Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Weird, Wacky and Awesome World of the NFL - General Banter thread V3

1192193195197198265

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,737 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I'm not saying is should go against him, I'm saying it does. It took 11 years for Terrell Davis to get in and it shouldn't. He was ridiculously good.

    As far as every a
    player is concerned I look at their career and decide if I think they should get in or not.

    I believe that Edelman and Heinz Ward should get in. Edelman's postseason numbers and his clutchness are hugely important in that. The same goes for Ward.

    The issue of playing getting in too soon or too late or not at all is one of the issues I have with the pro football hall of fame(name is a bit misleading) is the way it’s voting process is open to abuse. I mean yes art moddel did the city of Cleveland dirty, but because of the Cleveland member of the press on the committee he’ll never get in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,019 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I'm not saying is should go against him, I'm saying it does. It took 11 years for Terrell Davis to get in and it shouldn't. He was ridiculously good.

    As far as every a
    player is concerned I look at their career and decide if I think they should get in or not.

    I believe that Edelman and Heinz Ward should get in. Edelman's postseason numbers and his clutchness are hugely important in that. The same goes for Ward.

    Edelman doesn't have the stats, relative to other players, but he definitely fits the criteria of NFL myth. He's had so many big moments in the playoffs. They should almost have a separate HOF just for the playoffs, might alleviate some of these issues, and allow recognition of deserving players


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Edelman doesn't have the stats, relative to other players, but he definitely fits the criteria of NFL myth. He's had so many big moments in the playoffs. They should almost have a separate HOF just for the playoffs, might alleviate some of these issues, and allow recognition of deserving players
    He doesn't have the regular season stats you mean, he certainly has the postseason stats.
    Which is more important? Doing it in important knockout games or regular season games.
    I think if you are behind only Jerry Rice in yards and receptions in the postseason then you certainly have to be seriously considered for the Hall.


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Jasper Fit Pedestrian


    eagle eye wrote: »
    He doesn't have the regular season stats you mean, he certainly has the postseason stats.
    Which is more important? Doing it in important knockout games or regular season games.
    I think if you are behind only Jerry Rice in yards and receptions in the postseason then you certainly have to be seriously considered for the Hall.

    He just played a lot of postseason games because he played with the brady bb pats


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,737 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    eagle eye wrote: »
    He doesn't have the regular season stats you mean, he certainly has the postseason stats.
    Which is more important? Doing it in important knockout games or regular season games.
    I think if you are behind only Jerry Rice in yards and receptions in the postseason then you certainly have to be seriously considered for the Hall.

    Except Jerry rice isn’t in the HOF for just his postseason play though now is he ? No, he’s in there for his entire body of work over his career. We can all find ways to using certain stats to make a point. We won’t know how much his career means until 2026 and we see where he gets to in the process of that years class.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Jasper Fit Pedestrian


    At the very least I'm glad to have learned that this is not just talking heads nonsense and people do think he has a shot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,737 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    At the very least I'm glad to have learned that this is not just talking heads nonsense and people do think he has a shot

    Any player of note has a shot nerd but it’s a bit early to be getting this deep into whether he will get in or not when he’s just announced it and as far as I know hasn’t made it official. Let’s see what happens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,613 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    eagle eye wrote: »
    He doesn't have the regular season stats you mean, he certainly has the postseason stats.
    Which is more important? Doing it in important knockout games or regular season games.
    I think if you are behind only Jerry Rice in yards and receptions in the postseason then you certainly have to be seriously considered for the Hall.
    Yeah you have to look past the stats sometimes don't ya. It's all well and good knocking up massive yards, but there has to be more weighting to doing it in the playoffs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Itssoeasy wrote:
    Except Jerry rice isn’t in the HOF for just his postseason play though now is he ? No, he’s in there for his entire body of work over his career. We can all find ways to using certain stats to make a point. We won’t know how much his career means until 2026 and we see where he gets to in the process of that years class.

    Jerry Rice is the GOAT receiver, regular season or postseason.
    I'm saying if you are second to him in either than you have to be seriously considered for the Hall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,467 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Kgd2Y6c.jpg

    Half joking, but still. Edelman was undoubtedly a very good receiver, but with such a talented cast around him it does take away from it. I don't think he (or Jordy, unfortunately) are HOF quality.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Blut2 wrote:
    Half joking, but still. Edelman was undoubtedly a very good receiver, but with such a talented cast around him it does take away from it. I don't think he (or Jordy, unfortunately) are HOF quality.
    Can you compare their playoff stats?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Can you compare their playoff stats?
    Playoff stats mean even less for me tbh edelman bar last year I don't think missed a post season so had more opportunities than a lot of players.


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Jasper Fit Pedestrian


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Can you compare their playoff stats?

    If you add in playoff stats he's still behind nelson is that what your asking?

    Per playoff game if you exclude the regular season he may or may not be slightly ahead I'd wager per game they may be the same


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Playoff stats mean even less for me tbh edelman bar last year I don't think missed a post season so had more opportunities than a lot of players.

    Yeah, carving out 'playoff stats' is another very weird US sport thing to do - especially cumulative stats for a specific player that plays such a small part in the overall team success.

    I can maybe reach to understand it for other US sports when the team is small and/or they play in an extremely long season (which can really mess with data) but for football, when teams are so large and the regular season has only been 16 games long, it makes absolutely no sense.

    Being a PED cheat isn't going to help Edelman's case either. I know many presume that most of the league is doing similar but it can put off voters even if it wasn't such a huge reach in the first place.


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Jasper Fit Pedestrian


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Yeah, carving out 'playoff stats' is another very weird US sport thing to do - especially cumulative stats for a specific player that plays such a small part in the overall team success.

    I can maybe reach to understand it for other US sports when the team is small and/or they play in an extremely long season (which can really mess with data) but for football, when teams are so large and the regular season has only been 16 games long, it makes absolutely no sense.

    Being a PED cheat isn't going to help Edelman's case either. I know many presume that most of the league is doing similar but it can put off voters even if it wasn't such a huge reach in the first place.

    Not to mention if he was megatron for example he probably moves at some point and has less games. His being an average reciever that happened to fit well into the pats offence got him more playoff appearances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭heyjude


    Edelman was never considered an elite WR during his career as evidenced by his never being named all pro or making a pro bowl, yet somehow his 3 Superbowl rings seem to have led to the idea that he deserved Hall of Fame consideration. Yet there are other more deserving candidates to be considered before Edelman.

    Compare the career stats for Cliff Branch(who played in a less pass friendly era)

    Cliff Branch 501 rec - 8,685 yds - 67 TDs. 20 career playoffs appearances - 3 Superbowl wins and held playoff rec and TD records until surpassed by Jerry Rice. 4 time Pro bowler, 3 time first team All-Pro, led NFL in receiving yards once and in TDs twice

    Julian Edelman 620 rec - 6,822 yds - 40 TDs(36 receiving and 4 returns). 19 career playoffs appearances . 3 Superbowl wins. Never made Pro Bowl or All Pro. Never led league in receiving yards or TDs

    Yet despite his career stats comparing favourably with other pro bowl receivers of his era, Branch has never even been a Hall of Fame finalist(he has a semi finalist in 2004 and 2010), so if his 3 Superbowl rings, 4 Pro bowls, 3 all pro and superior yardage and TD totals weren't enough to even be a Hall of Fame finalist, then Edelman should be a long way down the list for consideration.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Per playoff game if you exclude the regular season he may or may not be slightly ahead I'd wager per game they may be the same
    Nelson played 13 times in the playoffs catching 54 balls for 688 yards.
    Edelman played 19 games with 118 catches for 1442 yards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Cliff Branch should be in the hall, it's a disgrace that he isn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    And Branch, Gronk, Andre Reed and Reggie Wayne all played more playoff games than Edelman and have less receiving yards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,112 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    Alex Smith is retiring. It’s remarkable that he came back from one of the worst injuries I’ve seen in sports and was a functional QB with Washington. I liked him a lot at the Chiefs too. He was a solid but unspectacular pair of hands and was a good influence on Mahomes by all accounts.

    16 years is a very good innings. Video announcement below.

    https://www.instagram.com/tv/CN2j9LohMi4/?igshid=8njua9vg1ueq


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Xavi6 wrote: »
    Alex Smith is retiring. It’s remarkable that he came back from one of the worst injuries I’ve seen in sports and was a functional QB with Washington. I liked him a lot at the Chiefs too. He was a solid but unspectacular pair of hands and was a good influence on Mahomes by all accounts.

    16 years is a very good innings. Video announcement below.

    https://www.instagram.com/tv/CN2j9LohMi4/?igshid=8njua9vg1ueq

    He dealt with a lot of crap during his time at the 49ers as well, always a great pro. Glad he has retired though, last season was very uncomfortable to watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Watson's lawyers releasing their response to the claims against him.

    https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1384176998394712064?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Watson's lawyers releasing their response to the claims against him.

    https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1384176998394712064?s=20

    If they have actual texts and **** like they claim this will only end in a win for watson


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Jasper Fit Pedestrian


    eagle eye wrote: »
    And Branch, Gronk, Andre Reed and Reggie Wayne all played more playoff games than Edelman and have less receiving yards

    Sounds like a prime candidate for the playoffs hall if fame


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,737 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    If they have actual texts and **** like they claim this will only end in a win for watson

    Which explains why he wants this to go to trial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Nelson played 13 times in the playoffs catching 54 balls for 688 yards.
    Edelman played 19 games with 118 catches for 1442 yards.

    So what you are saying is with only 8 games extra olayed Nelson grades out better over all??

    I'm a packers fan and I don't think Nelson deserves in


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Sounds like a prime candidate for the playoffs hall if fame

    There's only one hall of fame. If you split it into regular season and playoffs then nobody would care about the regular season one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    So what you are saying is with only 8 games extra olayed Nelson grades out better over all??
    How are you making that out?
    I was talking about the postseason, you suggested that Nelson's stats would match but their don't. He'd have 1k receiving yards given the same number of games as Edelman, that's a long way behind Julian.
    I'm a packers fan and I don't think Nelson deserves in
    He's borderline for me, I thought he was a great player. He had quite a few really outstanding seasons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    eagle eye wrote: »
    How are you making that out?
    I was talking about the postseason, you suggested that Nelson's stats would match but their don't. He'd have 1k receiving yards given the same number of games as Edelman, that's a long way behind Julian.


    He's borderline for me, I thought he was a great player. He had quite a few really outstanding seasons.
    I never mentioned jordy Nelson??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,928 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I never mentioned jordy Nelson??
    I see now it was nerd but you did mention Nelson when you quoted me.


Advertisement