2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Faugheen · 01-10-2020 12:59AM

AllForIt wrote: »

I don't see how you can have an ideology without a group of people who identity with said ideology.

It's like saying 'Antifa are just an idea in your mind. It doesn't really exist in reality'. :rolleyes:

That’s what the FBI Director, who Trump appointed, said.

Biden was quoting him. He made that very clear at the start of his sentence.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 01:21AM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote:

A bit like Melania with Trump? There's a 34 year difference there. Does this relationship disgust you also?

It'd be pretty low on the list of things that disgust me about Trump.
You do realise that it's ok not to like Trump and some democrats?

Justin Credible Darts · 01-10-2020 01:57AM

eagle eye wrote: »

It'd be pretty low on the list of things that disgust me about Trump.
You do realise that it's ok not to like Trump and some democrats?

most on here dont get it.

they think if you call biden boring, you must therefore be a trump supporter.

The fact you may think both parties are war mongers with dismal candidates is lost on some

Overheal · 01-10-2020 02:18AM

Justin Credible Darts wrote: »

most on here dont get it.

they think if you call biden boring, you must therefore be a trump supporter.

The fact you may think both parties are war mongers with dismal candidates is lost on some

Ah theres miles of difference between calling him "boring" and what a lot of one liners here actually suggest about Biden.

Real Donald Trump · 01-10-2020 02:24AM

Nice turn out in Minnesota tonight.

bobbyy gee · 01-10-2020 02:57AM

Donald losing support

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trumps-chances-are-dwindling-that-could-make-him-dangerous/

StupidLikeAFox · 01-10-2020 03:43AM

Watched most of the debate last night. Apart from the usual points that are being talked about I thought Trump really lost it when Biden brought up Putin and said something like he was Putin's puppet. Would love to see his reaction to that again

Biden was so poor though, anybody with half a brain could have torn trump to shreds on the things he was coming out with. Would love to see AOC up there

Brian? · 01-10-2020 06:28AM

Justin Credible Darts wrote: »

you are contradicting yourself when you say there is no demand for free health care.

did you not only on this thread on this page declare 100 million yanks with underlying conditions.

Are you trying to tell me those 100 million would rather pay than get it for free ?

If you look at how they vote, yes. Bernie has run for President twice on a “Medicare for all” platform and failed twice.

It’s a bizarre phenomenon in the US, but people rarely vote for the collective good.

ThunbergsAreGo · 01-10-2020 06:41AM

osarusan wrote: »

A fair few clips there of Trump denouncing these kinds of groups.

But how do we explain his 'and stand by' comments?

"Stand by" means hold and wait for further instuction. Always has. Why is he telling such a group to await further instruction?

I reckon he just said the wrong thing with his mouth going faster than his brain as usual. It's not a master plan

An idiotic comment but one he won't row back on.

"stand down and er stand er by".

Its typical of his speak first, think later style

Cody montana · 01-10-2020 07:26AM

Real Donald Trump wrote: »

Nice turn out in Minnesota tonight.

*Cough*

sydthebeat · 01-10-2020 07:28AM

Brian? wrote: »

It’s a bizarre phenomenon in the US, but people rarely vote for the collective good.

Its not bizarre at all that the ultimate capitalist economy in the world doesn't vote for socialist ideas.

Capitalism and the individual is what the country is built upon

01-10-2020 07:36AM

eagle eye wrote: »

And would it be a wild theory to suggest she slept her way to a couple of promotions?

I would say it is tbh, Harris has shown herself to be highly capable throughout her career. So I would say it's more likely that she reached the positions she reached via hard work.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 07:40AM

Deleted User wrote:

I would say it is tbh, Harris has shown herself to be highly capable throughout her career. So I would say it's more likely that she reached the positions she reached via hard work.

So sleeping with her boss, 32 years her senior, is a normal thing for an ambitious young woman?

01-10-2020 07:46AM

eagle eye wrote: »

So sleeping with her boss, 32 years her senior, is a normal thing for an ambitious young woman?

Some people have relationships with people older them. It's not a new phenomenon and she made no secret of the relationship. So I'm inclined to say it's more likely that it was a genuine relationship. Also the very fact she progressed so far beyond him in her career indicates that it's far more likely she progressed in her career as she did as a result of hard work.

Also, frankly it's coming across as a tad sexist the angle you're pursuing. You've brought it up more than once in the past. You've attempted to represent it as an "affair" when it wasn't. The reality is most people view her as a highly accomplished politician and who she was in a relationship with back in the nineties is irrelevant. You haven't established a pattern, you've shown a single public relationship.

Cody montana · 01-10-2020 07:49AM

eagle eye wrote: »

So sleeping with her boss, 32 years her senior, is a normal thing for an ambitious young woman?

Do you tell all women how they should and shouldn’t behave?
Or who they should date?

Seeing as you’re so concerned about an affair that never happened, what do you think about Trump cheating on all 3 wives?
Actual affairs.

Wanderer78 · 01-10-2020 07:52AM

Cody montana wrote:

Seeing as youâ€™re so concerned about an affair that never happened, what do you think about Trump cheating on all 3 wives? Actual affairs.

Yea but they would have been the greatest affairs ever, there's a big difference!

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 08:08AM

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

I reckon he just said the wrong thing with his mouth going faster than his brain as usual. It's not a master plan

An idiotic comment but one he won't row back on.

"stand down and er stand er by".

Its typical of his speak first, think later style

'If he mispoke, I think he should correct it, if he doesn't correct it I guess he didn't mispeak' - Tim Scott Rep SouthC

I don't believe he has corrected himself yet

ThunbergsAreGo · 01-10-2020 08:18AM

duploelabs wrote: »

'If he mispoke, I think he should correct it, if he doesn't correct it I guess he didn't mispeak' - Tim Scott Rep SouthC

I don't believe he has corrected himself yet

Cos he's a "proud man"

Never admitted a mistake before, can't see him starting now

01-10-2020 08:19AM

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

Cos he's a "proud man"

Never admitted a mistake before, can't see him starting now

He doesn't even have to admit a mistake, he could just clearly denounce white supremacists.

Danzy · 01-10-2020 08:19AM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

He doesn't even have to admit a mistake, he could just clearly denounce white supremacists.

He often has.

sydthebeat · 01-10-2020 08:23AM

Danzy wrote: »

He often has.

“White supremacy should be denounced at every turn. I think the president misspoke, and he needs to correct it,” Scott told reporters.

Tim Scott. Republican senator.

Trump should have denounced white supremists when challenged.

The fact he didn't speaks volumes about him

francois · 01-10-2020 08:29AM

eagle eye wrote: »

So sleeping with her boss, 32 years her senior, is a normal thing for an ambitious young woman?

Desperate over-reach

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 08:34AM

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

Cos he's a "proud man"

Never admitted a mistake before, can't see him starting now

Never admitting a mistake is a character trait that's one to be proud of?? Seriously?

Still hasn't corrected himself

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 08:35AM

eagle eye wrote: »

So sleeping with her boss, 32 years her senior, is a normal thing for an ambitious young woman?

Perfectly fine for anyone of any gender to do

Wanderer78 · 01-10-2020 08:35AM

duploelabs wrote:

Never admitting a mistake is a character trait that's one to be proud of?? Seriously?

Common with narrcacissts

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 08:38AM

Wanderer78 wrote: »

Common with narrcacissts

No narcissist, no narcissist, you're the narcissist

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 08:56AM

Deleted User wrote:

Some people have relationships with people older them. It's not a new phenomenon and she made no secret of the relationship. So I'm inclined to say it's more likely that it was a genuine relationship. Also the very fact she progressed so far beyond him in her career indicates that it's far more likely she progressed in her career as she did as a result of hard work.
Also, frankly it's coming across as a tad sexist the angle you're pursuing. You've brought it up more than once in the past. You've attempted to represent it as an "affair" when it wasn't. The reality is most people view her as a highly accomplished politician and who she was in a relationship with back in the nineties is irrelevant. You haven't established a pattern, you've shown a single public relationship.

Do you agree that she has shown herself as pretty ruthless throughout her career to get to where she is now? It's the case with most people who get there.
If you think a good looking young(28) woman who would have had many admirers ending up sleeping with her 60 boss is normal then I suggest you really don't know very much about the world.
Your sexist comment is ridiculous given the age gap and the position held by Brown.
A couple of months ago I found it shocking that people were coming on here with no information and posting links from agenda driven democrat supporters who were adamant that Tara Meade was lying despite not having any information about the alleged incident.
I never too sides on that as there are only two people who really know what, if anything, happened.
Did you come on here calling those guys sexist? I don't remember you saying it to any of them.

Look, it's just simply a thing here that has a look about it. When you are a public figure you can expect that to be looked at. It's not sexist to be suspicious of a good looking young woman sleeping with her boss who was over double her age at 60.

pjohnson · 01-10-2020 08:58AM

I assume you also criticise Melania?

24 years between her and Trumpy Wumpy.

Igotadose · 01-10-2020 08:59AM

eagle eye wrote: »

Look, it's just simply a thing here that has a look about it. When you are a public figure you can expect that to be looked at. It's not sexist to be suspicious of a good looking young woman sleeping with her boss who was over double her age at 60.

Like Melania Trump, for example. Sought a wealthy American in order to get citizenship for her and her parents and further her modeling career. So, perfectly normal isn't it? Her husband is much older than her.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:00AM

eagle eye wrote: »

Do you agree that she has shown herself as pretty ruthless throughout her career to get to where she is now? It's the case with most people who get there.
If you think a good looking young(28) woman who would have had many admirers ending up sleeping with her 60 boss is normal then I suggest you really don't know very much about the world.
Your sexist comment is ridiculous given the age gap and the position held by Brown.
A couple of months ago I found it shocking that people were coming on here with no information and posting links from agenda driven democrat supporters who were adamant that Tara Meade was lying despite not having any information about the alleged incident.
I never too sides on that as there are only two people who really know what, if anything, happened.
Did you come on here calling those guys sexist? I don't remember you saying it to any of them.

Look, it's just simply a thing here that has a look about it. When you are a public figure you can expect that to be looked at. It's not sexist to be suspicious of a good looking young woman sleeping with her boss who was over double her age at 60.

It's an ignorant, basic, misogynistic viewpoint to say that a woman should sleep with a certain person who fits with your ideas

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Comments