Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Garda Traffic on Twitter

194959799100117

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭dastardly00


    Murt102 wrote: »
    Guards were kept busy in Buncrana today.

    We could nearly have a dedicated thread to the Traffic Corp in Buncrana at this stage! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,252 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    The biggest problem is not needing to provide proof of insurance when taxing. The car needs to be Insured to be taxed so people just write anything in the box and it can't be verified.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,506 ✭✭✭Damien360


    I wonder is that NI reg vectra owned by someone living this side of border with a U.K. address also. They check MOT as not required here and seize. It would be a new approach to dealing with those using NI cars and living here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭nice_guy80


    they could have a separate division for Buncrana and they'd outperform nearly every other district


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,679 ✭✭✭✭wonski


    The biggest problem is not needing to provide proof of insurance when taxing. The car needs to be Insured to be taxed so people just write anything in the box and it can't be verified.

    What proof of insurance? They now print it on regular printer on plain paper and ask you to cut the disc off yourself.

    You can have it emailed and print yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 Prinks


    billie1b wrote: »
    Has no affect on the policy at all

    Until you come to claim. I know someone who had full comprehensive insurance who skidded while driving alone on a Provisional licence. Hit a wall, €2,000 worth of damage, insurance company wouldn't pay out. But the company still renewed for the following year at the same price!

    It's all bull**** - apparently no problem getting insurance when driving on a Provisional, but I've been refused a quote by two companies (Post Insurance and 123.ie) because my car is 2001. Full NCB, full licence, no penalty points :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,723 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,723 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,599 ✭✭✭ScrubsfanChris


    Murt102 wrote: »
    Apparently he wasn't feeling great about his weight :p:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,596 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    This post has been deleted.

    Most likely some EU Hobnobs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    Most likely some EU Hobnobs.

    You mean they are collecting the buscits for the tae break? :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock




    Fcpn's to be issued!!!

    Who are they trying to kid.

    Crooks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Pinch Flat wrote: »
    Depends on the terms of the insurance. Some insurance companies write it in the policy that when you hold a provisional licence you must gave a fully licensed driver with annual insurance cover to accompany you at all times."

    There was a case in the High Court a few years back - provisional driver was stopped by Gardai. They were convicted of driving without a licence, but not convicted of having no insurance as it was not a specific term in their policy.

    Can you link that case? I don't believe it.

    Driving on a learner permit on your own has no affect on your policy. None.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,860 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    This post has been deleted.


    That location they picked from the Dutch police book "How to shoot fish in a barrel" by the looks of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,660 ✭✭✭Mr Snow




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,079 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    inforfun wrote: »
    That location they picked from the Dutch police book "How to shoot fish in a barrel" by the looks of it.
    125 in a 100 zone at the end of a dual carriageway where both lanes merge into one is pushing it a bit though. If they were issuing FCPNs for doing 105 I'd say they were being harsh but at one and a quarter times the posted limit you can't complain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,860 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    True.
    I dont know the location but by the looks of it is up hill, you can expect people trying to overtake trucks there as quick as possible and by doing so breaking the speed limit.

    It is "easy" to catch people there. Just like the spots i find them on my route to work and back home, straight after the speed limit goes doen from 80 to 60.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 Prinks


    inforfun wrote: »
    That location they picked from the Dutch police book "How to shoot fish in a barrel" by the looks of it.

    How do they have the balls to post anything on their twitter account, now that everyone knows what they've been up to? :mad:

    Banana republic


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Prinks wrote: »
    How do they have the balls to post anything on their twitter account, now that everyone knows what they've been up to? :mad:

    Banana republic


    The laws and general morals of society don't apply to the Gardaí it would seem.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭tossy


    Prinks wrote: »
    Banana republic

    someone needs to google banana republic :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,079 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    inforfun wrote: »
    True.
    I dont know the location but by the looks of it is up hill, you can expect people trying to overtake trucks there as quick as possible and by doing so breaking the speed limit.

    It is "easy" to catch people there. Just like the spots i find them on my route to work and back home, straight after the speed limit goes doen from 80 to 60.
    I figured out where it is. N51°50.60' W08°31.858'

    At the end of the hatched area visible on the left in the picture there's a short right-turn / u-turn lane, a garage entrance / exit on the left, slow traffic entering and exiting the garage and traffic crossing from the opposite side to access the garage.

    Just after that again the hill gets steeper and there's a climbing lane + overtaking lane. No need for hurtling into a hazardous bottleneck.

    It's one location I'd have to say was well placed for road safety purposes where there are multiple hazards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,917 ✭✭✭GM228


    Pinch Flat wrote: »
    Depends on the terms of the insurance. Some insurance companies write it in the policy that when you hold a provisional licence you must gave a fully licensed driver with annual insurance cover to accompany you at all times."

    There was a case in the High Court a few years back - provisional driver was stopped by Gardai. They were convicted of driving without a licence, but not convicted of having no insurance as it was not a specific term in their policy.

    Can you link that case? I don't believe it.

    Driving on a learner permit on your own has no affect on your policy. None.

    The case is DPP vs Spendlove [2014] IEHC 558.

    http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2014/H558.html

    See 16(2).
    16(2). The defendant should not be convicted of an offence contrary to s. 56(1) and (3) of the Road Traffic Act 1961, as amended by s. 18 of the Road Traffic Act 2006, or failure to produce a certificate of insurance or exemption in respect of the use of his vehicle on 19th November, 2012, contrary to s. 69(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961, as amended, because he had a certificate of insurance which covered him on the date which was not made conditional in its terms on the accused complying with the terms of a learner permit licence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 Prinks


    ...and yet the person I mentioned upthread (who skidded on leaves on a roundabout and crashed into a wall) was fined for driving without an accompanying driver, and her insurance company didn't pay out even though she had full comp insurance.

    Reading the charge
    such vehicle being one for which neither a vehicle insurer nor an exempted person would be liable for injury caused by the negligent use of the said vehicle at that time and for which there was not then in force an approved policy of insurance as required by Part VI of the Road Traffic Act, 1961, as amended by Part VI of the Road Traffic Act, 1968, as amended. Contrary to s. 56(1) and (3) of the Road Traffic Act, 1961, as amended by s. 18 of the Road Traffic Act, 2006.
    I can see why that part of the case was dismissed. He was insured, so presumably the insurance company would have had to pay out to an injured third party?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭highdef


    I figured out where it is. N51°50.60' W08°31.858'

    At the end of the hatched area visible on the left in the picture there's a short right-turn / u-turn lane, a garage entrance / exit on the left, slow traffic entering and exiting the garage and traffic crossing from the opposite side to access the garage.

    Just after that again the hill gets steeper and there's a climbing lane + overtaking lane. No need for hurtling into a hazardous bottleneck.

    It's one location I'd have to say was well placed for road safety purposes where there are multiple hazards.

    Thanks for clarifying the location. Rather than let everyone draw a conclusion that the guards are muppets based on a single photograph that does not explain other important information with regards to the surrounding areas, you're GPS co-ordinates allow anyone to look at the aerial and ground photography via google Earth/Maps.

    I completely agree that this does look like a very justified place to ensure that people are not speeding or trying to out-race other vehicles past the merge at the last second, due to all the other reasons you mention. Dare I say it but with that very short right turn/u-turn lane immediately after the merge, 100 might be a little bit too high with cars turning right potentially decellerating quite rapidly.

    And as you say, just a little bit further on there is an overtaking lane to get by......any big artics will struggle to get anywhere near their 90kmph limit there, thereby making it relatively safe and easy to get by without breaking any limits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,928 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Prinks wrote: »
    How do they have the balls to post anything on their twitter account, now that everyone knows what they've been up to? :mad:

    Banana republic
    Because it's only certain (high ranking) Gardai that have been up to no good. Not the entire force. Today they still remain the Police Service of the Republic of Ireland and the decent members of the force, (Yes they do exist) including the person running the Twitter account, who may or may not be a Guard themselves, will continue to promote good driving practice and enforcement of drink driving laws, speed limits and all other motoring laws which they believe, rightly or wrongly, will save lives of you and your loved ones everytime you turn a key, mount a bike, step out your door and onto the roads.

    This too shall pass.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,186 ✭✭✭boardsuser1


    flazio wrote: »
    Because it's only certain (high ranking) Gardai that have been up to no good. Not the entire force. Today they still remain the Police Service of the Republic of Ireland and the decent members of the force, (Yes they do exist) including the person running the Twitter account, who may or may not be a Guard themselves, will continue to promote good driving practice and enforcement of drink driving laws, speed limits and all other motoring laws which they believe, rightly or wrongly, will save lives of you and your loved ones everytime you turn a key, mount a bike, step out your door and onto the roads.

    I thought it was a comedian running the Garda Traffic page.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,887 ✭✭✭billie1b


    KC161 wrote: »
    I thought it was a comedian running the Garda Traffic page.

    No, just a clown!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,928 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Listen, if you can't have a little fun at your job,you're in the wrong job.

    This too shall pass.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    flazio wrote: »
    Because it's only certain (high ranking) Gardai that have been up to no good. Not the entire force. Today they still remain the Police Service of the Republic of Ireland and the decent members of the force, (Yes they do exist) including the person running the Twitter account, who may or may not be a Guard themselves, will continue to promote good driving practice and enforcement of drink driving laws, speed limits and all other motoring laws which they believe, rightly or wrongly, will save lives of you and your loved ones everytime you turn a key, mount a bike, step out your door and onto the roads.

    Incorrect. It has been show that corruption and malpractice is endemic throughout the force.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement