Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Random Fitness Questions

1464749515258

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    But where did he come up with it? He hardly just made it up... he claims it worked for the dude in the video.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94


    I don't know where he came up with it. There's two types of quacks in the fitness industry: ones who know they're wrong and just want to make an easy buck, and ones who think they're right but don't realise because they're getting results for people.

    The limited studies that are available on using exercise to change posture will on average show that it doesn't work. http://www.greglehman.ca/blog/2012/05/17/the-limitations-of-specificity-defending-the-plank-and-the-curl-up

    Despite the fact that video shows no before or after to verify if his posture changed, I'll take him at his word. So really all we know is that the guy's posture changed, not that it was specifically because he did those exercises. Maybe Jeff made him more aware of his posture and the guy chose to start changing how he moved.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,822 ✭✭✭✭silverharp



    just based ona quick google, a gym website mentions something called "joint by joint" theory but the article says hamstrings are of minor importance


    this article seems to say there are unsubstantiated claims


    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94


    The first article is based on a popular theory from Yanda known as upper/lower cross syndrome. It's a nice sounding theory, but there's no support for it. It still gets taught to musculoskeletal health professionals and parroted despite its lack of scientific support.

    You'll notice the second article has actual research citations, and unsurprisingly comes to the conclusion that posture isn't likely to be changed by exercise. We don't even have evidence that one type of posture is better/worse for pain. The more you delve into the research on musculoskeletal health, the more you realise that a lot of the claims made by physios/therapist/chiros etc. have no backing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    Seeing as you've quite a bit of knowledge I might ask you another question.

    Have you any tips for how to get a flat stomach? Taking myself as an example; I have a six pack but I'd like to get my stomach in more. I'd be considered skinny, and I've been keeping a consistent core exercise routine for a number of years now. But at the end of the day my belly sticks out a little bit.

    I'm pretty pleased with how I look but when I look at the side view of my belly in the mirror, I do wish it would be sucked in a bit more. I've no doubt my muscles there are in great condition, and I could pull my stomach way in if I'd to pose for a photo shoot. But I'd like my stomach to be that way naturally... something like the way the guy appears in this photo. I don't know if he's pulling it in, but there are people who's bodies are naturally like that.

    Funnily here's the same guy in another photo from the same shoot, and if you were to see him from the side you can imagine his stomach would be sticking out more than his chest. Maybe it's something to do with westerners having an S-shaped back that forces their stomach out more.

    There are quite a few fitness people who have bellies too! This girl is actually a good example. She's clearly a fitness enthusiast, yet her belly sticks way out in spite of her being so young!

    I think it happened to me when I was about 12. I just remember my belly going out a little bit. And it's been there since. Don't know why!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94


    Just so you know, that 'guy' is Mark Wahlberg 😂

    As for your Q. It's probably not what you want to hear, but maybe that's just how your stomach looks 🤷‍♂️ Losing belly fat is one thing, but you seem to be talking about posture. I would contend that it's anatomically normal for a human belly to protrude and that what you see in a Calvin Klein ad is not indicative of how a normal stomach looks. The idea that the girl in the video has a 'belly' is insane. She just isn't trying to flex when she's talking.

    I did a post on this exact topic recently that involved me getting my nips out

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CU45etRsR6q/



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,822 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    leaving aside any photographer tricks, I'd guess many models are 3KG or 4 KG below their normal weight on the day of a shoot like that

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭the baby bull elephant


    It's impossible for some people to have completely flat stomachs at rest without removing a few of those pesky organs...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    Some people do. It's rare enough though. I think Enrique used to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    It's a funny one, in that true beauty shouldn't look better from different angles. Take a healthy german shepherd for example; you won't find yourself saying "gee actually it doesn't look too good from this angle". We humans are an exception in this regard in that we take one view of ourselves from the side (at the mid section) we can look pretty bad. Of course it suits us to say that certain looks are unattainable giving that we're now the second most obese country in Europe.

    I wasn't sure people would recognise him as Wahlberg as he looked so different back then. And I'm not gay or anything but I didn't even notice Kate Moss in that clip!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭atilladehun


    I'm in no position to give you advice but you reminded me of that scene.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    The photo's a bit too bright but Chris Hemsworth has got to be the king for flat stomachs. Now I don't think he'd look any worse from different angles!




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94



    Again: angles, flexing.

    Actors and models are paid to know how to do this. It's not what they look like 24/7.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    Could I ask another question while I have you? I'd like to know what your opinion about cold immersion therapy is? A scientific explanation about what goes on in the body during cold immersion can sound quite convincing to a lay person... when you hear all this talk about cold shock proteins, inflammation, longevity and whatever else! But as with the hype around fasting, is it really all that good? Or do people just get a placebo effect.

