Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Weird, Wacky and Awesome World of the NFL - General Banter thread V3

16364666869265

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,918 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Delighted Ty Law finally got in. Patriots legend and a great player his whole career.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Boselli getting the shun makes a joke of it altogether.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,918 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Boselli getting the shun makes a joke of it altogether.
    Why is it? He was really good but he had a relatively short career. I think that is held against him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,733 ✭✭✭MileHighGuy


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Delighted Ty Law finally got in. Patriots legend and a great player his whole career.

    Agreed, and the third former Bronco in the this years class :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,735 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Why is it? He was really good but he had a relatively short career. I think that is held against him.

    Terrell Davis had a short career but is in the HOF.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,918 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Itssoeasy wrote:
    Terrell Davis had a short career but is in the HOF.
    He had a very exceptional short career. He is part of the 2k rushing club, was a key part in two Superbowl wins and his first four seasons were all over 1k before the injuries.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Boselli was the best tackle to play the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    Agreed, and the third former Bronco in the this years class :)

    The anti-Bronco bias was clear again - Steve Atwater should be in the HOF - one of the best safeties to play the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,827 ✭✭✭OOnegative


    The anti-Bronco bias was clear again - Steve Atwater should be in the HOF - one of the best safeties to play the game.

    Champ Bailey & Pat Bowlen got elected, hardly an anti-Broncos class.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,096 ✭✭✭Liamalone


    What is the actual point of this Hall of Fame craic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Liamalone wrote: »
    What is the actual point of this Hall of Fame craic?

    The Yanks love Halls of Fame, not just sports ones but music, toys etc. No interest in them myself and usually don't may any more than a passing glance to news reports about them, despite being a big fan of the NFL and MLB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    OOnegative wrote: »
    Champ Bailey & Pat Bowlen got elected, hardly an anti-Broncos class.

    Pat Bolwen should have been elected years ago - when he still had the mental faculties to appreciate it.

    Champ Bailey is a no-brainer - he is one of the all-time great defensive players in the NFL. He is also the first ever Broncos defensive player to be a HOFer (an absolute joke)

    Steve Atwater was one of the best ever safeties in the game - and it is a joke that he hasn't been a HOFer for years. The treatment of Atwater in comparison, for example, to Ty Law or Ed Reed demonstrates how much of a joke the HOF is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,642 ✭✭✭Deco99


    Is romo on duty tonight? Also, do BBC and sky take the same feed or could it be fox on one and espn or someone on BBC?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Deco99 wrote: »
    Is romo on duty tonight? Also, do BBC and sky take the same feed or could it be fox on one and espn or someone on BBC?

    Don’t think ESPN ever get the Super Bowl but it is rotated among the other 3 networks and its CBS’ turn this year so it is Romo in the booth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Deco99 wrote: »
    Is romo on duty tonight? Also, do BBC and sky take the same feed or could it be fox on one and espn or someone on BBC?

    Yeah it's CBS on the main feed. BBC won't have fox or ESPN or anything because it's CBS' year for rights but they could have that crap 'international' commentary from the NFL where they spend most of the game explaining the rules. Not sure if they still do that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,642 ✭✭✭Deco99


    Don’t think ESPN ever get the Super Bowl but it is rotated among the other 3 networks and its CBS’ turn this year so it is Romo in the booth.

    It's prob in your answer but that's BBC coverage too?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Deco99 wrote: »
    It's prob in your answer but that's BBC coverage too?

    I reckon so. I’d forgotten about the international feeds until mentioned above so as long as BBC don’t go with that, we’ll get the CBS coverage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    The real worst thing about the Hall of Fame is that Tony Gonzalez is retired long enough to get in. **** I'm old.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    I reckon so. I’d forgotten about the international feeds until mentioned above so as long as BBC don’t go with that, we’ll get the CBS coverage.
    The NFL Show on the BBC last night had Osi interviewing Romo and they confirmed they will have the CBS commentary on tonight


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,642 ✭✭✭Deco99


    Who's presenting for BBC I wonder, do they treat the audience like idiots same as the London games coverage?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Deco99 wrote: »
    Who's presenting for BBC I wonder, do they treat the audience like idiots same as the London games coverage?

    Mark Chapman I'd say. Mike Carlson will probably be on it too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Gotta say I'm delighted for Gil Brandt

    Fully deserving of being in there


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 26,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Loughc


    So.... we all set for the American Alliance of Football, launches this weekend!

    The lifeboat has set sail



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,589 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    So apparently for next season the Oakland Raiders will play in San Francisco while the San Francisco 49ers will continue to play in Santa Clara, while the city of Oakland sues the Raiders over their move to Las Vegas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    adrian522 wrote:
    So apparently for next season the Oakland Raiders will play in San Francisco while the San Francisco 49ers will continue to play in Santa Clara, while the city of Oakland sues the Raiders over their move to Las Vegas.

    Where they playing in San Francisco??

    Loughc wrote:
    So.... we all set for the American Alliance of Football, launches this weekend!

    Go the Sam Antonio Commodores..
    Moose Johnson baby


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    brinty wrote: »
    Where they playing in San Francisco??


    What was AT&T Park, now Oracle park. Home of the Giants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭BaronVon


    Loughc wrote: »
    So.... we all set for the American Alliance of Football, launches this weekend!

    I sure am, anything that gives us more football is a good thing. I'm picking the Arizona Hotshots as my team, been there a few times!

    https://aaf.com/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    infacteh wrote: »
    I sure am, anything that gives us more football is a good thing. I'm picking the Arizona Hotshots as my team, been there a few times!

    https://aaf.com/

    Hadn't heard about this but I do notice they are going to be televised on NFL network. People have talked forever about having a Spring league and it has always fallen apart, but I think the only realistic way for it to work is to have the support of the NFL so it can work as a developmental league or something. Trying to take them on and compete with them has been the death of previous ones.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭BaronVon


    Agreed, even if they relaunched NFL Europe now, I feel it would be much more successful, given the higher profile of the game over here, and with the benefits the Internet has brought.

    It must be very hard for NFL teams to develop players, given you can only have a 53 man roster, and 10 practice squad players. Unless a player can contribute on Special Teams, it's rare for him to get an opportunity to develop on a 53 man roster. Superbowl MVP Julian Edelman would be a good example, survived as a Punt Returner, and sometimes Safety, while developing his route running/receiver skills. Without being able to keep a roster spot as a PR, it's unlikely he'd have been given the opportunity to transition from college QB to NFL WR.


Advertisement