Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

TV licence collection privatised and replaced with device licence fee in 5 years

1679111217

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,434 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    So am I correct in thinking that in five years time there will be a double charge on mobile phones,laptops etc.A service provider charge from Vodafone,Three,Eir etc and a new charge for accessing media which will go to RTE ?.Screwed even more times ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    So am I correct in thinking that in five years time there will be a double charge on mobile phones,laptops etc.A service provider charge from Vodafone,Three etc and a new charge for accessing media which will go to RTE ?.Screwed even more times ahead.

    At the moment they are flying a trial balloon. It remains to be seen what the Working Group on the Future Funding of Public Service Broadcasting recommends for the new funding model. This report has not been published yet. The issue of how this will be collected has been floating around the department of communications like a grenade with the pin pulled for a few years now. Originally they wanted to add it to the household charge, but that got scrapped during the Irish water/tax protest. They were also mooting it would be levied on internet service providers at another stage. Most likely they are planning to incorporate it in local property tax or finagle it someway with paying for the the national broadband plan.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Would it even enter the heads of the people running rte to make it a subscription service, have they ever mulled it over?.

    Say 7.99 or 9.99 for HD a month (works out at nearly 96.00 and 120.00 euro for the year), one bloody tv channel and one radio station is enough.

    Better still, two channels that we have a choice of subscribing to:
    1. RTÉ Culture, Education & Current Affairs
    2. RTÉ Anglo-American reality and sports shíte that you can get on any American or British channel.

    I'd gladly subscribe to the first one. You couldn't pay me to watch the other one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,434 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    At the moment they are flying a trial balloon. It remains to be seen what the Working Group on the Future Funding of Public Service Broadcasting recommends for the new funding model. This report has not been published yet. The issue of how this will be collected has been floating around the department of communications like a grenade with the pin pulled for a few years now. Originally they wanted to add it to the household charge, but that got scrapped during the Irish water/tax protest. They were also mooting it would be levied on internet service providers at another stage. Most likely they are planning to incorporate it in local property tax or finagle it someway with paying for the the national broadband plan.

    I heard Mary Wilson mention something about the Dinosaur Rabbitte being on Drivetime this evening,but I didn't get to hear much of the programme.He originally floated the idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,666 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    1. RTÉ Culture, Education & Current Affairs
    2. RTÉ Anglo-American reality and sports shíte that you can get on any American or British channel.

    I'd gladly subscribe to the first one. You couldn't pay me to watch the other one.

    The total subscription the first channel would receive would probably fund about two hours of quality programming per week.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭GreenandRed


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Ah FG. The party of taxation and privatisation, but nothing else except never-ending waste and scandals.

    They are obviously not expecting to be reelected next time out if they're pushing this through at this stage.

    I pay the license but I don't watch RTE at all. I couldn't even if I wanted to as I don't have the necessary external aerial for Saorview (internal doesn't work in my area). I do have freesat and everything else comes from the likes of Netflix, Amazon and the US.

    Why should I have to pay for services I can't even access?
    Or probably wouldn't evn want to access as RTE is poor? Plus they are getting government subsidies and advertising revenue. Besides some sports shows there's not a lot worth watching on RTEI listen to a lot of podcasts, mostly sports, is that not broadcasting. I want a form when I pay or my net licence with some options where my hard-earned €160 is distributed. Some of it would go to podcast makers in Ireland who are doing some inovative and informative. Government should sell off RTE and let a buyer keep the potentially profit-making part if there even is one and bring it into 2019.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭GreenandRed


    Thanks. Going to check it out now.
    If you can't et on the TV it'll run off an X-box. Had trouble with it on android box before so test it a few hours before game cos it's a pain in the bollo running round looking for compatible devices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭thomas anderson.


    I'm sitting here with no Sky sub, no Virgin Media sub and no Saorview. All I have is an internet subscription, trying to cast the Gold movie to my chromecast.

    I've paid my TV license.

    So where do I go to some kind of recompense as the rte app is appalling? Because I don't think I'm ever going to find out how Matthew lost his hair


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭irishproduce


    In the modern age there is simply no reason for rte. Privatise it, remove the licence fee and if they cannot survive so be it

    There is a very specific reason that RTE is retained and backed by the state.
    I refer to a post I made on another thread


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,563 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    There is a very specific reason that RTE is retained and backed by the state.
    I refer to a post I made on another thread

    And that (your linked post) is the very reason why all state funding should be cut off.
    It's a self serving institute for the mouth piece of the government of the day and is that not illegal?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭GSBellew


    CPTM wrote: »
    I don't really understand this. Would it not be more economical (And politically advantageous) to just scrap the tv license and factor it into the income tax instead. So for example, instead of dropping income tax by 2%, cut it by 1.5%. That way people will see tax reductions and also no tv license. Unfair for the handful of people who don't have a device I suppose but why have a whole system just for them?

    So those who work pay, those who don't get a freebie?

    Trot on, let it stand on its own feet or make it subscription & see how many really want to pay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,712 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Ten Pin wrote: »
    First 2 stories on 9 news...

    TV licence...for which you can be fined and go to jail if you don't pay...

    Preceded by...

    No conviction for 1st offence personal drug use.

    Good to know where govt priorities lie

    What am I missing with the second story?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,563 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    YFlyer wrote: »
    What am I missing with the second story?

    That the second story on the news is you skangers not paying your TV licence are screwed, nothing like being self deprecating


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 945 ✭✭✭Always Tired


    I will never fcuking pay it, got rid of my TV ages ago and will not pay any new fees for my phone or laptop.

    Surely there must be a way to challenge the legality of a new tax for items people have already bought as well, perhaps that's the reason for the delay. Between now and then they can say nearly everyone will have bought a new device after the announcement and therefore entered into it willingly.

    We need to get out and march again. I hate this bloody place it's just constant fleece job after fleece job and nothing back for any taxes.

    Anyway, the TV license inspectors are afraid to come into my estate thanks to some psycho neighbours who chased one away with a kitchen knife years ago (and that was just the Mother!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,712 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    fritzelly wrote: »
    That the second story on the news is you skangers not paying your TV licence are screwed, nothing like being self deprecating

    Neither are connected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,339 ✭✭✭CollyFlower


    I will never fcuking pay it, got rid of my TV ages ago and will not pay any new fees for my phone or laptop.

    Surely there must be a way to challenge the legality of a new tax for items people have already bought as well, perhaps that's the reason for the delay. Between now and then they can say nearly everyone will have bought a new device after the announcement and therefore entered into it willingly.

    We need to get out and march again. I hate this bloody place it's just constant fleece job after fleece job and nothing back for any taxes.

    Anyway, the TV license inspectors are afraid to come into my estate thanks to some psycho neighbours who chased one away with a kitchen knife years ago (and that was just the Mother!)

    I'm all for marching when the time comes,... It'll be like IW, they'll back down if we come out in force and protest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    YFlyer wrote: »
    Neither are connected.

    yes but

    one one hand you have someone going to jail for not payng an unjust and total rip off tax for a terrible service they might not even receive

    on the other you have someone get let off scot free for being in osetion of an ilegal drug and posibly leading to future criminal activity and drug addiction.

    the tv licence non payer should get a slap on the wrist and the drug using criminal should go to jail


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,563 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    yes but

    one one hand you have someone going to jail for not payng an unjust and total rip off tax for a terrible service they might not even receive

    on the other you have someone get let off scot free for being in osetion of an ilegal drug and posibly leading to future criminal activity and drug addiction.

    the tv licence non payer should get a slap on the wrist and the drug using criminal should go to jail

    And aint that the truth, drug overlord gets suspended sentence but licence fee evader gets thrown in jail


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭NaFirinne


    yes but

    one one hand you have someone going to jail for not payng an unjust and total rip off tax for a terrible service they might not even receive

    on the other you have someone get let off scot free for being in osetion of an ilegal drug and posibly leading to future criminal activity and drug addiction.

    the tv licence non payer should get a slap on the wrist and the drug using criminal should go to jail




    It's because it's all a scam to extract as much money as possible out of us suckers.


    They don't care about actual criminals in Ireland....they're not loosing money on those.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    why not pay for RTE out of general taxation, like water?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    New thread merged into existing thread.

    dudara


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    why not pay for RTE out of general taxation, like water?

    RTE is a government sponsored enterprise which comes under the purview of the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resource which also covers An Post, Ervia (formerly Bord Gais), Bord na Móna, EirGrid, the ESB, RTE and TG4.

    RTE is a non essential service i.e. if it is shuttered today there are alternatives and nobody save RTE employees, contractors and some incestuous companies will lose sleep over it. The transmission network (2RN) can be privatised and the orchestra can be hived off to the Department of Arts Heritage and the Gaeltacht.

    Paying RTE out of general taxation (they already receive funding that way) is hiding the costs of providing that service and it ends up being another department of health in that no matter how much money you throw at it it is never enough. With the present system there is an opt out, if you don't have a TV or device capable of receiving free to air transmissions you do not have to pay this tax which is entirely fair to those who never consume their service.

    They also compete in the broadcast market with other commercial services for market share, advertising revenue and sponsorship so paying them out of general taxation would amount to unfair competition (it already is since the annual TV tax is mandatory if you own a TV).

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,917 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I never watch any Irish tv station but I've always paid my tv license because it's the law. I agree with the sentiments of most here though.
    As soon as this goes to a private company I'm not paying it anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,263 ✭✭✭shanec1928


    This one never seems to be questioned but why do we spend several million per year on a national orchestra?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,752 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    shanec1928 wrote: »
    This one never seems to be questioned but why do we spend several million per year on a national orchestra?