    I was listening to the 'healthy or hoax' podcast and I heard Professor Jim Cotter from the University of Otago suggest cryotherapy is over-hyped. It reduces inflammation and pain but he says animal data shows that it could impair the health of that tissue in the long run.

    Assuming cold immersion therapy is good, then water/ice would likely be better than cryo as it's much more cardiovascular. With water although the temperature isn't as cold, the underlying tissue is cooled faster. Cold water is harder on the heart than cryo, as it has to push against the increased blood pressure caused by the cold. The heart should be getting more oxygen when it beats faster, but in this case (according to him) it actually gets less.

    I go to the sea at least once a week at the moment which I enjoy. I suppose it's possibly beneficial if you keep it up regularly, but if you were to do it out of the blue in mid winter it could quite taxing on the body.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    I'm not Cilian, but I've been doing various forms of cold water therapy for years. Daily cold showers most commonly.

    "The literature" is reasonably clear that cold water immersion is detrimental for muscular hypertrophy if you do it after lifting to at least some extent. I also think there's at least some basis for believing it can have an anti inflammatory effect, indeed the two things would go hand in hand.

    The extent to which it does that, probably negligible enough that it doesn't matter for most people, and I think that's true of most of the claimed benefits.

    So why do it?

    Because it does make you feel invigorated, when you towel off after 3-5 minutes of it.

    Yes, it can be unpleasant and it's normal that when people start they don't enjoy it and they lose control of their breathing and generally it's a form of masochism.

    I'm not really into doing it in order to build mental toughness, but I know some people feel that way about it. My observation has been that with time you actually just don't find it that unpleasant anymore, to the point that I wondered was my shower running warmer than it used to (It isn't).

    Wim Hof - who admittedly is hit and miss - has a theory that your skin is a giant organ that has become over sensitised because we are so well wrapped up and protected against the elements. It tingles and feels weird, basically, and he feels that a benefit of cold water therapy is that you progressively desensisitise your skin so that you are not as easily made to feel unpleasant (Basically). I guess my experience would be that he's possibly onto something there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,780 ✭✭✭Patsy167


    A question on Minimum required volume - I'm currently doing the following 3x per week and wondering whether this is enough volume to make strength increases (All at an RPE of 7-8). I've never enjoyed any training with a lot of volume so trying to get strength increases with the minimum effective amount -

    Pull-ups (5x5)

    Lat Pull down (5x5)

    Seated Row (5x5)

    Walking Lunges (5x5)

    Hamstring Curl (3x5)

    Seated leg curl (3x5)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    That's quite low intensity and low training frequency. The volume is moderate at best considering the RPE mentioned.

    RPE 8 can mean different things to different people. I'm taking it that you would mean you would have a few more reps in the tank at RPE 7 or 8 i.e you're nowhere near failure on your work sets.

    Some of the machines you are using would probably lend themselves to using a slightly higher rep range and progressing by weight and rep PRs week on week. You don't typically see sets of 5 seated leg curls.

    There's a strong tradition of low volume machine-based training that's still around, albeit typically with hypertrophy in mind versus strength, but it is renowned for high intensity work sets... Basically, you'd be a lot closer to failure (or at failure) if you're doing such low volume, on the basis that you really need to push yourself hard in order that you're getting in several effective reps at the end of your work sets which will give the body a reason to adapt. Even then, a lot programs using this approach have higher volume on a given day overall. There might be just 1-2 hard work sets on the high bar squat, for example, but then the quads would be smashed again on lunges, leg extension and so on. Again, more of a hypertrophy protocol than a strength approach it must be said.

    Considering your exercise selection I'm taking it you're in a commercial gym... Why no use of quad dominant machines - leg extension, hack squat? You've got also two vertical pulls and a horizontal pull ... But no pressing at all? Just curious, maybe it's injury related.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94



    My opinion about coldwater immersion is that it's something you can do if you enjoy it. Most of the claims I've heard about what it can do aren't scientifically supported. And we do have some science to show that it can have a detrimental effect on muscle adaptations. Depends on how much of it you're doing though. Until it's been sufficiently studied, placebo effect is never something you can rule out when it comes to any health intervention. What you believe often matters more than whether the thing really works.

    People don't want to hear this, but if you're looking to boost longetivity, it mostly comes down to exercising regularly, having good nutrition and sleep, and socialising. Social class is also extremely indicative of lifespan, but harder to control.

    Everything outside of that, whether it's fasting or coldwater therapy, is often just a distraction created to sell you a product.





  • .

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 20,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    That looks like a recipe to burn out and stop making any gains, I don't understand why you are doing such low reps on isolation lifts. Do low reps because you don't enjoy higher reps is a bad idea IMO. You need a properly structured program instead of a random selection of lifts.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94


    No pushing exercises, why?

