Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Bulgarian workers/Keelings - read OP (threadbans listed)

1138140142143144

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    Well, typically the objective of the news is to perpetuate the utilitarian societal systems in place, where they regard them as beneficial. The objective of unions is to protect individuals from exploitation at work. Those two groups are quite possibly going to find their narratives at odds, particularly on polarising issues around Covid19 because they are literally life and death for one in five people. The media have a stake in the economy ticking away, so they're going to take the view that individual freedoms or rights are less meaningful now and that large-scale engagement with commerce as normal is the only thing that will sort this.

    Now, this is at odds with utilitarianism whether or not they know it, because the ramifications is of turning around now and loosening restrictions won't be felt until months after people go back to pretending things are normal.

    It is the responsibility of the unions to make sure that workers are shielded from being statistics in all of this, sacrificed for the sake of the economy. Whether they will actually do this or they're too invested in the economic narrative due to corruption remains to be seen.

    I have been in touch with my union and they appear to be hell-bent on sending us to the firing line, so I may not be able to engage with them if I have any self-preservation. I'm making the gamble there going with what I'm reading and seeing about this virus and taking no chances but I will likely inevitably lose my job. Although this may not matter, because life as it was is over for the next few years at least, possibly forever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,425 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    s1ippy wrote: »
    Well, typically the objective of the news is to perpetuate the utilitarian societal systems in place, where they regard them as beneficial. The objective of unions is to protect individuals from exploitation at work. Those two groups are quite possibly going to find their narratives at odds, particularly on polarising issues around Covid19 because they are literally life and death for one in five people. The media have a stake in the economy ticking away, so they're going to take the view that individual freedoms or rights are less meaningful now and that large-scale engagement with commerce as normal is the only thing that will sort this.

    Now, this is at odds with utilitarianism whether or not they know it, because the ramifications is of turning around now and loosening restrictions won't be felt until months after people go back to pretending things are normal.




    It is the responsibility of the unions to make sure that workers are shielded from being statistics in all of this, sacrificed for the sake of the economy. Whether they will actually do this or they're too invested in the economic narrative due to corruption remains to be seen.

    I have been in touch with my union and they appear to be hell-bent on sending us to the firing line, so I may not be able to engage with them if I have any self-preservation. I'm making the gamble there going with what I'm reading and seeing about this virus and taking no chances but I will likely inevitably lose my job. Although this may not matter, because life as it was is over for the next few years at least, possibly forever.

    Very good post but i cannot figure out your roll in it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Blueshoe wrote: »
    200 euro take home pay after 40 hours work.
    This is a grossly misleading statement.

    The Unite rep shows his payslip, which clearly shows his wage was €486.98 gross. He then had €19.48 PRSI deducted. No PAYE deduction as he's not liable for any. So his actual take home was €467.50.

    This includes a min wage adjustment of almost €90 because he didn't pick nearly enough to bring him up to min wage per hour for the hours he worked. This is also undoubtedly the reason he was shown the gate after 8 weeks.

    The Unite goes on to say "but you had to pay €95 accommodation, and some other expenses' and you're left with about €200. So you're basically working for €200?" WTF!?!?! NO! This is not how it works!

    Someone should really be telling the Unite guy how employment works in this country. When people in this country, and every other country get paid, they THEN have to go and pay their living expenses! It's not the other way round.

    An absolute disgracefully misleading attempt by Unite to put words in the guys mouth and totally misrepresent the situation. Shame on them!


    Screenshot-2020-04-26-at-13-04-46.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭2u2me


    It's just a shame we can't believe those Bulgarian workers.

    If only they weren't on probation for 8 weeks out of a 12 week contract
    Or weren't afraid of not receiving an invitation next year
    Or perhaps if they had a union of their own
    Or perhaps if they were allowed to congregate with locals and tell their story.
    Perhaps if our media did actual investigative journalism instead of that tripe posted earlier

    We might know.

    I guess we'll never know.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Scotty # wrote: »

    An absolute disgracefully misleading attempt by Unite to put words in the guys mouth and totally misrepresent the situation. Shame on them!


    Screenshot-2020-04-26-at-13-04-46.png

    No surprise to be honest.

    Notice the union flag-wavers conveniently skip over inconvenient things like pay slips.

    Candidates no doubt chosen to avoid anyone that's actually good at picking.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    GinSoaked wrote: »
    That isn't how it works. The employer pays that how do you think recruitment agencies work?

    So absolutely nothing like the way Keelings works. Just wanted to clear that up. Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Keelings owned through IOM. Wonder how much tax they pay here??


    “Keelings is owned jointly by Joe Keeling (who recently took up the role of chairman of Horse Racing Ireland) and his three children. It is unlimited and the shares are held through Isle of Man entities. As a result, it does not have to file annual accounts. Keeling is happy to disclose the group’s turnover, but replies to a question about profits with a laugh and the comment “not enough” before expanding her answer slightly: “Sorry we don’t share that”.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭2u2me


    Scotty # wrote: »
    This is a grossly misleading statement.

    The Unite rep shows his payslip, which clearly shows his wage was €486.98 gross. He then had €19.48 PRSI deducted. No PAYE deduction as he's not liable for any. So his actual take home was €467.50.

    This includes a min wage adjustment of almost €90 because he didn't pick nearly enough to bring him up to min wage per hour for the hours he worked. This is also undoubtedly the reason he was shown the gate after 8 weeks.

    The Unite goes on to say "but you had to pay €95 accommodation, and some other expenses' and you're left with about €200. So you're basically working for €200?" WTF!?!?! NO! This is not how it works!

    Someone should really be telling the Unite guy how employment works in this country. When people in this country, and every other country get paid, they THEN have to go and pay their living expenses! It's not the other way round.

    An absolute disgracefully misleading attempt by Unite to put words in the guys mouth and totally misrepresent the situation. Shame on them!


    Screenshot-2020-04-26-at-13-04-46.png

    You're perspective is also misleading. How do you know those targets by keelings are fair targets? (Hence why they change workers so often)

    Let's take the maths of 8 weeks work.

    €467.50 * 8 = €3,740
    he paid €500 to agency for the privilege of working for the farmer. €3,240
    That's if he's lucky enough to get to 8 weeks.

    Now that is based on a fifty hour week as per his payslip.

    3,250 /400 = €8.10 per hour. For fifty hours of gruelling labour come rain or shine. If you ever watch Dan Ariely talk about the sisyphus condition you'll know why no one applies for these jobs except the very desperate.

    Then keelings charge him for rent and food aswell(€95 seems pricey enough to be living on farm). They don't supply enough toilets, not many have rooms to themselves. Work 50 hours with no overtime pay. They can't complain as they are on probation. They have no union.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,327 ✭✭✭Alrigghtythen


    Scotty # wrote: »
    This is a grossly misleading statement.

    The Unite rep shows his payslip, which clearly shows his wage was €486.98 gross. He then had €19.48 PRSI deducted. No PAYE deduction as he's not liable for any. So his actual take home was €467.50.

    This includes a min wage adjustment of almost €90 because he didn't pick nearly enough to bring him up to min wage per hour for the hours he worked. This is also undoubtedly the reason he was shown the gate after 8 weeks.

    The Unite goes on to say "but you had to pay €95 accommodation, and some other expenses' and you're left with about €200. So you're basically working for €200?" WTF!?!?! NO! This is not how it works!

    Someone should really be telling the Unite guy how employment works in this country. When people in this country, and every other country get paid, they THEN have to go and pay their living expenses! It's not the other way round.

    An absolute disgracefully misleading attempt by Unite to put words in the guys mouth and totally misrepresent the situation. Shame on them!


    Screenshot-2020-04-26-at-13-04-46.png
    It just shows how out of touch with reality that union is.



    Who deductes rent and salary from their gross salary and then declares that's the wage.
    :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,327 ✭✭✭Alrigghtythen


    2u2me wrote: »
    You're perspective is also misleading. How do you know those targets by keelings are fair targets? (Hence why they change workers so often)

    Let's take the maths of 8 weeks work.

    €467.50 * 8 = €3,740
    he paid €500 to agency for the privilege of working for the farmer. €3,240
    That's if he's lucky enough to get to 8 weeks.

    Now that is based on a fifty hour week as per his payslip.

    3,250 /400 = €8.10 per hour. For fifty hours of gruelling labour come rain or shine. If you ever watch Dan Ariely talk about the sisyphus condition you'll know why no one applies for these jobs except the very desperate.

    Then keelings charge him for rent and food aswell(€95 seems pricey enough to be living on farm). They don't supply enough toilets, not many have rooms to themselves. Work 50 hours with no overtime pay. They can't complain as they are on probation. They have no union.

    I wonder if they "change workers so often" is because fruit by its nature is seasonal and at some periods of the year they may need more workers than others.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    2u2me wrote: »
    Let's take the maths of 8 weeks work.
    I don't have a 'perspective'. I've given you the facts based on the payslip provided by the Unite video.

    You're deduction his PRSI contributions and then saying "look, he's on less than minimum wage". The min wage is based on gross, not net.

    It's also based on a 48 hour week, not 50 and there is overtime. Do you know how to read a payslip?

    Here's a clue... OT = Overtime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    It just shows how out of touch with reality that union is.
    Oh they're not out of touch at all. They're blatantly trying to represent the truth in way to suit their agenda. They know exactly what they are doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,074 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    mgn wrote: »
    What, the facts of two men who worked there or some mickey mouse journalist fawning over the Keeling, like we would all starve to death without them.

    If you mean them as agri-business, then yes, you would starve.

    Id say most here couldn't tell the difference between a cow and a horse, or tillage farming and dairy farming.

    But sure, I am looking forward to 900 Irish fruit pickers given jobs. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭2u2me


    I wonder if they "change workers so often" is because fruit by its nature is seasonal and at some periods of the year they may need more workers than others.

    It's a nice way of keeping your 'employees' in-line eh? Work harder, stay quiet or you won't get an invite next time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,074 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Scotty # wrote: »
    This is a grossly misleading statement.

    The Unite rep shows his payslip, which clearly shows his wage was €486.98 gross. He then had €19.48 PRSI deducted. No PAYE deduction as he's not liable for any. So his actual take home was €467.50.

    This includes a min wage adjustment of almost €90 because he didn't pick nearly enough to bring him up to min wage per hour for the hours he worked. This is also undoubtedly the reason he was shown the gate after 8 weeks.

    The Unite goes on to say "but you had to pay €95 accommodation, and some other expenses' and you're left with about €200. So you're basically working for €200?" WTF!?!?! NO! This is not how it works!

    Someone should really be telling the Unite guy how employment works in this country. When people in this country, and every other country get paid, they THEN have to go and pay their living expenses! It's not the other way round.

    An absolute disgracefully misleading attempt by Unite to put words in the guys mouth and totally misrepresent the situation. Shame on them!


    Screenshot-2020-04-26-at-13-04-46.png

    Sure we all know, that when we get our pay slips we don't have to use that money to pay ANY bills whatsoever, apart from a few pints.

    We all don't have to pay rent, put petrol into the car, pay the gas bill.... :p:p

    Unite, like most Unions in this country are a bunch of charlatans. If they could, they would ban every single foreign worker coming into this country.


  • Posts: 7,852 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    markodaly wrote: »
    If you mean them as agri-business, then yes, you would starve.

    Id say most here couldn't tell the difference between a cow and a horse, or tillage farming and dairy farming.

    But sure, I am looking forward to 900 Irish fruit pickers given jobs. :)

    He didn’t mean the agri business though. he’s meant Keelings specifically.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,074 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    2u2me wrote: »

    Then keelings charge him for rent and food aswell(€95 seems pricey enough to be living on farm). They don't supply enough toilets, not many have rooms to themselves. Work 50 hours with no overtime pay. They can't complain as they are on probation. They have no union.

    What sort of dumb nonsense is this being posted. It LITERALLY says O/T on the pay slip.

    That is an acronym for Over-Time.

    Can you read?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,074 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    He didn’t mean the agri business though. he’s meant Keelings specifically.

    Doesnt matter. They are part of that business. Its how this business has been operating for over 20 years.

    The main reason Irish people are no longer working these jobs is that the dole is too generous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Scotty # wrote: »
    The Unite goes on to say "but you had to pay €95 accommodation, and some other expenses' and you're left with about €200. So you're basically working for €200?" WTF!?!?! NO! This is not how it works!

    Someone should really be telling the Unite guy how employment works in this country. When people in this country, and every other country get paid, they THEN have to go and pay their living expenses! It's not the other way round.

    You're presenting an argument that assumes that the workers brought in and the workers resident full-time in this state have the same opportunities towards accommodation.

    They don't.

    It's true, workers everywhere have to contend with some costs, whether it's food, fuel or housing. However with workers resident in Ireland full-time, they at least have the opportunity to look at other places to rent, other places to shop, other means of getting to and from work. The Keeling staff don't have any option to change because the accommodation is part of the contract and non-negotiable.


  • Posts: 7,852 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    markodaly wrote: »
    Doesnt matter. They are part of that business. Its how this business has been operating for over 20 years.

    The main reason Irish people are no longer working these jobs is that the dole is too generous.

    Of course it matters. Nobody meant the agri business as a whole, you’ve just done that to suit yourself.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭2u2me


    markodaly wrote: »
    What sort of dumb nonsense is this being posted. It LITERALLY says O/T on the pay slip.

    That is an acronym for Over-Time.

    Can you read?
    Scotty # wrote: »
    I don't have a 'perspective'. I've given you the facts based on the payslip provided by the Unite video.

    You're deduction his PRSI contributions and then saying "look, he's on less than minimum wage". The min wage is based on gross, not net.

    It's also based on a 48 hour week, not 50 and there is overtime. Do you know how to read a payslip?

    Here's a clue... OT = Overtime.


    Lads if ye're going to quibble about a few cents per hour and avoid the overarching themes of the points I made go ahead, I have no time for ye're nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    You're presenting an argument that assumes that the workers brought in and the workers resident full-time in this state have the same opportunities towards accommodation.

    They don't.
    You're right. The locals would be paying far more out of their wage to pay mortgages and rent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    2u2me wrote: »
    Lads if ye're going to quibble about a few cents per hour and avoid the overarching themes of the points I made go ahead, I have no time for ye're nonsense.

    Hmm it's hardly a 'few cents'. The Unite video proclaims he's 'basically working for €200/week" and then shows a payslip showing his take home to be €467.

    Do you honestly not see a problem there? Honestly?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Scotty # wrote: »
    You're right. The locals would be paying far more out of their wage to pay mortgages and rent.

    Lots of places on Daft in and around Swords/Santry for less than €380 a month, which Keelings are charging. And for single rooms too. Not sharing a cramped space with another person.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Scotty # wrote: »
    You're right. The locals would be paying far more out of their wage to pay mortgages and rent.

    That's an assumption on your part. You don't know if a local is living with family, or has a cheaper situation, or perhaps yes, even has a more expensive commute.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,074 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    2u2me wrote: »
    Lads if ye're going to quibble about a few cents per hour and avoid the overarching themes of the points I made go ahead, I have no time for ye're nonsense.

    If you don't want people pointing out your mistakes and brain farts, then perhaps double check your posts for simple errors, or if you cant do that, stop posting fake news and nonesense.

    Its very simple.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Lots of places on Daft in and around Swords/Santry for less than €380 a month, which Keelings are charging. And for single rooms too. Not sharing a cramped space with another person.
    I don't see anything in the contract (also shown in the video) that says they can't find their own accommodation. It just says they have to be on time. It also says they can work a second job elsewhere as long as it doesn't interfere with their max working time hours.

    It's unclear in both interviews if it's €95/room or €95 per person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,074 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Scotty # wrote: »
    Hmm it's hardly a 'few cents'. The Unite video proclaims he's 'basically working for €200/week" and then shows a payslip showing his take home to be €467.

    Do you honestly not see a problem there? Honestly?

    An honest question. Where does the Unite guy get the '€200 a week' from?

    Did he just take some number out of thin air and presented it like a hard cold, researched fact.

    Doesnt Trump do that on a daily basis?

    Trump also disparages foreigners and migrants.
    I guess many in this thread have a lot in common with him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭2u2me


    Scotty # wrote: »
    Hmm it's hardly a 'few cents'. The Unite video proclaims he's 'basically working for €200/week" and then shows a payslip showing his take home to be €467.

    Do you honestly not see a problem there? Honestly?

    Yeah I noticed that on first watch. It's wrong. But I believe just as wrong as people pointing to the minimum wage and saying look they're being treated fairly!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,425 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    To me €467.80 seems pretty fair and i suppose the only way of supervision is performance factor.
    If they getting bed and food for €95 pw that seems fair, i assume they well looked after as you need to eat well to do this work.
    The one thing i would gripe about is the agency fee €40+ pw for the privilage of hard labour.
    I think at least half of this should be returned on completion of full time.
    I wonder who pays for the flights on normal year?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement