Werewolf XX - WWE: The Monday Night Wars

Frank WW · 27-11-2017 10:46PM

beakerjoe wrote: »

To be blunt : Nope

Good luck and happy hunting.

Huh well that's kinda ****ty. That is not gonna help.

beakerjoe · 27-11-2017 10:51PM

Frank WW wrote: »

Huh well that's kinda ****ty. That is not gonna help.

Sorry I cant me more helpful. We arent giving the results of lynches on thread.

You have methods to our madness I promise

Steve WW · 27-11-2017 10:52PM

Frank WW wrote: »

Huh well that's kinda ****ty. That is not gonna help.

Was it the trade off for knowing Nigel’s role?

Hey mods, if we don’t find out role tomorrow does that mean we have our lynch results back?

Steve WW · 27-11-2017 10:52PM

Dammit

Gertrude WW · 27-11-2017 10:53PM

With vote results being kept in the dark, WCW have the advantage, as they can always have 3 votes in the bank for any lynch. Doing FFA's and sticking to the results may be our best bet to overcome this.

Jake WW · 27-11-2017 10:55PM

beakerjoe wrote: »

To be blunt : Nope

Good luck and happy hunting.

How come?

Frank WW · 27-11-2017 10:59PM

Gertrude WW wrote: »

With vote results being kept in the dark, WCW have the advantage, as they can always have 3 votes in the bank for any lynch. Doing FFA's and sticking to the results may be our best bet to overcome this.

Yeah this is very bad for the village as all wolves can vote together and not worry about being caught out.

Hmm, would've been handy to know that before we voted for that lynch. We'll have to announce who we're voting for on thread then. Although what will that even do?

Jake WW · 27-11-2017 11:02PM

Frank WW wrote: »

Yeah this is very bad for the village as all wolves can vote together and not worry about being caught out.

Hmm, would've been handy to know that before we voted for that lynch. We'll have to announce who we're voting for on thread then. Although what will that even do?

Do we know if wolves can communicate? If we don't have vote tallies that would be a +5 every vote.

Phil WW · 27-11-2017 11:05PM

I'm assuming each team has their own chat room, but they're also competing against each other, so they wouldn't have a combined chat room. Worst case scenario, come lynch time, WCW could combine 3 votes, and ECW could combine 2, but they couldn't intentionally combine all 5

Gabriel WW · 27-11-2017 11:07PM

How about we all publicly state who we voted for? Maybe we could keep track of them or something. I know people could lie, but might help catch people out or something.

Frank WW · 27-11-2017 11:10PM

Well I'm popping off to bed now but I voted for Nigel. The confusion over posting yesterday was too suspicious to me.

Phil WW · 27-11-2017 11:11PM

Good idea, probably needs a tag too, so we can search back easier

WWVOTE1 Desmond

Tegan WW · 27-11-2017 11:14PM

wwvote1 nigel

Jake WW · 27-11-2017 11:16PM

Wwvote1 nigel

Wendy WW · 27-11-2017 11:16PM

wwvote1 Nigel.

Mary WW · 27-11-2017 11:24PM

I know this isn't what I said earlier but I panicked and changed my mind when it looked like I was for the chop.

Wwvote1 nigel

Orla WW · 27-11-2017 11:25PM

Wwvote1 - Jake

Riona WW · 27-11-2017 11:25PM

WWVote1 Nigel

Like I said I intended to do before the lynch.

Steve WW · 27-11-2017 11:25PM

WWVOTE1 Nigel

Tegan WW · 27-11-2017 11:26PM

while I am not saying anybody is not being truthful there is no imperitative here.

Orla WW · 27-11-2017 11:27PM

Im thinking if we do FFAs tomorrow we should also post when we vote aswell, gives us clarity and in the event of a tight vote being swung then it at least narrows down the suspects list of who may have switched. Some transparency is needed or we will struggle badly

Gabriel WW · 27-11-2017 11:29PM

Orla WW wrote: »

Im thinking if we do FFAs tomorrow we should also post when we vote aswell, gives us clarity and in the event of a tight vote being swung then it at least narrows down the suspects list of who may have switched. Some transparency is needed or we will struggle badly

This. We have no idea what is going on. The more transparency we have, the more likely it will be that we can catch people out later on.

WWvote1 Angus

I panicked and didn’t want to vote Nigel

Steve WW · 27-11-2017 11:29PM

I suppose it will work well if we all have to state who we vote for at precisely 9pm tomorrow. The mods will only be telling us lynch form is closed at that time so we can know the result before they declare it.

Would that work?

Wendy WW · 27-11-2017 11:32PM

Steve WW wrote: »

I suppose it will work well if we all have to state who we vote for at precisely 9pm tomorrow. The mods will only be telling us lynch form is closed at that time so we can know the result before they declare it.

Would that work?

That works. If the result comes back different we know then we have wolves in the mix.

There can be no hiding in the votes then.

Phil WW · 27-11-2017 11:46PM

Sounds good. Or, at least, the least bad option

Orla WW · 27-11-2017 11:46PM

Steve WW wrote: »

I suppose it will work well if we all have to state who we vote for at precisely 9pm tomorrow. The mods will only be telling us lynch form is closed at that time so we can know the result before they declare it.

Would that work?

You might find it difficult to get everyone to post at 9 but either way people need to post there vote otherwise we are up **** creek. My concern is if its a close vote and wolves jump last minute to swing a 1 vote lynch, we've no way of knowing where those votes came from.

Mary WW · 27-11-2017 11:48PM

Steve WW wrote: »

I suppose it will work well if we all have to state who we vote for at precisely 9pm tomorrow. The mods will only be telling us lynch form is closed at that time so we can know the result before they declare it.

Would that work?

Great in theory
In practice how many of us are free to do that at 8.59? Personally I had a little more time around Lynch than I expected tonight but don't anticipate that will continue through the week.
Although looking at the ffa, maybe that's not going to be a problem for long

Point is, someone posting their vote late potentially creates a wolfy vibe unnecessarily and that's not helpful.

I don't have an alternative to suggest though, so crack on but maybe be mindful of the tightness of the window.

Orla WW · 27-11-2017 11:50PM

Mary WW wrote: »

Great in theory
In practice how many of us are free to do that at 8.59? Personally I had a little more time around Lynch than I expected tonight but don't anticipate that will continue through the week.
Although looking at the ffa, maybe that's not going to be a problem for long

Point is, someone posting their vote late potentially creates a wolfy vibe unnecessarily and that's not helpful.

I don't have an alternative to suggest though, so crack on but maybe be mindful of the tightness of the window.

Im in a similar boat, ill post when i vote as i might not get back on. If people are bandwagoning on the first votes it opens up more possibilities for us and gives more lines of investigation

Jake WW · 27-11-2017 11:57PM

Orla WW wrote: »

You might find it difficult to get everyone to post at 9 but either way people need to post there vote otherwise we are up **** creek. My concern is if its a close vote and wolves jump last minute to swing a 1 vote lynch, we've no way of knowing where those votes came from.

I think if we run the ffa early enough we could ask people to commit to their vote say an hour after the ffa result is in. Its less time for someone to defend themselves but it gives us more control around the vote.

Orla WW · 28-11-2017 12:02AM

Jake WW wrote: »

I think if we run the ffa early enough we could ask people to commit to their vote say an hour after the ffa result is in. Its less time for someone to defend themselves but it gives us more control around the vote.

True, i suppose an hour window is fair enough and if people cant commit to it they can let us know early enough. My only concern is if we will actually get much worthwhile info out of it. Worth doing i suppose seeing as we've little else to go on

Werewolf XX - WWE: The Monday Night Wars

Comments