    Yet there are 3 pulling exercises and 2 hamstring exercises.

    Walking lunges aren't well suited to going that heavy as it's not a very stable exercise. Seems like everything in there is heavy.

    I think you'd get much better progress out of following an established programme. It would have more balance and a built in method of progression. Reddit's fitness forum has a section on this and there's a thread on here called 'beginner strength programmes'.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,780 ✭✭✭Patsy167


    That's helpful. My main aim was to pick exercises that I would enjoy so I cobbled together the above exercises purely based on enjoyment. I don't enjoy any Push exercises and only like doing single leg exercises. I know that this approach is not sustainable in the long run but my thinking is that it will allow me to build up some strength and a momentum in the gym over a few months. Once I've an acceptable level of strength built up i'll look at a more balanced programme focused on strength.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    Patsy,

    I get where you're coming from.

    Any chest press or shoulder press machines in the gym? Since you seem to like machines they would be an easy option for some pushing work.

    If not that then can’t really beat DB bench, DB seated shoulder press, push ups.

    For quads if they had a leg extension and / or hack squat it would be a no brainer to complement all the hamstring work.

    The other thing you could consider that would probably be of general benefit to you is going to something like 3x10 for everything except the pull ups.

    If you do all of that it’s a lot in one session, you have the makings of two alternating workouts there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    "Once I've an acceptable level of strength built up i'll look at a more balanced programme focused on strength."


    This seems like a strange logic, to be honest. You'll do a set of exercises you cobbled together to get stronger and then you'll move to a balanced programme to get stronger?


    Why not just do a balanced programme to get stronger now?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,780 ✭✭✭Patsy167


    Appreciate the feedback. The logic I've been using is that my gym attendance has been flakey at best recently as I wasn't really enjoying it. To get some momentum going I was going to focus on just doing whatever I enjoy and hoping it will snowball from there.

    I took the feedback from here on-board and tried to adjust so this mornings workout was:

    • Trap Bar Deadlift - 5x3
    • Hamstring Curl - 5x3
    • Seated Leg Curl - 3x5
    • V-Bar Pulldown - 3x5
    • Seated Row - 3x5
    • Chest Dips - 5x3

    My plan is to count that as a full body workout and do it 3 times per week. I'm sure more volume is needed so I'll focus on sorting this in the coming weeks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭VW 1


    Looking for an opinion on what to do...

    Had a decent strength building programme for the compound lifts, working from higher volume down to close to max doubles over a 12 week period.

    Did a deload week to prepare for one rep max testing. Woke up a day or two after my last deload session with a lot of lower back pain, but muscular. So stretched lower body, back and hips for two weeks to the point the back is feeling good.

    Is it a good idea to jump back back in this evening and continue as planned on the one rep max tests for the week?

    Or is it a better idea to ease back in and use estimated numbers to plan my next training cycle?

    I feel the correct answer is the latter, but I was more than likely going to see an all time PR on squat, and probably come close with DL.

    TIA!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    That's a great question.

    I've done 12 week programming followed by a deload week and then 1RM testing on a number of occasions, and you seem to have been particularly unlucky here.

    I would not now go ahead with 1RM tests for two reasons:-

    1) You ended up taking what is effectively a 3 week deload, if I read your post right, because of the back. Unfortunately that's long enough some detraining will have occurred and there's a risk that you won't hit your target 1RMs now.

    2) If your back feels totally normal then re-injury might not be a large risk, but you may not want to chance it.

    I think if you are confident in your estimations, going with estimated 1RMs is the smart move. You could keep it conservative - 2.5kg to 5kg per lift. You should actually know whether you were going to get your target 1RMs based on how the doubles felt and what the bar speed was like. If you felt like the doubles could have been trebles or even quadruples, and/or the bar speed was reasonably fast, you know your 1RM has moved.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭VW 1


    That's the sensible approach I guess, and it's the advice I would give to someone else.

    Impatience to test might lead to injury again, which I definitely don't want off the back of a really good training cycle.

    Onwards and upwards!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Cill94


    The work and adaptations you built up won't have just vanished because you took a few weeks off. I would start back at heaviest you can comfortably, and then over weeks build back to a position where you could hit a new 1RM.

    Also this is just an aside, but it's my personal belief that taking a deload before testing a 1RM is not a good idea for a significant amount of people. It doesn't work well for me and many people I've coached. It also just doesn't make sense to go light and detrain your body right before you need it to be at its strongest. Some people can taper down and get a peaking effect, but it's easy to **** up and is probably only necessary for more advanced lifters.



Advertisement