Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cyclists, insurance and road tax

  • 19-04-2021 9:08am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 455 ✭✭


    My opinions on this are not welcome on the cycling forum, so here we go.

    Why is it such a taboo to request cyclists to get insurance and pay taxes for the roads that they use, just like car drivers do?

    "There is no such thing as road tax" cyclists bleat - except there are plenty of taxes that other road users have to pay, and cyclists pay none of them. There are plenty of tax breaks which cyclists can avail of, and second hand bikes which are dickied up to be as good as new are even VAT free.

    I agree that cycling is worth encouraging in big cities like Dublin, where it is a superior form of transport, but the cycle lanes have to be paid for from somewhere. And in rural areas, the only cyclists I see are doing it as a form of exercise on a road built for cars and tractors, slowing all the traffic down and endangering all road users. If cyclists want to cycle on main roads in rural Ireland, then they should pay for greenways for this purpose.

    Until then, they're a nuisance and a menace. So cyclists really have no arguments against mandatory insurance either. Before giving them insurance, I assume those companies will want evidence that cyclists know the rules of the road - something which currently they are not required to be remotely aware of.

    It's a pity I can't actually address this point to cyclists in the cycling forum.



    Threadbanned Posters:
    • Joe4321
    • Spook_ie


«13456765

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    Its been a while since we've had this thread.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭statto25


    "There is no such thing as road tax" cyclists bleat - except there are plenty of taxes that other road users have to pay, and cyclists pay none of them.


    What are these other taxes you speak of....and there IS NO such thing as road tax....so those bleating cyclists are correct


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,405 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Could have googled it OP. But you didnt.

    PS - as a cyclist, glad to know I am both a nuisance and a menace.

    Glad to know I am in the category of 'they'. Not one of 'us', whatever that is.

    You are saying you werent allowed post this in the Cycling forum?

    Anyway, I am sure your views will be welcome in in the Current Affairs/ IMHO .


    The forum where 'us' takes the opportunity to rant about 'they'.


  • Registered Users Posts: 455 ✭✭Sono Topolino


    statto25 wrote: »
    What are these other taxes you speak of....and there IS NO such thing as road tax....so those bleating cyclists are correct

    Motor tax
    VRT
    VAT

    Cyclists get tax breaks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    Motor tax
    VRT
    VAT

    Cyclists get tax breaks.

    I got a tax break when I bought my car.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 455 ✭✭Sono Topolino


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    Could have googled it OP. But you didnt.

    PS - as a cyclist, glad to know I am both a nuisance and a menace.

    You are saying you werent allowed post this in the Cycling forum?

    I was told "this isn't a forum for complaining about cyclists".

    I tried resurrecting an AH thread but my post was deleted by moderators.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,411 ✭✭✭griffdaddy


    Motor tax
    VRT
    VAT

    Cyclists get tax breaks.

    You could drive an electric car and avail of low rates of motor tax as well as getting a grant from the government. There's VAT on everything to some extent, not sure what your argument is there? Everyone pays tax to fund everything in the country. By your logic pedestrians should pay footpath tax?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,405 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Motor tax
    VRT
    VAT

    Cyclists get tax breaks.

    Why didnt you include Ice Cream tax and Surf Board tax.

    What they all have in common is that none of them are Road tax.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭statto25


    Motor tax
    VRT
    VAT

    Cyclists get tax breaks.


    Motor Tax: Tax for the privilege of owning a Motor Vehicle
    VRT: Tax for the registration of a purchased motor vehicle
    VAT: Tax applied to all goods sold for non commercial purposes


    2 of those 3 dont apply to cyclists as they apply to motor vehicle owners. The 3rd applies and the last time I checked, I paid VAT on my last bike purchase.
    Dont forget to account for the fact that most cyclists are also car owners so your post is incorrect for the most part


  • Registered Users Posts: 734 ✭✭✭doughef


    You should know by now your not allowed question our cycling friends about anything in this platform !


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,405 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    statto25 wrote: »
    Motor Tax: Tax for the privilege of owning a Motor Vehicle
    VRT: Tax for the registration of a purchased motor vehicle
    VAT: Tax applied to all goods sold for non commercial purposes


    2 of those 3 dont apply to cyclists as they apply to motor vehicle owners. The 3rd applies and the last time I checked, I paid VAT on my last bike purchase.
    Dont forget to account for the fact that most cyclists are also car owners so your post is incorrect for the most part

    When presented with information - will OP recognise his/ her mistake?

    Lets find out.....


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,841 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    You forgot to include the fact that nobody charges cyclists for petrol or diesel for their bikes either OP.
    And how the cyclists are let away with not having to do a yearly NCT on their bikes is another one.
    Not to mention the high charges in the local garage here to get your car washed using their machine. I've never seen a garage with a relatively high bike-wash. Discrimination I tell ya


  • Registered Users Posts: 250 ✭✭antfin


    My opinions on this are not welcome on the cycling forum, so here we go.

    Why is it such a taboo to request cyclists to get insurance and pay taxes for the roads that they use, just like car drivers do?

    "There is no such thing as road tax" cyclists bleat - except there are plenty of taxes that other road users have to pay, and cyclists pay none of them. There are plenty of tax breaks which cyclists can avail of, and second hand bikes which are dickied up to be as good as new are even VAT free.

    I agree that cycling is worth encouraging in big cities like Dublin, where it is a superior form of transport, but the cycle lanes have to be paid for from somewhere. And in rural areas, the only cyclists I see are doing it as a form of exercise on a road built for cars and tractors, slowing all the traffic down and endangering all road users. If cyclists want to cycle on main roads in rural Ireland, then they should pay for greenways for this purpose.

    Until then, they're a nuisance and a menace. So cyclists really have no arguments against mandatory insurance either. Before giving them insurance, I assume those companies will want evidence that cyclists know the rules of the road - something which currently they are not required to be remotely aware of.

    It's a pity I can't actually address this point to cyclists in the cycling forum.

    How would this be enforced against kids on their bicycles cycling to school? Would the Gardai be diverting resources to set up checkpoints to stop kids, issue them with a fine and take the bike off them if the parents hadn't insured and taxed the bike for the kid? Or would there be an age limit so that if a kid could produce an ID document to prove they were under the age limit they wouldn't be fined? Checkpoints either side of most schools in cities would surely generate massive revenue!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,405 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    doughef wrote: »
    You should know by now your not allowed question our cycling friends about anything in this platform !

    I dont see the mods intervening......


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    doughef wrote: »
    You should know by now your you're not allowed question our cycling friends about anything in this platform !

    Fixed that for you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,628 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    Motor tax
    VRT
    VAT

    Cyclists get tax breaks.

    Motor tax and VRT dont cover the cost of the externalities of motor vehicles; the health problems they cause, the environmental damage, the amount of the landmass of this country covered in tar, the streetlights at deserted junctions which all electricity uses pay for but only road users benefit from.

    Cyclists pay VAT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,405 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Come on OP - is this yet another example of someone using false information to vent their gripes on social media.

    Or can you acknowledge that you are completely wrong - if facts count for anything - on the subject of Road Tax.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,719 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    I dont see the mods intervening......

    The cycling forum will soon attempt to kidnap a mod and hold them to ransom until this thread is closed!


  • Registered Users Posts: 455 ✭✭Sono Topolino


    statto25 wrote: »
    Motor Tax: Tax for the privilege of owning a Motor Vehicle
    VRT: Tax for the registration of a purchased motor vehicle
    VAT: Tax applied to all goods sold for non commercial purposes


    2 of those 3 dont apply to cyclists as they apply to motor vehicle owners. The 3rd applies and the last time I checked, I paid VAT on my last bike purchase.
    Dont forget to account for the fact that most cyclists are also car owners so your post is incorrect for the most part

    1. There's no VAT on second hand bicycles - even if they're as good as new.
    2. Cyclists can get 50% off the price of a new bike via the BTW scheme. Note, there's nobody checking if they use this bike to get to work!
    3. Motor tax and VRT are taxes on road vehicles.

    The Irish people are subsidising people owning bikes, which would be fair enough in the middle of Dublin but makes no sense in Castlepolard, Co. Westmeath.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,355 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Because cars, trucks and vans destroy the roads, which constantly need to be maintained and repaired at the tax payer's expense.

