Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Dublin - Metrolink (Swords to Charlemont only)

Options
16667697172189

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Even after an RO is got government can still shelve it



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Of course - my point is that there are several points along the process where politics can further delay progress, such as now, before submission to ABP, and also after a Railway Order is granted, if that indeed happens.

    And when politics gets involved, that inevitably leads to delays.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,680 ✭✭✭jd


    Depot will be south of airport - at Dardistown



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It has to go through the government spending cost review process now - he cannot influence that either way.

    We will just have to wait on the outcome of that.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, he can continuously bring it up in every media interview. That is an influence. Radio silence is not influence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,610 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Was just reading that Daily Mail 10bn hit piece, there is no detail in it whatsoever to explain how we have gone from 3bn to 10bn. Granted with construction costs the 3bn was likely closer to 4bn but this other 6bn sounds like a figure just pulled out of the sky, 10 is a nice round figure too.

    This line had me despairing, it feels like groundhog day all over again

    Now alternatives such as extending the Luas network to the airport and under-served suburbs, and a further ‘Dart spur’ to the airport are being investigated.

    The Dart spur was costed during the recession for only 300m at a time of high unemployment in the construction trades and yet never built. It would be open now had they spent the 300m. I know the country was broke but it wasnt that broke, we borrowed 4bn from the UK, Sweden and Denmark so I dont think asking for an extra 300m for infrastructure would have been outrageous in the grand scheme of things. While the Dart spur wouldnt have been a direct route at least it would have gotten the airport connected to the main Dublin to Belfast railway line. Plus it would have used existing station infrastructure. Hindsight is everything but its crazy that it was never done when the cost was negligible and a very cheap way to get a rail link to the aiirport.

    Anyway just back to this 10bn costing. Swords to Charlemount is 20km or 12.4 miles. 10bn would give it a cost per mile of 806 million euros. Crossrail in London (which itself is way over budget and 3 years late) has a cost per mile of GBP202 million with a potential rise to 268 million per mile if the expected extra 4bn cost to finish it is added.

    So even taking worst case scenario of Crossrail costing 19bn the per mile cost would be GBP268m or in euros 315m per mile. So Im not sure where the Daily Mail and senior civil servants are coming out with this 806m per mile cost for the Metrolink, the figure is clearly pulled out of their arse.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,344 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The 10bn figure is clearly from someone trying to do a hatchet job on the project. It’s completely unfounded and has been picked up frequently in the media since. From that point of view it worked.

    €10bn for a partially underground tram line is ridiculous even for Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The Mail were obviously being fed bs by someone trying to derail the project, a Minister apparently. I would like to see questions asked of them on this, although I'm sure they won't give up their source. They, and all media, should be held to some sort of standards and not get away with printing blatant lies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    I really think these so called journalists who broke this apparent breaking news story in the Irish DM nearly 2 weeks ago are not really that good at maths to even come up with this figure in the 1st place. If they don't give to us or other parts of the media any solid hard figures as to how that cost per mile is justified; well we just have to assume that the article written within that sham of a newspaper is completely stuck in fantasy land.

    I would also give the view that if taxpayers living here, and along the line itself within North Dublin, were to read about that massive cost per mile going from your own calculations on it while comparing it to Crossrail out in London; they wouldn't really know how to process that information at first. They would be seriously alarmed & disgusted that they could potentially have to pay that much money per mile for a new mode of light rail transport in our capital city which just amounts to 12.4 miles. Our taxpayers could also go on to say that these figures being highlighted for Metrolink from that Irish DM article would simply be plucked out from the lands of the unicorns while these 'projected' costs for it are just based on assumptions alone, from one rag of a newspaper primarily based in the UK, when there is no verifiable hard evidence provided from within government circles to say otherwise.

    If you had the real costs of it while it was costed within a headline cost of €4 billion; they would see those costs as being more reasonable to build it in full from start to finish even though it's meant to go out to Sandyford in the near future going from the proposed plans set out in the revised Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy.

    People could also ask what the journos from the Irish DM are smoking when they come up with the goods on that €10 biilion cost. If a government minster officially came out on public record to officially outline these costs out in full for all to see with all of it's i's dotted & T's crossed; well then that is something that we should be able to understand once they are given to us in real time. But when that headline figure of €10 billion euro is publicised by those within our media sector with no proof to back it up at this point. More questions need to be asked about how to gain the actual proof of them in the 1st place otherwise it will just be regarded as more loaded BS.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,027 ✭✭✭prunudo


    You've got to remember though, we're in era of lazy journalism and click bait articles. They can hide behind 'sources' and are never accountable. And its not just in regards to infrastructure reporting.

