Garda Traffic on Twitter

Fred Swanson · 24-01-2017 12:08PM

This post has been deleted.

boardsuser1 · 24-01-2017 12:11PM

Fred Swanson wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Would be interesting to see what percentage they successfully recover

Fred Swanson · 24-01-2017 12:13PM

This post has been deleted.

boardsuser1 · 24-01-2017 12:14PM

Fred Swanson wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Country is arse ways :rolleyes:

bear1 · 24-01-2017 12:16PM

Oh the coincidence..

http://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057697133/1/#post102385909

boardsuser1 · 24-01-2017 12:20PM

bear1 wrote: »

Oh the coincidence..

http://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057697133/1/#post102385909

Has to be a re-reg being a troll :mad:

boardsuser1 · 24-01-2017 12:23PM

Facebook post.

Oh how I love these seizures

:D:D
https://www.facebook.com/676247719139199/photos/a.1141480682615898.1073742150.676247719139199/1141479799282653/?type=3&theatre

They're a bloody nuisance

honda boi · 24-01-2017 12:32PM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

If you have an accident where you are at fault why would you not expect to pay out? If you are at fault there would be no claim against the other driver.

I always thought if you were drunk/ uninsured you wouldn't get a penny.

Fred Swanson · 24-01-2017 12:40PM

This post has been deleted.

honda boi · 24-01-2017 12:43PM

Fred Swanson wrote: »

You assumed wrong.

And that I did

ohnonotgmail · 24-01-2017 12:47PM

honda boi wrote: »

I always thought if you were drunk/ uninsured you wouldn't get a penny.

The party at fault pays out.

OldMrBrennan83 · 24-01-2017 12:48PM

This post has been deleted.

ohnonotgmail · 24-01-2017 12:53PM

Patww79 wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Sounds like something i would hear from somebody sitting on a bar stool. Usually accompanied by slurring and an inability to stand up properly.

OldMrBrennan83 · 24-01-2017 12:55PM

This post has been deleted.

ohnonotgmail · 24-01-2017 12:57PM

Patww79 wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

absolutely not. but to suggest that somebody is automatically at fault in any accident because they are not insured is nonsense. If you cant see that then there is no point discussing it further with you.

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy · 24-01-2017 01:21PM

Part of the problem is that one f-ck up will follow you around forever. I think RTA convictions should only need to be declared for a fixed term, eg 7 years and not forever. If a young fella was caught drink driving at 18, and ten years later is still getting penalized with higher premiums, he's the one who's going to be tempted to do without it.

Yakuza · 24-01-2017 01:36PM

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy wrote: »

Part of the problem is that one f-ck up will follow you around forever. I think RTA convictions should only need to be declared for a fixed term, eg 7 years and not forever. If a young fella was caught drink driving at 18, and ten years later is still getting penalized with higher premiums, he's the one who's going to be tempted to do without it.

The Spent Convictions bill that was brought in in March / April last year does exactly that - convictions over 7 years don't have to be declared on insurance proposal forms (but still must be for, say, applying for US / Australian Visas).

Special Circumstances · 24-01-2017 01:40PM

Yakuza wrote: »

The Spent Convictions bill that was brought in in March / April last year does exactly that - convictions over 7 years don't have to be declared on insurance proposal forms (but still must be for, say, applying for US / Australian Visas).

Our Assumptions
Get your Aviva car insurance quote now
Get a quote
In offering you an online car insurance quote, we assume the following:

You (your named drivers or any person who may drive your car) driving history

Have never been disqualified from driving
Have never had any endorsement on your licence
Have not been convicted of any offences of any nature, or have any now pending
Have had no claims made against you in the last three years, have no outstanding claims, nor been involved in any accident or loss

Yakuza · 24-01-2017 01:41PM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

quite frankly this is nonsense.

Why? If you get injured in a place you've no right to be in, why should you be compensated? If you sneak into the wheel wells of a plane in order to stow away, should the airline be liable for your inevitable injuries and/or death?

boardsuser1 · 24-01-2017 01:41PM

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy wrote: »

Part of the problem is that one f-ck up will follow you around forever. I think RTA convictions should only need to be declared for a fixed term, eg 7 years and not forever. If a young fella was caught drink driving at 18, and ten years later is still getting penalized with higher premiums, he's the one who's going to be tempted to do without it.

My conviction for careless driving is not disclosed in vetting as it is over 7 years old.

http://www.garda.ie/Documents/User/Garda%20Vetting%20Procedures%20-Aministration%20Filter.pdf

Special Circumstances · 24-01-2017 01:44PM

Insurers are a law unto themselves and will choose to consider NCT or lack of NCT as they see fit, an expired driving licence (purely a paperwork exercise) can become insurance voiding without any other aggravating factors and the "spent convictions" bill means SFA to them.

ohnonotgmail · 24-01-2017 01:44PM

Yakuza wrote: »

Why? If you get injured in a place you've no right to be in, why should you be compensated? If you sneak into the wheel wells of a plane in order to stow away, should the airline be liable for your inevitable injuries and/or death?

I dont even know where to start with that ridiculous analogy. So i wont.

Alun · 24-01-2017 01:46PM

Special Circumstances wrote: »

Insurers are a law unto themselves and will choose to consider NCT or lack of NCT as they see fit, an expired driving licence (purely a paperwork exercise) can become insurance voiding without any other aggravating factors and the "spent convictions" bill means SFA to them.

I agree, if it's good enough for the state from a legal perspective, then it should be OK for the insurance companies too. A law unto themselves indeed.

Big Nasty · 24-01-2017 01:47PM

/Unsubscribes

OldMrBrennan83 · 24-01-2017 02:21PM

This post has been deleted.

Henry Ford III · 24-01-2017 02:29PM

KC161 wrote: »

My conviction for careless driving is not disclosed in vetting as it is over 7 years old.

http://www.garda.ie/Documents/User/Garda%20Vetting%20Procedures%20-Aministration%20Filter.pdf

Insurance is a different matter.

boardsuser1 · 24-01-2017 02:32PM

Henry Ford III wrote: »

Insurance is a different matter.

As in declaring it for insurance purposes?

Fred Swanson · 24-01-2017 02:32PM

This post has been deleted.

Alanstrainor · 24-01-2017 02:45PM

More tweets, less chitchat. This discussion RE: insurance has been rambling on for a couple of pages now. Lets get back on track here, shall we?

Fred Swanson · 24-01-2017 02:46PM

This post has been deleted.

Garda Traffic on Twitter

Comments