Freeman Megamerge

BnB wrote: »

https://twitter.com/paddycosgrave/status/1407798441242206215

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Sure, the test booking data can be looked up by anyone but he's publicly linking it to a named person. In other words, doxxing. I always thought he was a right bollox but that's pretty bad even for him.

whippet wrote: »

Impact?

It is about a grown man harassing someone over something really trivial

L1011 wrote: »

And due to some IT cockup, they have extended some validity far further than they should have, making it very difficult to book a test for them at all.

I had a car off the road for ages, so the original extension had expired - the day I got it back on the road I got a letter extending it to the end of August, so ~15 months after the original cert expired!

eldamo wrote: »

So, a person running in the south dublin by election had an expired NCT on their car.
This chap wrote a script that queried the cars details in their database every 60 seconds so he could see when it had been booked in for an NCT.


He realised it was petty, so he named the script he wrote petty.exe or something, but the reality is this guy is just a creep, he is a perpetual moaner with a real elevated opinion of himself, an internet mouthpiece with an opinion on everything (I say from my hidden name on the internet).


Anyway, presumably the database is open to query from the public, I think when I have booked an NCT in the past, all you needed to do first was enter your car registration number, and it would tell you when your NCT was due to expire and offer you slots to book a test, but you needed further information to actually book it.


So, he is not doing anything that you can't do, but it's like elevated facebook stalking, yeah sure, all the info is there publically available, but, you have clearly used it in a manner that was never intended.


So, I suppose, people running for office should be of good moral standing etc, he thinks that her car is not safe according to the governments own rules... but I don't know the persons personal situation, are they using the car? you might not need it in south dublin with public transport and shopping deliveries... I don't know, presumably he does, and he thinks it is relevant to the substance of their character....


So, that's just the pettyness, there is also the suggestion that doing this has doxxed the person running for the seat, he provided a screenshot from the NCT which would show information like the make model and colour of the car, not sure if the registration number was blanked out, but still, more information about a private citizens private vehicle than required...


He's just a bit of a creep

Whatever about the freeman stuff, if it's in the constitution that the judge should have to present his oath on request then he should bloody well have to do so. This is the problem with legal a-holes - it's an occupation of snobbery and double standards. They happily throw the book at you but don't like it being thrown back.

Is it in the constitution? what do you think "present his oath" even means?

Swing and a miss there.

Judges are a "law unto themselves"? Oh please.

Usually people who slam the judiciary (and in particular suspended sentences) do so without any understanding of the reasoning behind their decisions, there are accepted sentences (custodial and non-custodial) which are appropriate based on the unique circumstances of each case, Mr. Justice Hunt would be well up on appropriate sentencing given all the facts of the case and applied what is known as the O'Keefe principle (and others) which often dictates that a suspended sentence is preferable over a custodial sentence.

It's freeman nonsense !! Back to basics on the thread

The constitution is freeman nonsense is it? Like something someone in the legal profession would say alright.

Must be a "freeman" cult down in The Ballagh, Wexford. Both above case and the hilariously funny Elizabeth/Christopher Cussen case are from the Balagh.