Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIV-37,063 ROI (1,801 deaths) 12,886 NI (582 deaths) (02/10) Read OP

1133134136138139331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,922 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    That's a pathetic retort at best. Will you really defend those drunken, fornicating louts? Gathering like that in the middle of a pandemic. Spreading a killer virus to God knows who? It's a national disgrace I think, I've had enough

    You've said yourself, there's no hope of us getting rid of this virus, it's going to kill us all, no vaccine, no future........ Might as well be too drunk to notice........

    Had enough? Hope your not planning on flying anywhere, just covid death tubes in the sky.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    You've said yourself, there's no hope of us getting rid of this virus, it's going to kill us all, no vaccine, no future........ Might as well be too drunk to notice........

    Had enough? Hope your not planning on flying anywhere, just covid death tubes in the sky.

    You can at least show the basic modicum of regard for our frontline workers and the 1802 victims of this ****ing plague and their families and keep it in your trousers for a few months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    I can’t help wondering why they use the metric of cases per 100,000 to describe the incidence rate per county. 100,000 is a very large population number in the Irish county context. For some small counties it makes the incidence rate larger than the actual number of cases because there are less than 100,000 living in the county.
    I assume that it is done this way to make the incidence seem as large as possible and thereby get people’s attention.
    It would be more accurate and honest to present the incidence rate as a straightforward percentage of the population, but, of course, that would be a tiny number and wouldn’t scare people enough.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's a pathetic retort at best. Will you really defend those drunken, fornicating louts? Gathering like that in the middle of a pandemic. Spreading a killer virus to God knows who? It's a national disgrace I think, I've had enough

    Not defending what are essentially kids going out getting drunk, but I will criticise a jumped up little internet hardman who advocates violence against those he judges not worthy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,922 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    You can at least show the basic modicum of regard for our frontline workers and the 1802 victims of this ****ing plague and their families and keep it in your trousers for a few months.

    But you told me there's no hope, we're all doomed!!!

    **** it, CiarraiManc on boards told me I'm going to die, I'm trying heroin........


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    But you told me there's no hope, we're all doomed!!!

    **** it, CiarraiManc on boards told me I'm going to die, I'm trying heroin........

    I've never said everyone was going to die of covid. Please quote me saying that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,160 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Most people fall in one of two columns. Polarization, denialism, and anti-science vs reality.

    527857.jpeg

    Once again, the obsession with categorising laid bare in the Covid debate. This reductionist view that you can only fall into one of two columns is unhelpful, anti-intellectual and will prevent us from finding balanced ways forward.

    It’s a cancer in discourse on current affairs these days — if people disagree with you on a point then you simply content yourself by saying “oh well they’re obviously one of them lot in that other group and therefore must think the exact same way the rest of them do.”

    That chart isn’t clever — it’s poison.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    Once again, the obsession with categorising laid bare again in the Covid debate. This reductionist view that you can only fall into one of two columns is unhelpful, anti-intellectual and will prevent us from finding balanced ways forward.

    It’s a cancer in discourse on current affairs these days — if people disagree with you on a point then you simply content yourself by saying “oh well they’re obviously one of them lot in that other group and therefore must think the exact same way the rest of them do.”

    That chart isn’t clever — it’s poison.

    It cuts too close to the bone for more than a few on here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭technocrat


    How refreshing to hear a different perspective.
    Rte1 now for anyone not watching.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    patnor1011 wrote: »
    Yeah but aren't we sometimes imagining too much?

    That's a rather bleak world view


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,260 ✭✭✭TomSweeney




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    Once again, the obsession with categorising laid bare in the Covid debate. This reductionist view that you can only fall into one of two columns is unhelpful, anti-intellectual and will prevent us from finding balanced ways forward.

    It’s a cancer in discourse on current affairs these days — if people disagree with you on a point then you simply content yourself by saying “oh well they’re obviously one of them lot in that other group and therefore must think the exact same way the rest of them do.”

    That chart isn’t clever — it’s poison.

    Well said and bang on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭Santy2015


    McConkey getting shown up here!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,012 ✭✭✭Azatadine


    technocrat wrote: »
    How refreshing to hear a different perspective.
    Rte1 now for anyone not watching.

    Yep. I agree. Not letting McConkey away with anything either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Akabusi


    McConkey in bother here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Akabusi


    He has veered off talking about nursing homes as a distraction


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Akabusi wrote: »
    McConkey in bother here

    McConkey actually suggesting Australia who locked down Melbourne indefinitely & doesn’t allow people to travel between states to see loved ones family members die...two week mandatory quarantine which failed...pathetic argument by McConkey. This zero Covid idea needs to be hit on the head once and for all.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Once again, the obsession with categorising laid bare in the Covid debate. This reductionist view that you can only fall into one of two columns is unhelpful, anti-intellectual and will prevent us from finding balanced ways forward.

    It’s a cancer in discourse on current affairs these days — if people disagree with you on a point then you simply content yourself by saying “oh well they’re obviously one of them lot in that other group and therefore must think the exact same way the rest of them do.”

    That chart isn’t clever — it’s poison.

    Cancerous poison, eh?

    Sounds nasty.

    I happen to think there's a certain invective that isn't helping


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,012 ✭✭✭Azatadine


    I like this fella. Cool as a cucumber and makes a ton of sense.


  • Posts: 21,290 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This debate is interesting and needs to be had.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,012 ✭✭✭Azatadine


    This debate is interesting and needs to be had.

    Yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Dr. Steve Brule


    What McConkey is suggesting is unrealistic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭Spiderman0081


    Not defending what are essentially kids going out getting drunk, but I will criticise a jumped up little internet hardman who advocates violence against those he judges not worthy
    Very insensitive of you to presume this persons gender identity.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    Once again, the obsession with categorising laid bare in the Covid debate. This reductionist view that you can only fall into one of two columns is unhelpful, anti-intellectual and will prevent us from finding balanced ways forward.

    It’s a cancer in discourse on current affairs these days — if people disagree with you on a point then you simply content yourself by saying “oh well they’re obviously one of them lot in that other group and therefore must think the exact same way the rest of them do.”

    That chart isn’t clever — it’s poison.
    I don't think it's supposed to be interpreted as black or white, it's a sliding scale.

    I don't think we don't need the vaccine or that it's necessarily an exit strategy. I think it might help us get back to something resembling normality but it's not the panacea it's being touted as.

    Until there is concrete, observable evidence of something there's no sense in believing it entirely. The middle ground with an open mind is the most sensible. Let people believe whatever they want tbh, reasonably minded people can try all day to change their opinion and they're wasting their time.

    Instead of arguing semantics and hunting down facts to support our already firmly-held beliefs from which we won't be swayed, I'm suggesting we try and come up with solutions to confront the inevitable hard times ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,312 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Not really a debate. More of a master schooling a novice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭jay0109


    "Greenland, Faroes, Australia, New Zealand" says Sam.....can he not see what they have in common!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,141 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    polesheep wrote: »
    Lives have certainly been ruined.

    It's over a month now since I last saw someone not wearing a mask in a shop.

    It’s hours since I saw it actually.

    Lives get ruined when people die, when their loved ones die, the rest is fixable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭boggerman1


    McConkey is a fraud at this stage.fair play to that man for showing him up


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    Azatadine wrote: »
    I like this fella. Cool as a cucumber and makes a ton of sense.

    It's populist nonsense it means absolutely nothing in the long run. McConkey might not be popular here but he appreciates how bad things could've been and how bad they can still get


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement