All Covid-19 measures are permanent, don't be a boiling frog!

What? Stop the riddles. For once use plain English and say what you want to say.

The thread was closed by admin, and the reasons were given. There is nothing suspicious about the reasons. Life must be hard when you see a conspiracy in everything. It must be so scary.

It's taken 240 pages to FINALLY get him to outline specific measures he believes will be permanent.

He is now deflecting from explaining why these measures will be permanent and how the benefit the people behind the conspiracy.

I'm betting we'll hit page 250 before we'll get a straight answer.

The MO

1. Fanatically believe that "something is going on"
2. Reject anything that doesn't support that, latch onto anything that does

Have you done any independent reading about the head of WHO? I've no strong opinion either way on Tedros, however a small bit of reading puts a bit of context on your comment.

Firstly, "member of terrorist organisation"!! Yes, one that later became the government of Ethiopia, so just like Fianna Fáil, or Sinn Fein! And a government, by the way, that Tedros was health minister in from 2005 to 2012

Next "has been accused of committing war crimes"!! The accusations seem to be by rivals in what seems to amount to a civil war in his country - see https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/11/19/ethiopia-who-tedros-criminal-military-tigray/. I'm not saying Tedros is a saint, but what makes you think your black and white interpretation of that situation is fair and balanced?

As regards cholera outbreaks, two points. Firstly, the accusations were raised in 2017 by a rival for the top job in WHO after Tedros got the most votes in a preliminary vote for the WHO top job. Secondly, read this to get a bit of context on governments denying cholera -> https://www.devex.com/news/why-governments-tiptoe-around-the-word-cholera-92348.

Would you like to counter these points, and explain why they are wrong, and why your blanket condemnations of Tedros are more correct, and why anything you said makes him unfit to be head of WHO? Or will you simply ignore this and continue to believe what you said because it's part of some narrative you have swallowed (which probably originates in the politicised public health debate in the US!)?

They once called Nelson Mandela a terrorist, do you agree with that accusation?

If you were accused if a crime (no trial just accusations) would you resign from your job?

Again we keep running into this notion that the moment some one wins or is nominated for a Nobel Prize they become an enlightened figure who knows all and cannot possible be wrong. (Unless they say something against the conspiracy theory, at which point they are corrupt.)

But the OP said ALL measures.

And again, it took 230 pages for your to list those 3 measures (ie. not all of them) and you are not once again deflecting and running away from explaining why those measures will be permanent. You can't provide a rational reason for how those measures benefit the people behind the conspiracy. That's because it's not rational and it doesn't make sense. Hence your claim is false until you can provide rational motivations that stand up to a bare level of questioning.

You can't do that. You know you can't do that. Hence you dodge and run away and whinge to deflect. For some reason you think this stops people from noticing.

In addition, there are no lockdowns, so even your pared down list is incorrect.

At what point will you accept the conspiracy theory is false?

Or will it be the case that even when all of these measures are ended, you'll still claim their "permanent" because they might come back some day?

This thread has devolved into other posters having to explain basic info and reality to you. Which you don't want to accept because you have a religious style belief that "something nefarious" is going on, but you can't explain what it is. And everything goes through that nonsensical filter. If someone has an irrational belief that they are being followed, then they'll see "clues" for it everywhere.

Let's have a look at the claims in the first post:

"Social/population control measures" - No. Measures were to combat the spread of an infectious virus, many of which have been used before in previous pandemics and epidemics

The measures weren't introduced by the "state security apparatus"

"Health scare" - It's a global pandemic which has killed around 5 million people and paralysed national health systems

Measures haven't remained permanent

So yeah, it's entirely debunked.

Just more of your usual so when the truth hurts

You now have no interest in Sweden when your previous post was a question on Tegnell and Giesecke, even though you know the answers as well as I do by from you being all over the Sweden thread like a rash supporting the two chancers.

Australia has enough problems after wasting time that should have been used to vaccinate, as does the US with low uptake, to be overly worried about the sensitivities of antivaxxers.

I have no opinions one way or another on the WHO, other than to me they were attempting to be all things to everyone during this pandemic. Giving the job of advisor on pandemic response to a charlatan like Giesecke who got this one so wrong would not inspire me though.

As to the head of the WHO, both no thoughts on the man or interest of being dragged down another rabbit hole by you with another of your attempts at deflection.