    It is needed and should be promoted over a lot of the wastage the government does


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,752 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    RTÉ will never go, plus we will always have to pay a tv license. The government point to UK etc and use that as an excuse

    The problem is RTÉ is useless. They have a load of useless presenters that nobody else would pay for but they hand out massive wages to them

    The excuse for these wages is that other tv station would hire but in reality nobody would pay half for any of these people.

    Continue with RTÉ but include a max salary, if someone like tubs wants more tell him to f**k off and get it somewhere else, see how long it takes for him to come back

    Radio stations? They have loads and nobody listens to them, the content on RTÉ junior radio is awful....what about alll those digital stations? Who actual listens to them....dump the lot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    shanec1928 wrote:
    This one never seems to be questioned but why do we spend several million per year on a national orchestra?

    To be fair, the orchestra is excellent. I don't begrudge money going to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I never watch any Irish tv station but I've always paid my tv license because it's the law. I agree with the sentiments of most here though.
    As soon as this goes to a private company I'm not paying it anymore.

    When you stop paying your licence you will receive a series of increasingly threatening letters from AN POST on behalf of RTE unless you sign a declaration that you no longer have a TV (Don't sign this, if you do and break the law they will use it against you and you will receive a heavier fine up to €1000). This will be followed by an inspection whether you sign the declaration or not. Are you are prepared to go to jail over €160? few are.


    Woman who failed to pay TV licence fine taken to jail in five-hour taxi trip
    The State spent thousands of euro sending five women to prison by taxi on the same day for non-payment of fines, and releasing them all hours later.

    One woman, who was driven from east Donegal to Dublin, told the Irish Independent how two gardai arrived at her home at 7.10am and arrested her. She had paid €212 of a €450 court fine issued for not having a TV licence.

    She said her 11-year-old son was crying as she was taken to her local garda station before being transferred to a taxi for the journey to Dublin.

    As two gardaí were accompanying her, the taxi had to go via Sligo as they could not travel through the North.

    source


    If you wish to protest this you must contact the TDs in your constituency by letter you can deliver it to their constituency clinics if you want to discuss it directly. You should also be on the voter register lists as non voters opinions don't carry any weight with politicians.

    Ministers should be advised that the technology exists so that RTE can offer a subscription service for devices that access it's services via the internet (smartphone, or laptop) and there is no need to extend taxation beyond it's current remit. By using subscription services RTE can also reduce the cost to its consumers by differentiating its services and since broadband will increasingly be available across the country (you can then kick them over the national broadband plan if you want) this resolves the problem for the future. The cost of collection is also reduced as the money can be directly collected by RTE without 3rd party involvement, RTE would also be free to increase their subscription in line with costs without political interference determining licence fees.


    You can also if so inclined sign a petition to abolish the licence fee, however if successful this will not reduce your overheads unless RTE is ultimately privatised.

    http://chng.it/5fhjbqxmrt


    You can also use RTEs competition (newspapers, Radio and TV companies and online news sites to make your views known and promote alternatives since they also have a vested interest in gaining advertising revenue and generally view the licence as an anti-competitive subsidy to RTE.

    Be polite and beware of drifting into rants about political bias, nepotism in RTE and payments to the "stars". If you are an RTE consumer then offer constructive criticism about the poor quality of much of the content and the repeats of repeats and that you are not willing to pay for sub-par content that you have better things to do with your time and money.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 828 ✭✭✭BarryM


    I have a PC that I built from scratch. I have a smartphone. I never watch RTE nor do I have any intention of. I've already paid tax on my pc parts when I built it, tax on my smartphone to buy, tax on my phone bill, tax on my Internet, tax on my electricity. I'll go to court before I pay the government a cent to pay for Ryan Tubridy and Ray Darcys salary.

    So, you don't want your information to be provided by an entity which is answerable for what it says? OK then. Maybe you don't want any information?

    You pay tax,OK, so you'd rather not? How would you get about without roads, for example. How would you get your drinking water, maybe you have your own well? Have you your own sewage?

    Agreed regarding a 'universal' tax on communicating, but..... I'd rather have some confidence that my communications were accountable.

    Smell the roses


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭tim3000


    Add it to general taxation and be done with it. Or trim the fat and make two channels an Irish language and an English language one, and cut presenters entirely.

    I wont be paying for this there is not a hope in hell that I would volunteer 160 euros to pay for Fair City or Joe Duffy.

    For equivalent cost you can get a years Xbox Live Membership and a years Netflix. Coupled with youtube thats your entertainment for the year.

    People can make the comparison that certain things are subsidised in this country already but 3000 households tv license fees go to the paying of just Tubridys salary. This is a shocking indictment of the bloat of this organisation.

    Make it a subscription service at 50 euro a year or add it on to the general taxation. I dont see large amounts of the youth paying for this.


Advertisement