    And because cars, truck, vans emit massive amounts of carbon into the atmosphere... which needs to be offset at the tax payer's expense.

    Cycling has virtually zero impact on the road surface quality. And virtually zero carbon footprint.

    Cycle lanes are a necessary evil as so many drivers are incapable of sharing the road. A lot of cyclists hate cycle lanes as they are badly designed, used by others as footpaths and badly maintained. But to encourage people to start cycling, it seems cycle lanes are needed.

    The only people endangering road users' safety on roads are people who can't cycle or drive within the rules of the road. Only an idiot would argue that a road user is in more danger as a result of a cyclist than a dangerous, impatient, poorly skilled driver.

    You're entitled to your opinion, which is effectively that cyclists should be taken off all roads onto either cycle lanes or greenways, and the roads returned to use exclusively by cars. Maybe you think that would make the country a better place to live.

    My opinion? Roads have been around for centuries. Cars for about 100 years. Roads were certainly not built for them - they've been taken over by them. Cars should be subject to higher rates of motor tax given the impact they have on the road infrastructure. Particularly the big, gas-guzzling types. This would result in better roads and better public transport options. Speeding drivers should be crucified on insurance renewal and fines. Drivers prosecuted for dangerous/ careless driving should have their licences revoked without exception. And people driving without insurance should be jailed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,628 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    What about insurance? The main cost of insurance is 3rd party. Are cyclists likely to kill, main and destroy property of they have an accident?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,275 ✭✭✭km991148


    It's not so much that your opinion isn't so much welcome on its own, I'd say it's more because the arguments and generalisations don't make much sense.

    The tiniest bit of research would show this.


    But sure, they don't even wear helmets etc etc


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 158 ✭✭Joe4321


    Totally agree, when you purchase a bike you should need to have it registered and a number attached so you can be identified just like a motor vehicle, cyclists that use public roads should have insurance. Anyone who cycles on public roads should have a licence or certificate to say that they are proficent in the rules of the road, but unfortunately we have no one in government including that clown in the green party to implament these things, oh and cyclists need to be allocated 90% of the road for their use.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,020 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Oh this thread again,
    It’s one those who you nearly can predict who’ll post in it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,628 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    1. There's no VAT on second hand bicycles - even if they're as good as new.
    2. Cyclists can get 50% off the price of a new bike via the BTW scheme. Note, there's nobody checking if they use this bike to get to work!
    3. Motor tax and VRT are taxes on road vehicles.

    The Irish people are subsidising people owning bikes, which would be fair enough in the middle of Dublin but makes no sense in Castlepolard, Co. Westmeath.

    1. You can buy a second hand car without vat.
    2. The tax break on a bike is cheaper than suffering the external costs we all suffer from other people's car journeys.
    3. The gas state of water is known as steam.

    Irish people are subsidising the destruction of the environment by motorists and the health costs caused to others by the actions of motorists.


  • Registered Users Posts: 734 ✭✭✭doughef


    The cycling forum will soon attempt to kidnap a mod and hold them to ransom until this thread is closed!

    Won’t be long !


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,497 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    McGaggs wrote: »
    What about insurance? The main cost of insurance is 3rd party. Are cyclists likely to kill, main and destroy property of they have an accident?

    If they go through someone's windscreen? Yep.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 158 ✭✭Joe4321


    Agree cyclist are not likely to kill but are very likely to injure people and cause danage while zig zagging through traffic


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,275 ✭✭✭km991148


    2. Cyclists can get 50% off the price of a new bike via the BTW scheme. Note, there's nobody checking if they use this bike to get to work!
    3. Motor tax and VRT are taxes on road vehicles.

    The Irish people are subsidising people owning bikes, which would be fair enough in the middle of Dublin but makes no sense in Castlepolard, Co. Westmeath.

    #2.. where do I sign up! I wish!

    The 'Irish people'.. lol.. are cyclists not Irish people? Do we get to say what our tax goes on? In that case I want a refund. I don't have kids but pay for schools (amongst many other taxes to promote family life).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 734 ✭✭✭doughef


    Smee_Again wrote: »
    Fixed that for you.

    Thanks - although I asked you already not to edit my posts on a separate forum ?

    The ‘fixed it for you’ bit is hilarious though - every time .


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement