards federalism, but I don't think we'll have any real say. And it's inconceiveable we'll leave at any point in the next 30 years.


    Undoubtedly the EU has been good for Ireland, but I doubt any closer integration will bring us any benefits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭Freight bandit


    I wonder if the people of any of the member states are going to get a say on this very big decision, given the EUs history with referendums I doubt it.The hope seems to be that after further integration it will be past the point of no return so tee hee hee....



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    The founding document of the EU, the Treaty of Rome, contains the objective of "creating an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe". It's not like this is a state secret. The EU has been quite clear about what it aspires to be since day one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    The Fourth Reich, achieved by paperwork rather than by Panzer.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    The Daily Mail called. It wants its headline back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,697 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Do you not see the contradiction here though? Britain didn't like where the EU was heading so they left. That option is always there for any member state, and the EU will always need to balance that fact with any moves it makes.

    In the US, individual States cannot just leave when they want.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,009 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I think Texas still has an opt out clause but yeah I see your point. We are not being coerced into anything, the door is always open.



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭Freight bandit


    Except it hasn't, it's federalisation by stealth, if people knew years ago that joining the EEC would lead to federation I don't think many would have joined, even now a lot of people either don't know or deny its federal ambitions.Im also convinced if it was put to referendums it would be rejected in every member state.Theres also the matter of the Lisbon treaty after the French and Dutch rejected an EU constitution and it was repackaged ,designed to be unreadable,language removed to hide its political ambitions and avoid referendums on it,not very transparent.Under the EUs own rules the constitution should have been dead in the water...what we got was one commissioner accusing the French and Dutch of blackmail....



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    You do realise the treaties are public documents? And that as voters, the people of Europe are not divorced from the process? If we don't like how the EU is moving, we can vote in different representatives. Or indeed leave entirely.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Absolutely not.

    We should remain a Europe of independent, sovereign states managing our own borders, and not create a centralised Government of Europe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,785 ✭✭✭fly_agaric



    I see 2 people thanked the stale German=Nazi slur so I suppose it must be an old one but a good one!

    Anyway those most likely to bring such troubles back to Western Europe are the anti-EU nationalists in the different member states either trying to hobble the EU or break it up. They won and got Brexit done in the UK and it has been a wonderful boon for good relations and mutual understanding between France and UK and Ireland and UK. If there are more "exits" it'll be more of the same bad humour with more players (or more likely just pawns being played by external powers like US/China/Russia/Giant MNCs/India or who knows who else from Asia or Africa in future etc).



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,186 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    There will be no further reform of the EU institutions for the foreseeable. There are too many external threats at the moment and the process of treaty change is too fraught. There isn't the time for extended period of navel gazing.

    As for the long term direction of Europe, well that's for the peoples to decide.



  • Registered Users Posts: 692 ✭✭✭cheezums


    As much as people want to retain sovereignty, we have to face the geopolitical reality which is the US is in a rapid economic, environmental and social decline and will or has already ceased to be a global superpower and thus we are moving into a world with China as the sole superpower and Russia as a lesser power.

    A federal EU state with a EU army would restore the balance of power so our ancestors wont be speaking chinese in 100 years time.

    You have to look at the bigger picture.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    China is only interested in Taiwan, not a Fourth Reich-style global domination.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,702 ✭✭✭seenitall


    Lol, here’s the bigger picture: our descendants will be speaking Chinese any way you cut it, my teenage daughter is already ahead of the curve and is taking lessons in mandarin!! :D



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Russia hasn't been a superpower since rocky 4 ,

    There was always a belief that we would part of a unified and united Europe,as pointed out already most countries use European laws, we have a European parliament , currency ,and global trade deals ,next they will push for a standing EU army running along side or separate to nato , our defense forces are already part of the eu Nordic battlegroup ,it actually makes sense with the Putin carry on and the threats of putin using energy and gas supplies to various states to threaten or blackmail other states to allow him free range to bully other countries in the Baltics



  • Registered Users Posts: 692 ✭✭✭cheezums


    Not global domination no, but setting the global agenda on all fronts, from non negotiable positions. A world in which an authoritarian human rights intolerant China is the sole superpower is not where we want to go.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,186 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I'm already confident my ancestors weren't eating beef chow mein.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No.

    They're going to struggle to keep it together over the next 20-30 years anyway.



Advertisement