    Equally we have politicians who speak from both sides of their mouth, they never give a straight answer, have absolutely no backbone and are constantly afraid of saying something for fear a journalist will bring it up again in the future.

    Ryan or any other minister won't give a figure of costing as it will either come back to haunt them or they're afraid of being held to account.

    And to add to the above, we have a population who by and large don't understand or care about infrastructure projects and only see the headline cost, never dig into the body of the article and instead focus on terms like 'will cost taxpayers....'



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    The finances are billions ahead of where they expected a few short months ago. Nearly a ten billion swing. Four billion Is an irrelevance to the irish state. A huge amount of it will go back to state coffers anyway.

    Ffg wonder why they are losing support, decades of inaction and waffle. People are sick of it...


    They have a billion welfare package on Tuesday, that's ten billion every decade. Not a word from.our great media about that, which would probably be championing it, if it were ten billion increase this budget..



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,291 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    You've got to remember though, we're in era of lazy journalism and click bait articles

    there were always plenty of lazy journalists, there's nothing new there. the clickbait phenomenon is new(ish) though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    Calling €4bn an "irrelevance" is just asinine even if hyperbolic. However, the real point is that ML will be a net-positive investment to the Irish exchequer. Not a lot of Keynesian thinking in our Government or media though, more of a Junior Cert Business Studies understanding of State finances as analogised to a household budget



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,056 ✭✭✭Rulmeq


    It may be hyperbolic, but this is 200 year infrastructure, so in that scale of things it is irrelevant. If only we could spread the cost over 200 years :P



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    I guess that's kind of what issuing a Government bond is, although I think they mostly mature within 5 - 20 years you just keep rolling it over forever as long as you don't default.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,344 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    And just like that a hatchet job on the project in the Sunday Independent by Colm McCarthy yesterday about the cost of MetroLink ballooning to 10bn and a lengthy “I told you so” about the project being a waste of money.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,615 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    McCarthy has never been right on anything, of course. DART would be a white elephant, Luas would fail etc etc.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,458 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    He's the very man that spent years lecturing his students that renewable energies, in particular wind energy, would never take off and would fizzle out. A spoofer when it comes to infrastructure projects.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Always do the opposite of what Colm McCarthy says.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    I read the article... we can buy tons of buses that can just sit in gridlock ... I really wonder why other cities bother with metros, when colm mccarthy says they can use buses instead...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 195 ✭✭Bsharp


    The sooner we're rid of so called experts that can only think in a straight line the better.

    Neither BusConnects nor trams can overcome the issue of city centre street capacity for the longer term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭MyLove4Satan


    He is like Rasputin. He simply can't be removed. In 100 years time his head suspended in formaldehyde and kept cognitive with AI will still be saying buses are enough and politicians will still be obeying him.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,344 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    TII have issued an update to the market regarding the procurement & delivery of MetroLink.

    Looks like they plan to publish a contract notice for the project delivery in late 2022/early 2023. It also appears that they will be going down the PPP route.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Worth noting though that the Project Delivery Partner isn't a contractor carrying out works.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,955 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    "A contract notice for the project delivery". What is this exactly?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    Concept designs seem to be out there now:

    https://twitter.com/DublinCommuters/status/1450572705762316290



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    There's a good few photos in that thread, and I think it mostly looks great. Really like the natural lighting solution they have, hopefully they get that into most of them.


    I'd be concerned about the quality of the materials used on the stations aboveground. The picture for Tara St makes it look like the cheap cladding that DCC seem to insist upon whenever they make alterations to the set back top floors of any building.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,730 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    well, who knows what futuristic materials will be available by 2031 when they're actually applying the finishes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    It's hard to tell but from the looks of the visualisation, and the layout released during the last consultation, that there is no direct link between Metrolink and Tara St station. The stairs/lifts for Metrolink should continue up to the Tara St platform level. Again, it's hard yo tell but it would be disappointing if the stations aren't integrated like that.

    I highlighted it during the last consultation, it would be ridiculous if people with mobility difficulties or buggies come out of Metrolink beside Townsend St and have to make their way to the existing Tara St main entrance on the Quays in order to take the lift up to the DART platforms. There should be lifts provided by the Metrolink project serving Metrolink platform level, ground level and Tara St platform level.



Advertisement